N32205-17-R-7004_Amendment_3.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this Amendment is to:

1. Extend the response due date from 30 November 2016 to 21 December 2016

2. Change the POC for submission of proposals from Maria Ashby to Colleen Houser.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 8

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 21-Nov-2016

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N32205-17-R-7004

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

11-Oct-2016

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

21-Nov-2016

CODE

MILITARY SEALIFT COMMAND NORFOLK

471 EAST C STREET, BLDG SP-64 NAVAL STATION N

NORFOLK VA 23511-2419

N32205 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N32205-17-R-7004

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been modified:

52.212-1 (ADDENDUM) ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS--COMMERCIAL ITEMS

Offerors shall submit proposal in three separate volumes:

Volume I Technical Proposal

Volume II Past Performance

Volume III Price Proposal

Offerors shall provide (1) original and two paper copies of Volumes I, and original and 1 copy of Volumes II and

III, (2) submit Volumes I through III in separate notebooks (3) ensure no pricing information is contained in Volume

I. Facsimile or E-Mail proposals will not be accepted.

Signed SF-1449, to include acknowledgement of amendments, as applicable.

Additionally, offerors shall submit one (1) copy of the Technical proposal, and one (1) copy of the Price proposal and Past Performance submittal on CD-ROM disk. Offerors shall ensure that proposal disks are virus free, and free of password protection. If access to proposal data is prohibited due to viruses, passwords, wrong format, the offer may be considered unacceptable.

Offerors shall submit completed Representations and Certifications, including those incorporated by reference.

At the time of solicitation closing date, offerors’ shall submit to the address specified in Block 9, Standard Form

(SF1449) with Blocks 12, and 17, 24, and 30 completed by the offeror, ATTN: Maria Ashby Colleen Houser.

Offeror’s questions must be submitted to the Contracting Officer in writing. The Contracting Officer or his/her technical representative will accept no verbal request for information. Requests for clarification must be submitted to the Contracting Officer in writing no later than 10 calendar days prior to the closing date of the solicitation.

Volume I Technical Proposals

The Technical Proposal must demonstrate an understanding of the ability to meet all of the requirements covered in the performance work statement. The proposal should be sufficiently complete to demonstrate how the offeror will comply with the Government’s requirements throughout the performance period. Data previously submitted, or presumed to be known, i.e., description of previous contracts for the Government, cannot be considered as a part of the proposal, unless physically incorporated into the proposal.

The technical proposal is limited to forty-five (45) text pages double-spaced pages 12 pt type-one page equals one side of a sheet of paper. Any resumes and appendices submitted as part of the technical proposal will be excluded from the page count.

Volume II Past Performance

The Past Performance factor will be evaluated by the Procurement Contracting Officer as a factor for award and used to evaluate Offeror’s ability to perform the contract successfully.

Offerors are requested to provide information on up to five (5) previous Government contracts whose effort is recent and relevant to the effort required by this solicitation.

a. “Recent” is defined as a contract in-progress or completed within the last three (3) years. If the offeror has not had five (5) Government contracts within the last three (3) years, information on recent and relevant subcontracts and/or commercial contracts may be submitted.

b. “Relevant” is defined as a contract that is of similar scope, magnitude, complexity to the requirements as set forth in this solicitation.

i. Scope: Experience in the areas defined in the PWS.

ii. Magnitude: The measure of the similarity of the volume, dollar value and/or duration of the work actually performed under the offeror’s submitted contracts to the PWS.

iii. Complexity: The measure of the similarity of technical difficulty, managerial intricacy and/or required coordination of efforts and disciplines performed by the offeror in its submitted contracts to the PWS. For complexity, not only will the tasks performed by the offeror be considered, but also the offeror’s ability to coordinate tasks (e.g., concurrent performance requirements).

A Past Performance Data Sheet (Attachment 3) is requested to be submitted for each contract to be considered as past performance. Additional information is contained in FAR 52.212-2.

Volume III Business/Price Proposals

Signed completed Standard Form (SF-1449) shall be scanned and included with the Business/Price Proposal, and should include Supplies or Services and Prices. The Offeror shall provide their proposed price on the CLIN for each contract period. Offeror’s representations and certifications, i.e. reps and certs, shall be included in the price proposal. Offerors are encouraged to register their representations and certifications online at https://orca.bpn.gov/login/aspx and provide confirmation in the price proposal of the registration, as opposed to providing a hard copy of the reps and certs. Furthermore, Offerors shall ensure they are actively registered in SAM

(www.sam.gov) and the information therein accurate.

Pricing shall (1) be used to evaluate the Offeror’s price; and (2) shall be incorporated into any resulting proposed contract award.

Proposals must be realistic in both technical approach and total price. Proposals that are unrealistic in terms of technical or schedule commitments, or unrealistically low in price will be considered indicative of a lack of understanding of the complexity and risk in the solicitation requirements. The ability of the Offeror to perform all aspects of the anticipated contract from inception to completion will be considered as part of the overall “fair and reasonableness” evaluation. Evaluation of fair and reasonableness will be based on FAR Part 15.404-1(b)(1).

Offerors unable to perform all aspects of the anticipated contract will not be considered for award. The total evaluated price shall consist of the extended price for all CLINs from 0001-4004 or those CLINs for which the

Offeror intends to perform.

ADMINISTRATIVE:

(a) All questions concerning the solicitation shall be addressed to the Contract Specialist (Maria Ashby

Colleen Houser) identified below, via email: maria.ashby@navy.mil colleen.houser@navy.mil or via phone at: 757-443-5910 757-443-5887.

Department of the Navy

Military Sealift Command (MSC)

Attn: Maria Ashby Colleen Houser, N102 https://orca.bpn.gov/login/aspx http://www.sam.gov/ mailto:maria.ashby@navy.mil mailto:colleen.houser@navy.mil

Building SP-64 / 2nd Floor

471 East C Street Norfolk, VA 23511

RATINGS:

Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings

Rating Description

Acceptable

Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Past Performance Evaluation Ratings

Rating Description

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

(End of provision)

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

The following have been modified:

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

(i) Technical capability of the items offered to meet the Government requirement as described in the Statement Of Work (SOW).

VOLUME I: TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

Proposals should clearly demonstrate an Offeror’s thorough understanding and capability to perform the efforts described in the Statement of Work. Recognizing that not all technical elements can be detailed in advance, proposal must contain sufficient detail to describe the manpower and facilities that an Offeror proposes to use in order to accomplish the effort described in the Statement of Work. Statements that the prospective

Offeror understands, “can” or “will” comply with the contract requirements, or paraphrasing the contract Statement of Work, or parts thereof, will be considered unresponsive and preclude the Offeror from further consideration for award.

At a minimum, Offerors shall provide in their proposals detailed information organized as follows:

Technical Factors.

Factor A: Understanding of the Requirements:

Offerors shall demonstrate their understanding of the requirements by providing a description of how they would accomplish each of the (7 ea) Sample Tasks provided.

Offerors shall describe how their internal procedures for obtaining ABS and US Coast Guard approvals as required to accomplish the requirements of the solicitation.

Offerors shall describe the plan for coordinating ABS and USCG inspections as required to accomplish the requirements of the solicitation.

Factor B: Emergency Response Capability

Describe in detail the ability to dispatch personnel in emergency and non-emergency situations once notification is received to accomplish multiple tasks in different locations throughout the world. Dates and locations for repair will normally be provided about 7 calendar days prior to start of performance and sometimes less than 24 hours. Describe in detail dispatch methods to include notification process of Offeror’s representative, and Contracting Officer.

Factor C: Equipment/Facilities

Describe in detail the capabilities of the Offeror’s Facility to accomplish the requirements of the solicitation.

Factor D: Key Personnel

Provide an organization chart of the key personnel who will be assigned to accomplish the requirements of the solicitation. Include upper management, program managers, negotiators, estimators, scheduling personnel, engineering personnel, key production personnel, safety personnel, quality assurance personnel and subcontract manager.

Submit brief but concise resumes of key personnel (in-house and subcontractor) that will be assigned to accomplish the requirements of the solicitation.

Factor E: Hazardous Waste Management Plan

Submit a Hazardous Waste Management Plan. The plan is to identify key personnel associated with hazardous waste management including, but not limited to, personnel associated with employee training, hazardous waste identification and manifest documentation.

The plan is to identify any subcontractors associated with removal, handling and disposal of hazardous wastes, including but not limited to, subcontractors responsible for removing, storing, transporting, recycling, reclaiming or otherwise disposing of hazardous waste. All permits or other applicable credentials associated with safe and proper disposal of hazardous waste should be included

Note: If a hazardous waste subcontractor is changed for any reason the Hazardous Waste

Management Plan should be amended prior to the new subcontractor beginning work on the vessel.

Identify all local, state and federal agencies associated with the disposal of hazardous waste.

Outline procedures used by the facility to accomplish removal, handling, storage and disposal of hazardous wastes in accordance with local, state, federal and NAVFAC requirements.

Describe all steps to be taken to reduce the volume and toxicity of hazardous waste generated during their performance of the contract. This is to include, but not be limited to a description of management of hazardous waste generation, process controls utilized to ensure that effective minimization techniques are maintained and any technological resources available to reduce either the toxicity of the volume of hazardous waste.

Factor F: Contractor Access Control Plan

Describe in detail the Offeror’s ability to process security requirements for both prime and subcontractor personnel in conjunction with RAPIDGate requirements and MSC’s Ship and Base

Access clause (see solicitations clauses for further information).

Identify points of contact within organization that will process security requirements.

Factor G: Experience

Offeror shall list experience in the accomplishment of work, which is comparable or related to the requirements of the solicitation.

SHIPBOARD ELECTRICAL SERVICE WORK (within the last five years):

Discuss relevant experiences as a prime contractor or subcontractor in servicing Shipboard

Electrical Power Generating, Power Distribution, Interior Communication, Automation, Control and Monitoring Systems onboard vessels owned and operated by the Military Sealift Command to support mission operations for the last three recent Government (Navy, MSC, Coast Guard, MARAD) repair contracts each with a value over $75,000 during the last five (5) years.

