LPD_17_QA_7.pdf

NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND

N00024-16-R-4409

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS #7

The following are answers to questions received from potential offerors. The answers provide clarification only and DO NOT constitute an amendment to the solicitation.

Addendum #1 is now available. Addendum #1 contains seven new work items which are now included in Attachment J-1 Work Specifications. Please refer to Amendment 0006 for details, a revised Attachment J-4 Pricing Workbook, and extension to the deadline for submission of questions for Addendum #1 Work Items only. For a copy of Addendum #1please contact Sheila Utz at Sheila.Utz1@navy.mil and Lisa Carll at Lisa.Carll@navy.mil.

122. Reserved.

135. Work Item 123-16-007: The paragraph directs the contractor to remove and install 11 each bolted plate manhole covers and bolting rings as designated by the supervisor based on the report provided in para. 3.1.1. The item only calls out two tank locations which should only be four lids. Is this a typo or does the Government plan to remove lids in other locations and if so how does the contractor effectively bid the other tanks not knowing if staging or decking will be required?

a. The Government clarifies that the quantity of 10 each is correct for bolted plate manhole covers and bolting rings. The Government confirms that the intent is to only remove lids in the designated location in the work specification. A revised work item 123-16-007 will be provided in a future errata to the work specification package.

145. Work Item 980-90-014: Para 3.1 states “ Remove the following equipment from the ship and load on to the conveyance provided by the AIT, when directed by the SUPERVISOR. The equipment will be unbolted and disconnected by the AIT.”

There is no list of equipment to remove provided, please provide a list of equipment including dimensional data and weights.

a. The Government will provide the list of equipment to remove including dimensional data and weights. For a copy of the PDF please contact Sheila Utz at Sheila.Utz1@navy.mil and Lisa Carll at Lisa.Carll@navy.mil.

147. Reserved.

149. Work Item 262-11-001: Para 3.2 invokes 009-90 requiring an OEM tech Rep and references para 4.1 for a source. Para 4.1 only lists Clarus Tech. LLC they are not the OEM for the engine or lube oil system Fairbanks is the OEM. Does the government really want an OEM for the lube oil flush?

NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND

N00024-16-R-4409

a. The Government confirms that Clarus Tech LLC is required in accordance with Para 4.1 of work item 262-11-001. Clarus Tech LLC designed and helped manufacture the lube oil system for the LPD 17 class ships. Clarus Technologies is required on scene to oversee the correct flushing and repairs to the lube oil system.

154. Reserved.

155. Reserved.

156. Work Item 441-80-001: Paragraph 3.1 directs the contractor to accomplish the requirements of 2.2 through 2.8, however references 2.6 through 2.8 appear to be drawings to remove the system and restore the affected areas after the system is no longer required. Should Para 3.2 include 2.2 through 2.5 only?

a. The Government clarifies that paragraph 3.2 should include reference 2.2 through 2.5 only. Revised work item 441-80-001 will be provided in a future errata to the work specification package.