N00024-15-R-6400_-_Amendment_0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to provide responses to bidder questions and revise N00024-15-R-6400 accordingly.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

U 1 87

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 23-Apr-2015

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N00024-15-R-6400

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

09-Apr-2015

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

23-Apr-2015

CODE

NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND (HQ)

1333 ISAAC HULL AVE SE

WASHINGTON NAVY YARD DC 20376-2040

N00024 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N00024-15-R-6400

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 27-May-2015 12:00 PM to 11-Jun-2015 12:00 PM.

The 'issued by' organization has changed from

NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND (HQ)

1333 ISAAC HULL AVE SE

WASHINGTON NAVY YARD DC 20376-2060

to

NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND (HQ)

1333 ISAAC HULL AVE SE

WASHINGTON NAVY YARD DC 20376-2030

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

CLIN 0014

The option status has changed from Option to No Status.

The following have been modified:

NOTE A

The Contractor shall propose a Fixed Price Incentive (FPI) structure for these item(s).

The Contractor shall propose within the following Government/Contractor shareline boundaries:

CLIN UNDERRUN OVERRUN

0001 50/50 50/50

Ceiling Price – 125% of Target Cost.

NOTE B

The Government may issue Technical Instructions in accordance with NAVSEA 5252.242-9115 TECHNICAL

INSTRUCTIONS (APR 1999) included in Section H of this contract. The Government estimate for Engineering

Services is approximately 80,000 man-hours during the base and all option years. These are estimated amounts of labor hours, and do not indicate that the Government will necessarily require this amount or any at all. These CLINs are Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF). The Government anticipates funding efforts under this CLIN using WPN, OM&N, and RDT&E. Additional SLINs will be added as required. Any Other Direct Costs associated with the performance of Technical Instructions shall be reimbursed on CLINs 0006, (IF OPTIONS EXERCISED) 0106, 0206, 0306, and

0406. The fully burdened labor rates proposed in Table L-2 for CLINs 0008, 0108, 0208, 0308, and 0408 will be incorporated into the resultant Contract in Section B to be used on all work efforts performed under these CLINs.

NOTE C

The Government may issue Technical Instructions in accordance with NAVSEA 5252.242-9115 TECHNICAL

INSTRUCTIONS (APR 1999) included in Section H of this contract. The Government Estimate is approximately

8,000 man-hours per year for Hardware Repair and Maintenance as described in Section C. This is an estimated amount of labor hours, and does not indicate that the Government will necessarily require this amount or any at all.

These CLINs are Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF). Any Other Direct Costs associated with the performance of

Technical Instructions shall be reimbursed on CLINs 0006(IF OPTIONS EXERCISED), 0106, 0206, 0306, and

0406. The fully burdened labor rates proposed in Table L-2 for CLINs 0009, 0109, 0209, 0309, and 0409 will be incorporated into the resultant Contract in Section B to be used on all work efforts performed under these CLINs.

NOTE D

SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING INCENTIVE: CLIN0014

(a) Objective:

PEO Submarine is committed to increasing small business participation in submarine system and subsystem development, production and support efforts consistent with cost/benefit considerations and attainment of acquisition objectives. Therefore, the Contractor may earn a Small Business Subcontracting Incentive Fee (SBSIF) under this contract for exceeding the Subcontracting Goals identified in the table below. The specifics for evaluation of the SBSIF are set forth in paragraphs that follow.

(b) Subcontracting Goals:

The following table identifies the percentages against which the

Contractor’s performance for the purposes of the SBSIF will be measured for the evaluation periods.

Goal*

Small Business (SB) 5.0%

HUBZone Small Business (HUBZone) 1.0%

Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) 3.0%

Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) 5.0%

Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB) 5.0%

Historically Black Colleges & Universities and Minority Institutions

(HBCU)

3.0%

*Base for measurement is total subcontract dollars.

(c) Periods and SBSIF Available:

The SBSIF is available for each column in the table below. The evaluation will be based on the value of small business subcontracting under each column up through delivery of the last system. The SBSIF pools for each category in each year will be calculated by applying the percentages specified in the table below to the total amount obligated on the specified

Contract Line Item Number (CLIN).

*Percentages Apply to Each Separate Column as defined below.

Subcontract Category Base

CLIN 0001,

0002, 0003, *Option 1

CLIN 0103,

*Option 2

CLIN 0203,

*Option 3

CLIN 0303,

*Option 4

CLIN 0403,

SB 0.05 % 0.05 % 0.05 % 0.05 % 0.05 %

HUBZone 0.01 % 0.01 % 0.01 % 0.01 % 0.01 %

SDVOSB 0.01 % 0.01 % 0.01 % 0.01 % 0.01 %

SDB 0.01 % 0.01 % 0.01 % 0.01 % 0.01 %

WOSB 0.01 % 0.01 % 0.01 % 0.01 % 0.01 %

HBCU 0.01 % 0.01 % 0.01 % 0.01 % 0.01 %

*If and to the extent exercised in accordance with FAR 52.217-7 entitled “OPTION FOR INCREASED

QUANTITY—SEPARATELY PRICED LINE ITEM.”

(i) The Contractor may earn the amount available under each category if its subcontracting percentage meets or exceeds the goal for each category established in paragraph (b) above.

(ii) The Contractor will not earn any of the amounts available if its subcontracting percentage is below the goal for the applicable category established in paragraph (b) above.

(iii) The incentive categories under this clause will be earned or not earned on an individual basis. Failure to earn the amount available under one or more of the categories does not preclude the Contractor from earning the amount available under the remaining category/categories.

(d) SF294 Subcontracting Reports:

The Contractor, unless a small business itself, shall submit semi-annual SF294s Subcontracting Report for

Individual Contracts submitted by the Contractor even if under a Comprehensive Plan that does not normally require

SF294s.

(e) Procedures:

1. Within one month of completion of effort and delivery of the last AUR Production Restart G&C Section or

CBASS Upgrade Kit (whichever is later) under each separate effort identified in paragraph (c), the

Contractor shall submit to the Contracting Officer in writing a self-evaluation of its performance under this clause. This self-evaluation will include, at a minimum, the SF 294s for the period and any other data used by the Contractor in determining its self-evaluation.

2. Within fifteen (15) working days of receipt of the Contractor’s self-evaluation, the Contracting Officer’s

Representative (COR) will review and evaluate the Contractor’s self-evaluation to determine if all required data was provided and if any SBSIF was earned. If the Contractor’s input is inadequate the COR shall ask the Contractor to correct the inadequacies of their self-evaluation and to resubmit a revised self-evaluation.

3. Within thirty (30) working days of receipt of the Contractor’s self-evaluation or revised self-evaluation, the

COR will meet with the PCO to make a final determination of whether any such SBSIF has been earned.

The PCO will issue a unilateral modification providing earned SBSIF. Determinations made under this paragraph are unilateral decisions made solely at the discretion of the Government.

4. No Small Business Subcontracting Incentive Fee will be earned unless the Contractor is making timely deliveries and is in compliance with the specifications for the hardware being acquired. The PCO will make the determination of whether the Contractor has met this prerequisite to be considered for the SBSIF.

In the event that the PCO determines that the Contractor’s performance is not satisfactory, the Contractor will not be eligible for the SBSIF.

(f) Finality of PCO’s Determination:

The parties agree that determinations of the PCO with respect to the amount of SBSIF to be paid to the Contractor are unilateral decisions made solely at the discretion of the Government. Notwithstanding anything else in this incentive or contract, a payment under this incentive is not incurred or earned until the effective date of a written contract modification.

(g) Payment of SBSIF:

The Contractor will be paid the SBSIF amount(s) earned upon submittal of proper invoices to the cognizant Payment

Office. The Contractor’s invoice shall show the amount of SBSIF payable by contract line item. The Contractor’s invoice must cite the appropriate accounting data in order for payment to be effected.

(h) Single Point of Contact:

The Contractor shall establish a single point of contact to deal with the Government on its small business subcontracting activities relating to this contract. The Government encourages the Contractor to pursue activities that will support increasing the level of small business subcontracting participation under this contract including, but not limited to, internal education and training, participation in matchmaking conferences and other outreach efforts, and the use of SUB-Net to post subcontracting opportunities.

NOTE E

Level of effort Item in accordance with NAVSEA Provision 5252.216.9122 entitled “LEVEL OF EFFORT” ALT 1 to the Contract. The hours shown in the schedule are the maximum hours for each CLIN to be performed within the period established under Section F of the contract entitled “DELIVERIES OF PERFORMANCE” and include both prime and subcontracts hours.

NOTE F

These CLINs consist of stepladder quantities which may range from the stated minimum quantities through the stated maximum quantities for each respective CLIN. Maximum steps are provided for each respective CLIN and shall not be exceeded. Offerors shall provide stepladder pricing in the “Stepladder Pricing Table”. Stepladder pricing set forth in Note F supersedes pricing in all other locations in Section B.

STEPLADDER GUIDELINES

Stepladder guidelines for CLIN 0003:

Minimum Quantity: 1

Maximum Quantity: 20

Maximum Number of Steps: 4

Stepladder guidelines for CLINs 0103 and 0203:

Maximum Quantity: 50

Maximum Number of Steps: 6

Stepladder guidelines for CLINs 0303 and 0403:

Maximum Quantity: 100

Maximum Number of Steps: 8

Stepladder guidelines for CLINs 0004, 0104, 0204, 0304, and 0404:

Minimum Quantity: 10

Maximum Quantity: 90

Maximum Number of Steps: 8

Stepladder guidelines for CLINs 0005, 0105, 0205, 0305, and 0405:

Maximum Quantity: 6

Maximum Number of Steps: 3

STEPLADDER PRICING TABLE (TO BE FILLED IN BY OFFEROR)

STEPLADDER NAME

ITEM

NO

Step

Number

FROM

QUANTITY

TO QUANTITY

UNIT

PRICE

MK48 MOD 7 G&C

Section Base 0003 1

NO

Step

Number

FROM

QUANTITY

TO QUANTITY

UNIT

PRICE

Option Year 1 - MK48

MOD 7 G&C Section 0103 1

NO

Step

Number

FROM

QUANTITY

TO QUANTITY

UNIT

PRICE

Option Year 2 - MK48

0203 1

NO

Step

Number

FROM

QUANTITY

TO QUANTITY

UNIT

PRICE

Option Year 3 - MK48

0303 1

NO

Step

Number

FROM

QUANTITY

TO QUANTITY

UNIT

PRICE

Option Year 4 - MK48

0403 1

NO

Step

Number

FROM

QUANTITY

TO QUANTITY

UNIT

PRICE

MK48 MOD 7 CBASS

Upgrade Kits 0004 1

NO

Step

Number

FROM

QUANTITY

TO QUANTITY

UNIT

PRICE

Option Year 1 - MK48

MOD 7 CBASS Upgrade

Kits

0104 1

NO

Step

Number

FROM

QUANTITY

TO QUANTITY

UNIT

PRICE

Option Year 2 - MK48

MOD 7 CBASS Upgrade

0204 1

NO

Step

Number

FROM

QUANTITY

TO QUANTITY

UNIT

PRICE

Option Year 3 - MK48

MOD 7 CBASS Upgrade

0304 1

NO

Step

Number

FROM

QUANTITY

TO QUANTITY

UNIT

PRICE

Option Year 4 - MK48

MOD 7 CBASS Upgrade

0404 1

NO

Step

Number

FROM

QUANTITY

TO QUANTITY

UNIT

PRICE

Factory Test Equipment 0005 1

NO

Step

Number

FROM

QUANTITY

TO QUANTITY

UNIT

PRICE

Option Year 1 - Factory

Test Equipment 0105 1

NO

Step

Number

FROM

QUANTITY

TO QUANTITY

UNIT

PRICE

Option Year 2 - Factory

0205 1

NO

Step

Number

FROM

QUANTITY

TO QUANTITY

UNIT

PRICE

Option Year 3 - Factory

0305 1

NO

Step

Number

FROM

QUANTITY

TO QUANTITY

UNIT

PRICE

Option Year 4 - Factory

0405 1

NOTE G

The Optional Provisioned Item Order (PIO) for Factory Test Equipment Component Spares CLIN 0012 will be implemented by separate contract modifications in accordance with Section C: PROVISIONED ITEMS ORDERS

(NAVSEA) (APR 1999). Pricing will be set forth on each order. Offerors shall propose a profit percentage in the table below. The proposed profit percentage will be utilized on all orders issued under CLIN 0012.

Proposed Profit Percentage

CLIN 0012 – PIO %

SECTION C - DESCRIPTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS

The following have been modified:

PART 3: SCOPE OF WORK

3.1 Background

The MK 48 Mod 7 Heavyweight Torpedo is the U.S. Navy’s primary submarine launched anti-submarine (ASW) and anti-surface warfare (ASuW) weapon. The MK 48 Mod 7 is a high performance, self-propelled underwater vehicle that contains complex electronic and mechanical subassembly systems for providing propulsion, steering, navigation, and target detection. The system technologies include acoustic sonar, guidance and control electronics, electrical power, hydraulic systems, mechanical pumps, and propulsion.

The MK 48 Mod 7 is 19 feet long, 21 inches in diameter and weighs about 3,700 pounds. The MK 48 Mod 7 consists of over 600 parts, including Functional Item Replacement (FIR) units (similar to modular replaceable “plug and play” units in other systems), torpedo shells, cables, fuel and lubricants, consumable piece parts, etc. A number of FIRs are currently in production while others have not been produced in over ten years.

This RFP is for the G&C Section of the MK 48 Mod 7 Torpedo. The G&C section performs the functions listed below.

a. Weapon Control and Safety functions - Allocates and controls torpedo resources throughout the run and ensures protection for the launch craft and other friendly vessels. Ensures operational software is not compromised.

b. Guidance functions - Controls the dynamic behavior and maintains position and altitude data. Converts seawater depth pressure to serial digital data.

c. Sonar functions - Performs broadband signal processing, active and passive beam forming, acquires target and generates target position data required for target engagement.

d. Power Distribution functions - Converts input power into DC voltages that are distributed to the subsystems internal to the nose section.

Further, MK 48 Mod 7 CBASS Upgrade Kits defined in CLINs 0004, 0104, 0204, 0304, and 0404 will be purchased under this contract to further upgrade the current MK 48 inventory. The CBASS Upgrade Kit is a subset of the G&C section.

This will be the third consecutive contract under which the US Navy purchases MOD 7 CBASS components. As such, there are extensive obsolescence issues within the current design that impact the current software (SW), middleware (MW), and firmware (FW). The Government will be supplying the SW, MW, and FW in the current design in order to support the Contractor’s efforts on this contract. A white paper describing the current known obsolescence in the Mk 48 Mod 7 design is provided (Attachment 16), and an example of a successful and similar obsolescence redesign is also provided as GFI (Attachment 3). The Contractor shall modify, reuse, or replace the provided SW, MW, and FW as necessary to meet the requirements of the Contract Baseline (Attachment 1).

3.2 Applicable Documents

To the extent referenced herein, the following documents form a part of this SOW and are hereby incorporated by reference. In the event of a conflict between the documents referenced herein and the contents of this SOW, the contents of this SOW shall take precedence. Other documents and specifications provided as Government

Furnished Information (GFI) are identified in Attachment 3.

3.2.1 Department of Defense Specifications

3.2.1.1.1 Contract Baseline Documents

See Attachment 1, Contract Baseline, for a list of design specifications, performance specifications, interface requirement documents, assembly drawings, and source control drawings. In the case where a particular assembly drawing is provided as both a PDF and in a native file format the PDF version shall be the controlling document and supersede the native file format version.

3.2.1.2 Program Unique Documents

Title Date and/or Revision

OPNAVINST S5513.5C – Undersea Warfare Program Security Classification

Guides (SCGs) SCG ID: 139.2, MK 48 ADCAP (MODS 5 and beyond), MK

50, AND MK 54 Torpedoes

(See Attachment 11)

26 April 2010

Undersea Weapons Program Office Risk Process Description (See

Attachment 11)

8 September, 2003

MK48 ADCAP CBASS Systems Safety Program Plan (SSPP) (See

Attachment 11)

November 2003, Rev 1

Configuration Management Plan for Undersea Weapons Program (PMS404), PEO SUB S0199-133-A-O-C (See Attachment 11)

August 2010, Rev D

Manufacturing Quality Assurance Specification, Torpedo Functional Item

Replacement (Document Number: 8595331) (Attachment 11)

March 3, 2015

3.2.1.3 Other Government Documents

Title Date and/or Revision

Failure, Reporting, Analysis and Corrective Action Taken (MIL-HDBK-

2155) (See http://www.assistdocs.com)

11 December 1995

Electrostatic Discharge Control Handbook for Protection of Electrical and

Electronic Parts, Assemblies and Equipment (Excluding Electrically Initiated

Explosive Devices) (Metric) (MIL-HDBK-263) (See http://www.assistdocs.com)

31 July 1994, Rev. B

Electrostatic Discharge Control Program For Protection of Electrical and 25 October 1995, Rev. C http://www.assistdocs.com/

Electronic Parts, Assemblies and Equipment (Excluding Electrically Initiated

Explosive Devices) (MIL-STD-1686) (See http://www.assistdocs.com)

Navy Manufacturing Screening Program (NAVMAT P-9492) (See http://www.assistdocs.com)

May 1979

Environmental Stress Screening (ESS) of Electronic Equipment (MIL-

HDBK-344) (See http://www.assistdocs.com)

16 August 1993, Rev A

Configuration Management Guidance (MIL-HDBK-61) (See http://www.assistdocs.com)

7 February 2001, Rev A

DoD Standard Practice System Safety (MIL-STD-882) (See http://www.assistdocs.com)

11 May 2012, Rev E

Department of the Navy Weapons System Explosives Safety Review Program

(NAVSEAINST 8020.6E) (See Attachment 11)

11 March 2008

Federal Acquisition Regulation (See https://acquisition.gov/far/) Available Online

National Aerospace Standard, Hazardous Materials Management Program

(NAS 411) (See http://www.assistdocs.com)

19 January 1995

Parts Management (MIL-STD-3018) (See http://www.assistdocs.com) 27 October 2011 GIDEP Operations Manual (NAVSEA S0300-BT-PRO-010) (See http://www.gidep.org/about/opmanual/opmanual.htm)

September 2009

3.2.1.4 Non-Government Documents

Title Description Date and/or Revision

ANSI/ISO/ASQ Q9001 Quality Management Systems – Requirements

Standard (See http://webstore.ansi.org/)

November 2008

AS9100C Quality Systems - Aerospace - Model for Quality

Assurance in Design, Development, Production, Installation and Servicing (See http://standards.sae.org/as9100c/)

January 2009

ANSI/EIA-649-B National Consensus Standard for Configuration

Management (See http://webstore.ansi.org/)

June 2011

IPC J-STD-001E Joint Industry Standard Requirements for Soldered

Electrical and Electronic Assemblies (See https://portal.ipc.org/ipc-store.htm)

April 2010

IEEE/EIA Std. 12207-

Systems and Software Engineering—Software

Life Cycle Processes (See http://www.astm.org/standards)

February 2008

IPC-A-610E Acceptability of Electronic Assemblies (See https://portal.ipc.org/ipc-store.htm)

April 2010

IPC/WHMA-A-620 Requirements and Acceptance for Cable and Wire

Harness Assemblies (See https://portal.ipc.org/ipc-store.htm)

October 2012, Rev B

3.3 Requirements

3.3.1 Program Management

The Contractor shall develop and provide a Program Management Plan in accordance with CDRL A001. The PMP shall contain detail to allow the Government to verify the Contractor’s management and scheduling of all efforts necessary to meet the Contract requirements to include completion of program reviews and completion of associated

CDRL deliverables. The Contractor shall include a description of their process of identifying and tracking risks and opportunities in the PMP. Where these efforts are event as opposed to calendar driven, schedule estimates shall be http://www.assistdocs.com/ http://www.assistdocs.com/ http://www.assistdocs.com/ http://www.assistdocs.com/ http://www.assistdocs.com/ https://acquisition.gov/far/ provided. The Contractor shall designate a full time Contractor Program Manager who shall have responsibility for all aspects of this contract, and shall be responsible for providing Contractor’s Progress, Status, And Management

Report: Program Manager’s Report (CDRL A002), see SOW section 3.3.2.

3.3.1.1 Security Requirements

The Contractor shall establish and maintain a facility clearance of at least SECRET as issued by the Defense

Investigative Service. Specific Contractor security access requirements are outlined in the Contract Security

Classification Specification (DD254) in accordance with Attachment 6. The Contractor shall issue the proper classification markings and maintain security for all classified items, including documentation, hardware, firmware, middleware, and software generated for the MK 48 MOD 7 G&C Sections and CBASS Upgrade Kits in accordance with OPNAVINST S5513.5 – Undersea Warfare Program Security Classification Guides (SCGs) SCG ID: 139.2, MK 48 ADCAP (MODS 5 and beyond), MK 50, AND MK 54 Torpedoes. The Contractor must have the capability to handle, store, and process classified information across all mediums (hard-copy, electronic, CD/DVD, etc.) at the

Secret level for their cleared facility.

The Contractor shall have the necessary clearances and processes necessary to ship and receive classified shipments.

The Contractor shall either establish the procedures and processes necessary to declassify all potentially classified hardware being delivered under this contract or contain all of their necessary Factory Test Equipment (both

Contractor developed and Government Furnished) in classified areas. All declassification processes and procedures shall be approved by the Defense Security Service (DSS), prior to delivery.

3.3.1.2 Parts Management

The Contractor shall establish and maintain a Parts Management Program in accordance with the requirements of applicable document “Parts Management (MIL-STD-3018)” for all designs or modified GFE. The Contractor shall verify that the use of parts meet the contractual requirements, reduce proliferation of parts within and across

Department of Defense (DoD) weapons systems and equipment through standardization, enhance reliability and supportability to meet material readiness objectives, and reduce total life-cycle costs. Also, the Contractor shall describe how the parts management process is validated, how process improvements are incorporated, and how process variation is controlled. The Contractor shall prepare and deliver the Parts Management Plan in accordance with CDRL A003 covering the period of performance of this contract.

The Parts Management Plan shall address the following parts management elements:

1. Parts selection baseline

2. Parts selection and authorization process

3. Obsolescence management

4. Parts list

5. Subcontractor management

6. Part and supplier quality

7. Part level documentation procedures

8. Substitute and alternative part procedures

9. Customer-contractor teaming

10. Counterfeit parts

11. Lead-free electronic parts

12. Long lead material

The Contractor shall conduct engineering analysis of the TDPs provided in the Contract Baseline (Attachment 1) and provided Government Furnished Information (Attachment 3) to identify changes required to resolve obsolescence issues (including the modification of any effected hardware and software, and validation of the modified hardware and software), reflect current best practices, and update supplier information to ensure a producible design. The Parts Management Plan shall define the contractor’s process that mitigates the risk associated with technology obsolescence; proprietary technologies; the loss or impending loss of manufacturers or suppliers of components, assemblies, or materials used in the system; and provide rationale for reliance on a single source of supply over the life of the system. The Parts Management Plan shall contain provisions to minimize the impact of obsolescence during contract execution, effectively manage obsolescence through planned modernization, and avoid additional costs from being incurred by the Government due to obsolescence. The Parts Management

Plan shall address means and approach for providing the Government with information regarding obsolescence and

Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) issues, access and insight into the

Contractor’s DMSMS forecasting tool, part list screening, part list monitoring, processing of Government Industry

Data Exchange Program (GIDEP) DMSMS alerts, processing of DLA DMSMS alerts, communication with and availability of information to the Government, a means and approach for establishing obsolescence and DMSMS solutions, and a plan for managing commercial off the shelf items (COTS).

The contractor shall actively participate in the Government Industry Data Exchange Program in accordance with the

GIDEP Operations Manual, S0300-BT-PRO-010. The contractor shall submit information concerning critical or major nonconformances, as defined in FAR 46.407/DFARS 246.407, to the GIDEP information system. GIDEP

Alerts and Safe-Alert Reports shall be submitted in accordance with CDRL A040.

The Parts Management Plan shall include Technology Road-mapping reports which establish the points along the service life of MK 48 MOD 7 G&C Sections and CBASS Upgrade Kits when it is optimal to change, or "refresh," both custom-built and COTS system components to ensure continued supportability throughout their lifecycle. It includes supplying the MK 48 User with hardware and software that is technically capable, available, sustainable, and cost effective. To ensure key torpedo systems are sustained through End-Of-Life, road-mapped efforts support the evaluation of the system technology and design, identification of technology/design options, assessment of the technical and cost trade-offs, and prioritization and recommendation of solutions. As a key tool of collaborative technology planning and coordination with IPT members, it allows the torpedo manufacturer, vendors, and integrators to make more informed business decisions when identifying and deploying appropriate technology alternatives to enhance design longevity.

The Contractor shall recommend design changes to ensure continuous manufacturing and/or repairing capabilities in accordance with the Configuration Management requirements of this contract.

The Contractor shall ensure all known and forecasted DMSMS issues are identified and have a mitigation plan, so that the Government is not left with an unsupportable system due to DMSMS. The Contractor shall provide prompt notification to the Government for any DMSMS/Obsolescence issues in accordance with section 2.4. Approved changes shall be made in accordance with the Configuration Management requirements of this contract.

The Contractor shall develop and flow down to all of its subcontractors and vendors at all tiers DMSMS requirements sufficient to ensure that the end items and services provided meet all requirements of this contract.

3.3.2 Program Reporting

The Contractor Program Manager shall provide the Contractor’s Progress, Status, And Management Report:

Program Manager’s Report in accordance with CDRL A002, covering all efforts under this Contract including

Subcontractor/Suppliers performance against the schedule baseline established in the Program Management Plan, Technical Instructions/Engineering Services, Obsolescence Reviews, Risk Management, Failure Analysis, Returned

Goods, and other work performed under the contract during the month of the report, in addition to Design, Development, Manufacture, Test, and Production efforts on the MK 48 MOD 7 G&C Sections, CBASS Upgrade

Kits, and Factory Test Equipment.

3.3.2.1 Obsolescence Reporting Requirements

The Contractor is responsible for the identification of all DMSMS/Obsolescence/Producibility issues associated with production and delivery of hardware under this contract in accordance with the Technical Design Package (TDP) and section 2.4 of Section C.

The Contractor shall submit Forecasting Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS)

Source Data in accordance with CDRL A005.

The Contractor shall provide obsolescence tasking updates as part of the Contractor’s Progress, Status, And

Management Report: Program Manager’s Report (CDRL A002). The obsolescence tasking updates shall address the results of the on-going review and identification of actual and potential issues within Contractor and their sub-vendors Bills of Material (BOM). The Contractor is encouraged to use the DoD DMSMS Center of Excellence

Shared Data Warehouse for the purpose of exchanging obsolescence information across the DoD enterprise.

For purposes of this contract, Producibility is defined as the ability to procure, fabricate, assemble, and test an item using available production technology while still meeting the necessary quality and performance requirements. This definition shall apply to all technical data supplied as a part of any change issued under this contract if the additional

DMSMS/ Obsolescence/ Producibility effort is required by reason of a Government-issued change. In which case this provision entitles the Contractor to an equitable adjustment for which the amount shall be included in the settlement of the change order for the Government-issued change.

3.3.2.2 Risk Management Process

The Contractor shall implement a comprehensive risk management process that is focused on program risk areas and the program’s critical path to systematically identify and mitigate cost, schedule, and technical risks. The Contractor shall use the Undersea Weapons Program Office Risk Process Description, contained in Attachment 11, as the basis for their risk management process. The Contractor shall provide risk item reports, to include the identification and adjudication of risk items in accordance with CDRL A002, Program Manager’s Report and address during reviews.

3.3.2.3 Reviews and Meetings

The Contractor shall be responsible for hosting the reviews and meetings required in paragraphs 3.3.2.3.1 through

3.3.2.3.5. Hosting shall include providing for meeting location at or near the Contractor’s facility with all necessary administrative support as well as development, coordination, and distribution of the agenda and Program Review and IPT Presentation Packets in accordance with CDRL A006 and Design Review Information Package (CDRL

A024) (as applicable) for each review. At PMS404 discretion, Government arranged facilities and administrative support may be used to support the meeting.

The Contractor shall record, generate, and process submittal of the review minutes from the participants of reviews, and track all action items after the reviews. The Contractor shall report these minutes and action item tracking data as Record of Meeting/Minutes – Meeting/Minutes Logs in accordance with CDRL A007. Progress and updated status on action items shall also be included in the Contractor’s Progress, Status, and Management Report: Program

Manager’s Report (CDRL A002).

Unless otherwise noted by the Government for the individual review or meeting events, the Contractor shall provide unclassified electronic and video or audio teleconference capability, allowing remote participation of conference room presentation screen by, and verbal participation of, Government personnel located in internet-connected

Government offices, including NUWC Newport and NUWC Keyport locations. The Contractor shall provide internet-based ability to access or download unclassified program review documentation, models and data to

Government personnel located in internet-connected Government offices.

3.3.2.3.1 Inter-Organizational Contract Processes Familiarization Workshop

Within 30 Days after Contract Award (DAC), the Contractor shall support the Government in preparing for and attending an Inter-Organizational Contract Processes Familiarization workshop, which will be facilitated by the

Defense Acquisition University (DAU). As risk mitigation to miscommunications and other inter-organizational performance delays, this workshop allows Government and Contractor personnel to become familiarized with the organizational structures and processes under the new contract effort.

The Contractor shall review the agenda of the workshop and prepare for the applicable presentation for the workshop prior to the dates of the workshop. On the dates of the workshop, the Contractor shall participate in the workshop on-site and provide presentations during the workshop. The Contractor shall host this meeting one time.

The Government will provide slide packages to the Contractor two days in advance of the workshop. The

Contractor will print-out the reading packages (including the Government and Contractor slide packages) for the participating members of the workshop. Aside from the information to support the agenda, the Contractor shall also provide the following data (CDRL A012):

Introduction to Contractor Personnel, Internal Processes, and Tools.

Contractor Cost Monitoring Techniques

Contractor Organization Chart with roles, names, email addresses, and phone numbers

3.3.2.3.2 Integrated Baseline Review (IBR)

The Contractor shall host a post-Award IBR within 120 Days after Contract Award (DAC). During the post-Award

IBR, the Contractor shall present its Program Management Plan. The IBR shall detail the Contractor's planning to ensure complete coverage of the work effort required by the contract, logical scheduling of work activities, adequate resourcing, understanding of technical requirements, and identification of inherent risks and risk mitigation plans.

Completion of the post-Award IBR will result in establishment of a baseline for all elements of the MK 48 MOD 7

G&C Sections, CBASS Upgrade Kits, and Factory Test Equipment production schedules provided in the Program

Management Plan. Contractor shall update CDRL A001 according to results of IBR action items and resubmit for

Government approval. The Contractor shall submit an IBR agenda and IBR presentations in accordance with

CDRL A006. The contractor shall host the post-Award IBR one time.

3.3.2.3.2.1 Entrance Criteria

The baseline is established by the Contractor reflecting the entire scope of work for the performance of the contract.

Project schedule key milestones are identified and documented.

Program Risks and Opportunities are identified.

Technical Scope of Work is consistent with Performance Specifications.

Resources such as budget, Facilities, and personnel are planned for the program and measured for

Variances.

Tasks are planned and can be measured objectively relative to the technical progress.

The program schedule is executable and updated.

The program has an executable budget plan established and is being measured for variances.

Management processes are documented for execution of the project.

Earned Value Management System (EVMS) is in place, including a plan for earned value collection and periodic status (Applicable to CLIN 0001 only).

3.3.2.3.2.2 Exit Criteria

Technical scope of work is fully included and is consistent with authorizing documents.

Formal cost and schedule baselines established and approved.

IBR Action Items completed and approved.

3.3.2.3.3 Systems Engineering Technical Reviews (SETR))

The Contractor shall host the SETRs listed below throughout the performance of this contract in order to demonstrate readiness to proceed in its hardware and software development efforts for the MK 48 MOD 7 G&C

Sections, CBASS Upgrade Kits, and Factory Test Equipment under the approving authority of the Undersea

Weapons Program Manager. These SETRs shall be captured as program milestones in the Contractor’s Systems

Engineering Management Plan (CDRL A008) and the plan to complete necessary SETR tasking shall be described.

The Contractor shall present all of the information detailed in DI-SESS-81757 at the applicable SETRs and deliver to the Government the Design Review Information Package CDRL A024. The Contractor shall include any necessary Objective Quality Evidence (OQE) (e.g. test procedures, test reports, specification documents, design documents, interface documents, user manuals, configurations item data bases, schedules, etc.) referenced or needed to support the information presented in the Design Review Information Package with the CDRL A024 delivery.

System Requirements Review (SRR)

System Functional Review (SFR)

Software Specification Review (SSR)

Hardware Preliminary Design Review (HPDR)

Software Preliminary Design Review (SPDR)

Hardware Critical Design Review (HCDR)

Software Critical Design Review (SCDR)

Test Readiness Review (TRR)

Physical Configuration Audit (PCA)

Functional Configuration Audit (FCA)

The Contractor may combine multiple SETRs into a single meeting if they are able to present all of the necessary information and the COR approves of combining the SETRs. In order to receive COR approval, the Contractor shall send a formal request to combine multiple SETRs into a single meeting at least 30 days before the planned meeting date.

The Contractor shall include Firmware design discussions as part of the HPDR and HCDR.

In accordance with the Design Review Information Package CDRL A024, the SRR, SFR, SSR, and SPDR will not be subject to Government approval. For these Contractor approved reviews, the Contractor shall provide the

Government with no less than 30 days’ notice before conducting Contractor Approved SETRs and provide physical and remote access to allow the Government to attend the reviews. The Government reserves the right to provide comments that shall be adjudicated for Contractor approved reviews. Government approval shall be required for the

HPDR, HCDR, SCDR, TRR, PCA, and FCA in accordance with Design Review Information Package CDRL A024.

The PCA and FCA will be Government initiated and subject to Government approval in accordance with Design

Review Information Package CDRL A024. The Contractor shall host all SETR meetings for the G&C Sections, CBASS upgrade kits, and Test Equipment.

3.3.2.3.3.1 Test Readiness Review (TRR)

In addition to the DI-SESS-81757 requirements for the TRR, the Contractor shall present for Government review and approval test plans and procedures, test assets, facilities, risks in the upcoming test periods, and other related items.

The Contracting Officer’s Representative will provide authorization for the Contractor to proceed with the TRR once the following have been completed:

a. Approved Test Procedure – First Article Test Procedures (CDRL A034) and Test Procedure – Factory

Acceptance Test Procedures (CDRL A025)

b. Approved Contractor Validation Plan – Factory Test Equipment Certification Plan (CDRL A026)

c. Completed Factory Test Equipment TDP and Software (CDRLs B003, B006, B007)

d. Updated Systems Engineering Management Plan (CDRL A008)

The TRR shall comply with all requirements specified in the Systems Engineering Management Plan (CDRL A008) and all action items generated during the TRR shall require resolution and closure and reported via CDRLA007.

Once all requirements are met, the Contracting Officer’s Representative will issue a TRR closure letter authorizing the Contractor to proceed into formal Qualification Testing.

Post TRR, any issues found during POM testing that necessitate revision of previously approved CDRLs shall be addressed and the CDRLs revised and re-submitted for Government approval prior to the Production Readiness

Review (PRR). The Contractor shall host up to three TRR’s.

3.3.2.3.4 Production Readiness Review (PRR)

The purpose of the PRR is for the Contractor to demonstrate to the Government that it has accomplished adequate production planning without incurring unacceptable risks that could breach schedule, performance, cost or other established criteria and gain concurrence from the Government to produce production units. The Contractor shall submit a PRR agenda and PRR presentations in accordance with CDRL A006.

The PRR shall comply with all requirements specified in the Systems Engineering Management Plan (CDRL A008) and all action items generated during the PRR shall require resolution prior to PRR closure. Once all PRR requirements are met, the Contracting Officer will issue a closure letter authorizing the Contractor to begin factory production deliveries. Upon completion of the PRR, the baseline for all TDPs and factory processes shall be considered established.

The Government will determine when all entrance and exit criteria for the PRR have been satisfied and the

Contracting Officer’s Representative will notify the Contractor at least 14 days prior to the milestone event to schedule the PRR. The Contractor shall host PRR one time.

3.3.2.3.4.1 Entrance Criteria

Actions from Functional Configuration Audit (FCA) completed and approved.

Actions from Physical Configuration Audit (PCA) completed and approved.

Completion and verification of Contractor First Article and POM Testing, including completion of

Government POM Testing.

Supply Sources and Vendors are in place.

Completed Assembly and Manufacturing Processes and Procedures.

Approved Critical Manufacturing Processes (CDRL A016).

Approved Quality Program Plan including QASP elements (CDRL A020).

Approved Test Procedure - Factory Acceptance Test Procedures (CDRL A025).

Approved Factory Test Equipment TDP (CDRL B003).

Approved Systems Engineering Management Plan (CDRL A008).

Contractor design has been verified by the Government to be compliant with the Technical Manual for

Nuclear Powered Submarine Atmosphere Control Manual (S9510-AB-ATM-010).

The program risks have been evaluated by a joint Contractor/Government (including the Technical Warrant

Holder, Technical Design Authority, and Program Manager) review and ascertained to be acceptable at this phase of the program.

The system product baseline has been established and documented for the system, subsystem, equipment, and software including establishing nomenclature in accordance with MIL-STD-196E Joint Type

Designation System and to enable hardware fabrication and software coding to proceed with proper configuration management.

Technical Performance Measures are in place and being regularly monitored.

The program schedule is executable and updated.

3.3.2.3.4.2 Exit Criteria

ALL PRR Action Items completed and approved by the Program Manager

3.3.2.3.5 Program Management Reviews

The Contractor shall conduct quarterly Program Management Reviews (PMRs). PMRs shall cover, at a minimum:

a. Schedule performance covering all completed and planned efforts

b. Risk management activities

c. A review of all program, contractual, and obsolescence issues

d. A review of all test efforts

e. A review of all Technical Instructions, including cost and schedule performance

f. A cost data review

g. A review of production through-put calculations

Out of the four PMRs held each year, three shall occur at the contractor’s facility or at an agreed to location by the

Government and one will be conducted in the Washington Area (within 50 driving miles of the Washington Navy

Yard). When the PMR is held at the Contractor’s facility, the Contractor shall provide administrative support and access to the facilities to attending Government personnel. The Contractor shall propose date(s) and location no less than 45 days prior to the PMR. The Government will confirm the date(s) and location no less than 30 days prior to the PMR. The Contractor shall submit a PMR agenda and PMR presentations in accordance with CDRL A006.

3.3.2.4 Integrated Product Teams

The Contractor shall coordinate and host Government/Contractor Integrated Product Teams (IPT) at the leadership and working group levels to achieve program goals. At a minimum, IPTs shall be established for the following:

a. Monthly leadership meetings to review program status and determine go forward actions as needed. The

Contractor’s Progress, Status, And Management Report: Program Manager’s Report (CDRL A002) will serve as the information package for this meeting.

b. Weekly Systems Engineering meetings to support execution of the Government approved System

Engineering Management Plan (CDRL A008)

c. Weekly working level production meetings to resolve and discuss ongoing progress, status, condition of

GFE, failure analysis, quality metrics, and program issues.

d. Meetings to update and provide status to an Integrated Master Schedule that details Government tasking related to the execution of this contract and related to Contractor efforts shall be held a minimum of twice a month, up until the completion of the Production Readiness Review (PRR). The Government will maintain this schedule.

The Contractor-coordinated regular IPT meetings shall be established no later than one (1) month after the Inter-

Organizational Contract Processes Familiarization Workshop (see paragraph 3.3.2.3.1). The Contractor shall develop and distribute the agenda and Program Review and IPT Presentation Packets prior to all IPT meetings in accordance with CDRL A006, adjust the agenda in response to Government feedback, and shall submit Record of

Meeting/Minuets – Meeting/Minutes Logs in accordance with CDRL A007 following each meeting. IPT meetings may be held via telephone.

In addition to the above Contractor-coordinated meetings, the Contractor shall support the following Government-coordinated and hosted meetings:

a. Fault Isolation Team (FIT) weekly meetings to review failures or nonconformances on Contractor deliveries, score the nonconformances as either Contractor or Government responsibility, and provide disposition of previously submitted Failure Analysis and Corrective Action Report – Failures During First

Article, POM, Factory Acceptance Testing, Conditional Acceptance and Government POM Testing

(CDRL A032). The Government will provide the information packages for this meeting. The FIT weekly meetings will be established after the successful completion of the TRR. The FIT will utilize Attachment

13 (Fault Isolation Process) to perform fault isolation of nonconformances identified by the Government and track both Government and Contractor failure analysis efforts to closure.

The Contractor shall ensure appropriate Contractor personnel are in attendance or on telephone conferences with

Government personnel to resolve and discuss ongoing progress, status, condition of GFE, and program issues. The

Contractor shall be flexible and shall adopt improved processes developed by these IPT’s in a timely manner, react quickly to mitigate risk, increase efficiency through appropriate use of IPT products, and streamline management oversight.

3.3.2.5 Other Reports

The Contractor shall provide other reports required as detailed in sections 3.3.2.5.1 and 3.3.2.5.2.

3.3.2.5.1 Minimum Sustaining Quantities

The Contractor shall submit a Technical Report – Study/Services - Minimum Sustaining Rate (MSR) and Economic

Order Quantity (EOQ) Report in accordance with CDRL A009. The MSR and EOQ shall be prepared for the production of G&C CBASS Sections, CBASS Upgrade Kits, and Factory Test Equipment (CLINs 0003, 0004, 0005, and (IF OPTIONS EXERCISED) 0103, 0203, 0303, 0403, 0104, 0204, 0304, 0404, 0105, 0205, 0305, and

0405).

The MSR and EOQ Reports provide the Government with vital information to be used for production and budget purposes to help manage MK48 Mod 7 G&C…