Amendment_0002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

N62470-19-R-5012 Design-Bid-Build P 1601 Wholehouse Revitalization Las Palmeras, PH IV, Naval Station Rota, Spain

The Proposal due date is extended from Wednesday June 26, 2019 @ 2:00 PM (EDT) to Tuesday July 2, 2019 @ 2:00 PM (EDT).

PLEASE SEE SF-30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 16

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 11-Jun-2019

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6247019R5012

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

22-May-2019

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

12-Jun-2019

CODE

COMMANDER NAVFAC ATLANTIC

6506 HAMPTON BLVD

NORFOLK VA 23508-1278

N62470 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6247019R5012

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

CONTINUATION PAGE

P-1601 WHOLEHOUSE REVITALIZATION LAS PALMERAS, PH IV, NAVAL STATION ROTA, SPAIN

The purpose of this amendment is provide the following:

1. To extend the proposal due date from June 26, 2019 to July 2, 2019.

2. Pre-Proposal Inquires (PPIs) Responses

3. Solicitation Revisions (noted or highlighted in red print.)

1. Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPIs) Responses

PPI

REFERENCE

QUESTION

GOVERNMENT

RESPONSE

PAGE

SECTION

PARA-

GRAPH

02 Solicitation

Per the instructions, the requirement for providing a bid for a UTE (J/V) is to have a DUNS number, NCAGE number and have an account activated in SAM. Given the timeframe for the bureaucratic processing of the documentation to form a UTE (J/V) and then achieve all these requirements, we kindly request an extension of the turn in date of the bid from 26 June 2019 to add an additional two weeks to permit adequate time for acquiring the required documentation.

Referencing the first page of the solicitation, (OFFERORS ARE ADVISED THAT

FUNDING MAY NOT BECOME

AVAILABLE. IF FUNDS ARE NOT

AVAILABLE, NO AWARD WILL BE

MADE AS A RESULT OF THIS

SOLICITATION) if currently there are no funds assigned and a possibility that funds made not become available, we feel the additional time will not be a factor in the overall time the USG will have to evaluate all offers received and request funds for awarding before the end of FY 19 (30 Sept 2019). By permitting this time extension, the USG is assuring the maximum possibility of the company with the best value and best

See Amendment

0002, proposal due date has been extended to July 2, 2019 at 2:00 PM, (EDT).

qualified to properly fulfill the requirements of the solicitation and not be disqualified for lack of registration documentation.

03 Solicitation

Per the instructions, “Submit a minimum of

(2) and maximum of five (5) relevant construction projects that best demonstrate the offeror’s experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as vertical construction projects which renovated Multi- Unit Housing, apartment buildings or office buildings with at least fifty (50) residential units (across all buildings) in each project with a value equal to or exceeding $5,000,000 (or the equivalent foreign currency, on day of project award). To be considered, projects submitted for the Offeror must have been completed within the past five (5) years from the date of issuance of this request for proposal (RFP). To ensure a project is considered “complete”, the documentation should demonstrate final delivery to the client.” Given the economic situation of Spain within the past 8 years, we kindly request to alternation to this requirement. 1. Permit new construction of Multi-Unit Housing, apartment buildings or office buildings with at least fifty (50) residential units (across all buildings) and 2.

to either consider projects at least 50% complete from the date of issuance of this request for proposal (RFP) or alternatively, past performance within the past eight (8) years from the date of issuance of this request for proposal (RFP).

See Amendment 0002, Factor 1, Corporate Experience has been revised to allow for relevant projects completed within the past ten (10) years.

04 Solicitation 00 21 16

The solicitation documents state that the “solicitation closing date” is 26 June 2019.

Section 002116 “Instructions to Proposers,” paragraph 6 “Inquiries, Proposal Format and Due Date” states that “the Government does not intend to respond to [PPI’s] submitted less than 15 calendar days before the solicitation closing date.” Therefore, the cut-off date for submittal of the PPI’s is established as 12 June 2019. However, pursuant to section 002116 “Instructions to Proposers,” paragraph 2 “Site Visits,” the site visit is also scheduled for 12 June 2019. We believe that there is no time allowed before the PPI cutoff date for the consideration, evaluation and submittal of any questions and/or issues that may arise from the site visit.

See Amendment 0002, proposal due date has been extended to July 2, 2019 at 2:00 PM, (EDT).

05 Solicitation

Is it necessary to perform the UTE registration? Is a teaming agreement valid?

The offeror may submit proposal as a JV or UTE in accordance with the solicitation. If offerors intend to perform as a UTE see solicitation section 00 21 16- Instruction to Proposers, 6.

Inquiries, Proposal Format and Due Date for details on what UTE offerors are required to submit with the proposal and upon award.

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION

The required response date/time has changed from 26-Jun-2019 02:00 PM to 02-Jul-2019 02:00 PM.

SECTION 00 21 16 - INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

List of Attachments:

(A) Request for Work Pass Format Form

(B) Construction Experience Project Data Sheet

(C) Past Performance Questionnaire

(D) Pre-Proposal Inquiry Form

(E) Schedule B, Pricing Form

(F) Specification and Drawing Package (includes 2 specification files and 26 drawings)

(G) Lafayette River Annex Commercial Vehicle Inspection Procedures

1. OVERVIEW OF THIS SOURCE SELECTION

This solicitation is conducted as a negotiated procurement utilizing procedures in accordance with FAR Part

36.2. The best value continuum source selection process used in this acquisition is the tradeoff process. This process allows for a tradeoff between non-price factors (i.e., Corporate Experience, Safety, and Past Performance) and price and allows the Government to accept other than the lowest priced proposal or other than the highest technically rated proposal to achieve a best-value contract award. Award will be made to that responsible offeror whose proposal, conforming to the solicitation, is determined to offer the best value to the Government considering the technical and price factors stated herein.

The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration any or all offerors at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; to award the contract to other than the offeror submitting the lowest total price; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the proposal determined to be the best value.

This acquisition will result in a firm fixed price contract for construction services. In accordance with FAR 36.205, the statutory cost limitation is $23,200,000 USD for P-1601. Award will be made in U.S. Dollars.

The contract completion time for P-1601 shall not exceed 900 days after notice to proceed.

The Government intends to award a contract to a single contractor for CLIN 0001, with CLIN 0002, CLIN 0003, CLIN 0004 CLIN 0005, CLIN 0006, CLIN 0007, CLIN 0008, CLIN 0009, CLIN 0010, CLIN 0011, CLIN 0012, CLIN 0013, CLIN 0014, CLIN 0015, CLIN 0016, CLIN 0017, CLIN 0018, CLIN 0019, CLIN 0020, CLIN 0021, CLIN 0022, CLIN 0023, CLIN 0024, CLIN 0025, CLIN 0026, CLIN 0027, CLIN 0028, CLIN 0029, CLIN 0030, CLIN 0031, CLIN 0032, CLIN 0033, and CLIN 0034 as priced options. The Government reserves the unilateral right to award Option(s) CLIN 0002, CLIN 0003, CLIN 0004 CLIN 0005, CLIN 0006, CLIN 0007, CLIN 0008, CLIN 0009, CLIN 0010, CLIN 0011, CLIN 0012, CLIN 0013, CLIN 0014, CLIN 0015, CLIN 0016, CLIN 0017, CLIN 0018, CLIN 0019, CLIN 0020, CLIN 0021, CLIN 0022, CLIN 0023, CLIN 0024, CLIN 0025, CLIN 0026, CLIN 0027, CLIN 0028, CLIN 0029, CLIN 0030, CLIN 0031, CLIN 0032, and CLIN 0033 to the contractor at the time of award or within 120 calendar days after contract award. Offerors must submit a price for CLIN 0001 through CLIN 0033. Offerors not submitting pricing for all CLINs will be considered nonresponsive to the solicitation and will not be evaluated.

INTENT TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS: Proposals must set forth full, accurate and complete information as required by this Request for Proposal (including attachments). The penalty for making false statements in proposals is prescribed in 18 U.S.C. 1001. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award without discussions. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines discussions to be necessary. Therefore, each initial offer should contain the best terms from technical and price standpoints.

2. SITE VISITS

This will be the ONLY Government scheduled site visit. Requirements and deadlines below will be strictly enforced. Late requests may not be processed in time for the visit.

a. An organized Site Visit is scheduled for 12 June 2019 at 10:00 A.M. Central European Time (CET) at Naval Station Rota, Spain. All interested parties must meet applicable base access requirements for Naval Station Rota. Only three representatives from each firm will be permitted to attend the site visit.

b. Spanish participants in the Site Visit must complete the Work Pass Format Form (Attachment A) along with a copy of their identification. All forms and copy of ID must be submitted via email to Ms. Manuela Arroyo at manuela.arroyo.SP@eu.navy.mil and a copy to heather.a.seibold@navy.mil. All required forms with copy of ID must be received no later than 2:00 P.M. CET on 29 May 2019 (10 business days prior to the scheduled site visit).

c. European/American/Other National contractors participating in the Site Visit must complete the Work

Pass Format Form (Attachment A) along with a copy of their passport. All required forms with copy of passport must be submitted via email to Ms. Manuela Arroyo at Manuela.arroyo.SP@eu.navy.mil and a copy to heather.a.seibold@navy.mil. All forms must be received no later than 2:00 P.M. CET on 29 May 2019 (10 business days prior to the scheduled site visit).

d. PWD Rota will provide a bus for the Site Visit for all participants. The bus will pick up all participants at the Naval Station Rota main gate, and will return all participants back to Naval Station Rota Main gate after the site visit has finished. Contractors must be at the Naval Station Rota main gate no later than 9:30 A.M. CET to pick up the base pass. Ms. Manuela Arroyo and/or alternative government representative(s) will be at the main gate to meet cleared Site Visit participants who submitted their work pass format form timely.

Failure of the prospective offeror to attend the site visit will be construed to mean that the offeror fully understands all requirements of the solicitation. All prospective offerors are advised that this solicitation will remain unchanged unless it is amended in writing. However, if an amendment is issued, normal procedures relating to the acknowledgement and receipt of any such amendment shall be applicable.

Bring your copy of the solicitation with you, as no copies will be provided at the site visit.

3. ELIGIBILITY FOR AWARD

To be eligible for award, firm(s) must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database as required as required by FAR 52.204-7, System for Award Management (Oct 2016).

Entities registering from outside of the United States MUST contact the Federal Service Desk as part of the registration process. The contact information is available at https://www.fsd.gov/.

Note that the System for Award Management (SAM) is required for all offerors, including Joint Ventures (JV) (registration must state the NAME of the JV). Offerors not currently registered in SAM must obtain a DUN & Bradstreet (DUNS) number and a CAGE or NCAGE prior to registering in SAM.

All offerors, including JV offerors, must submit with their proposal a DUNS number. In addition to the DUNS number required for JV offerors, JV offerors must submit with their proposal a DUNS number for each member comprising the JV. DUNS numbers can be obtained at http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform. The DUNS number is required in order to register in SAM (see above.)

CAGE/NCAGE – A CAGE/NGAGE code is required for all offerors, including JV offerors. JV offerors must acquire a CAGE/NCAGE Code registered in the JV name.

(a) U.S. Offerors, including Joint Venture offerors: U.S. offerors must obtain a CAGE Code prior to registering in the SAM database, part of the SAM registration process (see paragraph above.)

(b) Non-U.S. (foreign) Offerors ONLY, including JV: Non-U.S. offerors must obtain a NATO CAGE (NCAGE) Code instead of a CAGE Code prior to registering in the SAM database. NCAGE codes may be obtained at the NCAGE website https://eportal.nspa.nato.int/AC135Public/scage/CageList.aspx

IMPORTANT NOTICE: If the offeror is registering a new entity in SAM.gov, the offeror must follow new procedures, which include providing an original, signed notarized letter indicating authorized entity Administrator for the entity associated with the DUNS number before a new SAM.gov entity registration will be activated.

IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED FOR THE NEW REGISTRANTS TO CHECK WITH SAM.GOV HELPDESK

DIRECTLY TO ENSURE THAT ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR TIMELY REGISTRATION ARE MET.

4. CERTIFICATE OF CLASSIFICATION

Offerors must hold, at the time of proposal submission, an updated Certificate of Classification issued by the “Registro Oficial de Contratistas de Obras” of the “Ministerio de Industria y Energia” that meets or exceed the Groups, Subgroups, and Categories in the following chart.

An official certified copy of the following Certificate of Classification must be included in the proposal package:

Group Subgroup Category C 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 6 I 1, 6, 9 4 J 2, 4 4 K 6 4

In the case of a Joint Venture offeror, at least one member of the Joint Venture must have the required Certificate of Classification. The Joint Venture member who has the Certificate of Classification must perform the majority of the work pertinent to the certification. Certification of Classifications submitted by a subcontractor will not be accepted.

The Certificate of Classification documentation submitted with an offeror’s proposal does not have to be translated to English.

Proposals received from firms which do not provide individually or jointly the requisite Certificate of Classification documentation shall be considered non-responsive, and may result in rejection of the offer.

5. ENGLISH SPEAKING REPRESENTATIVE

At all times when any performance of the work at the site is being conducted by any employee of the Contractor or his subcontractors, the contractor shall have a representative present on the site capable of explaining the work operations and receiving instructions in the English language. The Contracting Officer shall have the right to determine, without appeal of such decision, whether the proposed representative has sufficient technical and lingual capabilities, and the Contractor shall immediately replace any individual not acceptable to the Contracting Officer.

6. INQUIRIES, PROPOSAL FORMAT AND DUE DATE

All pre-proposal inquiries (PPI) regarding this RFP shall be submitted electronically to Heather Seibold by e-mail at heather.a.seibold@navy.mil. Offerors are requested to use the PPI’s submittal Form (Attachment D). Responses will be published as an amendment to the solicitation.

The Government does not intend to respond to inquiries submitted less than 15 calendar days before the solicitation closing date in order to permit adequate time to reply to the inquiries. There is no guarantee that PPI’s submitted after cutoff date will be answered before the solicitation closes.

Amendments will be posted directly to Navy Electronic Commerce Online (NECO). Additionally, other postings will be made to NECO under the Additional Documents section on NECO website. Postings to the Additional Documents section of NECO DO NOT generate an automated email to contractors. It is recommended contractors check the NECO Additional Documents section of the RFP periodically to see if additional postings have been made. It is the contractor’s responsibility to check NECO for all postings.

Proposals shall be delivered to:

Commander Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Atlantic Building A Mailroom ATTN: Heather Seibold ACQ34 6506 Hampton Blvd Norfolk, VA 23508-1278

ALL SUBMITTALS MUST BE RECEIVED AT THE LOCATION SPECIFIED ABOVE PRIOR TO 2:00

PM (EDT), TUESDAY, 2 JULY 2019. LATE SUBMITTALS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED.

Proposal must be clearly marked on the outside of the package with the solicitation number.

ELECTRONIC/FACSIMILE SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.

Proposal shall be labeled “PRICE PROPOSAL OR NON-PRICE TECHNICAL FACTORS PROPOSAL FOR RFP

N62470-19-R-5012, NAVFAC ATLANTIC P-1601 WHOLEHOUSE REVITALIZATION LAS PALMERAS,

NAVAL STATION ROTA, SPAIN, ATTN: HEATHER SEIBOLD. All pages shall be numbered and binders shall be appropriately tabbed, conforming to the proposal submittal requirements’ structure for each evaluation factor.

Price and Non-Price Factors proposals must be submitted in sealed envelopes/boxes. Any pricing information included in the Non-Price Factors proposal will not be considered. Similarly, any Non-Price information included in the Price Proposal will not be considered.

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

The offeror’s proposal must include all data and information required and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. The offeror shall be compliant with the requirements as stated herein, for nonconformance may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation.

Special Joint Venture (JV), Unión Temporal de Empresas (UTE) Requirements:

a. For the purposes of this solicitation a joint venture (JV) refers to either: (1) a U.S. Corporation, LLC, or other legal entity, comprised of two or more persons or companies, with the new entity acting as the prime contractor, or

(2) an agreement between two or more persons or companies to propose as a team, with each individual member acting as a prime contractor. Each joint venture must provide one (1) NCAGE code and one (1) DUNS number for the joint venture and one (1) DUNS number for each member comprising the joint venture. Each joint venture must be Registered in SAM using the name of the joint venture.

b. Unión Temporal de Empresas (UTE):

1. The Spanish Ministry of Industry defines “Union Temporal de Empresas (UTE)” as temporary business alliances set up for a specified or unspecified period of time, for the purpose of carrying out a specific project or service. Website: http://www.investinspain.org/guidetobusiness/en/2/art_2_23.html

2. Provide temporary UTE number from the Spanish tax department with the proposal. If awarded the contract, the UTE shall provide the permanent UTE number to the procuring agency (U.S. Navy) within 15 working days after award. The Spanish Tax Department provides guidance on UTE registration requirements.

