1_N00189-07-R-0022-Atch3-PastPerfDataSheet.doc

Attachment 3 Contract Performance Data Sheet

Provide the information requested in this form for each program being described. Provide frank, concise comments regarding the nature of your performance on the contracts you identify. If more space is required, continue on the back of the form or add additional pages as necessary. This form is available in electronic format (MS Word) from the Contract Specialist identified as the Point of Contact in the solicitation.

1. Offeror Name (Company/Division)

2. Program Title:

3. Description of Service:

4. Contract Specifics:

a. Contract Number

b. Contract Type

c. Period of Performance

d. Original Contract $ Value

e. Current Contract $ Value

(If Amounts for d and e above are different, provide a brief description of the reason)

f. Dollar amount of work actually performed to date

g. CAGE Code

5. Brief Description of Effort as __Prime or __Subcontractor (Check one). (Please indicate whether it was development and/or production, or other acquisition phase and highlight portions considered most relevant to current acquisition. Describe team contribution by team member as major, significant or minor.)

6. Completion Date (fill in all that apply):

a. Original date:

b. Current Schedule:

c. Estimated date of Completion:

d. How Many Times Changed:

e. Primary Causes of Change:

7. Primary Points of Contact:

a. Program Manager (Government):

(1) Name:

(2) Office:

(3) Address:

(4) Telephone:

(5) E-Mail

b. Procuring Contracting Officer (Government):

(1) Name:

(2) Office:

(3) Address

(5) Email

c. Administrative Contracting Officer(Government) :

(1) Name:

(2) Office:

(3) Address:

(5) Email

8. Relate your experience under this contract to the tasks or subtasks contained within the current solicitation PWS. In particular, compare the Relevance of this contract work in terms of the Scope, Complexity, and Magnitude of the current solicitation. (See the solicitation for more detailed treatment and definition of Relevance, Scope, Complexity, and Magnitude).

As an initial step, the PCO will conduct a simplified relevancy review. Any contracts involving work/performance that have no meaningful relationship to the requirements stated in the solicitation will be excluded from consideration. Subjective judgment on the part of the PCO is implicit in the entire process, and the PCO will have substantial discretion in determining what is, or is not, a relevant contract.

9. Address any unique aspects of this program that would reflect upon your ability to successfully perform the work described in the current solicitation.

10. Specify by name any key individual(s) who participated in this previous contract and are proposed to support the new contract. Also, indicate their roles/job descriptions/duties for both efforts.

11. Summary of awards, citations, or other indications of customer satisfaction.

12. Problems encountered and lessons learned. Describe your ability to isolate past problems down to a root cause, and then describe actions taken to resolve the root cause. Performance problems found during the evaluation of a contractor’s performance, which are not addressed by the Offeror shall be assumed to still exist. Consequently, it is imperative that all performance issues are addressed.

Source Selection Information

- 1 -

See FAR 3.104