N00421-16-R-0058_FACSFAC_Questions_20161102.docx
DOCX document 17 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FACSFAC Hardware
- Solicitation number
- N00421-16-R-0058
About this file
Questions and Answers
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| N00421-16-R-0058_FACSFAC_RFP_Amendment_2.docx | DOCX document | |
| N00421-16-R-0058_FACSFAC_Questions_20161012.docx | DOCX document | |
| N00421-16-R-0058_FACSFAC_Questions_20161012.docx | DOCX document | |
| N00421-16-R-0058_FACSFAC_RFP_Amendment_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| N00421-16-R-0058_FACSFAC_RFP_Amendment_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| PPQ.doc | DOC document | |
| N00421-16-R-0058_FACSFAC_Questions_20161012.docx | DOCX document | |
| WD_05-2104.pdf | ||
| PPQ.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Fully_Burdened_Rate.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Cost.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Data_Transmittal.doc | DOC document | |
| DD_254.pdf | ||
| N00421-16-R-0058_FACSFAC_RFP.docx | DOCX document | |
| CDRLS.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| QASP.doc | DOC document | |
| OCI_List.docx | DOCX document | |
| Draft_Labor_Categories_and_Labor_Hours.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| DRAFT_PWS.doc | DOC document | |
| DRAFT_CDRLS.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Personnel_Qualifications.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 21
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Amendment 1
1. Is attachment P6 the same as attachment P1? If not, can the government provide the attachment P6?
Yes, attachment P1 replaces P6.
2. The “basis for award” of the resultant contract is listed as “best value” and “lowest price, technically acceptable (LPTA)”. Please clarify regarding the Government’s intent.
The Government has deleted “5252.215-9524 Basis for Award (NAVAIR)(JUL 1998).” Please see the updated solicitation.
3. The Ordering Period reflects 05 July 2017 through 04 July 2022; whereas the overall POP is 07 July 2017 through 06 July 2022. Please clarify.
The correct ordering period is 05 July 2017 through 04 July 2022.Please see the updated solicitation.
4. PPQ.xls is another copy of the Cost attachment instead of the Past Performance Questionnaire Please see fbo.gov for corrected attachment.
5. Should these items 0005, 0009, and 0010 match the description in Section B?
Yes, these items should match Section B. Please see updated solicitation.
6. What areas do CLINs 0005, 0009, and 0010 cover? Should they be added to Section D and E?
Yes, these items should match Section B. Please see updated solicitation.
7. What areas do CLINs 0014, 0015, and 0016 cover? Should they be added to Section D and E?
Yes, these items should match Section B. Please see updated solicitation.
8. Is it the Government’s intention that all proposals include at a minimum the total labor hours and/or the specified hours by labor category as well as the ODC’s stated in the Solicitation?
Yes, please see updated solicitation.
9. Please confirm that Section L 1.2.1.3 should be numbered 1.3.1.3.
Yes this section should appear as 1.3.1.3. Please see updated solicitation.
10. Please confirm that Section L 2.0 Past Performance is Volume 2.
Yes this section should appear as Past Performance Volume 2. Please see updated solicitation.
11. RFP Section L Part A 2.0 states that “Graphs shall be presented in no smaller than 10 pt. font and should contain a grid, which allows values to be read directly from the graph to the same accuracy that a 10 x 10 to the ½-inch grid provides. Does this comment refer to tables and not graphics? Please explain the format for tables and graphic charts (i.e. org. or flow charts).
As this is not a disqualifying factor, please use best business practices.
12. Can the Government please provide the complete NAVAIR tripwire list?
Yes, please see updated solicitation Section M paragraph 3.4.
13. Please confirm that the Wage Determination to be used for this RFP should be WD 2015-2103 Revision. 2 per the WD provided as an RFP attachment and not the file name of WD 05-2104 as stated in Section A.
Yes, attachment 5 should read WD 15-2103 (Rev.-2). Please see updated solicitation.
14. In reference to Section L, Part B, 1.1.2.8 is the Offeror to provide a detailed cost breakout for Travel and Material in response to the Sample Task? If not, what kind of information is the government looking for in response to 1.1.2.8?
Yes, please see updated solicitation.
15. Does the Government intend to issue an Amendment 1 using the SF30 and/or correcting the SF33 to remove the watermark?
Yes, please see attached SF30.
16. Please confirm that Offerors do not need to price the six-month option to extend services, as the Government will automatically perform this function, if/when the six-month option to extend services is exercised.
Yes, Offerors do not need to price the six-month option to extend services.
17. There was no SF30 provided in response to Q&A question15, although a revised SF33 was provided. Does the Government intend to issue SF30 for amendments?
No, the government does not intend to issue an SF30 for amendments. The government standard practice is to post the conformed SF33 with the changes clearly marked.
Amendment 2
18. On page 112 of the RFP Section 1.3 it states, “The offeror shall submit a written narrative of the offeror’s understanding and capability to perform the requirements of the PWS paragraphs 12.2 Business Relations, 12.3 Contract Management and Administration, 12.4 Subcontractor Management, 12.5 Contractor Personnel, Disciplines and Specialties including all associated subtasks as described below.” However, there does not appear to be a paragraph 12.4 or 12.5. Additionally, paragraphs 12.2 and 12.3 don’t seem to have anything to do with the titles mentioned above. Please clarify.
Yes, referenced paragraphs 12.2, 12.3, 12.4 and 12.5 are incorrect. Please see the updated SF33.
19. On page 112 of the RFP it has “1.3.1.9 transition plan as described in Section L Part B paragraph 2.3.5”. I believe the description of this plan is really 1.3.5. Could you please clarify if 1.3.1.9 should reference 1.3.5 instead of 2.3.5.?
Yes, 1.3.1.9 should reference 1.3.5 instead of 2.3.5 please see the updated SF33.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .