Amend 0008.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICAITON NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicble)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICIATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a)By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPIRATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

1 7

AMENDMENT NO. 0008 06/27/24 21-0036

N40085

NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic Resident Officer in Charge of Construction 1005 Michael Road Camp Lejeune, NC 28547-2521

See Item 6

✘ N40085-24-R-2708

05/29/24

21-0036, P1594 Repair by Replacement RR1, MCB Camp Lejeune

Amendment 0008, RFI answers.

This amendment should be acknowledged when your proposal is submitted. Failure to acknowledge the amendment may constitute grounds for rejection of a proposal.

See Continuation Page(s)

N40085-24-R-2708 Amendment 0008

CONTINUATION SHEET

1. QUESTION: The RFP provides a letter template that has space to list Subcontractor(s) To Be Used. Firm commitments are not typically made with subcontractors until after project award.

Please confirm that Subcontractors do not need to be listed.

ANSWER: Delete page 4 of the original RFP. Use the attached pricing sheet for your proposal submission.

2. QUESTION: Will the Government please confirm Offerors will submit their proposals via email?

ANSWER: Already provided in Amendment 6 question 2 on page 2 of 7.

3. QUESTION: Please confirm the proposal response will only include the Offeror's bid guarantee SF-24, the form on page 4 of the RFP, and the pricing sheet on page 10 of the RFP.

ANSWER: A complete proposal will include the bid guarantee and completed pricing sheet attached. The form on page 4 can be deleted.

4. QUESTION: Please confirm that FAR 28.102-2(d) applies to this contract and bond percent will be added to the award of ELIN2. The FAR requires the Government to secure additional bond from the Construction Contractor for any contract price increases. Therefore, an increase to the original contract bond is required at the time of the FF&E Option Item award, to protect the Government against the Construction Contractor not providing FF&E ordered and to ensure that the FF&E vendor(s) receive payment if the Construction Contractor goes out of business. The increased cost of the bond must come from the FF&E funding source and is not a part of the Construction Contractor’s HAR.

ANSWER: FF&E does not require a bond.

5. QUESTION: 01 57 19 Please confirm the installation is considered the hazardous waste generator for any existing conditions and will sign all contaminated and hazardous waste manifests.

ANSWER: RR1 is not within 400 feet of known PFAS detections. The reference to the PFAS site at RR4 is due to the tendency of utility work to extend outside of the area designated as part of the original Decision Memorandum. Whatever the case, we recommend that soils remain on-site when possible.

6. QUESTION: CD 101Please confirm all former building RR1 structures, foundations, etc. were removed under the previous contract and filled and compacted with structural fill as required by the RFP.

ANSWER: Demolition included everything below ground.

7. QUESTION: 01 57 19 The attached Enclosure 3, applicable conditions, notes that RR4 is nearby a known PFAS site. However, there are no identification that it impacts RR1. Please confirm that the site of RR1 should be considered clean and not contaminated. Any contamination or hazardous materials identified, such as PFAS contaminated soil, will be considered a differing site condition. Otherwise the government should provide a unit price for potential contaminated soil and water handling/ disposal.

ANSWER: To our current understanding the site should be considered clean and not contaminated.

8. QUESTION: 01 35 29 1.6 The drug Prevention Program as described is illegal and unenforceable

The GC cannot mandate any Blood, Urine, or Saliva test to be provided to the COR. Please confirm this is not a requirement and remove from specification.

ANSWER: Must remain as written.

9. QUESTION: 01 35 29 1.9.1 The requirements of the Alcohol and drug abuse plan include random drug test and alcohol test. Random tests have a strict chain of custody requirement, and the contractor would not be able to fulfill these requirements. Please confirm this requirement is not necessary and remove from specification?

ANSWER: Per DFARS 252.223-7004 Spec section must remain.

10. QUESTION: 01 35 29 1.7.1.1/1.7.2.2 The RFP requirement for the SSHO must meet EM 385 Para 01.A.17 and sub paragraphs, then goes on to say if the SSHO is a CSP, CIH, ASP, CHST or STS the duties of the position shall also be performed. Please clarify that the SSHO must meet EM 385 para 01.A.17 and additionally must hold one of the credentials listed in para 1.7.2.2 ANSWER: If the CSP, CIH, ASP, STS CHST is appointed as the SSHO all duties of that position shall also be performed.

11. QUESTION: 01 50 00 There are no requirements for Temporary Fencing in Section 01 50 00.

a) Please confirm Temporary Fencing is required.

b) If yes, please specify the type of Temporary Fencing required.

ANSWER: The contractor shall provide fencing, barricades or other protective devices to maintain a secured work area at all times.

12. QUESTION: A-601 On the Door and Frame Schedule there are references to Door type "G", but this door type is not shown via D4 Door Dimensions. Please advise.

ANSWER: Sheet A-601 has been revised.

13. QUESTION: Detail D, CG501 states to reference specification 02 82 30 re-establishing vegetation for specific sod installation and sod bed preparation requirements. This specification does not exist. Please confirm the correct specification section to reference is 32 92 23 for Re- Establishing Vegetation?

ANSWER: Confirmed, correct specification.

14. QUESTION: See B5 and C5/A-303 (Typ) for the Cast Stone Water Table referenced, is this material to be prefinished or painted? Reference adjacent Barracks have CIP concrete painted white or left unfinished.

ANSWER: The cast stone must have through body color. Painting is not acceptable.

15. QUESTION: Please clearly indicate the location of point of connection for gas line. Also clarify the scope if it is tank connected and the scope required under this contract for anything beyond the outside face of the building.

ANSWER: The utility NG meter will be at the service entrance shown on Sheet MP402. NG utility distribution from the meter to the main is provided by the utility.

16. QUESTION: 01 30 01.00 22 Specification 01 30 01.00 22 largely incorporates scope for a full FFE design of the building as well as the best value determination process. I-101, I-102 and I-701 are fairly well developed and also include minimal selections with much repetition. Following all the requirements of specification 01 30 01.00 22 will lend to unnecessary costs if all meetings, visits, interviews and processes are followed. Is there a more streamlined approach the government can consider to save those Interior Designer expenditures?

ANSWER: The requirements indicated are the Government's guide spec.

17. QUESTION: A3/I-203 calls out T-2 as the wall tile whereas the finished legend on I-601 calls for T-1. Please confirm the selection for Wall tile in these spaces is T-1 or T-2.

ANSWER: T-1 is the correct finish for the wall tile in the janitors closets only. See attached revised sheet I-203.

18. QUESTION: Sheet S-001 references UFC 4-010-01, change 1, 19 August 2020 “Minimum Anti- Terrorism Standards for Buildings”. Does the truss framing require blast loading? If yes, please provide the following information:

a. Standoff Distance

b. Charge Weight

c. Level of Protection

ANSWER: There are no blast loading requirements for the truss framing.

19. QUESTION: S-001 Please confirm if it is acceptable for top and bottom truss chords to be 20 gauge with no minimum gauge for web thickness and that the use of the manufacturer’s proprietary truss members is acceptable. Recommend that the chords be 20-gauge minimum, and the webs as required by engineering analysis by the truss designer with no minimum.

ANSWER: Truss design suggestions are acceptable as noted.

20. QUESTION: CD-101, CU-101 From the site visit there is an existing rusted PIV at the NE corner of the site that is not shown on the plans. Is this to remain in place, be replaced or removed?

ANSWER: The existing PIV is to remain.

21. QUESTION: CD-101, CS-101 From the site visit there is another tree next to the existing 24" Oak at the NE corner of the site that is not shown on the plans. Is this to be removed or left in place. If left in place, does it require tree protection?

ANSWER: Leave tree in place. Provide tree protection.

22. QUESTION: CD-101, CS-101 Confirming that the entire section of sidewalk that runs North to South on the front of the building is to be removed per the plans. This sidewalk section is new and was recently demolished and replaced but it can be reasonably assumed it is to be replaced due to it being too close to the footprint of construction.

ANSWER: Yes, remove and replace per the project plans.

23. QUESTION: CD-101, CS-101 Confirming that the sidewalk replacement section that runs North to South at the NE corner of the site and at the crosswalk at Powder Lane and the new section from the front of the building running East to Rifle Range Road are to stop at the top of the steps at each area. The stairs and the small amount of sidewalk sections below the stairs are cracked up and in bad shape.

ANSWER: Provide per the project plans.

24. QUESTION: CD-101, CU-101 & E-701 Reference Work Item #11 on CU-101. The drawings lack a independent site electrical plan which would be helpful to understand the scope of the existing infrastructure surrounding the site. For instance, CD-101 shows a OHE running adjacent.

to the parking lot from North to South and to the backside of the building. There are several poles in this run that are not reflected on the plans. With the multiple networks of sidewalks and new storm to run to the backside, please confirm these poles have been surveyed and what the scope of work includes for existing electrical lines. Work Item #11 on CU-101 states new UGE but to see electrical drawings. Outside of A3/E-701and Riser notes on E-701 the scope for existing components is fairly unclear.

ANSWER: Please refer to Electrical Site 'ES' sheets for this information.

25. QUESTION: CD-101, CU-101 There is a backflow preventor enclosure sitting on the curb to be replaced alongside the parking lot in the back of the new building. This utility is not referenced on the plans. Please provide the following information:

a. Information on what this utility is used for.

b. Scope of work to replace/remove or clearance to work around it and not replace curb.

ANSWER: This apparently served as a temporary office trailer for the previous Contractor.

Remove and cap at main.

26. QUESTION: CD-101, CS-101 See key note #4, CD-101, Mill Transition. For the driveway entrances off from Powder Lane where it calls for mill transitions; please confirm that scope stops right at the fence posts at the dumpster enclosures of SRR15C and SRR1B and that no relocation (working within) nor replacement of these enclosure components should be anticipated.

ANSWER: Confirmed.

27. QUESTION: 01 35 29 VPP Program, VPP is a voluntary program through FED OSHA.

Specification states the Contractor shall comply with the reequipment of SCP 03.01.033 VPP program and procedures. The reference should read CSP 03.01.033 VPP policies and procedure manual. This document is an archived document that no longer represents OSHAs VPP Polices.

Additionally, to be a VPP participant, this is a stringent program that takes months to qualify for and is a Voluntary Program and carries additional cost. Please remove from specification.

ANSWER: Remove specification section 03.12 through 03.12.3 in its entirety.

28. QUESTION: State Employees and contractors shall demonstrate and understanding of and be able to derive the fundamental principles of VPP. Again, the referenced document is no longer valid. Additionally, the GC cannot be expected to be a VPP participant as this is a FED OSHA voluntary program that takes months to qualify for and carries additional cost. Please remove from specification.

29. QUESTION: Applicable contractors whose employees worked or intend to work at least 1,000 hours for a VPP participant in any calendar quarter or within the last 12 months and are not directly supervised by the applicant or participant.

a) Please clarify what this requirement is;

b) and, if part of the VPP, since the GC is not a VPP participant, please remove from specification.

30. QUESTION: Applicable Contractors, the host shall report all applicable contractor’s injury and illness case incidence rate data to OSHA Annually. Contractors’ injury and illness case incidence rates shall be submitted to the G-F safety officer via the COR, no later than 15 Jan for work competed each full or partial preceding calendar year or at contract completion, whichever is first.

Our team is not responsible to submit annual 300A subcontractor incidence rates to OSHA.

Again, we are not a VPP participant, nor are we the host. If Camp Lejeune or NAVFAC MidAtlantic is the host, this requirement would be the responsibility of the host, Camp Lejeune or NAVFAC, and would not be for the GC. Please remove this requirement from the specification.

31. QUESTION: Nested contractors are supervised by the host. We are not a VPP participant so, therefore we are not the host. The host would be Camp Lejeune or NAVFAC, if they are a VPP participant.

a) Please confirm who is a nested contractor.

b) Please remove this requirement from the specification.

32. REPLACE: Page 10 with the attached pricing sheet which includes ELINs for Unsuitable Soils

33. All other terms and conditions unchanged.

P1594 Repair by Replacement RR1 Solicitation N40085-24-R-2708 MCB, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina Project No. 21-0036

PRICING SHEET

Under the line items furnished, the offers shall state prices for each Exhibit Line Item Number (ELIN) given hereinafter:

ELIN 0001

Price includes completing all work associated with constructing a two-story “H” style barracks in Stone Bay in accordance with the provided drawings and specifications, but excluding work described in ELIN 0002. The price for this line item should include all applicable costs, overhead and profit for this work.

ELIN 0002

Price includes completing all work associated with the purchase of Furniture, Fixtures & Equipment (FF&E) in accordance with the provided drawings and specifications, but excluding work described in ELIN 0001. The price for this line item should include all applicable costs, overhead and profit for this work.

EST FF&E Cost HAR (NTE 5%) Total

$780,966.00 X ____________% $________________________________

ELIN 0003

Price includes completing all work associated with unsuitable soils (not POL/contaminated) to include removal and replacement with suitable fill, per 31 32 00.00. Soils may be unsuitable due to general soil characteristics or the presences of organics, construction debris, etc. A signed and sealed report with recommendation will be required from a Geotech Engineer. The price for this line item should include all applicable costs overhead and profit for this work, but excluding work described in ELIN 0001 and ELIN 0002.

DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE

00003

Unsuitable Soils and Replacement with suitable fill material

Cubic Yards

TOTAL ELIN 0001, 0002, & 0003 $ _____________________________________

Notes A. Offers must be submitted on all line items. Failure to propose on all line items may result in the offer being rejected as non-responsive.

B. ELINs shall include all markups (overhead, labor burden, and profit).

C. Award will be made on the total sum of ELIN 0001, ELIN 0002, and ELIN 0003.