0003_SF30.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

F-16 Mission Training Center, Aviano Air Base, Aviano, Italy

Please see continuation page.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 5

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 28-Mar-2014

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N62470-14-R-3003

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

05-Mar-2014

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

28-Mar-2014

CODE

COMMANDER NAVFAC ATLANTIC

6506 HAMPTON BLVD

NORFOLK VA 23508-1278

N62470 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N62470-14-R-3003

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0003

Amendment 0003 is being issued to provide the following:

‐ Extend the proposal deadline to 2:00 pm (EDT), Friday, 11 April 2014 ‐ Instructions for Hand Deliveries of Proposals ‐ Attachment: Visitor Access Pass Request form ‐ Attachment: Site Visit Attendance Roster ‐ Attachment: Site Visit Presentation ‐ Revise SOA Certification Requirements, Section 00100, B. ELIGIBILITY FOR AWARD, 1. SOCIETĄ

ORGANISMI DI ATTESTAZIONE (SOA) CERTIFICATION (Page 5 of the Solicitation) ‐ Responses to PPIS 13-14

In Section 00100, Item C. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS, the second paragraph has been changed

FROM:

All submittals shall be received prior to 2:00 pm (EDT), Monday, 7 April 2014.

LATE SUBMITTALS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED. Proposal must be clearly marked on the outside of the package with the solicitation number. ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE

ACCEPTED.

TO THE FOLLOWING:

All submittals shall be received prior to 2:00 pm (EDT), Friday, 11 April 2014.

LATE SUBMITTALS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED. Proposal must be clearly marked on the outside of the package with the solicitation number. ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE

ACCEPTED.

HAND DELIVERIES OF PROPOSALS:

All visitors to the Lafayette River Annex (LRA) who do not have a CAC badge or RAPIDGATE badge must have a background check run by the Naval Station Pass & ID office (located on Hampton Blvd) and pick-up up their temporary visitor pass at that location before they can access the LRA.

Visitors who do not have a CAC or RAPIDGATE badge must complete the attached Visitor Access Pass Request form. Visitors must complete and forward the form to the following personnel in the NAVFAC Atlantic Security Department via email:

1. Iris Gholston (757) 322-8116 / Email: iris.gholston@navy.mil

2. Steven K. Anderson (757) 322-8115 / Email: steven.k.anderson@navy.mil

Visitors must complete and provide the attached form to the NAVFAC Atlantic Security Department at least 3-5 days prior to their scheduled meeting date to allow ample time to process and complete the background check.

Commercial couriers, such as FEDEX, DHL or UPS follow different procedures and may not be required to submit the above information. Offerors should check with their intended courier to ensure they have access to navy bases.

Section 00100, B. ELIGIBILITY FOR AWARD, 1. SOCIETĄ ORGANISMI DI ATTESTAZIONE (SOA) CERTIFICATION (Page 5 of the Solicitation) has been revised FROM

1. SOCIETĄ ORGANISMI DI ATTESTAZIONE (SOA) CERTIFICATION.

The following SOA Certifications are required by the Offeror:

The Prevailing Work Category: OG-1 Classification OS-4 60%

Additional Work Category: OG-11 Classification OS-3 40%

Companies that are QUALIFIED in the Prevailing Work Category and pertinent Classification, but NOT QUALIFIED also in the Minor Work Category and pertinent Classification, can still bid against the subject solicitation, by forming a Joint-Venture or subcontracting for the execution of the work pertaining to the OG1and OG11 Categories (or alternatives) for which they are not qualified. Offerors must declare their intention of forming the Joint-Venture or awarding a subcontract. A "Teaming Agreement" or "Letter of Commitment" with the subcontractor must be submitted with the proposal and must identify the qualifications of the subcontractor (attaching the pertinent SOA certificate) and what work they will perform (identifying type and percentage of the work covered by specific SOA certificate).

In the case of a JV, at least one member of the JV must have the required SOA Certifications. The JV member who has the SOA Certification must perform the majority of the work pertinent to the certification. In the case of a JV, certification submitted by a subcontractor will not be accepted.

As required by DPR 554, art 75 and DPR 412 /2000 the Contracting Officer shall require the apparent successful bidder/offeror to submit additional documentation, upon Contracting Offivcer’s demand, for evaluation of firm's technical and financial qualifications to execute the work.

Debarment from Award:

As required by article 75 of DPR 554 and DPR 412/2000, Contractors cannot bid if they have a history of, or there is an existing question relative to:

- Bankruptcy

- Pending Charges

- Final Penal Judgment for moral and/or professional misconduct

- Breach of use of unauthorized subcontractors, i.e. anti-trust laws

- Breach of safety / security or labor regulations

- Serious malpractice or negligence

- Tax payments violations

- False or fraudulent representations in prior solicitations

A Contractor must submit extract from criminal record or affidavits released by the local court of contractor’s residence.

The Contracting Officer shall review a contractor’s certifications for compliance. Firms who obtained SOA certification are listed in the SOA website. Not submitting the additional documentation is treated as a responsiveness issue. The Contracting Officer shall ensure that the contract provisions stipulate that the contract may be terminated for default if it is discovered after award that the contractor failed to meet the certification requirements of D.P.R. n. 34, or art 75 of DPR 554, and DPR 412/2000.

TO THE FOLLOWING:

1. SOCIETĄ ORGANISMI DI ATTESTAZIONE (SOA) CERTIFICATION.

The following SOA Certifications are required by the Offeror:

The Prevailing Work Category: OG-1, Classification V 60%

Additional Work Category: OG-11 Classification IV 40%

Companies that are QUALIFIED in the Prevailing Work Category and pertinent Classification, but NOT QUALIFIED also in the Minor Work Category and pertinent Classification, can still bid against the subject solicitation, by forming a Joint-Venture or subcontracting for the execution of the work pertaining to the OG1and OG11 Categories (or alternatives) for which they are not qualified. Offerors must declare their intention of forming the Joint-Venture or awarding a subcontract. A "Teaming Agreement" or "Letter of Commitment" with the subcontractor must be submitted with the proposal and must identify the qualifications of the subcontractor (attaching the pertinent SOA certificate) and what work they will perform (identifying type and percentage of the work covered by specific SOA certificate).

In the case of a JV, at least one member of the JV must have the required SOA Certifications. The JV member who has the SOA Certification must perform the majority of the work pertinent to the certification. In the case of a JV, certification submitted by a subcontractor will not be accepted.

As required by DPR 554, art 75 and DPR 412 /2000 the Contracting Officer shall require the apparent successful bidder/offeror to submit additional documentation, upon Contracting Officer’s demand, for evaluation of firm's technical and financial qualifications to execute the work.

Debarment from Award:

As required by article 75 of DPR 554 and DPR 412/2000, Contractors cannot bid if they have a history of, or there is an existing question relative to:

- Bankruptcy

- Pending Charges

- Final Penal Judgment for moral and/or professional misconduct

- Breach of use of unauthorized subcontractors, i.e. anti-trust laws

- Breach of safety / security or labor regulations

- Serious malpractice or negligence

- Tax payments violations

- False or fraudulent representations in prior solicitations

A Contractor must submit extract from criminal record or affidavits released by the local court of contractor’s residence.

The Contracting Officer shall review a contractor’s certifications for compliance. Firms who obtained SOA certification are listed in the SOA website. Not submitting the additional documentation is treated as a responsiveness issue. The Contracting Officer shall ensure that the contract provisions stipulate that the contract may be terminated for default if it is discovered after award that the contractor failed to meet the certification requirements of D.P.R. n. 34, or art 75 of DPR 554, and DPR 412/2000.

Responses to PPIS 13-14

13. QUESTION: The solicitaiton requires the following certifications: "OG 1 Classification OS04" and

"OG11 Classification OS03" There seems to be an error in these requirements since the Italian certification system works differently and this wording is not applicable. This system is composed of, in fact, "General Works" represented with the acronym OG (with categories 1 to 13 and "Specialized Works" represented with the acronym OS (categories 1 to 35). Each of these categories, General or Specialized, OG and OS, have a classification from 1 to 8 according to the magnitude of the works. Therefore OS-4 and OS-3 cannot be classifications of OG-1 and OG-11 as they seem to be right now. Moreover in reading the RFP and its attachments we could not find any reference to works pertaining to specialized categories, OS-3 or OS-4 (which are special kitchens, special lavatories, particular transport belts and similiar.) We believe the correct requirements should be OG-1 Classification 4 - 60% (and not OS-4) and OG-11 classification 3- 40% ( and not OS-3) which corresponds to the works in the RFP. Can you please confirm?

RESPONSE: Please see Amendment 0003 for the revised SOA information.

14. QUESTION: As you can read in the attachment, OS-03 refers to special industrial kitchen installations and

OS-4 refers to special mechanical conveyors (normally in packaging or bottling factories). None of these are linked with the subject project. OG1 and OG11 are relevant.

Probably there was a clerical mistake and the requirement should have read:

The Prevailing Work Category: OG-1 Classification 4 60% Additional Work Category: OG-11 Classification 3 40%

RESPONSE: Please see Amendment 0003 for the revised SOA information.

(End of Summary of Changes)