18R3003_Q&A__2.pdf

18R3003 Q&A #2

1. Section 3.4.8, Qualifications of Contract Administrator, has been replaced with qualifications from the newly added Life Cycle Manager found in section 3.4.9. Please correct section 3.4.8 to show qualifications as presented in original solicitation.

A: Please see Amendment 0003.

2. On FORM B there were no ROS days for the base year and Option YR 1, however commencing in

Option YR 2-4 there are 14 days in ROS. I just want to confirm that FORM B is accurate and those were not supposed to be RAV days.

A: The days in the evaluated OPTEMPO table on revised Solicitation Attachment O, provided with

Solicitation Amendment 0002 are correct, this is in order to receive input for RAV rates.

3. On your Amendment 0001 you state that Amendment 0002 replaces Amendment 0001 – was there an

Amendment 0001? If so what date was it released? This becomes an issue when completing your

Standard Form – SF33. Please clarify.

A: Due to IT issues, Amendment 0001 to solicitation N32205-18-R-3003 is void. Amendment 0001 was not utilized or distributed. When acknowledging amendments on the provided SF-33, annotate Amend

0001 (void) and use the date of Amendment 0002.

4. The Wage determination is incomplete since it only includes the SCA fringe benefit rates and not the

SCA wage rates that are currently being paid in support of this existing contract. Respectfully request that the wage portion of the Wage Determination be included as soon as possible and that the solicitation be extended at least an additional three weeks from the current closing date so that proposals can be formulated once the SCA wages from the predecessor agreements are provided.

A: Please see Amendment 0003, attachment: 18R3003 Attachment B - DOL CBA Wage Determination

– 0003, for proper Wage Determination. Closing date is not extended.