USS_O'KANE_PPI_QA4.xlsm

Sheet1

KTR requests clarification on the contents of the tubes. For example: cable, conduit, or fittings.

Unless otherwise stated this item will be estimated to remove and replace tubes only. All hours for cable rollback and conduit and fitting removal will be subject to a change order.

Please Review, advise or concur.

Seven different lines address HM&E TURNOVER 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 with the associated dates. However, the specifics of what equipment, systems or spaces pertain to the particular “TURNOVERS” are not defined.

Please clarify the definition or intent of these TURNOVER Milestones.

IAW para. 283, “Fueling and Defueling Procedures” of NAVBASESANDIEGOINST 5450.8Q Dated 27APR2012, defueling prior to major maintenance availability and refueling prior to completion of major maintenance availability should use the Defense Fuel Support Point Defense Point (DFSP) Point Loma utilizing only Navy Provided YON Barges. Para. 283 (d) (2) restricts all fuel transfers to weekdays, using normal work hours (0800-1600), Will the Government revise the specification to conform to NAVBASESANDIEGOINST 5450.8Q?

WI is revised via Errata 2 as follows:

Q1: It is the Government's intent to defuel and refuel the ship in the contractor’s facility if the contract is awarded outside of San Diego. This Option Item will not be placed on contract if the contract is awarded within San Diego. For defueling it is Ship's Force responsibility to remove all fuel to lowest suction to allow KTR to decomp tanks. For refueling it is Ship's Force responsibility.

62 150-11-039 Antenna 2-3 Platform Deck; repair and preserve 150-11-039, Para 3.5 tasks KTR to, “Remove existing and install new deck plating on antenna platform…”

Is the Government going to provide critical alignment and in-place machining services?

Is the Government going to provide critical alignment and in-place machining services?

Is the Government going to provide critical alignment and in-place machining services?

In order to afford the contractor and all subcontractors/vendors ample time to respond to Q&A’s, prepare/submit accurate proposals, and allow adequate time for subcontractor/vendor solicitations/evaluations/selections, request that the proposal due date be extended from 13 August 2018 at 10:00 am, local time, San Diego, CA. to 27 August 2018 at 10:00 am, local time, San Diego, CA. A 14-day proposal due date extension.

Paragraph 1.2 Location of Work lists, “117 locations.”

Due to the containment requirements for abatement of heavy metals and the cost associated with them, the contractor suggests using 50 locations (at 20 sqft per location) for bidding purposes. This will insure that all parties are given a fair and reasonable evaluation.

Bidder's Question: For bidding and estimating purposes, will the work scope of paragraph 3.6.1 be updated to include a defined number of locations and the sqft of abatement per location?

Paragraph 3.6.1 is a sub-paragraph of paragraph 3.6 which states, "Provide heavy metal sampling in 350 locations as designated by the Hull Manager or AIT OSIC from (Start Availability A+0 through A+90).

Samples taken shall be analyzed and results turned over to the Hull Manager or AIT OSIC within 3 weeks maximum." Paragraph 3.6.1 provides the total number of square feet of Heavy Metal Abatement from (Start Availability A+0 through A+120) as directed by the Hull Manager or AIT OSIC to be accomplished. The sqft of abatement per location will be directed by the Hull Manager or

AIT OSIC.

91 980-90-005 , “ShipAlt DDG51-76869K 1MC Upgrade, 76974K MWS for DDG Modernization Plan, 77259K Replace Legacy EM Log with AN/WSN-9(V)1 DHYSL and 90485K SIWCS Next Generation System, Alteration Installation Team (AIT) Support Service; provide” Paragraph 3.17 states, “Accomplish Paint Sampling/Heavy Metal Testing of 100 locations as designated by the SUPERVISOR Additionally to accomplish heavy metal paint abatement of 100 SF found during testing.”

Paragraph 1.2 Location of Work lists, “31 locations.”

Due to the containment requirements for abatement of heavy metals and the cost associated with them, the contractor suggests using 5 locations (at 20 sqft per location) for bidding purposes. This will insure that all parties are given a fair and reasonable evaluation.

Bidder's Question: For bidding and estimating purposes, will the work scope of paragraph 3.17 be updated to include a defined number of locations and the sqft of abatement per location?

Paragraph 1.3 states, “Firemain Piping, 5 Inch, 90-10 Cu-Ni, MIL-T-16420, Class 200” Paragraph 1.2 states, “Location of Work: 1.2.1 Auxiliary Machinery Room No. One (4-126-0-E)” Ref 2.2 identifies, “521-6218463 Rev P, Firemain System Diagram” this is a schematic drawing and only identifies rough equipment locations, piping runs lengths.

Contractor has reviewed the specification and is unable to determine the quantity/length of 5” pipe required and whether any fittings or flanges are required to accomplish the scope of work identified in paragraph 3.2. Additionally, reference 2.2 521-6218463 is a “diagram/schematic” with no dimensions. In this instance, a ship check of a similar ship to determine material requirements will not work, because of specific ship field run installation requirements.

Bidder's Question: Will the material required to accomplish the work scope directed by paragraph 3.2 be identified so that contractor can procure the correct type and quantities or can the material be provided as GFM?

Sub-paragraphs 3.1.1 thru 3.1.6 than follow. Based upon the paragraph hierarchy identified in NAVSEAs FY19 Appendix 4E Package for Work Item Development, the contractor has assumed that the directed labor and material identified in paragraph 3.1 is to only be utilized to cover the costs of sub-paragraphs 3.1.1 thru 3.1.6.

And because paragraphs 3.2 through 3.6 are not sub-paragraphs of 3.1, they must be priced separately from the directed labor and material identified in paragraph 3.1.

Bidder's Questions:

1) Is it the customer’s intent that the directed labor and material identified in paragraph 3.1 is to only be utilized to accomplish paragraphs 3.1 thru 3.1.6?

2) Or, is it the customer’s intent that the directed labor and material identified in paragraph 3.1 is to be utilized to accomplish the entire specifications scope of work as defined by paragraphs 3.1 thru 3.6?

The only know source is located in Canada. Due to ITAR regulations Contractor cannot send the specification and or drawings required because its “Export Controlled Data” Contractor is requesting the following:

Paragraph 3.2 states, “Accomplish the requirements of 2.2 through 2.13 and 2.16 (E2)” Paragraphs 3.2.5 states, “Procure and install the material listed in 2.16. (E2)” Contractor has reviewed all Errata 02 documentation received and has determined that reference 2.16 of work item 472-90-001 is missing.

Bidder's Question: Contractor requests missing reference 2.16 “DDG77 SA 80156K, CFM MATERIAL LIST” of work item 472-90-001 be provided as soon as possible to allow pricing to be captured in the proposal.

Paragraph 2.16 identifies, “DDG77 SA 80156K, CFM MATERIAL LIST (E2)” Paragraph 3.2.5 states, “Procure and install the material listed in 2.16. (E2)” Contractor has reviewed reference 2.16 and notes that the items listed under Drawing Number 8750599 with Item Numbers 101 thru 108, 110 thru 112, and 114 have insufficient identifiable information to allow the contractor to price and procure the equipment as directed by paragraph 3.2.5. Additionally, it’s noted that the equipment in question and identified below is still annotated in reference 2.5 as being provided by Hardware Systems Command (HSC) as Government Furnished Material (GFM).

The contractor does not need to procure Item Numbers 101 thru 108, 110 thru 112, 114, 146, and A001 (Sub-Items - TL, M0114, M0115, M0116, M0117, and M0118). These items will be provided by the PARM.

3.1.1.1 Electrical cable ripout and installation, sheets 133, 135-162.

Q1: KTR also notes that no wire connection list or hook up sheets are provide in the specification and requests to clarify if cable assemblies will come completed with connectors already installed or of if connectors and hook up needs to be included in the estimate.

Q2: KTR is requesting clarification on who is to complete the install and ripout of electrical cable.

Q3: KTR is requesting clarification on who is to complete Banding, MCT re-packing and Air testing requirements. Q1: Contractor is not performing any of the wire connections or electrical hook-up for Paragraph 3.1.1.1, the AIT will be accomplishing the wire connections and electrical hook-ups.

Q2: The AIT will accomplish the install and ripout of electrical cable.

Q3: Each contractor will complete their own banding, MCT re-packing and air testing requirements IAW NSI 009-73.

100 N000-18-R-4406 Amendment 2 N000-18-R-4406 Amendment 2, Errata 1 & 2 Due to the size and complexity of the work package, and in order to afford all contractors ample time to prepare an accurate proposal that will be most beneficial to the Government, it is requested that the bid date be extended 21 days to 14 September 2018 vice 24 August 2018. It is also requested the due date for bidder's questions be extended 21 days to 22 August 2018 vice 1 August 2018.

Note that:

1. Errata 1 added 131 lines of IAF material into WI 643-11-001

2. Errata 1 added 131 lines of IAF material into WI 644-11-003

3. Errata 2 added 772 lines of IAF material into WI 472-90-002

Q1: Please provide correct NSN, or provide item as GFM Q2: Alternate option is to replace entire unit. If so, please provide correct part number and NSN for entire unit or provide as GFM.

Para 3.6 is Sp-11 column A? It should be Table 2 Line 21 Column A(Sp-12) ,B,C,E Type I nonskid Para 3.7: incorrect; should be a proprietary nonskid system (note7) follow 3.6 Para 3.8: incorrect; follow 3.6 for coating system column Table 2 Line 21 Columns B & E Para 3.9: 03-282-0-Q – Table 3 Line 6 Column A(Sp-11) B & D Correct High Durability Coating mil-prf-32171 Para 3.10: Table 3 Line 1 Column A (Sp-2), B, F & G (Lagging?)

Para 3.4,3.5,3.5.1:Table 2 Line 18 Column A (Sp-11) Blast Pads recommend Table 2 Line 21 Columns B,C,E for nonskid system Type I-3.5, 3.5.1 if flex fram is authorized any more for use?

Para 3.10 & 3.10.1: Table 2 Line 9 Column A,B,C,E is incorrect; should be Table 2 Line 15 Column B & E Nonskid Primer & Top Coat.

Paragraph 2.2 identifies, “551-8773460 Rev A, ShipAlt DDG-51-73738 Installation of Additional Bulkhead Cutout Valves & ML” Paragraph 3.1 states, “Accomplish the requirements of 2.2 through 2.6.”

Contractor has reviewed all documentation provided with issuance of Amendment 0003 and notes that reference 2.2 identified above was not provided.

Bidder's Question: Contractor requests that the customer provide reference 2.2 “551-8773460 Rev A, ShipAlt DDG-51-73738 Installation of Additional Bulkhead Cutout Valves & ML” of new work item 551-80-001, so that the contractor can provide accurate pricing.

Paragraph 2.9 identifies, “180-7622314 Rev B, AN/WSC-6(V)9 FWD AS-3018A/WSC-1(V) STRL FDN MODS & ML” Contractor has reviewed all documentation provided with issuance of Amendment 0003 and notes that reference 2.9 identified above was not provided.

Bidder's Question: Contractor requests that the customer provide reference 2.9 “180-7622314 Rev B, AN/WSC-6(V)9 FWD AS-3018A/WSC-1(V) STRL FDN MODS & ML” of revised work item 441-11-002, so that the contractor can provide accurate pricing.

Drawing 180-7622314 has been provided to KTRs upon request.

&P of &N

Sheet2

Sheet3 image1.jpeg image2.png image3.emf