CDCA_Updates_on_SeaPort_Brief_08Dec2017.pdf

Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release. Distribution is Unlimited

SeaPort-e to

SeaPort-NxG Susan W. Tomaiko - SeaPort Program Manager

Sharon Rustemier – Services Guru Naval Sea Systems Command

08 December 2017

Evolution of SeaPort Category SeaPort

(2001 – 2004) SeaPort-E

(2004-2005) VS SeaPort-E (2005-2019)

SeaPort-NxG (2019-2029)

Portal Components

“Buy” site for Gov’t, “Sell” site for Industry Same Same Same

Program Website www.seaport.navy.mil Same Same Same

Navy Users NAVSEA HQ All NAVSEA Navy Virtual

SYSCOM

Navy Virtual SYSCOM (no

NAVAIR/NAVSUP)

# of Ordering

Offices 1 24 121 75

# of Primes 21 151 3,195 TBD

# of Functional Areas 4 21 22 2

SB

Consideration? No Yes Yes Yes

TO’s Competed Nationally? Yes No No Yes

Current SYSCOM Usage Usage of SeaPort

* All SeaPort Task Orders Awarded Since 2004

Current SYSCOM Usage

Vendor Statistics

• Small Business

– Prime MAC awards: 2,860 of 3,196 (90%) (as of Dec 2016)

– 50% of all small business prime contractors have submitted a proposal as a prime

– Across the Navy 2,225 task orders have been awarded to 551 different small businesses

• Large Business

– Prime MAC awards: 333 of 3,196 (as of Dec 2016)

– ~78% (251) of all large business prime contractors have submitted a proposal as a prime

– Across the Navy 2,037 task orders have been awarded to 182 different large businesses (some of which changed size status or novated over the life of the SeaPort program)

* Stats based on all SeaPort Task Orders awarded since 2004 to all VS Members

So What Comes Next?

1. Status quo – administratively costly to maintain thousands of MACs held by vendors who do not propose on opportunities

2. Abandon SeaPort – use other GWACs

3. “Redefine” SeaPort - must provide the following:

• Flexibility in contract type and requirements

• Maximize competition

• Maintain the developed vendor base

• Reduce the risk of fraud and other procurement integrity/bad behavior issues by centralizing the procurement solution

• Maximize standardization to speed procurement lead times

Market Research Process

• Performed analysis on existing SeaPort statistics

• Explored other vehicles & did comparisons

• Information gathered via various forums:

– NCC – November 2015

– NSWC Small Business Outreach Event – March 2016

– Professional Services Council Meeting – March 2016

– NCC – April 2016

– RFI (Both Govt & Industry) – May 2016

– NAVSEA Small Business Industry Day – August 2016

– Navy Gold Coast SB Conference – August 2016

OASIS Vendor Base Comparison

Only 5% of SB who have won SeaPort TO’s hold

OASIS MACs

Only 23% of LB who have won SeaPort TO’s hold

OASIS MACs SeaPort LB also in OASIS

SeaPort SB also in

OASIS

RFI Participation

• Industry users ~3,000 prime MAC holders along with all their team members - ~103 vendors responded

• Government users ~1,700 1102 contract specialists across the Navy - ~94 responses (both individuals and activities)

• Results were split almost down the center 50% on responses – did not reveal burning desire for change to the current construct

– Resulted in Government changing what they believed would relieve true administrative burdens to the Government but not the overall SeaPort construct

Summary of Analysis

• OASIS does not support the current vendor base and therefore will not work as a substitute for SeaPort

• Other vehicles ruled out

• Industry input advocates continuation of

SeaPort

• May be some benefit to redefining SeaPort

SeaPort-e to SeaPort-NxG

• Single NAICS (541330) but possibly with direct ordering authority for IAW SBA regs (8(a), Hubzone, SDVOSB, WOSB)

• Removal of Zone Presence Requirements – All MAC holders will get all zones

• Grouping of functional areas

• Off-ramp process

• US Navy Experience, as either prime or sub, in order to win

MAC - Limit vendor entry to those that will bid on work to increase quality competition and reduce administration costs

• Mandatory Gov’t User compliance with SOP to increase standardization and reduce cycle time

Contemplated Changes

SeaPort e

• Zones – Established presence through either physical location of prime or subcontractor relationship. Could only propose on opportunities where zone had been established

• Small Business Considerations –

• Recertification only in designated timeframes by MAC PCO

• Gov’t users could further restrict set-asides to any designation under NAICS (WOSB, 8(a), SDVOSB)

SeaPort NxG

• Zones – All vendors will receive all 7 zones. Zones will only exist for Gov’t users to designate where proposal opportunities are located. Removes the need for local presence at the MAC level.

• Small Business Considerations –

• Recertification only from Small to Large business and Large to Small Business – no longer would have designations for set-asides. Credit at the other designations would be dependent upon vendors to keep their SAM and SBA registrations up to date.

• Gov’t users could further restrict set-asides to any designation under NAICS (WOSB, 8(a), SDVOSB) -- the burden on the PCO’s at the task order competitions to certify the size status at proposal submission or award depending on the designation - not at the MAC level.

Pre-Decisional Document Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release. Distribution is Unlimited

Zone Distribution

Over 50% of Small & Large Businesses have 5 or more zones

19%

13%

10%

7% 7%

10%

34%

Small Business Zone Distribution

1 zone

2 zones

3 zones

4 zones

5 zones

6 zones

All Zones

4%

6% 5%

5%

6%

12% 62%

Large Business Zone Distribution

1 zone

2 zones

3 zones

4 zones

5 zones

6 zones

All Zones

Contemplated Changes

SeaPort-e

• NAVY VIRTUAL SYSCOM USERS

• NAVSEA

• USMC

• ONR

• MSC

• SPAWAR

• NAVFAC

• NAVAIR

• NAVSUP

• Statement of Work – 22 broad functional areas

• Experience Requirements–

• Any DoD experience from the Prime or a proposed Team Member to establish experience

SeaPort NxG

• NAVY VIRTUAL SYSCOM USERS

• NAVSEA

• USMC

• ONR

• MSC

• SPAWAR

• NAVFAC

• NAVSUP

• Statement of Work– 2 broad functional areas with subcategories

• Experience Requirements–

• US Navy experience must be from the prime proposal (prime may submit experience from a subcontracted effort, but not from a team member) and must be verifiable (CPARS, Government endorsement)

SOW Comparison SeaPort-e

1. Research & Development

2. Engineering, System Engineering & Process Engineering

3. Modeling, Simulation, Stimulation, & Analysis

4. Prototyping, Pre-Production, Model-Making, & Fabrication

5. System Design Documentation & Technical Data

6. Software Engineering, Development, Programming, &

Network

7. Reliability, Maintainability, & Availability (RM&A)

8. Human Factors, Performance, & Usability Engineering

9. System Safety Engineering

10. Configuration Management (CM)

11. Quality Assurance (QA)

12. Information System (IS) Development, Information

Assurance (IA), & Information Technology (IT)

13. Inactivation & Disposal

14. Interoperability, Test & Evaluation, Trials Support

15. Measurement Facilities, Range, & Instrumentation

16. Logistics

17. Supply & Provisioning Support

18. Training Support

19. In-Service Engineering, Fleet Introduction, Installation &

Checkout

20. Program Support

21. Functional & Administrative

22. Public Affairs & Multimedia

SeaPort NxG Engineering Support Services

1. Electrical and Mechanical, Engineering Support

2. System Engineering and Process Engineering Support

3. Software Engineering, Development, and Programming Support

4. System Safety Engineering Support

5. In-Service Engineering, Fleet Introduction, Installation and

Checkout Support

6. Industrial Engineering Support

7. Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Support

8. Measurement Facilities, Range, and Instrumentation Support

9. Interoperability, Test and Evaluation, Trials Support

10. Research and Development Support

11. Modeling, Simulation, Stimulation, and Analysis Support

12. Prototyping, Pre-Production, Model-Making, and Fabrication

Support

13. System Design Documentation and Technical Data Support

14. Reliability, Maintainability, and Availability (RM&A) Support

15. Inactivation and Disposal Support

Program Management Support Services

1. Financial Analysis and Budget Support

2. Quality Assurance (QA) Support

3. General Program and Administrative Support

4. Technical Training Support

5. Professional Development and Training Support

6. Analytical and Organizational Assessment Support

7. Database Administrators

8. Multimedia and Graphic Design Support

9. Supply and Provisioning Support

10. Logistics Support

11. Configuration Management (CM) Support

12. Information System (IS) , Network and Web Development

Support

13. General Information Technology (IT) Support

14. Computer and Information Security and Systems Analysis and

Management Support

Notional Timeline of Events

FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20

SeaPort NxG Timeline

Draft

RFP

Release

Current IDIQ Life

Proposal Receipt

New MACs awarded AP Approval

RFP

Release

Virtual Industry Days