Admin_Ops QAs Amendment 1.pdf

# Date Submitted

Question Source (RFP, attachment #, GFI title, etc.)

Page number and paragraph header from source Question USG Resoponse

1 10/27/2021 RFP Section C. 3.2.2.2 Pg 21

Can the TS level Facility Clearance requirement be satisfied by use of a teammate/subcontractor’s FCL with a certified TS FCL in the same geographical area?

The prime must possess the required top secret facility clearance level.

2 11/2/2021 RFP

Pages 94-97, 4.0 VOLUME 4: PAST PERFORMANCE and VOLUME 4:

PRICE/COST PROPOSAL

after reviewing the final RFP recognizes that numbering in Section L appears nonsequential. For example, section 4.0 VOLUME 4: PAST PERFORMANCE moves from 4.1.1 to 4.1.3, skipping over 4.1.2. Additionally, Section L labels the Price/Cost Proposal as Volume 4 and numbers the sections as 4.1 through 4.4 although Past Performance is also labeled as Volume 4 and uses sections 4.1 through 4.14. Should we use this numbering for our response or does the government anticipate releasing updated documents with revised section numbers for us to use? Any guidance is appreciated.

Paragraph numbering is revised. See Amendment 0001 to the Solicitation.

3 11/3/2021 RFP Section A- Solicitation/Contract Form

The solicition identifies the requirement for a Top Secret Facility. The proposed prime currently has a secret facility. Would it be acceptable if the sub-contractor has an approved TS facility at the time of award and the prime then begins the upgrade process thereby allowing all TS requirements to be met upon award?

The prime must possess the required top secret facility clearance level.

N00019-21-R-0036 Q&A 1

Sheet1