Amend 0004.pdf

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 2

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 0004 08/31/2026

6. ISSUED BY Code N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6.) Code

NAVFACSYSCOM MID-ATLANTIC

PWD NORFOLK

FACILITIES ENGINEERING & ACQ DIV

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE

NORFOLK, VA 23511

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

N40085-26-R-0249

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

08/05/2026

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended is not extended. Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods: (a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning _1 _ copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (if required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14. ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATION CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103 (b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER: (specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

N4008526R0249, SP-364 Replace Underground Cabling in SP Area, NAVAL STATION NORFOLK, NORFOLK, VIRGINIA

SEE SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR (Same as Item 8)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070 30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV.1-83) 0224-3(10-90)

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE Prescribed by GSA

SECTION SF30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

AMENDMENT 0003

The purpose of this amendment is to:

1. Post the Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPIs) answers 1-13

PPI#

Date

Submitte d

Reference

Question Govt. Responses Page

Sectio n

Paragrap h

1 08/13/26

What is the existing conduit material within each of the existing duct banks? Please provide a response per duct bank and be specific.

Duct bank locations/material provided via Attachment L

2 08/13/26 03 30

3.13.3.3

Is concrete testing for the duct banks required or does this spec section only pertain to the ground surface concrete features of the work?

Specification applies to all concrete features of the work.

3 08/13/26 Dwg

CD-

The sidewalk area to the North of EMH SP-42C is severely damaged and heaved from underlying tree roots and it occurs just beyond the demolition limits indicated on CD103. Should the contractors include replacement of this section of the sidewalk in our scope of work and price? If so, please be very specific as to the extent of sidewalk replacement to be performed.

Perform sidewalk work as shown on the drawings.

4 08/13/26

During the installation of the duct bank work, may the excavated soil from the duct bank trenches be considered suitable for backfill of the trenches?

Excavated soil must be tested to determine if it is suitable backfill material.

5 08/13/26 Dwg S501

Can the government provide the bidders with the basis of design for the pad mounted junction boxes used to determine the equipment sizes in detail A1/S501 and A4/S501.

Equipment drawings provided via Attachment M

6 08/13/26

Has an environmental survey been performed for the presence of asbestos, lead, chromium, etc. for all portions and existing materials of the project? If so please provide the bidders with a copy of the report.

An environmental survey has not been performed.

7 08/13/26 01 58

1.3

A project identification sign is required in spec section 01 58 00 and it is the very first item to be removed from the scope during VE or change order negotiations. Can we dispense with the dance and remove the requirement now?

A project identification sign is required.

8 08/13/26 01 35

1.8.3

The contractors management staff seems to be 2-hated by the requirements in 01 35 26-

1.8.3. This project is way to

small to require 2 people and a single hat can easily manage the work of this project. The 2-hat requirement will unnecessarily inflate the cost of the work. Will the government relax the requirement of 01 35 26-

1.8.3 to allow the project to be a single hat versus a 2-hat as specified?

The QCM must be separate from the Superintendent. The KTR may suggest combining all three positions after award and the government will consider.

However, government acceptance should not be assumed.

9 08/20/26

Will the entire work area be available to us at one time or is there some sort of phasing being contemplated by the government?

No. Project will require coordination with existing/planned construction projects in the area (e.g. SP-254 Exterior Repairs)

10 08/27/26

PPI #4 - a) What type of testing is the government requesting to be performed on the excavated soil (sieve analysis, water content, etc or is testing for hazardous chemical content being required) in order to determine the suitability for backfill.

If the soils are being used as backfill, no EV testing is required. A TCLP would only be required if the soil was being taken off-base for disposal.

11 8/27/2026 PPI #4 - b) Can the excavated soil be determined to be suitable within the cost

No. The management of baseline unsuitable soil quantities must be of the base bid amount of our proposals with any soils determined be unsuitable by testing handled by contract modification?

included in your base bid amount and cannot be deferred to a contract modification.

12 8/27/2026

PPI #6 - If an environmental survey not been performed, what is the government's expectation of the contractor within the scope and price of our proposals? Are we expected to perform testing of any suspected lead, asbestos, chromium, etc.

containing material within the price of our proposals or is the government relatively certain there is no reasonable suspicion for the presence of these contaminants?

It is recommended that monitoring for concealed suspected materials that may be ACM during demolition phase. If concealed materials are identified, recommend material be sampled and a determination of asbestos content be made. For projects that require disturbance or removal: Asbestos containing materials shall be removed, transported and managed in accordance with the following regulations:

29CFR 1926.1101, and 40 CFR 61-Subpart M. In addition, this project is located in and downgradient of Restoration Site 31 - SP Hangar Area. PFAS is known to be present in soil and groundwater in the vicinity of SP35. In addition, because the project location is estimated to be downgradient of the restoration site (based on potentiometric data collected during the SI investigation), PFAS is likely to be present in groundwater in the project area. The project indicates excavation depths up to 8 feet bgs.

Groundwater is estimated to be present at 5 to 8 feet bgs. PFAS is a CERCLA-listed hazardous waste and therefore worker safety protocols should be followed for occupational safety and health.

Although PFAS is not currently a RCRA-listed waste, please refer to the waste media manager to verify installation-specific requirements for management of wastes potentially containing PFAS. PFAS data results can be accessed in the SI Report.

8/27/2026

PPI #9 - Is the government merely stating in their response that both contractors working in the project area will need to coordinate and cooperate with each other, or will there be areas occupied by the other contract that will put a full hold stop on areas of our work area? If so, what are the areas that will be on hold and what will the duration of the hold?

Access will be provided to the work area as required to perform the work and as shown. Coordination will be through the NAVFAC CMs for each project when having to access construction other construction areas.

Reference 011400 Work Restriction for additional details on access.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

(End of Summary of Changes)