Attachment

ATTACHMENT (10) PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE

TRAINING DATA PRODUCTS CONTRACT(TDPC)

Questionnaire Instructions: The form is designed to be e-mailed to the Customer and completed using Microsoft Word 2007.

PART A - The offeror shall complete PART A only. After completing Part A the offeror shall forward one copy to each PCO, Program Manager and Technical Lead for each relevant project, WHICH DOES NOT HAVE A CPARS SUBMISSION, to be considered for the TDPC Past Performance Volume 3. In all cases where the offeror performed as a subcontractor on the effort the form shall be submitted to the prime contractor’s Program Manager (PM) in addition to the Government representatives previously mentioned.

PART B - The respondent(s) (Contracting Officer, Program Manager and Technical Lead (Prime’s PM if applicable)) will each complete PART B of the form received. The respondent(s) may elect to complete long hand and return by fax if needed. After completing PART B the respondent shall deliver the form to NAWCTSD.

Form Delivery Method - The respondent(s) will return the completed Past Performance Questionnaire directly to Mr.Thomas Courtney and Mr. Rafael Soberal at Thomas.courtney@navy.mil and Rafael.soberal@navy.mil. Mr. Soberal can be reached by phone at 407-380-4077 or by fax at 407-380- 8406.

PART A RELEVANT CONTRACT INFORMATION

Contractor’s Name and Project Title :

Contract Number (Include the Prime’s Contract Number if offeror performed as sub-contractor under this contract :

Type of Contract:

% Complete:

Award Fee:

% Award Fee Received:

Government Agency Name:

Contracting Officer Name, Phone and E-Mail:

PM Name, Phone and Email:

Technical Lead Name, Phone and E-Mail :

Please provide a short description of the subject contract.

PART B PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS

SECTION 1: TECHNICAL AND QUALITY PERFORMANCE

1.1 Identify whether the contractor experienced technical and quality performance problems or strengths for any of the following:

PROBLEMS

|_| Personnel |_| Data Collection |_| Data Synthesis and Analysis

· |_| Design and Design Reviews

· |_| Technical / Progress Reviews

· |_| Quality of Data

· |_| Quality of Design

· |_| Production Problems of Issues

· |_| Installation and Test

· |_| Other

STRENGTHS

|_| Personnel |_| Data Collection |_| Data Synthesis and Analysis

· |_| Design and Design Reviews

· |_| Technical / Progress Reviews

· |_| Quality of Data

· |_| Quality of Design

· |_| Production Problems of Issues

· |_| Installation and Test |_| Other

1.2 Describe the technical performance problems or strengths that were experienced by the contractor?

1.3 Describe the cause of these technical problems or strengths?

1.4 To what extent have corrective actions been taken to correct problem(s) identified above and to what extent have the corrective actions been effective? Describe the progress made to date. Also explain to what extent the corrective actions addressed the root cause of the problem(s) and led to systemic improvement such that similar problems would not reoccur.

1.5 Overall, the contractor's technical performance is rated as?

|_| Exceptional - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

|_| Very Good - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

|_| Satisfactory - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

|_| Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

|_| Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

SECTION 2: SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE

2.1 What kinds of delivery/schedule problems or strengths were experienced by the contractor?

PROBLEMS

|_| Deliverables |_| Design Reviews |_| Progress Reviews

· |_| Data Collection Conferences/Meetings

· |_| Production Scheduling

· |_| Installation and Test

· |_| Other

STRENGTHS

|_| Deliverables |_| Design Reviews |_| Progress Reviews

· |_| Data Collection Conferences/Meetings

· |_| Production Scheduling

· |_| Installation and Test

· |_| Other

2.2 What was the cause of these delivery/schedule problems or strengths?

2.3 To what extent have corrective actions been taken to correct problem(s) identified above and to what extent have the corrective actions been effective? Describe the progress made to date. Also explain to what extent the corrective actions addressed the root cause of the problem(s) and led to systemic improvement such that similar problems would not reoccur.

2.4 Specifically as it relates to Training Data Products, detail whether the contractor experienced schedule performance problems or strengths.

2.5 Overall, the contractor's delivery/schedule performance is rated as?

|_| Exceptional - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

|_| Very Good - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

|_| Satisfactory - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

|_| Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

|_| Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

SECTION 3: COST PERFORMANCE

3.1 What kinds of Cost problems or strengths were experienced by the contractor?

PROBLEMS

· |_| Product Rework |_| Staffing |_| Software |_| Tools

· |_| Hardware

· |_| Travel

· |_| Facilities

STRENGTHS

· |_| Product Rework |_| Staffing |_| Software |_| Tools

· |_| Hardware

· |_| Travel |_| Facilities

3.2 If the contractor experienced an overrun please provide the percentage.

3.3 What was the cause of these Cost problems or strengths?

3.4 To what extent have corrective actions been taken to correct problem(s) identified above and to what extent have the corrective actions been effective? Describe the progress made to date. Also explain to what extent the corrective actions addressed the root cause of the problem(s) and led to systemic improvement such that similar problems would not reoccur.

3.5 Overall, the contractor's Cost performance is rated as?

|_| Exceptional - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

|_| Very Good - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

|_| Satisfactory - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

|_| Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

|_| Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

SECTION 4: MANAGEMENT

4.1 Management Responsiveness. What was the contractor’s record of timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals (especially responses to change orders, engineering change proposals, or other undefinitized contract actions), the contractor's history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, effective business relations, and customer satisfaction?

4.2 Subcontract Management. What was the contractor’s success with timely award and management of subcontracts, including whether the contractor met or exceeded small business, small disadvantaged business, small business HUBZone, veteran-owned small business, service disabled veteran owned small business, women-owned small business participation and subcontracting goals?

4.3 Program Management and Other Management. To what extent does the contractor discharge their responsibility for integration and coordination of all activity needed to execute the contract; identify and apply resources required to meet schedule requirements; assign responsibilities for tasks/actions required by contract; and communicate appropriate information to affected program elements in a timely manner?

4.4 What were the contractor’s risk management practices, especially the ability to identify risks and formulate and implement risk mitigation plans?

4.5 If applicable, identify and provide information on any other areas that are unique to the contract, or that cannot be captured elsewhere under the Management Assessment.

SECTION 5: ASSESSMENT OF OVERALL MANAGEMENT

5.1 Overall, the contractor's management performance is rated as?

|_| Exceptional - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

|_| Very Good - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

|_| Satisfactory - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

|_| Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

|_| Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

5.2 Is there any other information regarding this acquisition that you think would be helpful to our evaluation? If so please explain. Examples of additional information that could be helpful to our evaluation include information on (1) problems or strengths with regard to key personnel and (2) the kind of business relationship problems or strengths with regard to management of subcontracts, cooperation with business partners/customers, customer satisfaction, etc.

5.3 Given the choice and knowing what you know today, would you award a future contract for training systems to this contractor?

|_| definitely would not |_| probably would not |_| might |_| might not |_| probably would |_| definitely would

Attachment (10) 12 May 2011, Rev 3