Amendment_0003.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 17

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. P ROJECT NO.(If applicable)

0003 20-Jun-2019

6. ISSUED BY CODE N62470 7. ADMINISTERED BY (Ifother than item6) CODE

COMMANDER NAVFAC ATLANTIC

6506 HAMPTON BLVD

NORFOLK VA 23508-1278

See Item 6

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONT RACT OR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICIT AT ION NO.

N6247019R5012

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

22-May-2019

10A. MOD. OF CONT RACT /ORDER NO.

CODE FACILIT Y CODE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. T HIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENT S OF SOLICIT AT IONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt ofthis amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one ofthe following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies ofthe amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt ofthis amendment on each copy ofthe offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegramwhich includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. Ifby virtue ofthis amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegramor letter, provided each telegramor letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNT ING AND APPROPRIAT ION DAT A (If required)

13. T HIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICAT IONS OF CONT RACT S/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES T HE CONT RACT /ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. T HIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT T O: (Specify authority) T HE CHANGES SET FORT H IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN T HE

CONT RACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONT RACT /ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINIST RAT IVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO T HE AUT HORIT Y OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. T HIS SUPPLEMENT AL AGREEMENT IS ENT ERED INT O PURSUANT TO AUT HORIT Y OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORT ANT : Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPT ION OF AMENDMENT /MODIFICAT ION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

N62470-19-R-5012 Design-Bid-Build P 1601 Wholehouse Revitalization Las Palmeras, PH IV, Naval Station Rota, Spain

The Proposal due date is not extended by this amendment and remains Tuesday July 2, 2019 @ 2:00 PM (EDT).

PLEASE SEE SF-30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions ofthe document referenced in Item9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONT RACT ING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONT RACT OR/OFFEROR 15C. DATE SIGNED

TEL:

16B. UNIT ED ST AT ES OF AMERICA

EMAIL:

16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

BY

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

EXCEPT ION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

30-105-04 ST ANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

N6247019R5012

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0003

P-1601 WHOLEHOUSE REVITALIZATION LAS PALMERAS, PH IV, NAVAL STATION ROTA, SPAIN

The purpose of this amendment is provide the following:

1. Pre-Proposal Inquires (PPIs) Responses

2. Provide updated Site Visit Power Point Brief and Sign-in Sheet

3. Solicitation Revisions (noted or highlighted in red print)

4. Provide updated Attachment (E) Schedule B.

5. Provide Revisions to Attachment (F) RFP Design Package

1. Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPIs) Responses

PPI

REFERENCE

QUESTION GOVERNMENT

RESPONSE

PAGE SECTION PARA-

GRAPH

Is there an overall Dimensions Attachment (F) document of the project? Specification and Drawing

Package (includes 2

Specification files and 26 drawing files) should be referenced for project

06 dimensions and details. All

Proposers are reminded to view section labeled

“Additional Documents” to ensure all available information is received.

07 5 08 81 00

2.3.1 &

2.3

Paragraph 2.3.1 mention the following:

2.3.1 Assemblies

Provide insulated glass assemblies with integral operable horizontal louver blinds where indicated.

Question : Attending drawing AE601 , Door number X1, type 12 shall be provided with Blast Resistant Glass

GL2 with integral operable horizontal louver blinds. It would be necessary to provide additional information and features regarding this integral operable louver blind in order to quote

Type 12 doors require integral operable horizontal louver blinds between the glass panes. GL1 glass is required outside the blast arcs and GL2 glass is required inside the blast arcs. If the GL2 10mm space is not adaquate to allow for the integral blinds then the space may be increased as necessary provided the blast rating is still maintained.

them correctly. Also please the following: The GL2 glass is required with only 10mm air space, as detailed in paragraph 2.3. A bigger air space is anticipated to meet the contract requirements.

Paragraph 2.2.9 mention the following

2.2.9 Finishes

Exposed aluminum surfaces must be factory finished with an anodic coating or organic coating. Color must be white. All windows for each building must have the same finish.

Refer to Specification

08 51 13 - ALUMINUM

WINDOWS

paragraph 1.12:

"...Manufacturer must have the facilities capable of meeting contract requirements, single-source responsibility and warranty."

paragraph 2.2.9: "Exposed aluminum surfaces must be factory finished with an anodic coating or organic coating. Color must be white. All windows for each building must have the same finish.".

The contract scope of works includes different aluminum fenestration product including new windows and new blast resistant aluminum windows and doors.

08 8 08 51 13 2.2.9 Please confirm if to comply with the above mentioned requirement all building enclosure products have to be based on a single manufacturer sole responsibility supplying of all component or, blast and non-blast resistant units to be installed in the same housing unit, may be supplied form different manufacturer, and may have therefore, different provision of products, different designs, aesthetics, hardware, components, energy efficiency rate and different performance characteristics?

Drawi ng sheet

46 of

406, and

180 of

DRAWIN

G C-002, nad drawing

AE102A

Attending drawing C-002, houses of

AREA 1, type B1 are inside of ESQD

ARC.

But in Drawings AE102A (sheet 180 of 406) there are not blast resistant windows or doors detailed to be provided.

Please confirm if considering the

ESQD Arc, the distance from/to the

Base Secured Perimeter and the parking standoff distances from/to the

Housing Units within Area 1, require or not, a certain mitigating Level Of Protection against any potential blast.

See 1366671 Drawing

Revisions 0001 for revisions to the following drawings: 14069543, 14069614, and 14069617

10 9 08 51 13 2.4

2.4 THERMAL-BARRIER

WINDOWS

Provide thermal-barrier windows, complete with accessories and fittings, where indicated.

The paragraph calls to provide thermal-barrier windows "where indicated".

Project drawing AE 604 does not shows the window schedule detailing which window shall be thermally broken, please also note that existing windows in the same rooms, defined to remain, are not thermally broken windows and the related condensation foreseen issue.

Please clarify where it is intended to install thermal barrier windows.

i.e. please check drawing AE101

(sheet 17 of 406), see room#133 and #112.

Refer to Specification

08 51 13 - ALUMINUM

WINDOWS

paragraph 2.1: …"Provide windows with insulating glass and thermal break necessary to achieve a minimum

Condensation Resistance

Factor (CRF) of 45 when tested in accordance with

AAMA 1503."

paragraph 2.2.7: "Provide mullions with a thermal break...."

11 5 05 51 13 1.11.2

1.11.2 Explosive Safety Blast

Performance.

The design of window frames, mullions, and sashes shall satisfy UFC

3-340-02, Structures to Resist the

Effects of Accidental Explosion including Change 2 dated 1 September

2014. The performance of window panels shall satisfy the requirements of Performance Condition 2 in

WINGARD or Medium Level of

Protection in SBEDS, which allows the window to crack but the glazing restrained by the frame does not enter the room. The glazing contained within doors shall satisfy the performance criteria for window panels The design blast pressure and impulse values are shown on Sheet S-

001.

The contract requires to comply with

UFC 3-340-02 (2014).

Additionally, due the location of the

Project housing units, the number of houses included in PHASE 4 (150 house units), the critical parking distances (less than the security minimum standoff distance) and the distance to/from the Base secured

Bid per Solicitation;

UFC 4-010-01 is not applicable to this project.

perimeter, please confirm if UFC 4-

010-01 shall be also applicable.

UFC 4-010-01 has been recently updated last December 2018 with clear design strategies that may result effective and economical in protecting

DoD personnel from blast incidents.

The UFC 4-010-01 (2018) is more up to date than the UFC 3-340-02 (2014) by defining the glazing frame bite in accordance with ASTM F2248, requiring to apply a structural silicone bead or a glazing tape to the glass panel, as a design strategy wich may result effective and economical in protecting DoD personnel from an explosive event, focused to minimize the hazard of most windows, which breaks at very low blast pressures. Its provisions are more accurate for the contract intended level of protection, in which glazing is retrained by the frame and shall not enter the room as a dangerous flying debris.

12 Attachme nt (E)

Schedule

B

00 22 13.00

Supplementar y Instructions to Offerors

1.2b (a) Pursuant to Attachment (E) Schedule

B, Pricing Form, paragraph 1.2.b requires that for CLINs 0002 through

0014 the offeror shall divide the total amount of each CLIN by 150 and apply the resultant “per housing unit” cost to each unit of housing in CLINs 0001, and

0015 through 0032 as they are considered for award.

(b) Further, paragraph 1.2.1 CLIN-specific Bid Notes states that estimated and actual quantities of the unit-priced items will be handled in accordance with

[FAR] 52.211-18 – Variation in

Estimated Quantity.

We understand from (a) that the estimated “per housing unit” price resultant from unit priced CLINs 0002 through 0014 has to be incorporated to the firm fixed price of each unit of housing in the solicitation’s corresponding CLIN. However, we believe that there is a CLIN 0033 for five additional housing units, which is not mentioned in (a).

Additionally, we believe that the FAR referenced in (b) above is not included in the solicitation document.

See Revised Attachment (E)

Schedule B and Solicitation

Revision; additional clauses incorporated by reference.

13 Drawing AE503 Detail B1 In accordance with referenced detail, the contractor is required to install a self-adhering underlayment on the new and existing roof intersection.

Please, confirm if there are any other areas which may be subject to roof leaking.

Bid per Solicitation, drawings and specifications

14 Drawing P602 Detail in upper left corner of drawing

According to reference project detail, a solar panel steel support will be anchored on existing roof, by means of a drilled in galvanized threaded rod. We would like to clarify if:

1. Is there self adhering underlayment in the area to be drilled?

2. If there is, do underlayment sheets contain asbestos?

If the response to questions 1 and 2 above is positive, should the price of asbestos abatement be included in the

CLIN for the solar system? Or, will this cost be otherwise added to the contract price by application of CLIN 0003 for the removal and legal disposal of ACM in stucco and in roof?

See Revised 02 82 16.00 20 -

ENGINEERING CONTROL

OF ASBESTOS

CONTAINING MATERIALS

and the associated HazMat report for locations and handling of asbestos containing materials

SECTION 00 21 16 - INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

List of Attachments:

(A) Request for Work Pass Format Form

(B) Construction Experience Project Data Sheet

(C) Past Performance Questionnaire

(D) Pre-Proposal Inquiry Form

(E) Schedule B, Pricing Form

(F) Specification and Drawing Package (includes 2 specification files and 26 drawings)

(G) Lafayette River Annex Commercial Vehicle Inspection Procedures

1. OVERVIEW OF THIS SOURCE SELECTION

This solicitation is conducted as a negotiated procurement utilizing procedures in accordance with FAR Part

36.2. The best value continuum source selection process used in this acquisition is the tradeoff process. This process allows for a tradeoff between non-price factors (i.e., Corporate Experience, Safety, and Past Performance) and price and allows the Government to accept other than the lowest priced proposal or other than the highest technically rated proposal to achieve a best-value contract award. Award will be made to that responsible offeror whose proposal, conforming to the solicitation, is determined to offer the best value to the Government considering the technical and price factors stated herein.

The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration any or all offerors at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; to award the contract to other than the offeror submitting the lowest total price; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the proposal determined to be the best value.

This acquisition will result in a firm fixed price contract for construction services. In accordance with FAR

36.205, the statutory cost limitation is $23,200,000 USD for P-1601. Award will be made in U.S. Dollars.

The contract completion time for P-1601 shall not exceed 900 days after notice to proceed.

The Government intends to award a contract to a single contractor for CLIN 0001, with CLIN 0002, CLIN 0003, CLIN 0004 CLIN 0005, CLIN 0006, CLIN 0007, CLIN 0008, CLIN 0009, CLIN 0010, CLIN 0011, CLIN 0012, CLIN 0013, CLIN 0014, CLIN 0015, CLIN 0016, CLIN 0017, CLIN 0018, CLIN 0019, CLIN 0020, CLIN 0021, CLIN 0022, CLIN 0023, CLIN 0024, CLIN 0025, CLIN 0026, CLIN 0027, CLIN 0028, CLIN 0029, CLIN 0030, CLIN 0031, CLIN 0032, and CLIN 0033, and CLIN 0034 as priced options. The Government reserves the unilateral right to award Option(s) CLIN 0002, CLIN 0003, CLIN 0004 CLIN 0005, CLIN 0006, CLIN 0007, CLIN 0008, CLIN 0009, CLIN 0010, CLIN 0011, CLIN 0012, CLIN 0013, CLIN 0014, CLIN 0015, CLIN 0016, CLIN 0017, CLIN 0018, CLIN 0019, CLIN 0020, CLIN 0021, CLIN 0022, CLIN 0023, CLIN 0024, CLIN 0025, CLIN 0026, CLIN 0027, CLIN 0028, CLIN 0029, CLIN 0030, CLIN 0031, CLIN 0032, and CLIN 0033 to the contractor at the time of award or within 120 calendar days after contract award. Offerors must submit a price for CLIN 0001 through

CLIN 0033. Offerors not submitting pricing for all CLINs will be considered nonresponsive to the solicitation and will not be evaluated.

INTENT TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS: Proposals must set forth full, accurate and complete information as required by this Request for Proposal (including attachments). The penalty for making false statements in proposals is prescribed in 18 U.S.C. 1001. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award without discussions. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines discussions to be necessary. Therefore, each initial offer should contain the best terms from technical and price standpoints.

2. SITE VISITS

This will be the ONLY Government scheduled site visit. Requirements and deadlines below will be strictly enforced. Late requests may not be processed in time for the visit.

a. An organized Site Visit is scheduled for 12 June 2019 at 10:00 A.M. Central European Summer Time

(CEST) at Naval Station Rota, Spain. All interested parties must meet applicable base access requirements for Naval

Station Rota. Only three representatives from each firm will be permitted to attend the site visit.

b. Spanish participants in the Site Visit must complete the Work Pass Format Form (Attachment A) along with a copy of their identification. All forms and copy of ID must be submitted via email to Ms. Manuela Arroyo at manuela.arroyo.SP@eu.navy.mil and a copy to heather.a.seibold@navy.mil. All required forms with copy of ID must be received no later than 2:00 P.M. CEST on 29 May 2019 (10 business days prior to the scheduled site visit).

c. European/American/Other National contractors participating in the Site Visit must complete the Work

Pass Format Form (Attachment A) along with a copy of their passport. All required forms with copy of passport must be submitted via email to Ms. Manuela Arroyo at Manuela.arroyo.SP@eu.navy.mil and a copy to heather.a.seibold@navy.mil. All forms must be received no later than 2:00 P.M. CEST on 29 May 2019 (10 business days prior to the scheduled site visit).

d. PWD Rota will provide a bus for the Site Visit for all participants. The bus will pick up all participants at the Naval Station Rota main gate, and will return all participants back to Naval Station Rota Main gate after the site visit has finished. Contractors must be at the Naval Station Rota main gate no later than 9:30 A.M. CEST to pick up the base pass. Ms. Manuela Arroyo and/or alternative government representative(s) will be at the main gate to meet cleared Site Visit participants who submitted their work pass format form timely.

Failure of the prospective offeror to attend the site visit will be construed to mean that the offeror fully understands all requirements of the solicitation. All prospective offerors are advised that this solicitation will remain unchanged unless it is amended in writing. However, if an amendment is issued, normal procedures relating to the acknowledgement and receipt of any such amendment shall be applicable.

Bring your copy of the solicitation with you, as no copies will be provided at the site visit.

3. ELIGIBILITY FOR AWARD

To be eligible for award, firm(s) must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database as required as required by FAR 52.204-7, System for Award Management (Oct 2016).

Entities registering from outside of the United States MUST contact the Federal Service Desk as part of the registration process. The contact information is available at https://www.fsd.gov/.

mailto:manuela.arroyo.SP@eu.navy.mil mailto:heather.a.seibold@navy.mil mailto:Manuela.arroyo.SP@eu.navy.mil mailto:heather.a.seibold@navy.mil mailto:heather.a.seibold@navy.mil http://www.fsd.gov/ http://www.fsd.gov/ http://www.fsd.gov/

Note that the System for Award Management (SAM) is required for all offerors, including Joint Ventures (JV)

(registration must state the NAME of the JV). Offerors not currently registered in SAM must obtain a DUN &

Bradstreet (DUNS) number and a CAGE or NCAGE prior to registering in SAM.

All offerors, including JV offerors, must submit with their proposal a DUNS number. In addition to the DUNS number required for JV offerors, JV offerors must submit with their proposal a DUNS number for each member comprising the JV. DUNS numbers can be obtained at http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform. The DUNS number is required in order to register in SAM (see above.)

CAGE/NCAGE – A CAGE/NGAGE code is required for all offerors, including JV offerors. JV offerors must acquire a CAGE/NCAGE Code registered in the JV name.

(a) U.S. Offerors, including Joint Venture offerors: U.S. offerors must obtain a CAGE Code prior to registering in the SAM database, part of the SAM registration process (see paragraph above.)

(b) Non-U.S. (foreign) Offerors ONLY, including JV: Non-U.S. offerors must obtain a NATO CAGE (NCAGE)

Code instead of a CAGE Code prior to registering in the SAM database. NCAGE codes may be obtained at the

NCAGE website https://eportal.nspa.nato.int/AC135Public/scage/CageList.aspx

IMPORTANT NOTICE: If the offeror is registering a new entity in SAM.gov, the offeror must follow new procedures, which include providing an original, signed notarized letter indicating authorized entity Administrator for the entity associated with the DUNS number before a new SAM.gov entity registration will be activated.

IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED FOR THE NEW REGISTRANTS TO CHECK WITH SAM.GOV HELPDESK

DIRECTLY TO ENSURE THAT ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR TIMELY REGISTRATION ARE MET.

4. CERTIFICATE OF CLASSIFICATION

Offerors must hold, at the time of proposal submission, an updated Certificate of Classification issued by the

“Registro Oficial de Contratistas de Obras” of the “Ministerio de Industria y Energia” that meets or exceed the

Groups, Subgroups, and Categories in the following chart.

An official certified copy of the following Certificate of Classification must be included in the proposal package:

Group Subgroup Category

C 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 6

I 1, 6, 9 4

J 2, 4 4

K 6 4

In the case of a Joint Venture offeror, at least one member of the Joint Venture must have the required Certificate of

Classification. The Joint Venture member who has the Certificate of Classification must perform the majority of the work pertinent to the certification. Certification of Classifications submitted by a subcontractor will not be accepted.

The Certificate of Classification documentation submitted with an offeror’s proposal does not have to be translated to English.

Proposals received from firms which do not provide individually or jointly the requisite Certificate of

Classification documentation shall be considered non-responsive, and may result in rejection of the offer.

5. ENGLISH SPEAKING REPRESENTATIVE

At all times when any performance of the work at the site is being conducted by any employee of the Contractor or his subcontractors, the contractor shall have a representative present on the site capable of explaining the work operations and receiving instructions in the English language. The Contracting Officer shall have the right to determine, without appeal of such decision, whether the proposed representative has sufficient technical and lingual capabilities, and the Contractor shall immediately replace any individual not acceptable to the Contracting Officer.

6. INQUIRIES, PROPOSAL FORMAT AND DUE DATE

All pre-proposal inquiries (PPI) regarding this RFP shall be submitted electronically to Heather Seibold by e-mail at heather.a.seibold@navy.mil. Offerors are requested to use the PPI’s submittal Form (Attachment D). Responses will http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform mailto:heather.a.seibold@navy.mil be published as an amendment to the solicitation.

The Government does not intend to respond to inquiries submitted less than 15 calendar days before the solicitation closing date in order to permit adequate time to reply to the inquiries. There is no guarantee that PPI’s submitted after cutoff date will be answered before the solicitation closes.

Amendments will be posted directly to Navy Electronic Commerce Online (NECO). Additionally, other postings will be made to NECO under the Additional Documents section on NECO website. Postings to the Additional

Documents section of NECO DO NOT generate an automated email to contractors. It is recommended contractors check the NECO Additional Documents section of the RFP periodically to see if additional postings have been made. It is the contractor’s responsibility to check NECO for all postings.

Proposals shall be delivered to:

Commander Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Atlantic

Building A Mailroom

ATTN: Heather Seibold

ACQ34 6506 Hampton Blvd

Norfolk, VA 23508-1278

ALL SUBMITTALS MUST BE RECEIVED AT THE LOCATION SPECIFIED ABOVE PRIOR TO 2:00

PM (EDT), TUESDAY, 2 JULY 2019. LATE SUBMITTALS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED.

Proposal must be clearly marked on the outside of the package with the solicitation number.

ELECTRONIC/FACSIMILE SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.

Proposal shall be labeled “PRICE PROPOSAL OR NON-PRICE TECHNICAL FACTORS PROPOSAL FOR RFP

N62470-19-R-5012, NAVFAC ATLANTIC P-1601 WHOLEHOUSE REVITALIZATION LAS PALMERAS,

NAVAL STATION ROTA, SPAIN, ATTN: HEATHER SEIBOLD. All pages shall be numbered and binders shall be appropriately tabbed, conforming to the proposal submittal requirements’ structure for each evaluation factor.

Price and Non-Price Factors proposals must be submitted in sealed envelopes/boxes. Any pricing information included in the Non-Price Factors proposal will not be considered. Similarly, any Non-Price information included in the Price Proposal will not be considered.

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

The offeror’s proposal must include all data and information required and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. The offeror shall be compliant with the requirements as stated herein, for nonconformance may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation.

Special Joint Venture (JV), Unión Temporal de Empresas (UTE) Requirements:

a. For the purposes of this solicitation a joint venture (JV) refers to either: (1) a U.S. Corporation, LLC, or other legal entity, comprised of two or more persons or companies, with the new entity acting as the prime contractor, or

(2) an agreement between two or more persons or companies to propose as a team, with each individual member acting as a prime contractor. Each joint venture must provide one (1) NCAGE code and one (1) DUNS number for the joint venture and one (1) DUNS number for each member comprising the joint venture. Each joint venture must be Registered in SAM using the name of the joint venture.

b. Unión Temporal de Empresas (UTE):

1. The Spanish Ministry of Industry defines “Union Temporal de Empresas (UTE)” as temporary business alliances set up for a specified or unspecified period of time, for the purpose of carrying out a specific project or service. Website: http://www.investinspain.org/guidetobusiness/en/2/art_2_23.html

2. Provide temporary UTE number from the Spanish tax department with the proposal. If awarded the contract, the UTE shall provide the permanent UTE number to the procuring agency (U.S. Navy) within 15 working days after award. The Spanish Tax Department provides guidance on UTE registration requirements.

Website: https://www.agenciatributaria.gob.es/AEAT.sede/procedimientos/GC00.shtml

c. Each Joint Venture or UTE must provide one (1) CAGE/NCAGE code and one http://www.investinspain.org/guidetobusiness/en/2/art_2_23.html http://www.agenciatributaria.gob.es/AEAT.sede/procedimientos/GC00.shtml http://www.agenciatributaria.gob.es/AEAT.sede/procedimientos/GC00.shtml

(1) DUNS number for the Joint Venture or UTE, as well as one (1) DUNS number for each member comprising the Joint Venture or UTE.

d. Each Joint Venture or UTE must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) using the name of the Joint Venture or UTE.

e. Joint Venture (JV) and UTE Offerors shall provide with their proposal a notarized legal document that establishes the JV or UTE. The JV or UTE Agreement shall take effect upon the submission of the proposal and remain irrevocable for at least one (1) year after the work has been finally inspected and accepted by the Government.

Submission of the notarized legal document that establishes the JV or UTE shall be furnished with the proposal in its original language version along with a certified English translation of the notarized JV or UTE document. The

Joint Venture or UTE must be formed and valid at the time of submission of the proposal. The validated notarized legal document must include language that each member of the JV or UTE will be jointly and severally liable for the performance of the whole contract and will be incorporated into the contract award if award is made to the JV or

UTE. Failure to submit a JV or UTE Agreement in English translation with notary is a failure to meet a material

Requirement of this solicitation.

f. The JV or UTE also needs to complete the online representations and certifications for each joint venture member as well as for the joint venture itself. Refer to “Paragraph 1.7 of Section 00100 – Bidding Schedule/Instructions to

Bidders” and “Section 00600 – Representations and Certifications.”

g. The Joint Venture Agreement and UTE Agreement shall include, at a minimum, the following:

1. Name of firms that form the JV or UTE and the name of the JV or UTE.

2. A copy of the JV, UTE, LLC, or LTD agreement.

3. Identify (by name and title) the personnel having the authority to legally bind the partners/parties

(including authority to execute the contract documents and bonds).

4. The management approach in terms of who will conduct, direct, supervise, and control.

5. The structure and decision-making responsibilities of the partners/parties in terms of who will control the manner and method of performance of work.

6. Solicitation number.

7. The relationship of the team/partners/parties in terms of business ownership, capital contribution, profit distribution or loss sharing.

8. Description of responsibilities in terms of work category for each member (for example: Firm A performing 100% of…).

9. The statement “The composition and structure of the JV or UTE will remain unchanged from award to one (1) year after work has been finally inspected and accepted by the Government.”

10. Date of issuance of the agreement and notarized signature of the corporate officials signing in behalf of each party.

11. Statement under oath stating that the Joint Venture (JV) or UTE is, at the time of proposal submission, in compliance with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations. This statement must be signed under oath by all members comprising the Joint Venture or UTE.

12. The validated notarized legal document must include language that each member of the JV or UTE will be jointly and severally liable for the performance of the whole contract and will be incorporated into the contract award if award is made to the JV or UTE.

13. A list of partners/parties, to include company name, DUNS and CAGE Numbers, Address, Point of

Contact, e-mail address, phone number and facsimile number

The U.S. Government reserves the right to review the actual JV or UTE Agreement to determine its basis and compliance with the applicable laws. Any internal agreements affecting the internal composition of the existing JV or UTE and its potential liabilities in relation to the contract (performance guarantee, insurance, etc.) will be sent to the Contracting Officer to provide notice of the same. Any change in the composition of the JV or UTE after award will require the JV or UTE to formally request a Novation Agreement in accordance with FAR 42.12, which will be approved/disapproved at the discretion of the Contracting Officer. JV/UTE composition cannot change between proposal and award.

PROPOSALS MAY NOT BE HAND DELIVERED. ALL PROPOSALS MUST BE MAILED VIA POSTAL

SERVICES OR COMMERCIAL COURIERS SUCH AS FEDEX, DHL, OR UPS.

When mailing proposal package or using a commercial courier, the firm is advised that the Contracting Officer is on a secured base and passes are required to enter the base. Anticipate delays in base access and plan accordingly.

Hand-carried proposals must be delivered to the mailroom between 7:30 AM and 1:45 PM EDT. A phone is available outside the mail room door, if delivering proposals outside the specified timeframe. If required, contact

Joe Goncalves at (757)-322-8125. Government personnel will not pick up proposals at the gate. It is the contractor’s responsibility to ensure delivery to the location specified.

All visitors to NAVFAC Atlantic at Lafayette River Annex (LRA) who do not have a CAC badge or DBIDS badge must have a background check run by the Naval Station Pass & ID office (Security Department at Commander

Naval Region Mid-Atlantic (CNRMA)). Special Note: DBIDS badges must be programmed for access to the Naval

Support Activity, Hampton Roads in order to gain access to the LRA.

Visitors who do not have a CAC or DBIDS badge must complete and submit the SECNAV FORM 5512/1 to

NAVFAC Atlantic Security a minimum of seventeen (17) days prior to the proposed date of visit to allow ample time to process and submit the requests to CNRMA.

The SECNAV FORM 5512/1 can be found at the following link:

https://www.cnic.navy.mil/content/dam/cnic/hq/images/DBIDS/SECNAV%20Form%205512-1.pdf

Visitor’s must transmit the completed SECNAV FORM 5512/1 form which contains Privacy Act/PII data to

NAVFAC Atlantic Security via AMRDEC Safe File Exchange (SAFE) website found at the following link:

https://safe.amrdec.army.mil/safe/Welcome.aspx

Please forward the SECNAV FORM 5512/1 via the AMRDEC SAFE website to all three of the NAVFACLANT security personnel listed below:

Robert Hernandez/ Email: Robert.hernandez3@navy.mil

Iris Gholston/ Email: iris.gholston@navy.mil

Steven K. Anderson/ Email: steven.k.anderson@navy.mil

Visitors can contact NAVFAC Atlantic Security department at 757-322-8116/8044/8116 if they have questions or need assistance.

Commercial couriers must also have their vehicle inspected at location listed in LRA commercial vehicle inspection procedures (Attachment G) prior to accessing the LRA.

Firms should check with their intended courier to ensure they have the proper identification credentials to access the

LRA.

Temporary visitor passes must be picked up by the approved visitor from the Naval Station Pass and ID Office located at the following address prior to visiting NAVFAC Atlantic LRA. Please note that this address is different from the address to which proposals must be delivered:

Address: Naval Station Pass and ID Office

9040 Hampton Blvd

Norfolk, VA 23505

Telephone Number: 757-322-2975

Hours of Operation: 0600-1700 Monday through Friday

7. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors: Factor 1 – Corporate Experience

Factor 2 – Safety Factor 3 – Past Performance on Recent, Relevant Projects

The distinction between experience and past performance is that experience pertains to the volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work described under the definition of recent, relevant projects, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. The relative order of importance of the non-price evaluation factors is Factor 1 Corporate Experience and

Factor 3 Past Performance/Performance confidence assessment Factor are of equal importance to each other. When http://www.cnic.navy.mil/content/dam/cnic/hq/images/DBIDS/SECNAV%20Form%205512-1.pdf http://www.cnic.navy.mil/content/dam/cnic/hq/images/DBIDS/SECNAV%20Form%205512-1.pdf http://www.cnic.navy.mil/content/dam/cnic/hq/images/DBIDS/SECNAV%20Form%205512-1.pdf mailto:Robert.hernandez3@navy.mil mailto:iris.gholston@navy.mil mailto:steven.k.anderson@navy.mil the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the non-price factors are approximately equal to price. Factor 2 , Safety will only be rated Acceptable or Unacceptable, and offerors must be found Acceptable to be eligible for award, but this

Factor will not be considered in the weighting of non-price factors and the ultimate non-price/price tradeoff analysis. If an offeror is rated Unacceptable in any factor, they will not be eligible for award, unless the deficiency(ies) is/are remedied through discussions (if held).

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

(a) Non-price Factors:

Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit one original, marked “Original”, five (5) copies marked “copy”, each in a separate three-ring or four-ring binder, and two (2) electronic copies on separate CDs, with the following characteristics:

• Text pages 8 ½ x 11 format (A4 paper is also acceptable)

• 12-point font, Times New Roman

• Two complete electronic copies of the technical proposal factors as a single .pdf searchable file, each on a separate CD (include the “Original” technical submission). If there are any conflicts between hard and/or electronic copies, the “Original” hard copy will govern.

• Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact, Title, phone number, and email address.

Factor 1 Corporate Experience:

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

Submit a minimum of (2) and maximum of five (5) relevant construction projects that best demonstrate the offeror’s experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as vertical construction projects which renovated Multi-Unit

Housing, apartment buildings or office buildings with at least fifty (50) residential units (across all buildings) in each project with a value equal to or exceeding $5,000,000 (or the equivalent foreign currency, on day of project award).

To be considered, projects submitted for the Offeror must have been completed within the past ten (10) years from the date of issuance of this request for proposal (RFP). To ensure a project is considered “complete”, the documentation should demonstrate final delivery to the client.

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or standalone contract. For multiple construction award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment B) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information to demonstrate construction experience. Except as specifically requested, the

Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages) 8-1/2” X 11” page size. DUNS numbers for the entity that performed the project shall be noted for the construction projects.

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (e.g.: unique features, area, construction methods). The offeror must provide the construction cost of the example project in U.S. dollars (on day of project award). Failure to do so may result in a project being found non-relevant.

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV)/ Union Temporal de Empresas (UTE), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the JV/UTE entity. If the JV/UTE does not have experience, at least one (1) project should be submitted for the JV/UTE members. Projects may be submitted for any JV/UTE partner; however, offerors who fail to submit experience for each JV/UTE partner may be considered less favorably. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

JV/UTE offerors shall provide with their proposal a notarized legal document that establishes the JV/UTE.

If an Offeror utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate the manner in which the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract for the experience information of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies to be considered. The proposal shall state specific commitments of technical resources (e.g. personnel, eq uipment) that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies will commit to the performance of this contract. In particular, the proposal will clearly state the specific commitments of resources of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member that will be located at the worksites and company offices in the city/area of the project. The proposal shall also describe specific roles of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies in terms of the work it will either self-perform or manage on behalf of the Offeror in performance of the contract.

The Offeror may utilize experience of a subcontractor that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement to demonstrate construction experience under this evaluation factor. The Offeror must provide a signed letter of commitment from the subcontractor and an explanation of the meaningful involvement that the subcontractor will have in performance of this contract. Substitution of subcontractor(s) shall be avoided to the maximum extent possible, and any proposed substitutions shall have verifiable, equivalent experience to the subcontractor being replaced. More weight may be given to the Offeror’s projects than those submitted for subcontractors.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review five (5) projects for construction. If more than the maximum number of projects is submitted, the Government will evaluate projects in numerical order of submission up to the maximum number and will not evaluate projects beyond the maximum number specified in the submission requirements.

The Offeror may be considered more favorably if:

1. Relevant projects demonstrate construction experience with Multi-Unit Housing or apartments.

2. Relevant projects demonstrate construction experience in the geographic area of Rota, Spain where project is located.

3. Relevant projects demonstrate construction experience performed for the U.S. Government.

4. Relevant projects demonstrate construction experience performed as a prime contractor versus a subcontractor.

5. Relevant projects demonstrate experience performed by the offeror than those performed by subcontractors, affiliates or parent companies.

Factor 2, Safety:

(a) Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information: (For a partnership, joint venture or union temporal de empresas, the following shall address each contractor who is part of the partnership, joint venture or union temporal de empresas; only one safety narrative is required.)

(1) Technical Approach for Safety:

Describe the offeror’s technical approach to safety for its employees as well as the plan that the offeror will implement to evaluate and measure safety performance of potential subcontractors, as part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. Also, describe any innovative methods that the Offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at all subcontractor levels. The Safety Narrative shall be limited to three pages, 8 ½” x

11” page size (i.e.., one (1) double-sided page plus one (1) single-sided page; or three (3) single-sided).

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. The

Government will evaluate the Offeror’s plan to select and monitor subcontractors, and any innovative safety methods that the Offeror plans to implement for this procurement. The Government’s sources of information for evaluating safety may include, but are not limited to, Government agencies, OSHA, NAVFAC’s Facility Accident and Incident Reporting (FAIR) and Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS) databases, and other related resources. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete safety information regarding these submittal requirements rests with the Offeror.

The evaluation will collectively consider the Offeror’s technical approach to safety and other sources of information available to the Government. The Government will also evaluate the narrative to determine whether subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project.

This Safety Factor will be rated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis.

Factor 3. Past Performance:

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

If a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 2 for Corporate Experience. If there is not a completed CPARS evaluation, then submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment C) for each project included in Factor 1, Corporate Experience. The Offeror should provide completed Past Performance

Questionnaires (PPQs) in the proposal. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The

Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Heather Seibold, via email at heather.a.seibold@navy.mil .

Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 2, Corporate Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues.

Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The

Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

This evaluation will consider how well the Offeror’s team performed on relevant projects submitted under Factor 1, Corporate Experience and may also consider past performance on other relevant projects currently documented in known sources.

The Government will consider the recency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the

Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the Offeror’s team’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s team’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

In the case of an offeror for which there is no information on past contract performance or where past contract performance information is not available or so sparse that no meaningful assessment can be performed, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past contract performance (see FAR

15.305(a)(2)(iv).) In this case, the Offeror’s past performance is unknown and assigned a performance confidence rating of “Neutral Confidence.” Although the Government may not rate an offeror that lacks recent, relevant past performance favorably or unfavorably with regard to past performance, the Government may determine that a

“Substantial Confidence” or “Satisfactory Confidence” past performance rating is worth more than a “Neutral

Confidence” past performance rating in a best value tradeoff as long as the determination is consistent.

(b) Price:

Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Offeror shall submit one (1) marked “Original,” one (1) copy, each in a separate three-ring or four-ring binder, and one (1) electronic copy (CD format) of the solicitation submittal requirements identified below:

-SF-1442, signed

-Amendments (SF30s) Acknowledged

-Completed Schedule B, Pricing Form

-Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone

Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact and their phone and email address.

-Required Contractor Responsibility Determination documentation

-Certificate of Classification

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO BE SUBMITTED WITH PRICE PROPOSAL PACKAGE:

RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION INFORMATION - In order to be eligible for award, the offeror must be determined responsible in accordance with FAR Part 9, specifically 9.104-1, General Standards.