N44255-14-R-9010_Amendment_0002.pdf

N44255-14-R-9010

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Amendment 0002 is issued to:

1) Respond to PPIs. See N44255-14-R-9010 PPI Log.

The proposal due date of 6 August 2014 remains unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 48

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 11-Jul-2014

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N44255-14-R-9010

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

24-Jun-2014

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

11-Jul-2014

CODE

NAVFAC NORTHWEST

1101 TAUTOG CIRCLE

SILVERDALE WA 98315-1101

N44255 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00010 - SOLICITATION CONTRACT FORM

The required performance has changed from INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) CONTRACT FOR CATEGORY III AND CATEGORY IV CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS IN THE

WEST SOUND REGION OF THE NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND (NAVFAC)

NORTHWEST AREA OF RESPONSIBLITY TO INCLUDE NAVAL BASE KITSAP (NBK) - BANGOR,

SILVERDALE, WA; NBK - BREMERTON, BREMERTON, WA; AND, TO A LESSER EXTENT, NAVAL

STATION (NAVSTA) EVERETT, EVERETT, WA; AND NAVAL AIR STATION (NAS) WHIDBEY ISLAND, WHIDBEY ISLAND, WA. Types of projects include, but are not limited to construction, repair, alteration, and maintenance services. Certified (stamped) design works is not a part of this acquisition.THIS PRE-

SOLICITATION NOTICE IS BEING ADVERTISED AS A 100% 8(A) SET ASIDE COMPETITIVE

PROCUREMENT. IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT COMPETITION WILL BE LIMITED TO 8(A) FIRMS

LOCATED WITHIN THE GEOGRAPHICAL AREA SERVICED BY THE SBA REGION X AND OTHER 8(A)

CONSTRUCTION FIRMS WITH A BONA FIDE PLACE OF BUSINESS WITHIN THE GEOGRAPHICAL

COMPETITIVE AREA, AND THE ASSIGNED NAICS CODE. ALL OTHER 8(A) BUSINESS

DEVELOPMENT (BD) PARTICIPANTS ARE DEEMED INELIGIBLE TO SUBMIT OFFERS.NACIS:

236220Maximum Dollar Value: $75,000,000Task Order Range: $2,000 to $1,000,000Minimum Guarantee:

$25,000Construction Contract: 14 Days for Payment (FAR 52.232-27) to INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE

QUANTITY (IDIQ) CONTRACT FOR CATEGORY III AND CATEGORY IV CONSTRUCTION

REQUIREMENTS IN THE WEST SOUND REGION OF THE NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING

COMMAND (NAVFAC) NORTHWEST AREA OF RESPONSIBLITY TO INCLUDE NAVAL BASE KITSAP

(NBK) - BANGOR, SILVERDALE, WA; NBK - BREMERTON, BREMERTON, WA; AND, TO A LESSER

EXTENT, NAVAL STATION (NAVSTA) EVERETT, EVERETT, WA; AND NAVAL AIR STATION (NAS)

WHIDBEY ISLAND, WHIDBEY ISLAND, WA. Types of projects include, but are not limited to construction, repair, alteration, and maintenance services. Certified (stamped) design works is not a part of this acquisition.THIS SOLICITATION IS BEING ADVERTISED AS A 100% 8(A) SET ASIDE COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENT. IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT COMPETITION WILL BE LIMITED TO 8(A) FIRMS LOCATED WITHIN

THE GEOGRAPHICAL AREA SERVICED BY THE SBA REGION X AND OTHER 8(A) CONSTRUCTION

FIRMS WITH A BONA FIDE PLACE OF BUSINESS WITHIN THE GEOGRAPHICAL COMPETITIVE AREA, AND THE ASSIGNED NAICS CODE. ALL OTHER 8(A) BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT (BD) PARTICIPANTS ARE DEEMED INELIGIBLE TO SUBMIT OFFERS.NACIS: 236220Maximum Dollar Value: $75,000,000Task Order Range: $2,000 to $1,000,000Minimum Guarantee: $25,000Construction Contract: 14 Days for Payment (FAR 52.232-27).

SECTION 00100 - BIDDING SCHEDULE/INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS

The following have been added by full text:

5252.228-9302 BID GUARANTEE (ALTERNATE I) (OCT 2004)

To assure the execution of the contract and the performance and payment bonds, each bidder/offeror shall submit with its bid/offer a guarantee bond (Standard Form 24) executed by a surety company holding a certificate of authority from the Secretary of the Treasury as an acceptable surety, or other security as provided in FAR Clause 52.228-1, "Bid Guarantee". Security shall be in a penal sum equal to at least 20 percent of the price payable for the contract guaranteed minimum under the bid submitted, but in no case to exceed $3,000,000. A copy of the agent’s authority to sign bonds for the surety company shall accompany the bid guarantee bond. (End of provision)

The following have been modified:

BASIS OF AWARD

BASIS FOR AWARD

1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the lowest priced, technically acceptable offer.

2. As stated in the solicitation, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

3. The LPTA process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition because the best value is expected to result from selection of a technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price. In order to permit efficient competition, the following methodology will be utilized. Proposals will initially be screened for price and placed in order of price (lowest price to highest price). The Government will then evaluate the technical factors of the three

(3) lowest priced proposals in accordance with the criteria for acceptability set forth in the solicitation. However, the Government, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to increase the number of proposals it will review under this methodology. If a proposal is found to be technically acceptable, the Government will make award to the offeror with the lowest price. If not, groups of three (3) proposals will continue to be evaluated in the order of lowest price to highest price until an offer is found to be technically acceptable. Accordingly, under this methodology, the technical factors and subfactors of some proposals may not be evaluated by the Navy. If discussions are deemed necessary by the Contracting Officer, all proposals will be evaluated (both technical and price) for the purpose of establishing a competitive range. At no time during the technical evaluation will the SSEB be made aware of the offerors’ pricing, nor their particular price ranking.

4. An overall non-price factors rating must be at least “ACCEPTABLE” in order to be eligible for award.

An “UNACCEPTABLE” rating in any factor results in the overall non-price factors proposal being rated “UNACCEPTABLE” unless corrected through discussions. An “UNACCEPTABLE” rating in any subfactor results in the factor being rated “UNACCEPTABLE” and the overall non-price factors being rated “UNACCEPTABLE” unless corrected through discussions. An overall non-price factors rating of “UNACCEPTABLE” makes a proposal ineligible for award. If an offeror receives an “UNACCEPTABLE” rating in any non-price factor, no additional proposal evaluation will be performed. Accordingly, under this methodology, some of the technical factors of some of the evaluated proposals may not be evaluated by the Navy.

B. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors and subfactors :

Price (Seed Project) Factor 1 – Management Approach Subfactor 1.A – Management Capabilities Subfactor 1.B – Management Plan Factor 2 – Experience Factor 3 – Past Performance Factor 4 – Safety

2. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

(a) Price:

For the purposes of establishing price for this solicitation, the offeror shall provide a proposed coefficient for each SLIN description on the Attachment B, Coefficient Table. Failure to offer a coefficient for each SLIN will result in an offeror being ineligible for award. The coefficients will become part of the contract upon award and will be effective for the base year and all options.

On Attachment B, offerors are to multiply the proposed coefficients by their associated Means Value Work (Estimate) multiplier to arrive at an Estimated Amount for each SLIN. The Estimated Amounts for each SLIN are to be added together to arrive at the Total Evaluated Price.

Coefficient – The coefficient includes any and all costs above and beyond RS Means bare costs with the exception of specialized costs unique to a given Task Order project (e.g. specialized training, USL&H insurance, specific environmental permit, etc.). Specialized costs may be negotiated with each Task Order

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The Offeror’s price proposal shall be separate from the technical proposal. Complete and submit the following:

(i) Cover letter in accordance with FAR 52.215-1(c)(2), including DUNS number

(ii) SF 1442, Solicitation, Offer, and Award Blocks 14 through 20c

(iii) Attachment B Coefficient Schedule

(iv) Letter from the Offeror’s surety. The letter should verify the Offeror has a minimum of

$1,000,000 bonding capacity per project and $8,000,000 aggregate.

(v) Bid Bond in the amount of 20% of the contract guaranteed minimum.

(vi) Ensure the Offeror’s Representations and Certifications, including the supplemental certifications included in Section 00600, are current and posted in SAM.

(vii) Signed copy of a joint venture agreement or mentor-protégé agreement if applicable.

(2) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the Total Evaluated Price of all SLINs found on Attachment B. Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.

Evaluation of the price proposal will determine the reasonableness, and completeness of the Offeror’s proposal.

Evaluation will determine the Offeror’s comprehension of the requirements of the RFP as well as to assess the degree to which the proposed price accurately reflects proposed performance.

The Bid Bond will be evaluated for accuracy and completeness in accordance with FAR 28.101.

The letter from the bonding company will be evaluated to assess the risk of the Offeror listed in Block 15A of the SF1442 being able to provide sufficient bonding for both individual and multiple task orders during the life of this contract.

Representations and Certifications will be reviewed in SAM to ensure they are complete.

(b) Technical Factors:

NOTE 1: If experience, past performance, or safety data is supplied for a firm whose CAGE code and DUNS number does not match the CAGE code and DUNS number for the offeror, the offeror MUST provide a DETAILED written explanation of how the experience, past performance, and /or safety data is relevant.

The explanation will be limited to a total of two pages and should be included under Factor 2, Experience.

This explanation may be required if the offeror is a newly formed subdivision of a parent company, is a new joint venture or other merger arrangement of several firms, or is a new firm formed by executives from other firm(s), and the offeror provides experience, past performance, and/or safety data from any of the parent/other office/partner/subdivision/originating firm(s) with a different CAGE code and DUNS number.

The offeror’s proposal MUST clearly demonstrate how the same policies, procedures, processes, management, and similar systems will be used in the newly formed offeror’s firm and delineate why there is an expectation that the same high quality of experience, past performance, and/or safety will be achieved by the offeror in performance of the requirements of this contract. The proposal must clearly show how experience from any entity other than the offeror is relevant to the offer’s ability to perform. The relevant considerations are whether the resources of the parent/other office/partner/subdivision/originating firm(s) will be provided or relied upon for contract performance such that the other firm(s) will have meaningful involvement in contract performance. Failure to provide an adequate connection and link between the offeror and the submitted experience, past performance and or safety information from a parent/other office/partner/subdivision/originating firm(s) could result in the finding of a deficiency, thereby making the offeror ineligible for award without discussions.

Note 2: While the Government may elect to consider data obtained from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate, and complete experience, past performance, management, technical, management, safety, and small business utilization information rests with the offeror.

Note 3: The non-price proposal shall be separate from the price proposal. See Section 00100 for additional instructions, format, and submission quantities required for the proposal.

Note 4: The page limitation for each factor/subfactor is provided in the submission requirements for each factor found later in this section. Page limitations will be strictly enforced. Any pages submitted in excess of the page limitations will not be reviewed and any data or material they contain will not be considered. Specific submission items which are excluded from the page count are listed in each factor later in this section.

Note 5: Projects submitted for Factor 2, Experience, shall be the same projects submitted for Factor 3, Past Performance.

Note 6: Failure to meet solicitation submittal requirements may result in an unacceptable rating.

Factor 1, Management Approach

(1) Subfactor 1.A – Management Capabilities

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information. Failure to provide the requested information may result in an unacceptable rating.

a. Provide a workforce management plan narrative that describes:

i. The interrelationship of the off-site management team and on-site management team(s).

ii. Identify key personnel who will perform the following functions: project management, quality control management, and safety management.

iii. The approach to sub-contractor relationships. Include any pre-established relationships with organizations qualified for work within the scope of this solicitation, quantifying number of projects that have been completed together and/or number of years of partnering.

iv. How you will ensure quality consistently across the team.

v. Quality control lines of authority between sub-contractors and prime.

vi. Quality control lines of authority between task order execution and contract management.

vii. Offerors shall demonstrate their experience in managing multiple projects (a minimum of five) simultaneously at different locations.

viii. Offeror’s approach for working in areas of limited access, limited lay down space, and working around activities common to heavily industrial environments with minimal disruption.

The workforce management plan narrative shall be limited to four (4) double-sided pages (or eight (8) single-sided pages).

Offerors failing to provide the workforce management plan narrative or failing to address required elements of the workforce management plan may receive an unacceptable rating.

Offerors failing to demonstrate a quality control system that adequately demonstrates a sustainable and fully functioning structure with sustainable and measurable results may receive an unacceptable rating.

Offerors failing to demonstrate the ability to manage multiple projects (a minimum of five) simultaneously at different locations may receive an unacceptable rating.

b. Provide an organizational chart and narrative that clearly shows management authority, supervision, span of control, and accountability. Include job descriptions, names, titles, qualifications, responsibilities.

The organizational chart shall be limited to one (1) single-sided page. The page size shall be no larger than 11 x 17.

The narrative shall be limited to one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

Offerors failing to provide an organizational chart or failing to show required elements of the organizational chart may receive an unacceptable rating.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate this factor based on the degree to which an offeror’s management capabilities meet the RFP requirements.

(2) Subfactor 1.B – Management Plan

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Provide a management plan narrative that describes:

a. Discuss how the offeror will provide labor, materials, equipment, subcontractors, and project management to multiple sites simultaneously at various geographically dispersed locations.

b. Discuss how the offeror will respond to proposed task orders that may have short notice site visits and/or response times for submitting proposals.

c. Discuss management familiarity and approach to joint scoping upcoming work with the Government, to include examples of any previous joint-scoping efforts if applicable.

d. Provide process for scheduling and discuss how offeror shall handle surges in work quantities.

The management plan narrative shall be limited to two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages).

Offerors failing to provide the management plan narrative or failing to address requirement elements of the workforce management plan may receive an unacceptable rating.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate the Subfactor based on the degree to which an offeror’s management plan meets the RFP requirements.

Factor 2 – Experience:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(i) Construction Experience:

Submit up to five (5) construction projects for the Offeror that best demonstrates your experience on relevant projects. Relevant projects are those that are similar in size, scope, and complexity. For purposes of this evaluation, similar in size, scope, and complexity is further defined as:

Size: Similar in size are projects between $2,000 to $1 million. One project shall be over $500,000.

Scope: Similar in scope are projects involving electrical, mechanical/HVAC, paving, roofing, vertical transportation equipment, dirt work, facility renovation, new construction, equipment repair and/or alteration, and construction-related activities.

One project shall be facility renovation or new construction.

One project shall include a majority of mechanical and/or electrical effort.

One project shall include a majority of roofing or paving effort.

At least one project must demonstrate and describe compliance with complex environmental regulations that were encountered during construction that may have been constraining and any actions that were taken by the Offeror to overcome such constraints.

Complexity: Similar in complexity is considered as managing projects with limited site access and lay-down area, compliance with complex environmental regulations, and work in an industrial environment.

Projects submitted for the Offeror shall be completed, or substantially complete, within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. The term “substantially complete” shall mean a construction project with construction of the facility/project more than 80% complete.

Offerors failing to provide relevant projects within the specified time frame demonstrating experience in the above may be rated unacceptable.

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project;

rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e.: unique features, area, construction methods).

Subcontractor experience will not be considered.

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV) or Mentor Protégé (MP), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture/Mentor Protégé entity. If the Joint Venture/Mentor Protégé does not have shared experience, projects shall be submitted for each Joint Venture/Mentor Protégé partner. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined. Joint Venture/Mentor Protégé offers must include at least two relevant projects for each partner. If the Joint Venture/Mentor Protégé includes more than two firms, the team's submission shall include at least one relevant project for each firm. Offeror may receive an unacceptable rating if the minimum number of projects for each firm is not submitted.

(2) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review five projects for construction. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for Construction Experience will not be considered.

Factor 3 – Past Performance:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

If a completed Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in factor 2 for construction experience. If there is not a completed CCASS evaluation then submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment C) for each project included in Factor 2. The Offeror should provide completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) in the proposal. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs.

However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Shannon Meland, shannon.meland@navy.mil.

Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 2 – Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues.

Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total. Offerors who receive a less than Satisfactory rating for any project submitted in Factor 2 shall submit this narrative. Offerors who have a less than Satisfactory rating for any project submitted in Factor 2 and who do not provide this narrative may receive an unacceptable rating.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Performance awards or additional information submitted will not be considered.

(2) Basis of Evaluation:

This evaluation focuses on how well the Offeror performed on the relevant projects submitted under Factor 2 – Experience and past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources. More emphasis will be placed on more relevant projects. In addition to the above, the Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government.

Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of Contractors who are part of a partnership or joint venture identified in the Offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror.

The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the Offeror’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

Offerors whose predominant (>50%) CCASS/CPARS and PPQ ratings are less than Satisfactory may be rated Unacceptable.

Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably in past performance and will receive an Acceptable.

Factor 4 – Safety

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The Offeror shall submit the following information: (For a partnership or joint venture, the following submittal requirements are required for each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. EMR and DART Rates shall not be submitted for subcontractors.)

(i) Experience Modification Rate (EMR):

For the three previous complete calendar years [2011, 2012, and 2013], submit your EMR (which compares your company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums over a three year period) using Attachment E Past Performance Worksheet for Safety. If you have no EMR, affirmatively state so, and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the EMR and upward or downward trends should be addressed as part of this element.

Offerors failing to identify extenuating circumstances, including corrective actions taken, that affected the EMR and upward or downward trends may receive an unacceptable rating.

(ii) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate:

For the three previous complete calendar years [2011, 2012, and 2013], submit your OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate, as defined by the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration using Attachment E Past Performance Worksheet for Safety. If you cannot submit an OSHA DART Rate, affirmatively state so, and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART Rate data and upward or downward trends should be addressed as part of this element.

Offerors failing to identify extenuating circumstances, including corrective actions taken, that affected the DART and upward or downward trends may receive an unacceptable rating.

(iii) Technical Approach for Safety:

Describe the plan that the Offeror will implement to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors, as a part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. Also, describe any innovative methods that the Offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at all subcontractor levels.

Page Limitation: The safety narrative shall be limited to two (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

Offerors with no technical approach may receive an unacceptable rating.

(2) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s overall safety record, the Offeror’s plan to select and monitor subcontractors, and any innovative safety methods that the Offeror plans to implement for this procurement. The Government’s sources of information for evaluating safety may include, but are not limited to, OSHA, NAVFAC’s Facility Accident and Incident Reporting (FAIR) database, and other related databases. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete safety information regarding these submittal requirements rests with the Offeror. The evaluation will collectively consider the following:

- Experience Modification Rate (EMR)

- OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate

- Offeror Technical Approach to Safety

- Other sources of information available to the Government

(i) Experience Modification Rate (EMR): The Government will evaluate the EMR to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward or downward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating.

(ii) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate: The Government will evaluate the OSHA DART Rate to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward or downward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rates.

(iii) Technical Approach to Safety: The Government will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project. The Government will also evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which innovations are being proposed that may enhance safety on this procurement.

The following have been deleted:

5252.228-9302 BID GUARANTEE (OCT 2004) OCT 2004

SECTION 00700 - CONTRACT CLAUSES

52.228-1 BID GUARANTEE (SEP 1996)

(a) Failure to furnish a bid guarantee in the proper form and amount, by the time set for opening of bids, may be cause for rejection of the bid.

(b) The bidder shall furnish a bid guarantee in the form of a firm commitment, e.g., bid bond supported by good and sufficient surety or sureties acceptable to the Government, postal money order, certified check, cashier's check, irrevocable letter of credit, or, under Treasury Department regulations, certain bonds or notes of the United States.

The Contracting Officer will return bid guarantees, other than bid bonds, (1) to unsuccessful bidders as soon as practicable after the opening of bids, and (2) to the successful bidder upon execution of contractual documents and bonds (including any necessary coinsurance or reinsurance agreements), as required by the bid as accepted.-

(c) The amount of the bid guarantee shall be 20% percent of the contract guaranteed minimum.-

(d) If the successful bidder, upon acceptance of its bid by the Government within the period specified for acceptance, fails to execute all contractual documents or furnish executed bond(s) within 10 days after receipt of the forms by the bidder, the Contracting Officer may terminate the contract for default.-

(e) In the event the contract is terminated for default, the bidder is liable for any cost of acquiring the work that exceeds the amount of its bid, and the bid guarantee is available to offset the difference.

(End of provision)

5252.228-9305 NOTICE OF BONDING REQUIREMENTS ALTERNATE I (DEC 2000)

(a) Within 15 days after receipt of award, the bidder/offeror to whom the award is made shall furnish the following bond(s) each with satisfactory security;

X A Performance Bond (Standard Form 25). The performance bond shall be in a penal sum equal to 100% of the the price payable for the contract guaranteed minimum for the basic indefinite quantity contract award or the task order price for each subsequent task order award.

X A Payment Bond (Standard Form 25A). The payment bond shall be in a penal sum equal to 100% of the the price payable for the contract guaranteed minimum for the basic indefinite quantity contract award or the task order price for each subsequent task order award.

(b) Any surety company holding a certificate of authority from the Secretary of Treasury as an acceptable Surety on Federal bonds will be accepted. Individual sureties will be permitted as prescribed in FAR 28.203 and FAC 5252.228-9300. Alternative types of security in lieu of furnishing sureties on performance and/or payment bonds will be permitted as prescribed in FAR 28.204, and will be held for at least one year after the completion of the contract. Additional bond security may be required as prescribed in FAR 52.228-2. Bonds shall be accompanied by a document authenticating the agents authority to sign bonds for the surety company.

(c) The contract time for purposes of fixing the completion date, default, and liquidated damages shall begin to run * days from the date of award, regardless of when performance and payment bonds or deposits in lieu of surety are executed.

* To be determined at Task Order level.

(End of clause)

SECTION 00800 - SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

SCOPE OF WORK

1 GENERAL INFORMATION

Except where otherwise stated, the Contractor shall furnish all labor, supervision, management, tools, materials, equipment, facilities, transportation, incidental engineering, and other items necessary to provide Category III and Category IV construction services under this fixed price job order contract. NAVFAC Northwest is a complex, multi-mission, echelon four command reporting to Commander, NAVFAC Atlantic, Norfolk, VA. NAVFAC Northwest has the following subordinate activities: Public Works Department Kitsap, Public Works Department Whidbey Island, and Public Works Department Everett. Work will be performed within the NAVFAC Northwest West Sound Region which covers: Naval Base Kitsap (NBK) – Bangor, Silverdale, WA; NBK – Bremerton, Bremerton, WA; Naval Station Everett (NAVSTA Everett), Everett, WA; and Naval Air Station Whidbey Island (NASWI), Whidbey Island, WA.

Major clients are Commander, Navy Region Northwest (CNRNW), Naval Base Kitsap, Puget Sound Naval Shipyard & Intermediate Maintenance Facilities (PSNS& IMF), Fleet and Industrial Supply Center (FISC), Naval Undersea Warfare Center Keyport (NUWC), Naval Magazine Indian Island, the Fuel Depot at Manchester, NASWI, NAVSTA Everett, Naval Radio Station at Jim Creek, as well as all the Navy Reserve facilities in Washington. The Navy hospitals in Washington are also supported.

Performance requirements and standards will be provided in individual Task Orders. The exact location of work will be indicated on individual Task Order request for proposals issued by the Government. Ninety-five percent of the work will occur at NBK – Bangor and NBK – Bremerton while the remaining five percent will occur at NAS Whidbey Island and NS Everett. The Contractor is required to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations.

1.1 Contract Type and Term

This is a multiple site/multiple administered regional, fixed-price, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contract, with a one year base plus four one-year option periods. The option periods may be exercised at the discretion of the Government. Delivery or performance shall be specified in individual Task Orders issued hereunder. Projects are expected to be within the minimum/maximum dollar range of $2,000 to $1,000,000.

Work ordered under this contract will not require the Contractor to provide design and/or engineering services, but will occasionally require incidental engineering and/or non-professional engineering design. Approximately twenty percent of the work is anticipated to require joint scope development by the Contractor and Government while the remaining eighty percent is anticipated to have Government provided design. The Contractor may be required to provide narratives, sketches, material catalog cuts and quantity take-off with each Task Order proposal to ensure common understanding. Pricing for each Task Order will be by Pre-Priced and Non-Pre-Priced methods.

In accordance with FAR 52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting (Dec 1996), the Contractor is required to perform at least fifteen percent of the cost of the contract, not including the cost of materials, with its own employees.

1.2 Basic Principles of the JOC

A major element of the JOC process is the use of applying a coefficient (multiplier) to proposal costs for specific Category III and Category IV construction and repair tasks. The coefficient must include not only the Contractor’s overhead and profit, but also all other costs associated with doing business that are not represented in the R.S.

MEANS bare costs or in Subcontractor’s proposals, with the exception of the City Cost Index and applicable sales/use tax, which is itemized separately.

For each project requiring joint scope development by the Contractor and Government, the Government and the Contractor follow these steps:

(1) Conduct a Joint Scope Meeting at the site to review and discuss the work and the construction schedule;

(2) Prepare a Detailed Scope of Work;

(3) Contractor prepares a price proposal in the format requested and submits a proposed construction schedule, list of Subcontractors and other documents required by the Task Order;

(4) Government reviews the proposal to ensure the right tasks and quantities were used;

(5) Government and Contractor negotiate price and schedule

(6) If Government is in agreement with price, schedule, Subcontractors, etc. it may issue a Task Order for the project.

For each project where the Government provides the design and/or technical information, the Contractor shall follow these steps:

(1) Receive a Request for Proposal (RFP);

(2) Conduct a site review to discuss the work and the construction schedule;

(3) Prepares a price proposal in the format requested and submit a proposed construction schedule, list of Subcontractors and other documents required by the Task Order;

(4) Government reviews the proposal to ensure the right tasks and quantities were used;

(5) Government and Contractor negotiate price and schedule

(6) If Government is in agreement with price, schedule, Subcontractors, etc. it may issue a Task Order for the project.

1.3 Construction Work Categories

Category III construction services are primarily composed of minor renovation or repair. Local environmental or usage permits are required; state or federal permits are not required unless specifically requested in the Task Order.

Building and/or site approvals are not required. There are no plans and specifications; work is developed from a scope of work supplemented by professional engineering staff as needed with sketches, catalog cuts, and/or narrative descriptions. Examples of typical Category III work include fire protection alarm relocation; pre-engineering buildings (>120 sf) with no utilities; installation of pre-fabricated carports; replacement of conveyors; non-structural demolition; overhead door repair/replacement (>100 sf); replacement of non-load bearing wall; exterior insulation finish system; HVAC package units (<5 tons, ground level); paving, asphalt overlay, large repair; sprinkler head, fire protection relocation/replacement (<21); roof replacement, structural repair in-kind; stairs, interior or exterior, single flight pre-engineering; utilities – connecting to existing with provider consultation; walls partition, no ingress/egress issues, no utilities; and window installation on non-load bearing walls.

Category IV construction services includes work without permits and is built from client requirements. There is no structural, electrical (primary distribution system), mechanical (HVAC), fire protection, intrusion detection, anti-terrorism force protection, or hazardous abatement. It may include replacement or repair of fixtures, hardware, and finishes. Examples of typical Category IV work include protective bollards (not on piers or for ATFP purposes);

pre-engineered buildings (<120 sf) with no utilities; parking lot bumpers; pre-engineered bus stop with no utilities;

floor cabinet installation; wall cabinets; cable TV receptacles; floor carpet replacement/installation; laminate countertop installation; solid surface countertop; under sink waste disposer installation; overhead garage door replacement (<100 sf); replacement of personnel doors (non-fire rated doors in non-fire rated walls); driveway asphalt repair or replacement; concrete driveway repair or replacement; dumpster enclosure; ceiling fan replacement; exhaust fan replacement; lighting fixture replacement; plumbing fixture replacement; ceramic floor tile; hardwood and vinyl floor; garage door electric openers; GFCI electrical receptacles; gutters and downspouts;

disabled ramps at curbs; handrail/guardrail replacement; replacing door hardware; replacing window hardware;

baseboard electric heater replacement; duct installation; pipe installation; wall installation (non-load bearing);

landscape sprinkler system; landscaping (<5,000 sf); installing wall mirrors; installing motion detectors; exterior painting (no lead paint removal); interior painting (no lead paint removal); concrete or synthetic parking bumpers;

parking lot striping; landscaping pavers; repair asphalt paving; repair concrete paving; built-up roof repair (no structural); fiberglass roof shingle repair by replacement (no structural); standing seam metal roof repair (no structural); light duty shelving; concrete sidewalk; exterior vinyl siding; architectural signage; clearing and grubbing site preparation (<1 acre); roof skylight; solar lighting; wood exterior stair replacement; roof ventilator replacement;

interior wall wainscot; ceramic tile wall; vinyl base wall; vinyl covering wall; film tint windows; window replacement (non-load bearing); storm windows.

2 MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION

2.1 Permits and Licenses

The Contractor shall obtain all required permits, licenses, and authorizations to perform work under this contract and comply with all the applicable Federal, state and local laws and regulations. Individual permit requirements will be identified in individual Task Orders.

2.2 Directives, Instructions and References

Applicable Department of Defense (DoD), Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV), Chief of Naval Operations (OPNAV), and other directives, instructions, and references may be provided in individual Task Orders. Additional requirements specific to the individual Task Order may incur a cost beyond the negotiated Coefficient. Such costs are to be presented in the proposal and considered in negotiations of the Task Order price.

2.3 Availability of Utilities

In accordance with FAR 52.245-1, Government Property, and NAVFAC clause 5252.236-9305, Government – Furnished Property, Materials and Services, the Government will furnish water and electricity at existing outlets required for the work to be performed under the contract at no cost to the Contractor. Information concerning the location of existing outlets may be secured from the Contracting Officer. The Contractor shall provide and maintain, at its expense, the necessary service lines from the existing Government outlets to the work site. Provide and maintain backflow prevention devices on connections to domestic water lines and electrical transformer provisions on connections to electric lines. Meet all Federal, State, local, and activity codes and regulations for backflow prevention devices and electrical transformer provisions. Services required by the Contractor, for which there are no available Government outlets, shall be provided by the Contractor at no cost to the Government.

2.4 Contractor Furnished Items

Except for items identified as Government Furnished, the Contractor shall provide all equipment, materials, parts, supplies, components, and facilities to perform the requirements of this contract. The Contracting Officer or designated Government representative may inspect Contractor-furnished items for adequacy and compliance with contract requirements. Inadequate or unsafe items shall be removed and replaced by the Contractor at no cost to the Government. Materials containing asbestos, lead, and PCBs shall not be brought on site. The Contracting Officer may at any time require Samples, Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) or Manufacturer’s Data Cut Sheets of Materials used in this contract.

2.5 Management

The Contractor shall manage the total work effort associated with the services required herein to meet the performance objectives and standards. Such management includes but is not limited to planning, scheduling, cost accounting, report preparation, establishing and maintaining records, and quality control. The Contractor shall provide a staff with the necessary management expertise to assure performance objectives and standards are met.

2.6 Personnel Requirements

2.6.1 Technical Personnel

The Contractor shall provide adequate technical expertise on staff sufficient to successfully complete joint scoping when requested by the contracting officer. The contractor shall not consult outside their organization, nor procure A&E services, unless approved by the contracting officer. Technical staff may hold other positions in the organization but shall be adequate to cover a wide array of experience, and expertise, as required by the breadth and complexity of projects scoped.

Approximately twenty percent of the work is anticipated to require joint scope development by the Contractor and Government while the remaining eighty percent is anticipated to have Government provided design.

2.6.2 Key Personnel

The Contractor shall confirm to the Contracting Officer the List of Key Personnel and their qualifications originally submitted as part of the proposal. The Contractor shall submit this confirmation within 15 calendar days of award of the contract. Submittal requirements of this deliverable are posted in Section 00800, 20. Deliverables. Any changes to key personnel shall be approved by the Contracting Officer. The Contractor will provide any additional information requested by the Contracting Officer to certify their qualifications.

The Contractor shall submit to the Contracting Officer a finalized Organizational Chart showing the lines of authority of the key personnel and on-site supervisor(s) for this contract. Submittal requirements for this deliverable are posted in Section 00800, 20. Deliverables. The chart shall include names of personnel and their position title in this contract. At a minimum, include the PM, QCM, SSHO, and on-site supervisor(s) and who they will report directly to for this contract. The key personnel shall be revised as applicable for the contract.

2.6.2.1 Project Manager (PM)

T…