N4008524R2535 Amend 02.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFIC T ON NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLIC TION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a)By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPIRATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

1 3

AMENDMENT NO. 0002 4/5/24

5. PROJECT NO. (If applicble) 20-0005

N40085

NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic Resident Officer in Charge of Construction 1005 Michael Road Camp Lejeune, NC 28547-2521

See Item 6

✘ N40085-24-R-2535

3/27/24

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

22-0005, Building AS2818 Head Repairs Amendment 0002 - RFI responses

This amendment should be acknowledged when your proposal is submitted. Failure to acknowledge the amendment may constitute grounds for rejection of a proposal.

See Continuation Page(s) Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

N40085-24-R-2535 Amendment 0002

CONTINUATION SHEET

1. Question: Will you permit exhibits/graphics and tables to have a smaller than 12 point font?

Answer: Text can be no smaller than 11 point font for exhibits/graphics and tables when 12 point font is not feasible.

2. Question: On page 10 of 61 at the bottom the sentence states Experience of proposed subcontractors will not be considered. Does this statement mean that all completed contracts used must be performed as the prime.

Answer: No, the Construction Experience Project Data Sheet permits submission of projects that were performed as a subcontractor or Joint Venture. The statement referenced above (“Experience of proposed subcontractors will not be considered for corporate experience.”) means that an Offeror cannot submit project experience of a proposed subcontractor in order to demonstrate Corporate Experience. The Government will only consider the experience of the Offeror or members of a formal partnership/ Joint Venture.

3. Question: After reviewing the documents I wanted to see if there are any prerequisites for an office that would be required near the jobsite within a certain distance. I wanted to make sure that I was not overlooking any information.

Answer: There is no specified requirement.

4. Question: Page 13 of 61 in the RFP - Factor 4 Past Performance. Please confirm there is no page limitation on Past Performance.

Answer: Past Performance is limited to submissions of related CPARS and/or Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) reports. Additionally, per Factor 4 Past Performance, section (i), paragraph 4, the solicitation states “Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 1, Corporate Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues.

Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total.”

5. Question: Page 12 of 61 in the RFP Factor 2 Safety. Please confirm if the TCR/DART rate information is outside of the 2 page max for the Technical Approach to Safety, ie, can the Safety section be a total of 3 pages?

Answer: Yes.

N40085-24-R-2535 Amendment 0002

6. Question: Page 10 of 61 in the RFP Factor 1 Corporate Experience. Would the Government consider allowing projects larger than $250,000 to be submitted?

Answer: The Government will allow projects up to $1 million.

7. Question: With regards to Factor 1, the size of the (5) relevant construction projects are indicated to be $25,000 to $250,000. Please review this cost range of projects, as the top amount of $250,000 almost assures that no CPARS evaluations are available. The size of projects many times exceeds $250,000. We suggest the upper limit be revised upward to $500,000 or $1,000,000 for several of the relevant construction projects to utilize CPARS evaluations.

Answer: The Government will allow projects up to $1 million. Any project that does not have an available CPARS evaluation shall utilize the Past Performance Questionnaire

(PPQ).

8. Delete Factor 1- Corporate Experience, Section (i), Paragraph 4, which states “Projects submitted for the Offeror must have been completed within five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP.

Replace with: “Projects submitted for the Offeror must have been completed within the prior five (5) years.

9. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.