Website: https://www.agenciatributaria.gob.es/AEAT.sede/procedimientos/GC00.shtml

c. Each Joint Venture or UTE must provide one (1) CAGE/NCAGE code and one

(1) DUNS number for the Joint Venture or UTE, as well as one (1) DUNS number for each member comprising the Joint Venture or UTE.

d. Each Joint Venture or UTE must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) using the name of the Joint Venture or UTE.

e. Joint Venture (JV) and UTE Offerors shall provide with their proposal a notarized legal document that establishes the JV or UTE. The JV or UTE Agreement shall take effect upon the submission of the proposal and remain irrevocable for at least one (1) year after the work has been finally inspected and accepted by the Government.

Submission of the notarized legal document that establishes the JV or UTE shall be furnished with the proposal in its original language version along with a certified English translation of the notarized JV or UTE document. The Joint Venture or UTE must be formed and valid at the time of submission of the proposal. The validated notarized legal document must include language that each member of the JV or UTE will be jointly and severally liable for the performance of the whole contract and will be incorporated into the contract award if award is made to the JV or UTE. Failure to submit a JV or UTE Agreement in English translation with notary is a failure to meet a material Requirement of this solicitation.

f. The JV or UTE also needs to complete the online representations and certifications for each joint venture member as well as for the joint venture itself. Refer to “Paragraph 1.7 of Section 00100 – Bidding Schedule/Instructions to Bidders” and “Section 00600 – Representations and Certifications.”

g. The Joint Venture Agreement and UTE Agreement shall include, at a minimum, the following:

1. Name of firms that form the JV or UTE and the name of the JV or UTE.

2. A copy of the JV, UTE, LLC, or LTD agreement.

3. Identify (by name and title) the personnel having the authority to legally bind the partners/parties (including authority to execute the contract documents and bonds).

4. The management approach in terms of who will conduct, direct, supervise, and control.

5. The structure and decision-making responsibilities of the partners/parties in terms of who will control the manner and method of performance of work.

6. Solicitation number.

7. The relationship of the team/partners/parties in terms of business ownership, capital contribution, profit distribution or loss sharing.

8. Description of responsibilities in terms of work category for each member (for example: Firm A performing 100% of…).

9. The statement “The composition and structure of the JV or UTE will remain unchanged from award to one (1) year after work has been finally inspected and accepted by the Government.”

10. Date of issuance of the agreement and notarized signature of the corporate officials signing in behalf of each party.

11. Statement under oath stating that the Joint Venture (JV) or UTE is, at the time of proposal submission, in compliance with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations. This statement must be signed under oath by all members comprising the Joint Venture or UTE.

12. The validated notarized legal document must include language that each member of the JV or UTE will be jointly and severally liable for the performance of the whole contract and will be incorporated into the contract award if award is made to the JV or UTE.

13. A list of partners/parties, to include company name, DUNS and CAGE Numbers, Address, Point of Contact, e-mail address, phone number and facsimile number

The U.S. Government reserves the right to review the actual JV or UTE Agreement to determine its basis and compliance with the applicable laws. Any internal agreements affecting the internal composition of the existing JV or UTE and its potential liabilities in relation to the contract (performance guarantee, insurance, etc.) will be sent to the Contracting Officer to provide notice of the same. Any change in the composition of the JV or UTE after award will require the JV or UTE to formally request a Novation Agreement in accordance with FAR 42.12, which will be approved/disapproved at the discretion of the Contracting Officer. JV/UTE composition cannot change between proposal and award.

PROPOSALS MAY NOT BE HAND DELIVERED. ALL PROPOSALS MUST BE MAILED VIA POSTAL

SERVICES OR COMMERCIAL COURIERS SUCH AS FEDEX, DHL, OR UPS.

When mailing proposal package or using a commercial courier, the firm is advised that the Contracting Officer is on a secured base and passes are required to enter the base. Anticipate delays in base access and plan accordingly.

Hand-carried proposals must be delivered to the mailroom between 7:30 AM and 1:45 PM EDT. A phone is available outside the mail room door, if delivering proposals outside the specified timeframe. If required, contact Joe Goncalves at (757)-322-8125. Government personnel will not pick up proposals at the gate. It is the contractor’s responsibility to ensure delivery to the location specified.

All visitors to NAVFAC Atlantic at Lafayette River Annex (LRA) who do not have a CAC badge or DBIDS badge must have a background check run by the Naval Station Pass & ID office (Security Department at Commander Naval Region Mid-Atlantic (CNRMA)). Special Note: DBIDS badges must be programmed for access to the Naval Support Activity, Hampton Roads in order to gain access to the LRA.

Visitors who do not have a CAC or DBIDS badge must complete and submit the SECNAV FORM 5512/1 to NAVFAC Atlantic Security a minimum of seventeen (17) days prior to the proposed date of visit to allow ample time to process and submit the requests to CNRMA.

The SECNAV FORM 5512/1 can be found at the following link:

https://www.cnic.navy.mil/content/dam/cnic/hq/images/DBIDS/SECNAV%20Form%205512-1.pdf

Visitor’s must transmit the completed SECNAV FORM 5512/1 form which contains Privacy Act/PII data to NAVFAC Atlantic Security via AMRDEC Safe File Exchange (SAFE) website found at the following link:

https://safe.amrdec.army.mil/safe/Welcome.aspx Please forward the SECNAV FORM 5512/1 via the AMRDEC SAFE website to all three of the NAVFACLANT security personnel listed below:

Robert Hernandez/ Email: Robert.hernandez3@navy.mil

Iris Gholston/ Email: iris.gholston@navy.mil Steven K. Anderson/ Email: steven.k.anderson@navy.mil

Visitors can contact NAVFAC Atlantic Security department at 757-322-8116/8044/8116 if they have questions or need assistance.

Commercial couriers must also have their vehicle inspected at location listed in LRA commercial vehicle inspection procedures (Attachment G) prior to accessing the LRA.

Firms should check with their intended courier to ensure they have the proper identification credentials to access the

LRA.

Temporary visitor passes must be picked up by the approved visitor from the Naval Station Pass and ID Office located at the following address prior to visiting NAVFAC Atlantic LRA. Please note that this address is different from the address to which proposals must be delivered:

Address: Naval Station Pass and ID Office

9040 Hampton Blvd Norfolk, VA 23505 Telephone Number: 757-322-2975 Hours of Operation: 0600-1700 Monday through Friday

7. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors:

Factor 1 – Corporate Experience Factor 2 – Safety Factor 3 – Past Performance on Recent, Relevant Projects

The distinction between experience and past performance is that experience pertains to the volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work described under the definition of recent, relevant projects, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. The relative order of importance of the non-price evaluation factors is the technical factors (Factor 1 Corporate Experience and Factor 2 Safety) are of equal importance to each other and, when combined are equal in importance to the past performance (performance confidence assessment factor). When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance (performance confidence assessment) factor combined (i.e., the non-price evaluation factors) are approximately equal to price. Factor 2, Safety will only be rated Acceptable or Unacceptable. If an offeror is rated Unacceptable in any factor, they will not be eligible for award, unless the deficiency(ies) is/are remedied through discussions (if held).

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

(a) Non-price Factors:

Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit one original, marked “Original”, five (5) copies marked “copy”, each in a separate three-ring or four-ring binder, and two (2) electronic copies on separate CDs, with the following characteristics:

• Text pages 8 ½ x 11 format (A4 paper is also acceptable)

• 12-point font, Times New Roman

• Two complete electronic copies of the technical proposal factors as a single .pdf searchable file, each on a separate CD (include the “Original” technical submission). If there are any conflicts between hard and/or electronic copies, the “Original” hard copy will govern.

• Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact, Title, phone number, and email address.

Factor 1 Corporate Experience:

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

Submit a minimum of (2) and maximum of five (5) relevant construction projects that best demonstrate the offeror’s experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as vertical construction projects which renovated Multi-Unit Housing, apartment buildings or office buildings with at least fifty (50) residential units (across all buildings) in each project with a value equal to or exceeding $5,000,000 (or the equivalent foreign currency, on day of project award).

To be considered, projects submitted for the Offeror must have been completed within the past ten (10) years from the date of issuance of this request for proposal (RFP). To ensure a project is considered “complete”, the documentation should demonstrate final delivery to the client.

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or standalone contract. For multiple construction award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment B) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information to demonstrate construction experience. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages) 8-1/2” X 11” page size. DUNS numbers for the entity that performed the project shall be noted for the construction projects.

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (e.g.: unique features, area, construction methods). The offeror must provide the construction cost of the example project in U.S. dollars (on day of project award). Failure to do so may result in a project being found non-relevant.

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV)/ Union Temporal de Empresas (UTE), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the JV/UTE entity. If the JV/UTE does not have experience, at least one (1) project should be submitted for the JV/UTE members. Projects may be submitted for any JV/UTE partner; however, offerors who fail to submit experience for each JV/UTE partner may be considered less favorably. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

JV/UTE offerors shall provide with their proposal a notarized legal document that establishes the JV/UTE.

If an Offeror utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate the manner in which the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract for the experience information of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies to be considered. The proposal shall state specific commitments of technical resources (e.g. personnel, equipment) that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies will commit to the performance of this contract. In particular, the proposal will clearly state the specific commitments of resources of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member that will be located at the worksites and company offices in the city/area of the project. The proposal shall also describe specific roles of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies in terms of the work it will either self-perform or manage on behalf of the Offeror in performance of the contract.

The Offeror may utilize experience of a subcontractor that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement to demonstrate construction experience under this evaluation factor. The Offeror must provide a signed letter of commitment from the subcontractor and an explanation of the meaningful involvement that the subcontractor will have in performance of this contract. Substitution of subcontractor(s) shall be avoided to the maximum extent possible, and any proposed substitutions shall have verifiable, equivalent experience to the subcontractor being replaced. More weight may be given to the Offeror’s projects than those submitted for subcontractors.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review five (5) projects for construction. If more than the maximum number of projects is submitted, the Government will evaluate projects in numerical order of submission up to the maximum number and will not evaluate projects beyond the maximum number specified in the submission requirements.

The Offeror may be considered more favorably if:

1. Relevant projects demonstrate construction experience with Multi-Unit Housing or apartments.

2. Relevant projects demonstrate construction experience in the geographic area of Rota, Spain where project is located.

3. Relevant projects demonstrate construction experience performed for the U.S. Government.

4. Relevant projects demonstrate construction experience performed as a prime contractor versus a subcontractor.

5. Relevant projects demonstrate experience performed by the offeror than those performed by subcontractors, affiliates or parent companies.

Factor 2, Safety:

(a) Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information: (For a partnership, joint venture or union temporal de empresas, the following shall address each contractor who is part of the partnership, joint venture or union temporal de empresas; only one safety narrative is required.)

(1) Technical Approach for Safety:

Describe the offeror’s technical approach to safety for its employees as well as the plan that the offeror will implement to evaluate and measure safety performance of potential subcontractors, as part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. Also, describe any innovative methods that the Offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at all subcontractor levels. The Safety Narrative shall be limited to three pages, 8 ½” x 11” page size (i.e.., one (1) double-sided page plus one (1) single-sided page; or three (3) single-sided).

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s plan to select and monitor subcontractors, and any innovative safety methods that the Offeror plans to implement for this procurement. The Government’s sources of information for evaluating safety may include, but are not limited to, Government agencies, OSHA, NAVFAC’s Facility Accident and Incident Reporting (FAIR) and Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS) databases, and other related resources. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete safety information regarding these submittal requirements rests with the Offeror.

The evaluation will collectively consider the Offeror’s technical approach to safety and other sources of information available to the Government. The Government will also evaluate the narrative to determine whether subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project.

This Safety Factor will be rated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis.

Factor 3. Past Performance:

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

If a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 2 for Corporate Experience. If there is not a completed CPARS evaluation, then submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment C) for each project included in Factor 1, Corporate Experience. The Offeror should provide completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) in the proposal. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Heather Seibold, via email at heather.a.seibold@navy.mil .

Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 2, Corporate Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues.

Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

This evaluation will consider how well the Offeror’s team performed on relevant projects submitted under Factor 1, Corporate Experience and may also consider past performance on other relevant projects currently documented in known sources.

The Government will consider the recency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the Offeror’s team’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s team’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

In the case of an offeror for which there is no information on past contract performance or where past contract performance information is not available or so sparse that no meaningful assessment can be performed, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past contract performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv).) In this case, the Offeror’s past performance is unknown and assigned a performance confidence rating of “Neutral Confidence.” Although the Government may not rate an offeror that lacks recent, relevant past performance favorably or unfavorably with regard to past performance, the Government may determine that a “Substantial Confidence” or “Satisfactory Confidence” past performance rating is worth more than a “Neutral Confidence” past performance rating in a best value tradeoff as long as the determination is consistent.

(b) Price:

Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Offeror shall submit one (1) marked “Original,” one (1) copy, each in a separate three-ring or four-ring binder, and one (1) electronic copy (CD format) of the solicitation submittal requirements identified below:

-SF-1442, signed -Amendments (SF30s) Acknowledged -Completed Schedule B, Pricing Form -Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact and their phone and email address.

-Required Contractor Responsibility Determination documentation -Certificate of Classification

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO BE SUBMITTED WITH PRICE PROPOSAL PACKAGE:

RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION INFORMATION - In order to be eligible for award, the offeror must be determined responsible in accordance with FAR Part 9, specifically 9.104-1, General Standards. No purchase or award shall be made unless the Contracting Officer makes an affirmative determination of responsibility. To be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must have adequate financial resources to perform the contract, or the ability to obtain them. The Contracting Officer shall require acceptable evidence of the prospective contractor’s current sound financial status, as well as the ability to obtain required resources if the need arises. In regard to resources, the contractor must be prepared to present acceptable evidence of subcontracts, commitments or explicit arrangements that will be in existence at the time of contract award, to rent, purchase or otherwise acquire the needed facilities, equipment, services, materials, other resources or personnel. Consideration of a prime contractor’s compliance with limitations on subcontracting shall be taken into account for the time period covered by the contract base period or quantities, plus option periods or quantities, if such options are considered when evaluating offers for award. Pursuant to FAR 9.104-4, the Contracting Officer reserves the right to request adequate evidence of responsibility on the part of any prospective subcontractor(s). In the absence of information clearly indicating that the prospective contractor is responsible, the Contracting Officer shall make a determination of non-responsibility.

As a minimum requirement, all offerors are requested to submit (in the English language) as part of the price proposal submissions, the following:

1. One (1) Signed Bank Reference demonstrating adequate financial resources. If offeror’s firm has a line of credit – provide information on how many figures offeror can borrow against the line of credit (i.e. medium 6 figures – exact line of credit is not required).

2. The offeror shall provide the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for the prime contractor, certified by an independent accounting firm, if practicable, or signed by an authorized officer of the organization. Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital, which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract. For JV/UTE arrangements, submit the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for each company in the JV/UTE and discuss the financial responsibilities among the companies. The Government may also utilize Dun & Bradstreet reports to evaluate the financial capacity of the offeror.

3. Point of contact from a bank or any financial institution with which the offeror transacts business.

Although required to be submitted with offeror’s price proposal, this information will not be evaluated as part of the price proposal. This information forms the basis of your firm’s responsibility determination should your firm be considered for award. Proposal packages from unsuccessful offerors will not be returned to the offeror, but shall be destroyed by the Contracting Officer. No certificate of destruction will be issued.

Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate price based on the total price. Total price consists of the basic requirements and all option items. The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.

8. PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE

Submittal Time: The offeror whose offer is accepted shall, within ten (10) days after award, furnish either (1) a Performance Guarantee and a notarized Performance Guarantee Letter conforming to the requirements below, or (2) Performance and Payment bonds conforming to the requirements below. If the offeror fails to provide either (1) a Performance Guarantee and a notarized Performance Guarantee Letter or (2) Performance and Payment Bonds within ten (10) days, the contract may be terminated for default. In such event, the offeror shall be liable for any cost of procuring the work which exceeds the amount of its offer and the bid guarantee shall be available toward offsetting such difference.

Form of Performance Guarantee: The Performance Guarantee shall be an amount equal to ten percent (10%) of the amount of the contract and shall be deposited into a banking institution, as acceptable to the contracting officer, which will then issue an irrevocable letter guaranteeing (the “Performance Guarantee Letter”) the payment of the amount deposited to the United States Government, upon demand by the Contracting Officer.