Attachment_13_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 19 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N6264919R0167
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a contractor bidding on a solicitation from the Department of the Navy Naval Supply Systems Command. The solicitation seeks maintenance, repair, and overhaul services for U.S. Marine Corps KC-130J aircraft forward deployed to the Western Pacific region. The past performance questionnaire requests information on the contractor's quality, schedule, safety, and overall performance on previous contracts, and whether the respondent would recommend the contractor for another contract. Details requested include contract numbers, descriptions of work performed, locations, dates of performance, values, and ratings and explanations for the contractor's conformance to requirements, processes for solving problems, timeliness in meeting schedules, adherence to safety standards, and overall customer satisfaction.
N6264919R0167 Attachment 13 Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 81 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
N6264919R0167 AMD 0002
Attachment 13 – Past Performance Questionnaire
Past Performance Questionnaire
Offeror:
Point of Contact
Your Company/Organization Name:
Your Name:
Position Title:
Telephone:
E-mail:
General Contract Information
a. Contract Number:
Type of contact:
☐ Firm-Fixed-Price
☐ Cost-Reimbursement
b. Brief Description of Work:
c. Location of Work:
e. Contract Performance:
From: Click here to enter a date.
To: Click here to enter a date.
f. Total Contract Value (USD):
Quality
How do you assess the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, statements of work, and standards of good workmanship (i.e. commonly accepted technical, professional, and quality standards)?
| ☐ Exceptional |
| ☐ Very Good |
| ☐ Satisfactory |
| ☐ Marginal |
| ☐ Unacceptable |
Reasoning / Comments:
(Please provide a detailed, elaborative response. Recommend a minimum of one full paragraph.)
How do you assess the contractor’s processes to solve contract performance problems?
| ☐ Exceptional |
| ☐ Very Good |
| ☐ Satisfactory |
| ☐ Marginal |
| ☐ Unacceptable |
Reasoning / Comments:
Schedule
How do you assess the contractor’s timeliness in meeting contract delivery schedules?
| ☐ Exceptional |
| ☐ Very Good |
| ☐ Satisfactory |
| ☐ Marginal |
| ☐ Unacceptable |
Reasoning / Comments:
How do you assess the contractor’s processes to solve schedule performance problems?
| ☐ Exceptional |
| ☐ Very Good |
| ☐ Satisfactory |
| ☐ Marginal |
| ☐ Unacceptable |
Reasoning / Comments:
Safety
How do you assess the contractor’s adherence to safety requirement (including safety of flight, workplace safety, and adherence to environmental regulations)?
| ☐ Exceptional |
| ☐ Very Good |
| ☐ Satisfactory |
| ☐ Marginal |
| ☐ Unacceptable |
Reasoning / Comments:
| How do you assess the contractor’s processes to solve issues and deficiencies involving safety of flight, workplace safety, and adherence to environmental regulations? |
| ☐ Exceptional |
| ☐ Very Good |
| ☐ Satisfactory |
| ☐ Marginal |
| ☐ Unacceptable |
Reasoning / Comments:
Additional Comments
Please select your overall level of customer satisfaction, considering contract work performed, promptness, completeness, follow up to correct errors, and documentation and history of reasonable and cooperative behavior.
☐ Exceptional
| ☐ Very Good |
| ☐ Satisfactory |
| ☐ Marginal |
| ☐ Unacceptable |
Reasoning / Comments:
Wrap-up Question
All things considered, would you recommend this Contractor for performance on another contract?
| ☐ Yes |
| ☐ No |
We greatly appreciate your cooperation in this matter.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .