N6264919R0167 Amendment 06.docx

N6264919R0167

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 15-Nov-2019 05:00 PM to 04-Dec-2019 05:00 PM.

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS

L-GI General Information

GI.1 Instructions for Submission of Proposals Proposals shall be submitted electronically via DoD SAFE which can be accessed at the following URL: https://safe.apps.mil/. The submissions shall be “dropped-off” to William.Koeditz@fe.navy.mil and Vanessa.Schwaner@fe.navy.mil no later than 05:00 P.M. JST on 04 DEC 2019. Any proposal submission provided after 05:00 P.M. JST 04 DEC 2019 will be considered late and not eligible for award.

Proposals shall also be submitted via CD-ROM accompanied with 10 paper copies and must be shipped by the same deadline of 05:00 P.M. JST on 04 DEC 2019. Proof of shipment (e.g. shipping receipt or tracking slip) must be submitted with the electronic submission.

In the event of a discrepancy between the electronic and hard copy, the electronic copy will take precedence; In-person delivery will not be accepted. Proposals that do not comply with these instructions may be considered invalid and may render the Offeror ineligible for award.

****************************FOR ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION******************************** The new DoD SAFE system requires outside users to receive a drop-off request from an internal user. Therefore, all offerors intending to submit a proposal must e-mail William.Koeditz@fe.navy.mil and Vanessa.Schwaner@fe.navy.mil by 22 November 2019 in order to receive a drop-off request. Once a drop-off request is input, the offeror will receive an e-mail with a link to submit the drop-off. The drop-off request is valid for 14 days only. The Offeror shall then submit their proposal by the closing deadline of 04 December 2019.

The full DoD Safe Instructions can be located at the following URL: https://safe.apps.mil/about.php

Any prospective offeror desiring an explanation or interpretation of the solicitation, specifications, etc., shall request it in writing no later than 01:00 PM JST on 01 November 2019 to allow a reply to reach all prospective offerors before the submission of the proposals. Oral explanations or instructions given before the solicitation closing date/award of the contract will not be binding. Any information given to a prospective offeror concerning a solicitation will be furnished promptly to all other prospective offerors as an amendment of solicitation, if that information is necessary in submitting offers or if the lack of it would be prejudicial to any other prospective offerors. Questions and requests for clarification shall be submitted to all of the following points of contacts via e-mail(s):

William.Koeditz@fe.navy.mil; Seiji.Yoshino.JA@fe.navy.mil; Vanessa.Schwaner@fe.navy.mil

The Offeror shall package the proposal volumes in cartons or equivalent packaging containers in the most efficient manner possible grouping like volumes to the maximum extent possible. Each container shall be single person portable. Each container should include a packing slip detailing the contents to include the volume number, title, and copy number. Also, each container should be stamped or marked “For Official Use Only” and “Source Selection Information – See FAR-2.101 and 3.104.” Clearly mark all packages with the solicitation number. Offerors shall not submit proposals by facsimile. Offerors shall submit the CD-ROM and paper copies of proposals using the address provided below.

Naval Supply Systems Command Fleet Logistics Center Yokosuka Code: 210, Attn: William Koeditz

PSC 473 BOX 11

FPO, AP 96349

Solicitation Number: N6264919R0167

Or if within Japan/Korea:

NAVSUP Fleet Logistics Center Yokosuka, Building F-157 Yokosuka Naval Base Code: 210, Attn: William Koeditz Honcho 1-Chome, Yokosuka-Shi Kanagawa-Ken, Japan 238-0041 Solicitation Number: N6264919R0167

GI.2 Proposal Format In order to maximize efficiency and minimize the time for proposal evaluation, all Offerors shall submit their proposals in accordance with the following format requirements:

