N6134020R0020_Amendment01.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is as follow s:

1.) Update the FINAL solicitation release date from 12 June 2020 to the actual release date of 22 June 2020; 2.) Update Attachment 1, Statement of Work in Section J; 3.) Upload Attachment L4,FRCSE PSS Question/Comment Form mention in Section L; 4.) Update references to Section B.4 clauses, ORDERING ESTIMATING RATES in Sections L and M; and 5.) Note that the follow ing f iles w ere uploaded in beta.sam.gov in error: "ATTACHMENT L3 - COST OR PRICE SUMMARY SPREADSHEET_02072020.xls"; "ATTACHMENT L2.docx"; and

"FRCSE PSS Synopsis.docx"

All attachments specif ied in Section J are re-uploaded. The proposal due date remains unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 27

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 25-Jun-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6134020R0020

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

22-Jun-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

25-Jun-2020

CODE

NAWCTSD 253

CODE 2.5.3.4.1

12211 SCIENCE DRIVE

ORLANDO FL 32826-3224

N61340 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6134020R0020

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The solicitation issue date has changed from 12-Jun-2020 to 22-Jun-2020.

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

The Table of Contents has changed from:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Exhibit B CDRL_B003 MONTHLY

MANHOUR REPORT

06-JUN-2019

Exhibit B CDRL_B001

CONTRACTOR ORG

CHART

06-JUN-2019

Exhibit B CDRL_B002 QUALITY

CONTROL PLAN

06-JUN-2019

Attachment 1 ATT. 1- STATEMENT

OF WORK

30-JAN-2020

Attachment 2 ATT. 2 - WD - Florida

(2015-4540 Rev.-11)

23-DEC-2019

Attachment 3 ATT 3 - WD - North

Carolina, Virginia (2015-

4342 Rev.-

23-DEC-2019

Attachment 4 ATT. 4 -

SURVEILLANCE

ACTIVITY CHECKLIST

06-JUN-2019

Attachment 5 ATT. 5 - DIT Acceptance or Rejection

06-JUN-2019

to:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Exhibit B CDRL_B003 MONTHLY

MANHOUR REPORT

06-JUN-2019

Exhibit B CDRL_B001

CONTRACTOR ORG

CHART

06-JUN-2019

Exhibit B CDRL_B002 QUALITY

CONTROL PLAN

06-JUN-2019

Attachment 1 ATT. 1- STATEMENT

OF WORK

26-MAY-2020

Attachment 2 ATT. 2 - WD - Florida

(2015-4540 Rev.-11)

23-DEC-2019

Attachment 3 ATT 3 - WD - North

Carolina, Virginia (2015-

4342 Rev.-

23-DEC-2019

Attachment 4 ATT. 4 -

SURVEILLANCE

ACTIVITY CHECKLIST

06-JUN-2019

Attachment 5 ATT. 5 - DIT Acceptance or Rejection

06-JUN-2019

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

SECTION L

PART A: GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

1.0 GENERAL

1.1 Section L contains instructions on how to prepare and submit proposals in response to this solicitation. Nonconformance with these instructions may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation and elimination from consideration. This solicitation incorporates by reference FAR provision 52.215-1, “Instructions to Offerors – Competitive.”

1.2 It is the offeror’s responsibility to submit a proposal that enables government evaluators to effectively evaluate and substantiate the validity of any assertions set forth in the offeror’s proposal. Assume the government has no prior knowledge of an offeror’s facilities and experience.

1.3 Alternate proposals are not acceptable. In addition, taking exception or deviating from any term or condition of the RFP may make an offer unacceptable, and the proposal unawardable, unless the RFP expressly authorizes such an exception or deviation with regard to that specific term or condition.

1.4 There is no need to repeat information in the same volume or in more than one volume. If an overlap exists, the detailed information should be included in the most logical place and summarized and referenced in other areas.

2.0 PROPOSAL FORMAT

All written proposals must be formatted using a Times New Roman 12-point normal font, no reduction permitted, single-spaced, one-inch margins all around, and formatted for standard 8.5 x 11 inch paper. All pages shall be numbered with section and page numbers. Drawings may be provided separately and may be any size, with font of any size, but should be folded to approximately 8.5 x 11 inch standard size and will count as one page. Graphs shall be presented in no smaller than a 10-point font.

3.0 PROPOSAL VOLUMES

3.1 All proposals must be UNCLASSIFIED.

3.2 Page limitations for each volume are specified in the table below.

Volume

Number

Volume Title Page Limit Electronic Copies Required

1 PAST PERFORMANCE As needed 1 Electronic Proposal Submission

2 ADMINISTRATIVE AND

COST/PRICE

As needed 1 Electronic Proposal Submission

4.0 SOLICITATION QUESTIONS

Questions regarding this solicitation shall be submitted in writing with the use of Attachment L-4, FRCSE

PSS Question/Comment Form. Each question or comment shall reference the applicable document, page number, and paragraph number. Do not include any proprietary information in your question, because the government will provide the question and answer to all potential offerors. All questions must be submitted for the solicitation no later than 5:00pm ten calendar days after the RFP release date specified in Block 5 of

Standard Form 33 of the RFP, to Carley.Galloway@navy.mil and Michael.Davis15@navy.mil. The government is under no obligation to try to answer questions received after that date, but may answer the question if time permits.

5.0 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION

5.1 Method of delivery shall be through the use of https://safe.apps.mil coordinated with the point of contact listed below. Proposals shall be submitted using the address provided below. The initial

Proposal shall not be submitted by facsimile or electronically via email.

(Electronic Copies)

Email: carley.galloway@navy.mil and michael.davis15@navy.mil

Note: SAFE restricts the maximum file submission at 8 GB. Firefox, Chrome and Edge are recommended. Internet Explorer is not recommended. Please note that Internet Explorer limits uploads to 2GB. In the Comments box put the following information: Offeror name, Solicitation number, POC, Backup POC. When files are encrypted for submission, send an email with the

“passphrase” to the PCO and the Contract Specialist as listed on the https://beta.sam.gov website.

A. Creating a Drop-off

For “outside or unauthenticated users”

In order for an outside user to create a drop-off, they must receive a drop-off request from the

PCO or the CS. If interested in submitting a response to the Solicitation, the Offeror must contact the PCO and CS to notify them no later than 10 working days in advance of the proposal submission date. When the PCO or the CS generates a drop-off request for you, you will receive an email with a link to submit your drop-off. This link is good for a one-time submission; ensure that the submission is sent to both the PCO and the CS.

B. For “CAC Authenticated users”

Create a “drop-off” with the PCO and the CS as the recipients.

Offerors are hereby notified that the Government will not reimburse for any costs incurred for solicitation preparation.

Late Proposals: Offerors are advised that the time identified on Block 9 of the Standard Form (SF)

33 applies. Delivery is defined as having occurred based on the DoD Safe’s email notification time stamp to the CS. If multiple drop offs occur, any drop off after the time identified on Block 9 of the SF 33 is considered Late. Offerors are strongly encouraged to deliver as early as possible to avoid any risk of late submission.

5.2 Hand Carried Proposals: Due to COVID-19, hand-carried proposals will not be accepted.

5.3 Late Proposals: See FAR provision 52.215-1, in addition to late proposal language above regarding SAFE.

5.4 Restriction on Disclosure and Use of Data: See FAR provision 52.215-1.

PART B: SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS

1.0 VOLUME 1 - PAST PERFORMANCE

The following is a list of the Section L Past Performance Attachments that the offeror shall utilize to provide past performance information as required for this Volume:

Attachment L-1 Contractor Performance Assessment Questionnaire (CPAQ) also sometimes referred to as Past

Performance Questionnaires, or PPQ’s

Attachment L-2 Table PP-1 Past Performance Information Form (PPIF)

1.1 Past Performance Contracts for Offeror

a. This solicitation also is utilizing a separate Corporate Experience Validation process that is not part of the Past Performance Factor. The offeror shall identify one of its past performance contracts to be utilized in the Corporate Experience Validation process described at Section M, Part B, 1.1.

b. The offeror shall submit up to, but no more than, three (3) total past performance contracts. This includes up to three (3) of the prime offeror’s most relevant government or commercial past performance contracts, and up to three (3) of the most relevant government or commercial past performance contracts for a principal team member, but in combined total, no more than three (3).

As set forth in Section M of this solicitation, the government will evaluate the Relevancy and

Demonstrated Past Performance of the past performance contracts to arrive at a Performance

Confidence Assessment for the offeror. Keep in mind that, in general, in assigning a Performance

Confidence Assessment Rating and/or in the source selection authority’s tradeoff decision, past performance of the prime offeror, or lack thereof, will be considered more significant than that of a principal team member.

c. A “principal team member” for purposes of the past performance evaluation Factor is defined as a subcontractor, joint venture owner (joint venturer), partnership owner (partner), corporate parent, division, subsidiary, affiliate or vendor that is proposed to provide at least 30% of the proposed total price/cost (excluding the offeror’s profit/fee) for the contract.

d. An offeror will not receive past performance credit for a proposed principal team member unless the offeror’s proposal demonstrates how the resources of that principal team member – its workforce, management, facilities or other resources – will in fact be provided to perform at least

30% of the proposed total price for the contract, excluding the prime offeror’s profit. Merely stating that the offeror has access to the resources of a principal team member is insufficient.

e. The government is not evaluating past performance of any entity other than the prime contractor entity identified in Block 15 of Standard Form 33 of the RFP and principal team members. Thus, the CAGE code, DUNS number, or corporate name and address of a prime offeror or principal team member must match the CAGE code, DUNS number, or corporate name and address on the cover page of the prime offeror’s or principal team member’s past performance contract or subcontract proposed for past performance evaluation.

f. Past performance contracts where supplies and services were sold or transferred between corporate divisions, subsidiaries, or affiliates of a contractor will not be considered unless the interorganizational transfer is identified in the form of a written agreement between the corporate divisions, subsidiaries, or affiliates — such as a subcontract, purchase agreement, job order, or similar type of written agreement — with the prime or principal team member’s CAGE code, DUNS number, or corporate name and address on the cover page of the written agreement. Any ambiguity will be resolved against the offeror or principal team member.

g. The government will not consider past performance contracts performed by an individual joint venturer or partner unless the joint venturer or partner meets the definition of “principal team member.”

h. The government will consider the past performance of an offeror or principal team member performed as a joint venture owner of another joint venture, but the joint venture agreement must contain within it the offeror’s or principal team member’s CAGE code, DUNS number, or corporate name and address, and the joint venture agreement must describe the effort and dollar amount performed by that offeror or principal team member under the joint venture agreement.

Any ambiguity will be resolved against the offeror or principal team member.

i. Any submitted past performance contract must contain Production Support Service performance within three (3) years of the RFP release date specified in Block 5 of Standard Form 33 of the

RFP. Any past performance contract that has Production Support Services performance within three (3) years of the RFP release date specified in Block 5 of Standard Form 33 of the RFP will be considered in its entirety, but only the Production Support Services portions. Keep in mind that, in general, in assigning a Performance Confidence Assessment Rating and/or in the source selection authority’s tradeoff decision, within an offeror’s past performance record, more recent past performance is generally considered more significant than past performance that is less recent, and a past performance record that is of longer duration may generally be considered more relevant than records with performance of shorter duration.

j. Forward a copy of the Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment L-1) attached to this RFP to the past performance contract customer’s Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), Administrative

Contracting Officer (ACO), Program Manager and/or Point of Contact ─ with a copy to the

Contract Specialist ─ for the following past performance contracts only:

• Past performance contracts that do not have CPARS Reports, and

• Past performance contracts with CPARS Reports completed by the Assessing Official more than six months prior to the RFP’s release date.

All questionnaires shall be forwarded within 14 calendar days release date specified in Block 5 of

Standard Form 33 of the RFP, with a copy forwarded to Carley.Galloway@navy.mil and

Michael.Davis15@navy.mil. The offeror shall include instructions for its customers to send completed questionnaires within two weeks of the customer’s receipt of the questionnaire to

Carley.Galloway@navy.mil and Michael.Davis15@navy.mil. The government will not evaluate an offeror’s submitted Past Performance Questionnaires that do not meet the criteria set forth in this instruction.

k. The offeror should provide written consent from its principal team members that will allow the government to coordinate any of those entities’ past performance issues with the offeror. If the offeror does not submit such written consent, then the government will address any past performance issues directly with the principal team member, and the offeror will forfeit the opportunity to participate in any related discussions. Consequently, for any principal team members that do not provide such written consent, provide a point of contact name, address, phone number, fax number, and email address with whom the government may coordinate past performance issues.

l. To enable the government to perform a comparison of the past performance contract’s product or service similarities to the instant solicitation’s work for each past performance contract, offerors shall provide one copy of the past performance contract without any attachments other than the

Statement of Work, the Performance Work Statement, and/or the Specification. As set forth below, offerors are required to cite specific pinpointed page numbers and paragraphs in those documents so the government may perform a comparison of the past performance contract’s product or service similarities to the instant solicitation’s work.

NAWCTSD is not responsible or accountable for the clarity of an offeror’s past performance contract. Information necessary to substantiate the relevancy of a past performance contract must be clear through a plain reading of the past performance contract, and its Statement of Work, the Performance Work Statement, and/or the

Specification, without further explanation.

For past performance contracts where the offeror or principal team member performed in a role other than the prime, the principal team member shall provide one copy of the

Statement of Work, Performance Work Statement, and/or Specification for both their subcontractor and the Prime contractor.

m. The offeror has the burden of providing thorough and complete past performance information.

The government has no duty to search for additional data to cure problems the government finds in the information provided by the offeror.

n. Regardless of relevancy, the offeror shall provide a list of Show Cause Notices, Cure Notices, and

Terminations for Default received on any contract, task order, or delivery order within the past 2 years of the RFP release date.

1.2. Past Performance Contract Information

a. Provide the information identified below in a Microsoft (MS) Word Table for each past performance contract identified:

Prime (P), Principal Team Member (PTM) P1 P2 P3 PTM1 PTM2 PTM3

1 Contractor’s Name

Contractor’s Role in the Past Performance Contract, and

Contractor’s Proposed Role in the Instant Contract

3 Contract Title

4 Contract Number

Contract Type: Firm-fixed-price, cost-reimbursable-fixed-fee, etc.

6 Procuring Agency

Brief Description of Product or Service (this would typically be the Scope paragraph of the past performance contract’s SOW or PWS)

Relevant CLINs from Past Performance Contract under which Production Support Services were Performed

9 Period of Performance

Dollar Value of Contract (Only Production Support

Services)

Dollar Value of Effort Performed by the Contractor (Only

Production Support Services)

12 Place of Performance1

13 CAGE Code and DUNS Number2

14 Do CPARS exist? Yes or No3

15 If CPARS exist, state the number of CPARS that exist

16 If CPARS exist, state the completion dates

Agree to Allow Coordination with Prime Offeror? Yes or

No.

18 The Number of Questionnaires the Contractor Sent

Point of Contact’s Name, Phone Number, Fax Number, and Email Address

Did Production Support Service Performance Take Place

Within Required three Year Period? Yes or No

1 Place of Performance should be the location of the government or contractor’s facility where the predominance of the work was performed.

2 The CAGE Code and DUNS Number shall be the same as the company proposed to perform the solicitation.

3 As part of its Past Performance Volume, the offeror shall provide printed CPARS that are referenced in the table.

b. Task or delivery orders awarded under Multiple-Award Contracts (MACs) will be considered standalone “contracts” for purposes of past performance evaluation. Thus, offerors may not propose an entire MAC as a past performance contract.

c. For a single-award indefinite delivery past performance contract, offerors may propose the entire basic contract as a past performance contract, or may propose a specific task or delivery order as the past performance contract. If an offeror proposes an entire single-award indefinite delivery contract as a past performance contract, however, the offeror must provide the past performance information for each task or delivery order issued, and those task and delivery orders (in the aggregate), not the indefinite delivery contract, will be used for the past performance contract’s

Relevancy assessment.

1.3 Relevancy Information of the Past Performance Contracts

a. To evaluate relevancy, the government will evaluate Scope and Magnitude of the past performance contract, as set forth in the table further below.

b. To assess the relevancy of the past performance contracts to the instant solicitation, the government does not want to receive, and the government will not consider, any document submitted by the offeror regarding past performance other than the past performance contract itself. For a federal government past performance contract, that means Sections A thru J. The government does not want to receive, and the government will not consider, any attachment of the past performance contract other than the contract’s Statement of Work, the Performance Work Statement, and/or the Specification. Unless otherwise allowed in these instructions, the government will not consider a document referenced within a Statement of Work, the Performance Work

Statement, and/or the Specification.

c. The government does not want to receive, and the government will not consider, an offeror’s explanation or description of the alleged past performance effort or what the offeror allegedly performed under a past performance contract. Government evaluators will compare the specific, pinpointed past performance contract’s costs/prices, terms, conditions, and Statement of Work, the Performance Work Statement, and/or the Specification pages and paragraphs that the offeror cites in the table further below to assess similarity to the Scope and Magnitude the government provides below for the instant solicitation.

d. It will be considered a noncompliant proposal when the offeror submits a past performance proposal that repeatedly fails to provide specific, pinpointed pages and paragraphs in the past performance Statement of

Work, Performance Work Statement, and/or the Specification, or fails to submit the past performance contract and its Statement of Work, the Performance Work Statement, and/or the Specification. As a result, the government may not perform an evaluation of that proposal and, instead, the government may reject that offeror’s proposal as noncompliant. Rejection of an offeror’s proposal as noncompliant will not be part of a competitive range determination. After rejecting an offeror’s proposal as noncompliant, the government may or may not decide to make a competitive range determination in accordance with FAR section 15.306.

Regardless of what the government decides to do, the offeror will not be eligible to be part of a competitive range determination if the government performs one.

e. For a principal team member, the government will compare the Scope and Magnitude of that principal team member’s past performance contract to the Scope and Magnitude of the effort the principal team member is proposed to perform for the instant solicitation.

f. For the Scope and Magnitude relevancy assessment items below, the offeror is required to cite specific, pinpointed page numbers, terms, conditions, CLINS, and Statement of Work, the Performance Work

Statement, and/or the Specification page numbers and paragraphs found in the offeror’s past performance contract that the offeror believes is relevant to the instant solicitation. Citing an entire section within a

Statement of Work, the Performance Work Statement, and/or the Specification is unacceptable, and it will not be evaluated.

g. Provide the information identified below in a Microsoft (MS) Word Table for each past performance contract identified:

Prime (P), Principal Team Member (PTM) P1 P2 P3 PTM1 PTM2 PTM 3

SCOPE

Role: Cite to the specific, pinpointed, page numbers, terms, conditions, and/or CLINS of the past performance contract that reveal the role of the contractor in the performance of the past performance contract.

Contract Type: Cite to the specific, pinpointed, page numbers, terms, conditions, and/or CLINS of the past performance contract that state the contract type of the past performance contract.

Contract Attributes: Cite to the specific, pinpointed page numbers, terms, conditions and/or CLINS of the past performance contract that show whether it is a Service Contract Act (SCA) applicable contract in an ISO 9001 environment.

Relevant Contract Line Item Numbers: Cite to the specific, pinpointed page numbers and CLINS of the past performance contract that show the product delivered or the service provided that is relevant to the instant solicitation.

Period of Performance: Cite to the specific, pinpointed page numbers, terms, conditions, and/or CLINS of the past performance contract that show the period of performance of the past performance

Location and Division: Cite to the specific, pinpointed page numbers, terms, conditions, and/or CLINS of the past performance contract that show the location and division of the company that performed the past performance contract.

SOW 3.1.1.a: Cite to the specific, pinpointed page numbers and paragraphs from the past performance contract and/or past performance contract’s SOW/PWS/SPEC that are most relevant to SOW paragraph

3.1.1.a Production Control of the instant solicitation.

SOW 3.1.1.b: Cite to the specific, pinpointed page numbers and paragraphs from the past performance contract and/or past performance contract’s SOW/PWS/SPEC that are most relevant to SOW paragraph

3.1.1.b Inventory Management of the instant solicitation.

Number of Sites: Cite to the specific, pinpointed page numbers and paragraphs from the past performance contract and/or past performance contract’s SOW/PWS/SPEC that show the number of sites supported under the past performance contract. There are multiple sites supported in the instant solicitation. FRCSE Jax, FRCSE Detachment Oceana, FRCMA Voyage Repair Team (VRT), Consolidated Automated

Support System (CASS) Portable Electronic Maintenance Aide

(PEMA), PMA 260, and Airborne Expendable Counter Measures

(AECM), PMA-272 – SOW 3.1.2.

MAGNITUDE

Total Dollar Amount: State the total dollar amount of the work performed up to the RFP’s release date where Production Support

Services were performed. Be sure to cite the specific page numbers and paragraphs from the past performance contract documentation that support that total dollar amount.

Next, take that total dollar amount and divide it by the number of months performed to arrive at an average monthly dollar amount. As set forth for Magnitude in Section M, the government intends to compare an offeror’s average monthly dollar amount to the average monthly dollar amount estimated for the instant solicitation.

Total Price or Cost of Relevant Contract Line Item Numbers:

Cite to the specific, pinpointed page numbers terms, conditions, and/or

CLINS of the past performance contract that show the total price or cost of the relevant contract line item numbers. This estimate is exclusively

Production Support Services. Should an offeror submit a contract that encompasses more than Production Support Services, only the Contract

Line Item Numbers that encompass Production Support Services will be considered in the Magnitude assessment.

h. Remember: Offerors are required to provide one copy of the past performance contract, without any attachments other than the contract’s Statement of Work, Performance Work Statement, and/or Specification.

i. Questions Regarding Relevancy and Demonstrated Past Performance are Not Discussions: It is possible that offerors may receive questions regarding the Relevancy and/or Demonstrated Past Performance of the offeror’s proposed past performance and corporate experience contracts. All offerors will be treated similarly if the government submits these questions to offerors Even if the information is needed by the government to determine the acceptability of an offeror’s past performance or corporate experience contract for evaluation purposes, those questions and answers are not “discussions” as that term is used at FAR subpart 15.3. Thus, it is possible that the government will ask questions of offerors regarding past performance and corporate experience, input that information into the government’s initial evaluation results, and be able to determine the successful offeror on initial proposals, without making a competitive range determination. If the government believes discussions are in the best interest of the government, NAWCTSD will make a competitive range determination and conduct meaningful discussions with all offerors in the competitive range.

1.4 Demonstrated Performance Information of the Past Performance Contracts

a. For each past performance contract, the offeror shall provide available CPARS and, where permitted under

Section L, Past Performance Questionnaires that address the following demonstrated past performance areas:

Quality of Product or Service. The offeror’s or principal team member’s past performance in the delivery of quality supplies and services, which includes meeting technical requirements.

Schedule. The offeror’s or principal team member’s past performance in meeting schedule requirements, to include on-time or late deliveries, modifications of original schedules.

Cost Control. The offeror’s or principal team member’s past performance in controlling contract costs, to include the cost of performance, cost overruns, and cost underruns.

Program Management and Subcontract Management. The offeror’s or principal team member’s past performance in managing the contracted effort, to include program management, subcontract management, and cooperation with the customer.

b. The government will use CPARS and Past Performance Questionnaires, where permitted under Section L, to document demonstrated past performance. The government does not want to receive, and will not use for evaluation, an offeror’s self-described assertions of demonstrated past performance. For the CPARS and

Past Performance Questionnaires provided, however, explain the reasons for any past performance problems, including schedule slips, and cost or price increases from time of award. Also, describe any claims or requests for equitable adjustment.

c. For any past performance problem identified in the CPARS or Past Performance Questionnaires, describe the status of the problem. If the problem was resolved, describe the resolution used to correct the past performance problem and, if applicable, how the offeror proposes to use that resolution for this solicitation’s effort.

2.0 VOLUME 2 – COST/PRICE and ADMINISTRATIVE

The following is a list of the Section L Cost Attachments that the offeror shall utilize to provide cost information as required for this Volume:

Attachment L-3 FRCSE PSS Cost or Price Summary

2.1 Cost/Price and Administrative Ground Rules and Assumptions

a. For the Cost/Price volume, the offeror is the entity identified in block 15A of the SF33. Costed Team

Member means all other entities proposed to provide any element of cost (i.e., any labor, regardless of the amount). As this relates to Past Performance, a Principal Team Member is always a Costed Team Member, but a Costed Team Member is not necessarily a Principal Team Member.

b. Unless otherwise stated, a Costed Team Member shall provide the same information, and follow the same instructions, required for the offeror.

c. As this is a competitive acquisition with adequate price competition anticipated, certified cost or pricing data in accordance with FAR 15.403-1 is not required. However, in the event that adequate price competition does not exist after receipt of proposals, the Government reserves the right to request additional cost or pricing data as necessary from the offeror and Costed Team Members. Further, the offeror may be required to provide a Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data prior to award, pursuant to

FAR 15.406-2. (See Section L clause 252.215-7008.)

d. Within all Excel spreadsheets, the offeror shall use formulas and functions to the maximum extent possible and avoid using output type “value only” cells. If links are utilized, supply those referenced files.

Spreadsheets shall not be protected.

e. The offeror shall provide sufficient information to support its cost/price as well as an explanation of all ground rules and assumptions that affect the cost/price estimates.

f. The offeror shall guarantee the length of proposal validity (for at least 180 days after proposal submission).

Note: Block 12 of the SF33 must state at least 180 days.

g. A Costed Team Member submitting its cost/price volume independently of the offeror shall comply with the proposal submission instructions, including timeliness instructions.

h. This solicitation is, and the resulting contract will be, subject to the Service Contract Act of 1965, as amended, and to FAR clause 52.222-41, contained in Section I of this solicitation.

i. The services acquired through this solicitation do not require meaningful numbers of professional employees. Therefore, Compensation for Professional Employees will not be evaluated.

j. For proposal purposes, offerors shall assume full performance (not mobilization) will begin on January 1, 2021.

k. The Government estimate is 1,766,529 hours for the entire work effort, inclusive of options. See Section B, Level of Effort clause for a breakdown of the labor hours per labor category. For evaluation purposes, the offeror shall propose to the labor categories/hours as outlined below:

(a) Mobilization: Offerors shall propose a separate Firm Fixed Price (FFP) for the

Mobilization effort (CLIN 0008) based on their own approach for Mobilization. Offerors shall complete the Mobilization cell in Attachment L-3 FRCSE PSS Cost or Price Summary, based on the dollar value associated with their own approach to meet the Mobilization requirements. The quantity of direct labor hours and categories proposed for FFP CLIN 0008 (Mobilization) are at the discretion of the offeror and are not included in Attachment L-3 FRCSE PSS Cost or Price

Summary. The proposed amount for Mobilization CLIN (0008) must be at least $100. CLIN 0008 total will be used as the contract minimum quantity.

(b) For CLINS 0001-0006, and 1001-1006 the estimated labor hours and categories to be used for evaluation purposes are duplicated in Attachment L-3 FRCSE PSS Cost or Price

Summary. The government’s estimate is based on historical actuals and FRC Southeast’s estimate of business in the future. The offeror’s proposed labor hours for CLINs 0001-0006, and 1001-

1006 shall not deviate from the estimated number of labor hours the government has provided for each labor category in Attachment L-3 FRCSE PSS Cost or Price Summary of the solicitation.

(c) Detailed instructions for Attachment L-3 FRCSE PSS Cost or Price Summary can be found on the “Instructions” tab of the attachment.

(d) CLINs 0007 and 1007 are Not-Separately-Priced (NSP). Any costs for CLINs 0007 and

1007 are reflected in the corresponding labor CLINs (0001-0006, and 1001-1006).

2.2 Cost/Price and Administrative Content Checklist

a. This Volume shall contain the following information:

i. OFFEROR ONLY- Signed SF33 for basic solicitation and acknowledgment of each amendment (or the signed SF33 plus the completed and signed SF30(s) for all amendments), including completion of any RFP clause or provision that requires a fill-in or response.

ii. OFFEROR ONLY- FAR 52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting (DEVIATION 2020-O0008) and

Offeror Summary Table completed (See Section L, Part B, 2.4).

iii. OFFEROR ONLY- Signed Representations, Certifications, and Acknowledgements and/or System for Award Management (SAM); completed copies of all certifications listed in Section K (to include confirmation that the offeror has completed the annual representations and certifications electronically via the SAM website, paragraph 2(i) of DFARS 252.204-7007 Alt A).

iv. OFFEROR AND COSTED TEAM MEMBERS- Guarantee the length of proposal validity (for at least 180 days after proposal submission). Note: Block 12 of the SF33 must state at least 180 days.

v. OFFEROR AND COSTED TEAM MEMBERS- Assumptions, Conditions, Exceptions, Deviations or

Waivers: Assumptions, conditions, exceptions, deviations, and requests for waivers may cause proposals to be considered deficient and, thus, not awardable. If there are no assumptions, conditions, exceptions, deviations or waivers, the offeror shall provide a statement stating that the proposal contains no assumptions, conditions, exceptions, deviations or waivers. If the offeror proposes an assumption, condition, exception, deviation, or waiver to a term or condition of the solicitation, the offeror shall provide a detailed description for each assumption, condition, exception, deviation, or request for waiver, as applicable. The offeror shall identify the portion of the solicitation and the offeror’s proposal that are affected.

vi. OFFEROR ONLY- Completed copy of Section B, except B.54- Ordering Estimating Rates, of the solicitation, to include Total Cost/Price. B.54 will be completed by the government with the information provided in Attachment L-3.

vii. OFFEROR AND COSTED TEAM MEMBERS- Completed copy of Attachment L-3, FRC Southeast

PSS Cost or Price Summary.

viii. OFFEROR AND COSTED TEAM MEMBERS- Applicable Forward Pricing Rate Agreement

(FPRA), Forward Pricing Rate Recommendation (FPRR), DCMA or DCAA Reviewed Billing Rate, and/or any other information necessary to substantiate the rates proposed. These submission requirements include substantiating documentation; do not just submit the rates. This documentation must, in total, support all proposed indirect rates through December 2023. The offeror shall fully explain, in detail, the methodology in how these rates were utilized in the development of the offeror’s cost/price proposal. Forward Pricing Rate Proposals (FPRP) and proposed provisional billing rates do not meet the instructions of the solicitation, because they have not been reviewed by an independent entity; as a result, they shall not be proposed. .

ix. OFFEROR AND COSTED TEAM MEMBERS-Three years of actuals incurred for indirect rates, to include a rate description, cost elements (pool and base), and the calculations utilizing the cost elements (pool and base) used to derive the rate. The offeror shall fully explain, in detail, how these actual rates compare to the proposed estimated rates and the basis for changes from the historical/actual incurred costs and current proposed rates.

Additionally, for each of the past performance contracts submitted for the Past Performance Factor, the offeror shall provide a detailed explanation of the actual or current indirect rates of those contracts, and fully explain the similarities and differences between those indirect rates and the estimated indirect rates proposed for this solicitation.

x. OFFEROR AND COSTED TEAM MEMBERS - Provide a detailed explanation of what consideration was given to any proposed direct and indirect rate(s) that differ from the preceding year’s rate by +/-5%, or a change in trend (up or down) from previous years, in relationship to this difference. A +/-5% difference would be, for example, 19% or less, or 21% or greater, after a year where the rate was 20%.

xi. OFFEROR AND COSTED TEAM MEMBERS- The base to which each indirect rate is applied.

xii. OFFEROR AND COSTED TEAM MEMBERS- A statement and explanation as to whether the same or different indirect rates are applied to straight time and overtime direct rates.

xiii. OFFEROR AND COSTED TEAM MEMBERS - Explanation of Direct Labor rate application. For

Service Contract Act (SCA) labor categories, the offeror shall explain how its rates are in compliance with the applicable Department of Labor (DoL) Wage Determination, and how the proposed rates are realistic. For any labor categories that are non-SCA, the offeror shall fully explain the basis for the proposed rate(s), and how the rates are realistic.

xiv. OFFEROR AND COSTED TEAM MEMBERS - All offerors including costed team members shall provide evidence from the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA), other federal civilian audit agency, or a private accounting firm that, as of the proposal due date, the offeror’s accounting system has been audited and has been determined adequate and suitable for administration of a cost-reimbursable contract. Offerors that submit evidence from a private accounting firm must submit

Standard Form1408, completed and signed by the private accounting firm that performed the audit.

The government will not evaluate an offeror’s or costed team member’s proposal if evidence is not received from both the offeror and costed team member to confirm accounting system has been audited and has been determined adequate and suitable for administration of a cost-reimbursable contract. An offeror’s proposal that fails to provide the above requested evidence of an acceptable accounting system will be determined unawardable, will be removed from the competitive range if discussions are held, will not form the basis for award, and will not be referred to the Small Business Administration for a Certificate of Competency determination.

xv. OFFEROR AND PRINCIPLE TEAM MEMBER - Provide a copy of the Joint Venture agreement, if applicable.

xvi. OFFEROR AND PRINCIPLE TEAM MEMBERS - Written consent from its PTMs that will allow the Government to coordinate any past performance issues directly with the Offeror.

2.3 Cost/Price Proposal Instructions

The completed copy of Section B with the Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) Net Amounts (i.e., the FFP amounts, Estimated Cost, Fixed Fee, and Total Estimated Cost + Fee) filled in using the estimated quantities in Section B, Attachment L-3 FRCSE PSS Cost or Price Summary, and the instructions below.

a. In accordance with FAR 15.404-1(d), cost realism will be conducted to determine the probable cost of performance for each offeror. For this solicitation, the probable cost of performance will be calculated through the application of the government prescribed level-of-effort (LOE), the offeror’s direct labor rates, and the offeror’s indirect rates.

i. Government prescribed LOE is provided in Section B of the solicitation and totals

1,766,529 hours. No deviation from the government prescribed LOE is permitted.

ii. Direct Labor Rates shall be proposed for each labor category, and shall be in compliance with the current hourly rate set forth in the Department of Labor (DoL) Wage

Determination (WD), as applicable. See attachments 2 and 3 of the solicitation. If a labor category is not covered by the DoL WD, then the basis / analysis for the rate shall be explained and supporting documentation (e.g., salary data report) submitted, and shall include actual payroll verification, if applicable.

Proposed Escalation on labor. Offerors shall apply a 2.2% escalation rate for all

SCA and non-SCA labor category rates. (Note: Attachment L-3 FRCSE PSS

Cost or Price Summary already includes the 2.2% calculation.)

Offeror's labor classifications should cross-reference to Department of Labor

(DoL) wage determination classifications as much as possible.

iii. Offeror’s indirect rates shall be applied to the appropriate base in accordance with the offeror’s accounting methodology. For Years 4, 5 and 6, the offeror shall apply the same indirect rates that are in effect during the final month of Year 3. If Year 3 indirect rates are a weighted or composite type rate, the offer shall propose the actual rate that would have been in effect during December 2023, not the weighted or composite type rate for

Year 3.

b. Offerors shall submit their fully completed cost/price build-up utilizing Attachment L-3 FRCSE PSS Cost or Price Summary. The offeror shall use the CLIN Summary tab to breakout total proposed costs by CLIN.

c. Except for FFP type of CLINs (e.g., CPFF, CPIF, or CPAF) under the solicitation, the offeror shall fully disclose the buildup of cost/price of each CLIN.

d. When completing the Attachment L-3 FRCSE PSS Cost or Price Summary, the offeror shall not utilize any fully burdened hourly rates when pricing the labor of its employees.

2.4 FAR 52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting (DEVIATION 2020-O0008)

This requirement is being set aside for the Small Business Program. The table provided below will detail the information necessary to demonstrate how the offeror’s proposal complies with FAR 52.219-14 Limitations on

Subcontracting (DEVIATION 2020-O0008). This table shall be consistent with the information provided in

L.B.1.2.a above, as applicable. The offeror shall complete the below table, to include all Costed Team Members which will be involved with the performance of the contract, and list all sites where the work will be performed. If an agreement (e.g., JV agreement, subcontracting arrangement) is proposed, identify the work share, distribution elements, and ratios that each Costed Team Member will perform using the table below. Also, provide a definition of the legal entities if it is other than a Prime/ subcontractor relationship.

Agreement to Limitations on Subcontracting (per 13 CFR §125.6) is an element of responsibility. The information below, to the extent it satisfies the requirements of FAR 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting (DEVIATION

2020-O0008), constitutes the offerors agreement that it will comply with the Limitations on Subcontracting.

Cost of contract incurred for services includes direct labor cost, overhead that has only direct labor as its base, and the small business’s General and Administrative (G&A) rate multiplied by the labor cost.

2.5 Government Furnished Information

2.6 Incumbent Information

The incumbent contractor is:

Prolog, Inc.

1253 Jensen Dr. Suite 100

Virginia Beach, VA 23451-5887

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

SECTION M

SECTION M – EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

PART A: GENERAL INFORMATION

1.0 Basis for Award

1.1 The government intends to select one offeror on the basis of its proposal providing the best value to the government, all factors considered. "Best value" means the expected outcome of an acquisition that, in the government's estimation, provides the greatest overall benefit in response to the requirement.

1.2 The government may, but is not required to, enter into discussions based upon what is in the best interest of the government. What this means is that the Government is not required to award on initial proposals, even

Offeror Introduction Table

Contractor

Name

Place of

Performance

CAGE

CODE/

DUNS #

Brief Work

Description and/or

Program

Responsibility

% of the Cost of Contract

Performance

Incurred for

Services though an awardable proposal may exist. Therefore, the offeror’s initial proposal should contain the offeror’s best terms. All proposals shall comply with the terms, conditions, and requirements set forth in the solicitation. Failure to address each of the areas identified in Section L may make the offeror’s proposal ineligible for award.

1.3 The government does not evaluate every requirement of the solicitation under Section M of the RFP. The awarded contractor, however, is required to comply with all requirements of the awarded contract.

1.4 Although the government may waive informalities and minor irregularities in proposals received, the failure to comply with terms and conditions of the solicitation may adversely impact the offeror’s evaluation results, and could result in the offeror being removed from consideration for award.

2.0 Offeror Responsibility to Submit an Unambiguous, Convincing Proposal

2.1 It is the offeror’s responsibility to draft a logical, unambiguous proposal that contains all pertinent information in sufficient detail so that government evaluators are able to meaningfully evaluate the offeror’s past performance, corporate experience, and price.

2.2 Proposal statements that the offeror will provide a particular feature or objective without explaining how the feature or objective will be met are generally inadequate and may adversely impact the government’s evaluation of the offeror.

3.0 Evaluation Factors for Award

3.1 The government will evaluate proposals of offerors with acceptable Corporate Experience using the following two Factors:

PAST PERFORMANCE

COST/PRICE

3.2 Past Performance is significantly more important than Cost/Price.

3.3 Because Past Performance qualities are significantly more important than the amount of the cost/price, the…