If offeror has not been a prime contractor or subcontractor on three Government repair contracts over $75,000 during the last five (5) years, then discuss relevant experience as a prime contractor or subcontractor in servicing Shipboard Electrical Power Generating, Power Distribution, Interior

Communication, Automation, Control and Monitoring Systems onboard commercial vessels for the last three Commercial repair contracts each with a value over $75,000 during the last five (5) years.

If a subcontractor for either a Government or commercial repair contract, the subcontract repair work shall have a value over $75,000 for each subcontract discussed.

SCHEDULE/COST COMPLIANCE

Offerors shall provide data on paragraph above as follows:

(i). Ship’s name, hull number and displacement (ii). Type of availability

(iii). Actual number of man-hour expended

(iv). Contract actual commencement date scheduled and actual completion dates;

reasons for schedule slippages/extensions.

(v). Original and final contract price to include a breakdown of settled prices for changes and request for Equitable Adjustment’s (REA’s) or proposed prices for pending REA’s.

(vi). Contract number, point of contact and phone

(ii) PRICE All information relating to price data shall be included in Volume II. The price proposal shall cover all aspects of the proposed effort. Data contained in the price proposal shall be consistent with data contained in Volume 1. Inconsistencies within the proposal may result in a lower overall evaluation of the total proposal. The price data shall support the level of resources required to complete the requirements of this solicitation. Data submitted shall be evaluated for price reasonableness and realism.

The results of the non-price factor evaluations will be compared to the price proposal to ensure that the labor categories and mix have been adequately priced in the proposal. The Government-evaluated probable price will include all contract line item numbers (CLINs) inclusive of base and all option CLINs. FAR Clause 52.217-5 Evaluation of Options is incorporated into the solicitation.

Price will not be an adjectivally scored factor in the evaluation of proposals and the importance of price does not bear a direct relationship to the importance of the non-price factors. The contracting officer will review proposed prices to determine whether they are materially unbalanced. The contracting officer will review an unbalanced offer to assess the associated risks to the Government in awarding to such an offeror, and whether award will result in unreasonably high price for contract performance. In accordance with FAR 15.404-1(g)(3), an offer may be rejected if the contracting officer determines that the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the

Government.

Submit price information in the Attachment 2 Rate Table provided on a disk, CD, or by email

(maria.ashby@navy.mil) as Microsoft Excel files by the solicitation closing date.

(iii) PAST PERFORMANCE This will be used to determine the risk of non-performance, defective performance, and/or late performance by evaluating each offeror’s reported quality of work and relevant experience with the services being solicited. In evaluating past performance, the Government may contact some or all of the references provided by the offeror and may contact other sources of information, including but not limited to: federal, state, and local government agencies, and published media and electronic databases (i.e. Department of the Navy’s Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting

System (CPARS) and the Department of Defense’s Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS)), other customers known to the Government, consumer protection organizations, and others who may have useful and relevant information. The Government may evaluate past performance of the offeror’s proposed subcontractors, predecessor companies, or key personnel who have relevant experience to the extent warranted. Past performance information considered by the Government for the offeror’s performance as a prime contractor and/or subcontractor and the performance of its key personnel may include (but not be limited to) the following areas:

relevance, quality, quality control, cost control, schedule, business relationships, compliance with

FAR 52.219-8, key personnel, and customer satisfaction. Only relevant experience will be considered for past performance purposes. Any offeror with no record of relevant past performance will be given a “neutral” rating for past performance.

Offerors shall provide information on three previous Government contracts whose effort was current and relevant to the effort required by this solicitation. Current is defined as a contract (or subcontract) in-progress or completed within the last five years. If the offeror has not had three

Government contracts within the last five years, information on relevant subcontracts and/or commercial contracts may be submitted instead. (The information must clearly show that the work by the offeror was done as a prime contractor or a subcontractor). Relevant is defined as a contract that is of similar scope, magnitude, and complexity to the requirements as set forth in this solicitation. Offerors who describe similar contracts and subcontracts should provide a detailed explanation demonstrating the similarity of the contracts to the requirements of this solicitation and

SOW. This information shall be provided by the submission of Attachment 3 (Past Performance

Data). Failure to submit the information shall be considered certification (by signature on the proposal) that the contractor has no past performance for like or similar items for the Government to evaluate. Offerors are urged to verify accuracy of all data provided. Past performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, and subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement should also be provided.

In addition to the information requested above, offerors shall contact their past performance references and request that each reference complete Attachment 4 (Past Performance

Questionnaire) and e-mail or fax the completed survey form directly to Maria Ashby Colleen

Houser, Military Sealift Command, 471 East C Street, Norfolk, VA 23511; e-mail:

maria.ashby@navy.mil colleen.houser@navy.mil; BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS

SOLICITATION. The Government may consider questionnaires received after the due date of the solicitation. The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information.

Technical and past performance, when combined, are approximately equal to cost or price.

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of provision)

(End of Summary of Changes) mailto:maria.ashby@navy.mil mailto:colleen.houser@navy.mil