1. The entire content of the proposal shall be in English.

2. A4 or 8.5x11 inch size paper

3. Not smaller than a 10 point font

4. Files shall be Microsoft Office 2010 or Adobe Reader XI compatible (spreadsheets shall be in Microsoft Excel)

5. All file names shall include title of the evaluation factor or sub-factor (if applicable)

6. Photographs, Pictures, Diagrams, Charts, and Tables are permitted

7. ZIP files (or similar means of compressing files) are not permitted

8. Fold-out pages are permitted, counting as 2 pages (example 8.5” x 14” or 11” x 17” is 2 pages)

9. Hyperlinks are not permitted

10. Proposals shall be in 3 ring binders (i.e., no spiral binders).

11. Proposal shall be paginated to include Volume number, factor, and sub-factor.

12. Each Volume shall include a table of Contents.

13. Each Volume shall include a List of Figures.

14. Each Volume shall include a List of Tables.

15. Each Volume shall include a List of Acronyms.

16. Each Volume shall include a RFP to Proposal Cross-reference matrix.

17. All Paragraphs shall be numbered

18. Volume organizational pages (e.g. intentionally blank pages) do not count against the maximum page limit.

GI.3 Single Offer In accordance with DFARS 215.371, if a single offer is received, at the Contracting Officer’s discretion, certified cost or pricing data may be required to be submitted subsequent to proposal receipt.

L-1 Proposal Content Each proposal shall contain the following volumes:

1. Volume 1 Executive Summary

2. Volume 2 Past Performance

3. Volume 3 Combined Technical/Technical Risk Proposal

4. Volume 4 Price Proposal

***The Offeror shall submit Volume 4 Price Proposal using U.S. Dollars and annotate the exchange rate used.***

PRICING INFORMATION SHALL NOT APPEAR ANYWHERE IN THE PROPOSAL OTHER THAN VOLUME 4.

The completion and submission to the Government of an offer shall be representative of the Offeror’s unconditional agreement to the terms and conditions of this solicitation. The offer shall include the following volumes and sections, and shall not exceed the page limits indicated below. If the proposal is printed double-sided, each side will count as 1 page. Any pages in excess of the stated limit will not be evaluated.

Volume 1 – Executive Summary

* Note: No pricing information shall be contained in this Volume.

1.1 Offer Letter

Identify at a minimum the solicitation number; enclosures being transmitted; proposed subcontractors and team members to be utilized under the contract; the CAGE code, DCMA, DCAA, and DFAS Points of Contact for the prime contractor and all proposed subcontractors and team members; acknowledgement of solicitation amendments; and state the length of proposal validity (at least 180 days after proposal submission).

1.2 Completed Section K

Complete and submit Section K of the solicitation.

1.3 Business Systems Status

The Offeror shall complete a table substantially the same as the one below to identify the current status and or determinations regarding its business systems. If any item is not applicable to the Offeror or for contract performance, state so and provide an explanation. If any item has been determined to be unapproved/inadequate, outline the potential impact on contract execution, mitigation plan, and correction plan. Submit relevant DCAA/DCMA reports, audits, and determinations as necessary within your proposal.

Sample Business Systems Status

1.4 Company Financial Profile

The Offeror shall provide the five (5) most recent years’ annual Income Statement, Balance Sheet, and Statement of Cash Flows for their company. If these documents are reported in other than $US, provide the information in both the reported currency and in $US and annotate the exchange rate used.

Volume 2 – Past Performance

* Note: No pricing information shall be contained in this Volume.

The past performance proposal must clearly articulate the Offeror’s past performance such that the Government has confidence in your ability to successfully perform the contract requirements. The past performance proposal shall address the following areas:

2.1 No Past Performance

If the Offeror does not have any past performance, provide a statement affirming you have no past performance.

2.2 Adverse Performance History

Provide a list of all Level III Corrective Action Reports (CARs), Cure Notices, Level III Nonconformance Reports (NCRs), Show Cause letters, and Terminations for Default received on any contract within the last 5 years from the date this solicitation is issued. In the event an Offeror has such adverse performance history, include a brief description of the contract and circumstances leading to the Government’s action or evaluation. Include your assertion as to the relevancy of these actions to this requirement. Adverse past performance history information does not count towards the maximum number of references.

2.3 Performance History

(Prime) Offeror Past Performance. The Offeror shall submit detailed descriptions of up to a maximum of five (5) recent (as defined in Section M) contracts, or those portions of a contract, of greatest relevancy and similar in magnitude, scope, and complexity. At least one (1) of these contracts should be efforts that were performed as the prime contractor. If the prime offeror or intended subcontractor/partner submits a past performance example in which it served as a subcontractor, the prime/sub/partner shall detail clearly the work that it performed and the magnitude (dollar value) of that subcontracted work only. A Past Performance example that does not differentiate between the overall contract effort and the subcontractor effort will not be evaluated.

Subcontractor Past Performance. Should an Offeror’s proposed approach include the use of subcontractors, the Prime Offeror shall include past performance information of any subcontractors and shall include the percentage and type of work to be done by the subcontractor. The Government will only evaluate past performance information belonging to significant subcontractors which is defined as 20% of labor workshare who perform work directly related to Touch Labor (e.g. labor spent directly on the aircraft or any aircraft components), Engineering, Supply Chain Management, and Support Equipment Maintenance. The offeror’s submittal shall detail clearly the aspects of the work in the solicitation that the subcontractor is proposed to perform. A Past Performance example which does not detail clearly the aspects of the work in the solicitation that the subcontractor is proposed to perform will not be evaluated.

Subcontractor past performance information does not count towards the maximum number of references for the Prime Offeror. Each individual subcontractor may submit up to a maximum of three (3) references. However, the total volume of past performance information from both prime and all subcontractors shall not exceed twenty (20) references (e.g., A Prime Offeror and 3 Significant Subcontractors shall submit up to 5 references for the Prime, and up to 3 references for each Significant Subcontractor for a total of up to 14 references).

Offerors shall provide written consent from their primary subcontractors that will allow the Government to coordinate their past performance issue(s) with the prime Offeror. If Offerors do not submit such written consent, then the Government will address any past performance issues directly with the principal subcontractor and the Offeror will forfeit the opportunity to participate in any related discussions. Consequently, for any subcontractors that do not provide such written consent, provide a point of contact (name, address, phone number, and email address) with whom the Government may coordinate these issues and obtain any responses as needed.

Joint Venture Past Performance. Should an Offer be received from a Joint Venture, the Offeror shall provide a narrative not to exceed 15 pages describing in detail the Joint Venture structure, including the roles and responsibilities of each party to the Joint Venture, any corporate experience each party to the Joint Venture has performing any other Joint Ventures, as well as any other information to support the Government’s overall assessment of our confidence in the Joint Venture’s ability to successfully perform the contract requirements. If the Joint Venture was formed specifically to perform this contract requirement, provide an affirmative statement of such circumstances.

Joint Venture Offerors shall submit detailed descriptions of up to a maximum of five (5) recent (as defined in Section M) contract references, or those portions of a contract, of greatest relevancy and similar in magnitude, scope, and complexity, that were performed by the Joint Venture.

Additionally, each individual party to the Joint Venture shall also submit up to a maximum of three (3) recent (as defined in Section M) contract references, or those portions of a contract, of greatest relevancy and similar in magnitude, scope, and complexity, that were performed as individuals outside of the Joint Venture. However, the total volume of past performance information from all parties to the Joint Venture shall not exceed twenty (20) references (e.g., A Joint Venture of two parties shall submit up to 5 references performed by the Joint Venture, and up to 3 references performed by each individual party for a total of up to 11 references).

Joint Ventures shall provide written consent from each party to the Joint Venture that will allow the Government to coordinate any past performance issues of each individual party with the Joint Venture as the Offeror. If the offeror does not submit such written consent, then the Government will address any past performance issues directly with the principal party to the Joint Venture and the Offeror will forfeit the opportunity to participate in any related discussions. Consequently, for any party to the Joint Venture that do not provide such written consent, provide a point of contact (name, address, phone number, and email address) with whom the Government may coordinate these issues and obtain any responses as needed.

2.3.1 Past Performance Matrix

When providing these references, the Offeror shall include a summary table using a format similar to the following Past Performance Matrix:

Past Performance Matrix

Contract Type

Program Name

Prime or Sub

Contract Value

Period of Performance

Brief Title

Name, Phone & Email of PCO

Name, Phone & Email of COR

Name, Phone & Email of any other POC

In addition to the information contained in Volume 2 - Past Performance, the Offeror shall coordinate the submission of the Past Performance Questionnaire (RFP Attachment 13) to the PCO for each reference provide. The Past Performance Questionnaire shall be completed in its entirety by the Offeror's customer.

For the Government's evaluation, it is important that the completed Past Performance Questionnaires contain detailed and elaborative responses in the "Reasoning / Comments" fields. The Past Performance questionnaire shall be transmitted directly from the Offeror's customer to the PCO by the solicitation's due date. The Government is under no obligation to evaluate Past Performance that is not backed by a fully completed and properly submitted Past Performance Questionnaire.

2.3.2 Recency of Past Performance

Offerors shall provide sufficient information for the Government to determine how the referenced work is recent as defined in Section M. The burden is on the Offeror to demonstrate the recency of the Offeror’s referenced contract(s) to the Government’s requirements.

2.3.3 Relevancy of Past Performance

Offerors shall provide sufficient information, including descriptions of how the work is similar, to facilitate the Government’s determination of relevancy, as defined in Section M. The burden is on the Offeror to demonstrate the relevancy of the Offeror’s referenced contract(s) to the Government’s requirements.

2.3.4 Quality of Past Performance

Offerors shall provide sufficient information for the Government to determine the quality of the referenced work. The burden is on the Offeror to demonstrate the quality of the Offeror’s referenced contract(s). Quality of past performance will include the quality of work performance, schedule performance, management and business relations and similar areas of interest associated with the requirements of this solicitation. Such information may include, but is not limited to, customer satisfaction sites, CPARS Evaluations, inspection & acceptance records (DD250), or any other past performance data.

Volume 3 – Combined Technical/Technical Risk Proposal

* Note: No pricing information shall be contained in this Volume.

The Combined Technical/Technical Risk proposal must clearly demonstrate the Offeror’s approach and understanding of the work and ability to perform the requirements identified in the Performance Work Statement (PWS). Offerors shall clearly identify subcontractors, their roles and the management relationship. The Combined Technical/Technical Risk proposal shall address the following Sub-factors:

3.1 Sub-Factor One - Technical Performance

Under the Sub-Factor “Technical Performance,” the Offeror shall address the following Elements and Sub-elements:

3.1.1(b) PMI Work Deck Development Process

3.1.1(c) PMI Work Deck Card Sample (not counted against the maximum page limit)

3.1.1(d) Technical Documentation Management Approach

3.1.1(e) In-Service Repair (ISR) and Contractor Field Team (CFT) Capability and Approach

3.1.3(b) SE Management Approach

3.1.4(b) Engineering Analysis Capability and Design Approach

3.1.5(b) Schematics (not counted against the maximum page limit)

3.1.5(c) Supporting Documents (not counted against the maximum page limit

3.1.5(d) Site Survey (no submission)

3.1.1 PMI Capabilities

MRO Process and Capability Discuss the following:

1) Pre-induction planning process

2) Complete MRO process (e.g., from aircraft induction to final processing)

3) Inspection/Evaluation process (e.g., development of Discrepancy Sheets to Government approval)

4) Corrosion control process and capability

5) Quality assurance process (e.g., monitoring and control)

6) Other MRO capabilities and qualifications (e.g., corporate experience, skills, worldwide facilities, etc.)

7) Integration between MRO process plan and staffing plan PMI Work Deck Development Process Discuss the following:

1) Process for developing the PMI work deck

2) Process for incorporating changes into the PMI work deck

PMI Work Deck Card Sample (not counted against the maximum page limit) Instructions:

1) Select 1 inspection task from the NAVAIR KC-130J PMI Specification, then develop a functional work deck card(s) in accordance the Offeror’s work deck development process.

2) Provide the proposed PMI work deck Card(s) developed in step 1 Technical Documentation Management Approach Discuss the following:

1) Establishing, updating, and maintaining Technical Publications Library

2) Establishing and maintaining Proprietary Information Agreement/Proprietary Information Exchange Agreement (PIA/PIEA) with Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM)

3) Process to ensure currency of documents

4) Process for Personal Electronic Maintenance Aid (PEMA) software updates

In-Service Repair (ISR) and Contractor Field Team (CFT) Capability and Approach Discuss the following:

1) Approach and process to respond to an urgent or emergent ISR request

2) Approach to maintain a deployable CFT

3.1.2 Logistics and Supply

Logistics and Supply Capability and Approach Discuss the following:

1) Approach and capability to provide total logistics management support to include supply, parts, and materials

2) Logistics support structure and internal processes that will support this requirement.

3) Business arrangements with OEMs and other MRO suppliers that will facilitate its support of this requirement.

4) Proposed Attachment 10, COG 7R Repairable Item, Parts and Process (not counted against the maximum page limit)

3.1.3 Support Equipment (SE)

SE Inventories and Shortfalls (not counted against the maximum page limit) Discuss the following:

1) Contractor-furnished SE to support this requirement

2) Contractor-furnished SE that must be acquired to support this requirement (prior to first induction)

3) SE requested from the Government

SE Management Approach Discuss the following:

1) Inventory of KC-130J specific and common C-130J SE proposed to support this requirement

2) Mitigating Schedule Disruptions due to shortfalls in SE inventories

3) Scheduled maintenance and calibration of SE

4) Repairs of SE

3.1.4 Parts Fabrication

Parts Fabrication Capability Discuss the following:

1) Structural inspection and repair capability

2) Facilities and equipment that will be available for the fabrication and repair of aircraft parts, including subcontractor facilities and capabilities

3) Skilled personnel that will be available for the fabrication and repair of aircraft parts. Provide certifications as applicable.

4) Prioritization of manufacturing requirements (e.g., how FRC WESTPAC requirements will be prioritized and integrated with the Offeror’s other manufacturing work)

5) List of any specialized fabrication capabilities the Offeror plans to utilize in the performance of this program (e.g., CNC (3D and complex dimensions), heat treating, specific parts/tooling manufacture, tolerances, types of metals, metal treatments, tube bending, plating, composite work, etc.) (5 pages maximum and not counted against the maximum page limit)

Engineering Analysis Capability and Design Approach Discuss the following:

1) Engineering capability for analysis, decision-making, and development of drawings

2) Decision process to request Temporary Engineering Instructions

3) Engineering design approach for local manufacture of parts, including Government approval process

4) Integration between engineering analysis and drawing development with parts fabrication

3.1.5 Facilities

Hangar and Airfield Discuss the following:

1) Hangar and airfield compliance with PWS and Attachments (e.g., safety, environmental, fire protection)

2) Details on any hangar-installed paint booth and fire suppression systems to be used in this contract

3) Facility changes that need to be completed prior to the first aircraft induction in order to comply with the requirement

4) Address of facility and distance (in kilometers) from Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Iwakuni

5) Details of any airfield use restrictions (e.g., operating hours, local ordinances, etc.)

6) Ability to accommodate up to fifteen (15) government personnel (e.g. meetings, Functional Check Flight, etc.)

7) Details of any lease agreements, exclusive of price information (e.g., access to facility, ability to mod facility, etc.)

Schematics (not counted against the maximum page limit) Instructions:

1) Provide schematic of the airfield that will be used in delivering the aircraft

2) Provide schematic proposed PMI facilities

3) Identify where the nominal and surge aircraft will be stored during maintenance and repair

4) Identify where equipment, tooling, material, and hazardous material will be stored

5) Identify location of government office spaces

Supporting Documents (not counted against the maximum page limit) Instructions:

1) Provide documents supporting availability of airfield and facilities upon contract award

2) Provide documents supporting full use of facilities by time of first aircraft induction

3) Provide copies of airfield access agreements

4) Provide English translations of foreign language documents

Site Survey (no submission) Instructions:

1) The Offeror shall make facilities available for a Site Survey within 30 calendar days following the PCO’s notification.

2) During the Site Survey, the Offeror shall be prepared to answer clarification questions from the Government’s Source Selection Team, and provide a tour of the facilities to be used in this contract. Both events should be targeted to complement Offeror’s proposal and confirm the Offeror’s readiness to induct their first aircraft.

3.2 Sub-Factor Two - Program Management

Under the Sub-Factor “Program Management,” the Offeror shall address the following Elements and Sub-elements:

3.2.1(b) Business Relations

3.2.1(c) Risk Management

3.2.2(b) Workforce Management

3.2.3(b) Transition Schedule (not counted against the maximum page limit)

3.2.4(b) Diplomatic Corporate and Facility Certifications (not counted against the maximum page limit)

3.2.1 Management Approach

MRO Program Management and Production Plan (not counted against the maximum page limit) Instructions:

1) Provide a typical Production Plan (CDRL A005) and Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) (CDRL F001) for a USMC PMI aircraft under scheduled maintenance. Include all workflow tasks, required meetings, etc., from pre-induction to adjudication of Aircraft Inspection Deficiency Report (AIDR) after Government Acceptance. Format the IMS in Microsoft Project Gantt Chart (or similar), with all tasks linked, with predecessors, with resources, and with critical path turned on. Ensure the IMS is legible.

2) Highlight the tasks in the Production Plan and the IMS that the Offeror is not prepared to conduct/complete at time of proposal submission.

Business Relations Discuss the following:

1) Authorities of the Contractor Program Manager, including authority and limits for making commitments or obligating funds on behalf of the company

2) Contractor Program Manager’s ability to direct increased staffing, surge subcontractors, commit Artisans to travel for remote ISR events, etc.

3) Interaction with Government Program Manager Office (PMO is FRC WESTPAC) regarding: repair turn-around-time, quality, requirement prioritization, work documentation, tasking/schedule changes, end-user deployments dynamic, unscheduled work, supply requests, requests for engineering instructions, procurement of support equipment and tooling, manufacturing of unique low-volume items, inspection and acceptance

4) Interaction with Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO is DCMA) regarding: review of business systems, requests for proposals, responding to CARs or AIDRs, processing DCMA task order modifications, unscheduled maintenance procedures, and reporting work stoppages to the Government.

5) Interaction with Procurement Contracting Officer (PCO is FLCY) regarding: supporting contract modifications, submitting cost or pricing data (certified and other than certified), prevention of unauthorized commitments

Risk Management Discuss the following:

1) Integration between the Production Plan, Staffing Plan, and Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) and method to resolve conflicts

2) MRO management approach and baseline assumptions to identify risks and enact mitigations, in general

3) MRO management approach to anticipate, mitigate, and respond to the following:

a. Quality slips

b. Safety mishaps

c. Urgent unscheduled maintenance on a non-inducted aircraft located on a different continent than the Offeror’s facility

d. Accelerated delivery request

e. Surge aircraft induction

f. Schedule delays for supply

g. Schedule delays for engineering

h. Manning shortfalls

i. Physical security breach

j. Cybersecurity breach

3.2.2 Staffing Plan

Staffing Matrix (not counted against the page limit) Instructions:

1) Provide chart showing lines of organizational authority in relation to this contract

2) Highlight personnel empowered to communicate with the Government in relation to this contract, by name, title, description of background/experience, and % of time to be dedicated to the contract

3) Provide overall staffing matrix for a typical scheduled maintenance basic requirement

4) Display labor categories and skill levels (i.e. number of years’ experience and specialized training or education)

5) Display number of personnel assigned to each labor category

6) Display mix of skill levels within each category.

Workforce Management Discuss the following:

1) A summary of the Staffing Matrix

2) Processes for training, licensing, and qualifying personnel

3) Maintaining technical competency of the workforce

4) Workforce retention planning

5) Staffing for workload fluctuations

6) Attrition planning (including maintaining workforce education, capabilities, experience and certification)

7) Personnel available upon contract award (percentage mix of current employees, contingent hires, prospective hires and subcontractors)

8) Managing visas and other entry paper-work for CFT deployments

9) Risk mitigation for possible performance interruptions (e.g. vacation, illnesses, labor strikes, etc.)

3.2.3 Transition Plan

Written Transition Plan (not counted against the maximum page limit) Instructions:

1) Submit a draft Phase-In Transition Plan in accordance with CDRL D001

Transition Schedule (not counted against the maximum page limit) Instructions:

1) Provide Transition Plan information in an integrated schedule/chart

2) Include a chronological listing of key transition activities and associated resources

3) Include a chronological listing of milestones using actual dates and assume authority to proceed

3.2.4 Certifications

Certification Summary and Qualifications Discuss the following:

1) Overall benefits that the Offeror’s certifications and qualifications will bring to this contract

2) Meeting quality standards identified in applicable clauses of the solicitation

3) Quality control certifications that will be applied during performance of the contract (to include safety and environmental)

4) Certifications in accordance with the PWS, NAVAIR KC-130J PMI Specification, and DCMA INST 8210.1C.

5) As applicable, plans to obtain certifications in accordance with the PWS, NAVAIR KC-130J PMI Specification, and DCMA INST 8210.1C prior to contract performance

Diplomatic Corporate and Facility Certifications (not counted against the page limit) Instructions:

1) Provide copies of Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) or similar diplomatic arrangement with the United States.

2) Provide copies of certifications for Contractor facilities for performing this requirement (e.g. 14 CFR Part 145 (FAA))

3) Provide copies of certifications for all facilities worldwide (CONUS and OCONUS, e.g. 14 CFR Part 145 (FAA)) relevant to aircraft MRO services

4) Provide copies of corporate-wide certifications (e.g. ISO 9100) relevant to aircraft MRO services

5) Provide English translations of foreign language documents

Volume 4 - Price Proposal

4.1 Section B - CLIN Pricing

Offerors shall submit prices by using Section B of the solicitation. ***The Offeror shall submit Volume 4 Price Proposal using U.S. Dollars and annotate the exchange rate used.***

4.2 Price Summary Spreadsheet

Offerors shall also submit Price Summary Spreadsheet in a format readable by Microsoft Excel summarizing their proposed prices for each CLIN including subtotals for each Year (all Base Years and all Option Years) and a Grand Total Price of all CLINs. In the event of a discrepancy between Section B and the proposed Price Summary Spreadsheet, Section B will prevail.

4.3 Hourly Rates & Pricing Post-Award Modifications

The hourly rates submitted in your offer shall be the maximum rates to be used throughout the performance of the contract. Potential post-award modifications to the contract are expected to be priced using these same rates. Potential task order awards may offer lower rates during the task order competition. Offerors are reminded that, if selected for award, it may be required to submit certified cost or pricing data or data other than certified cost or pricing data substantiating the proposed cost elements, including rates, during negotiation of a post-award modification in accordance with clause 52.215-21. The offeror shall provide all supplemental information to support proposed prices, to include but not limited to fully burdened labor rates and estimated level of effort by labor category.

L-2 Government-Furnished Information

1.0 Other Direct Costs (ODC)

The Government's fully burdened Estimated (EST) amounts for ferry flights, parts/material/equipment, GFM preserve/pack, GFM ship/transport, and travel for the prime and all subcontract efforts are listed below:

ODC

The above estimates include expected industry burdens, fees, taxes, and other associated costs. The Offeror shall not propose any additional fees or burdens to the above costs. The Offeror shall propose ODCs in the cost/price proposal in accordance with the above estimates.

Offerors shall provide cost proposals for individual CLINs/SLINs per the following instructions:

2.0 Incumbent Information

The incumbent contractor is AIROD.

3.0 Place of Performance Restrictions

With the exception of maintenance requiring deployment of Contractor Field Teams (CFT), or part repairs and manufacturing requiring the use subcontractor facilities or remote Contractor facilities, work shall be performed at the Contractor’s facility approved by the Government for performing KC-130J PMI. The Contractor’s facility for performing KC-130J PMI shall be located in a country that has a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) or similar diplomatic arrangement with the United States.

(End of Summary of Changes) image1.wmf