Exhibits_in_Word_Format.doc

DOC document 225 KB Posted

Attached to
Preventative Maintenance of HVAC, DDC and associated Mechnical Systems
Solicitation number
N6247314R2205
Issued by

About this file

Exhibits in Word Format

View the file

Other files

Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Solicitation Title

NXXXXX-XX-R-XXXX

Location

Source Selection Plan

Preventative Maintenance HVAC/DDC Systems N62473-14-R-2205

MCB Camp Pendleton, CA

Source Selection Plan

EXHIBIT “A”

FACTOR 1 – RECENT, RELATIVE EXPERIENCE QUESTIONNAIRE

The purpose of this form is to provide supporting project information for Factor 1, Recent, Relevant Experience of the Offeror and Offeror’s Team. This form is to be completed by the Offeror. Only projects that fit within the parameters of this factor will be evaluated. All other projects will be removed and discarded prior to evaluation.

1. Project No. (check one): - 5 - 4 - 3 - 2 - 1

2. Contract Number, Delivery/Task Order Number, Project Number, Title, and Location:

3. Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

100% Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

If not completed, 80% Completion Date:

4. Estimated Contract Cost:

5. Type of Work (check all that apply):

DDC PM Boiler System PM Chiller System PM HVAC PM

6. Type of Contract (check one):

Other (explain): Service Contract

7. Name Firm Who Performed the Service Work:

In what capacity did the firm perform the service work on this project (check one):

1. Prime Contractor

2. Joint Venture

2. Subcontractor

If the firm was the Subcontractor on this project, identify the name of the firm:

If the firm who performed this service contract differs from the firm proposing on this contract, identify relationship to the firm:

Subcontractor Joint Venture Predecessor Company Subsidiary Other:___________

8. Customer/Owner Information:

Customer Name:

Organization:

Address:

Point of Contact:

Phone Number:

E-mail address:

9. Identify proposed Offeror’s Team Participants (Prime, Joint Venture, Subcontracting Firm(s), Subsidiaries) who performed service work on this project.

10. Provide a detailed description (6-8 sentences) of the contract and specifically delineate the service work performed by each of the Offeror’s Team’s participants.

11. If experience submitted is for a joint venture or subcontractor, provide a description (6-8 sentences) of the service work that the firm will be performing for the solicited contract.

12. If a predecessor company or subcontractor will be performing on this contract the Offeror must explain ((no more than six sentences) how the predecessor company or subcontractor will participate on the solicited contract:

EXHIBIT “B”

FACTOR 2- PAST PERFORMANCE ON RECENT, RELEVANT PROJECTS

1. The NAVFAC Form PPQ shall be utilized for all evaluations that require a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).

2. Solicitation Submittal Requirements: IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE PROPOSAL. IF THERE IS NOT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor (insert applicable factor number, usually Factor 1, and insert factor title, usually Corporate Experience). AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE.

IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Exhibit B), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Marlanea Kirkbride, via email at marlanea.kirkbride@navy.m.il prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.”

EXHIBIT B

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information

Firm Name:

CAGE Code:

Address:

DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: FORMCHECKBOX Prime Contractor FORMCHECKBOX Sub Contractor FORMCHECKBOX Joint Venture FORMCHECKBOX Other (Explain)

Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: FORMCHECKBOX Firm Fixed Price FORMCHECKBOX Cost Reimbursement FORMCHECKBOX Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work FORMCHECKBOX High FORMCHECKBOX Med FORMCHECKBOX Routine

How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information

Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO NAVFAC WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON NAVFAC SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO NAVFAC. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR NAVFAC POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING

DEFINITION

NOTE

(E) Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.
An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
(VG) Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.
(S) Satisfactory
Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.
(M) Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.
(U) Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.
(N) Not Applicable
No information or did not apply to your contract
Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________

Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts
E VG S M U N
b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance
E VG S M U N
c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
E VG S M U N
d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)
E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)
E VG S M U N
b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract
E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project?
E VG S M U N
b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)
E VG S M U N
c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?
E VG S M U N
d) Overall customer satisfaction
E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?
E VG S M U N
b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort
E VG S M U N
c) Government Property Control
E VG S M U N
d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel
E VG S M U N
e) Utilization of Small Business concerns
E VG S M U N
f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines
E VG S M U N
g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes
E VG S M U N
h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?
E VG S M U N

Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________

Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client
E VG S M U N
c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)
E VG S M U N
d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.
Yes No
e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.
Yes No
f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.
Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)
E VG S M U N
b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.
E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).
E VG S M U N
b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues)
E VG S M U N
c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)
Yes No
d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.
E VG S M U N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

EXHIBIT “C”

Factor 4: Safety

1.
Provide the Offeror's EMR for the following years, if you cannot provide an EMR for the year, affirmatively state so.

2011:

If you cannot provide an EMR for 2011 indicate why.

2012:

If you cannot provide an EMR for 2012 indicate why.

2013:

If you cannot provide an EMR for 2013 indicate why.

2.
Provide the Offeror's DART for the following years, if you cannot provide a DART for the year, affirmatively state so.

2011:

If you cannot provide an EMR for 2011 indicate why.

2012:

If you cannot provide an EMR for 2012 indicate why.

2013:

If you cannot provide an EMR for 2013 indicate why.

EXHIBIT D - FINANCIAL QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation N62473-14-R-2205 (To be submitted by Offeror)

MCIWEST, ROICC Camp Pendleton, CA is currently requesting proposals for a Navy contract for HVAC/BOILER and DDC PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE SERVICES CONTRACT. As part of the proposal submission requirements, the Navy requests the financial information listed below with regard to our firm. In order to be responsive to the Navy’s needs, it is requested that you complete this financial questionnaire with regard to our firm. Upon completion of the questionnaire it is requested that you place the completed questionnaire in a sealed envelope showing the return address of the financial institution and forward it to the Prospective Contractor shown below. The requested information must be received by the contractor no later than __________________________ (Prospective Contractor is responsible to fill in date by which your response is needed) in order to meet the proposal submission deadline.

Prospective Contractor for which information is being requested:

Name:

Address:

City/State/Zip:

Phone Number:

Point of Contact:

Signature of Prospective Contractor or Contractor Representative Requesting Financial Information:

Name of Financial Institution: ______________________________________________________

Address: __________________________________________________________________________

Phone Number: _________________________________________________________

a. Account(s):

Checking: Date Opened:_______________ *Average Balance :___________________________

Savings: Date Opened: _______________ *Average Balance: ___________________________

*Please note that the account balances may be provided by indicating a range, or only the number of figures, e.g., low five figures, high four figures, etc.

Loan(s): Date Opened: _______________ Original Amount:____________________________

Current Balance:____________________

b. Does the Contractor have a line of credit? No Yes

Customer’s Line of Credit: ___________________________ Expiration Date:______________________

Unused Balance: _________________

c. Would you be willing to grant this customer a Line of Credit Increase, or loan, if required?

No Yes

What is the Contractor's relationship with the bank:

Other (explain): ________________________________________________ Satisfactory Outstanding How long has the Contractor been a client? ___________________________________________________________

Name of Person providing the above information

Signature and Title of Person providing the above information

Phone Number of Person providing the above information

Revised April 2012

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION

DISCLOSURE LIMITATIONS AS OUTLINED IN FAR 2.101 & 3.104 APPLY

PAGE

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION

DISCLOSURE LIMITATIONS AS OUTLINED IN FAR 2.101 & 3.104 APPLY

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .