J-13 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 203 KB Posted

Attached to
USNS JOHN LENTHALL (T-AO 189) FY 21 MTA
Solicitation number
N3220520R4009
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire and information on a related federal contract opportunity for ship maintenance and repair services. The past performance questionnaire is a template sent to references for a contractor bidding on a Military Sealift Command contract for mid-term availability services on the USNS JOHN LENTHALL, including quality of work, timeliness, business relations, and staffing. References are asked to provide ratings and comments on the contractor's past performance and return the completed questionnaire by October 24th. The related solicitation is for mid-term availability services on the USNS JOHN LENTHALL during fiscal year 2021, to be awarded by the Department of the Navy Military Sealift Command.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
J-1 Work Item Index RevC.docx DOCX document
0108_A_Double Bottom Tank Top Steel Replacement.doc DOC document
WI 0090_A_Daily COVID-19 Prevention and Control Services Rev M.doc DOC document
0202_REV B_Port Main_Reduction_Gear_Annual_Inspection.docx DOCX document
J-3 CAT B Items-RevC.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J-2 Cat A Items-RevC .xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J-3 RevB Category B Items.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendmnet 0008.docx DOCX document
Amendment 0007.docx DOCX document
Amendment 0006.docx DOCX document
WI 509_RevA_Tnk Dck Drain Piping Replace.docx DOCX document
Amendment 0005.docx DOCX document
Work Item Index-RevB 23OCT20.pdf PDF
J-2 Cat A Items-RevB .xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J-1 RevA WI Index 15OCT20.pdf PDF
Amendment 0004.docx DOCX document
J-2 RevA Cat A Items.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
New WI 403_ECDIS RADAR REPLACEMENT_13OCT20.docx DOCX document
408 REVA_Antenna Coupler Maint.pdf PDF
Amendment 0003.docx DOCX document
0105_A_Tank Hatch Preservation_RevA.doc DOC document
Amend 0002 20R4009-Update WI.docx DOCX document
0102_A_Degaussing Cable and Conduit Removal_RevA.doc DOC document
Amend 0001 20R4009-Extend.pdf PDF
J-12 Past Performance Data.pdf PDF
J-7 MSC Ship Repair Facility Survey.pdf PDF
J-8 Request for Clarification.docx DOCX document
J-10 Interport Differential.pdf PDF
J-4 Gov Furnished Material.pdf PDF
J-14 Technical Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA).pdf PDF
JA 20R4009_Redacted.pdf PDF
J-1 Work Item Index 08SEP20.pdf PDF
J-2 Category A Items.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J-3 Category B Items.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J-9 Disclosure Lobbying Activities (SF-LLL).pdf PDF
Solicitatioin 20R4009 - LENTHALL.pdf PDF
Show all 36

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

ATTACHMENT J-13

TO: EMAIL:

PHONE:

INFORMATION REQUEST

Military Sealift Command (MSC) is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract.

____________________ has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding their record of past performance under Contract No. ___________________. Specifically, we are looking for performance information in the following areas:

a.) Quality of Product or Service b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Service/Deliveries c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors)

In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached questionnaire and email it, and any other pertinent information, by BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS SOLICITATION (24 October at 1400 hours, 2:00 PM EST) to Ian Keller at ian.keller@navy.mil. Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.

Thank you, Ian Keller Contract Specialist

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

1. Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your organiation.

2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.

EXCEPTIONAL VERY GOOD SATISFACTORY MARGINAL UNSATISFACTORY

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING

Please provide an overall rating of the Contractor’s performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.

a.) Quality of Product or Service:

Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Supplies/Deliveries: Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.

c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction: Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program and satisfaction with Contractor’s service.

d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors): Qualified personnel, effective performance and conduct.

3. Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes No Please provide comments using additional pages if desired.

Signed:__________________________________

DEFINITION OF RATINGS FOR PAST PERFORMANCE

Exceptional Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory.

Marginal Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .