Solicitation Questions -- M67854-21-R-7901 RTAM MILOPS GIS Data Svcs (Final).xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 30 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- M67854-21-R-7901
- Issued by
-
United States Marine Corps
View the file
Other files
Show all 31
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Questions || M67854-21-R-7901
| TECOM RTAM Military Operations Data Support | ||||
| RFP: M6785421R7901 | ||||
| RFI # | Document/Section | Paragraph | Question/Issue/Concern | Government's Response |
| 1 | General Issue | Please identify any equipment that will be provided (including but not limited to software licenses, laptops, desktop workstations, data collection equipment such as GPS handhelds, vehicles and/or access to vehicles, fuel, etc.)? | Government will provide MCEN access via a Government supplied computer. | |
| 2 | General Question | Is USMC interested in leveraging alternative GIS solutions (other than ArcGIS) for MIM, MIMICS, and RMTK map production? Or is this strictly a services support contract? | No. ESRI ArcGIS software is the interface utilized for MIM, MIMICS, and RMTK map production. This is a service support contract. | |
| 3 | Performance Work Statement | C.3 | Will contractor have edit access to RFMSS and iNFADS to update those enterprise systems or will contractor provide the data to RTAM for input/coordination in RFMSS/iNFADS? | The contractor will provide the required data to RTAM for adjudication and the proper routing for input into both RFMSS and iNFADS |
| 4 | Performance Work Statement | C.3 | Will RTAM be the main POC for the coordination of RFMSS/iNFADS data? | Yes |
| 5 | Performance Work Statement | C.5.3 | Is the expectation for the "MIM" products to go through the NGA approval process? | Yes |
| 6 | Performance Work Statement | C.5.3 | Will authoritative data be provided for features "outside the fence line"? | Yes. Appropriate white space data will be provided for the development of all products. |
| 7 | Performance Work Statement | C.5.1.9 | Should the contractor assume that the Government will not furnish equipment or software for laptops, workstations, GPS equipment, printers, plotters for executing work on site on Government Networks? | The Government will provide MCEN access via a Government supplied computer. |
| 8 | Performance Work Statement | C.5.1.9 | Will the contractor need to provide software and hardware to perform duties required in PWS on the MCEN network? | Stand alone systems are required to be furnished by the contractor . Access to MCEN will be granted via a government laptop/desktop at the workstation after a Common Access Card is obtained and all security prerequisites are accomplished. |
| 9 | Performance Work Statement | C.5.8.4 | Does the GEOFidelis environment provide access to Esri ArcGIS software licenses? | No |
| 10 | Performance Work Statement | C.5.7.1 | Will the contractor be required to acquire network admin privileges to install software on Government machines in order to perform software installations? | MCEN network administrator privileges are not a requirement for this effort. |
| 11 | Performance Work Statement | C.5.7.1 | What are the personnel security requirements in order to obtain Network Administrator Privileges? | MCEN network administrator privileges are not a requirement for this effort. |
| 12 | Performance Work Statement | C.4 | "Contractor Personnel shall be available to work on the first day of the period of performance of the resultant contract." Does this opportunity require on-site contract support 5 days a week at Quantico? | The Government is expecting contractor responses to propose coverage effeciencies to achieving the objectives for the locations in the PWS. |
| 13 | Performance Work Statement | C.2 | Please clarify the government’s expectation for the level of on-site support required. | Offerors proposals are to demonstrate how its performance will achieve the requirements outlined in the PWS. |
| 14 | Performance Work Statement | C.2 | At which Bases/Stations and Major Installations will there be dedicated workspaces for contractor personnel? | All Bases/Stations and Major Installations will have dedicated workspaces for required on-site contractor personnel. |
| 15 | Performance Work Statement | C.2 | If there are no dedicated workspaces, will temporary workspaces be provided at the Bases/ Stations and Major Installations? | All Bases/Stations and Major Installations will have dedicated workspaces for required on-site contractor personnel. |
| 16 | Performance Work Statement | C.5 | Is this work being performed today, and if so, is it being performed by contractors, civil servants, or uniformed personnel? | This is a new requirement. |
| 17 | Performance Work Statement | C.5 | Will the contractor be expected to interface with other contractors performing related work? If so, please identify any related contracts or programs. | Potentally, contractors are expected to interface with other enterprise contactors. Who may conduct related work under other contract vehicles which are responsible for providing GIS support. |
| 18 | Performance Work Statement | C.5 | How does this work overlap or intersect with the GIS work to be performed under the Range and Training Area Management (RTAM) Support Services contract (Solicitation # M0026421R0012) | This is a new stand alone requirement completely independent of solicitation M0026421R0012. |
| 19 | Performance Work Statement | C.5 | To sufficiently staff this effort, offerors need to know the volume of products expected at across all Bases/Stations and Major Installations. Please provide historical metrics or guidance on the following: |
(Questions 20 - 25)
| 20 | Performance Work Statement | C.5.2.2 | What is the estimated level of field data collection required at each Base/ Station supported? | The scope of this contract shall identify and update functionally obsolete, inadequate and unverified MILOPS GIS data at the nine (9) Bases/Stations locations and five (5) optional Major Installations listed below. (PWS C.2) Therfore, the effort needed will vary by location. |
| 21 | Performance Work Statement | What is the expected volume of ad hoc map requests across the supported locations? | Varies, as required based on mission requirements support of the base/ Station. | |
| 22 | Performance Work Statement | C.5.3 | How many MIM products are expected to be produced for each Base/Station and Major Installation? | One final MIM version is required per location |
| 23 | Performance Work Statement | C.5.4 | How many MIMICS are expected to be produced for each Base/Station and Major Installation? | Varies, as required by the Base Commander and mission requirements in support of the base / station. |
| 24 | Performance Work Statement | C.5.7 | How many danger zone assessments are expected to be produced at each Base/ Station and Major Installation? | Varies, as required based on mission requirements support of the base/ Station. |
| 25 | Performance Work Statement | C.5.7 | How many established deviations will need to be developed and/or updated at each Base/ Station and Major Installation? | Varies, as required based on mission requirements support of the base/ Station. |
| 26 | Performance Work Statement | C.5.2 | Does the USMC expect to migrate to the latest GEOFidelis Data Model (GDM) during the performance of this contract? | Yes, the most current model will be utilized. |
| 27 | Solicitation | L.3.1 | Can the Government clarify the final sentence in the first paragraph, "the alternative performance may not…" | This partitial sentence is an artifact and is removed from the RFP. |
| 28 | Solicitation | L.3.6 |
| L.5.2. | Would the Government like submission via email as specified in L.3.6 or on CD-ROM as specified in L.5.2.C? | The Government will only be accepting email submissions. No CD-ROM is required. | |||
| 29 | Solicitation | What is the ceiling on this RFP? | This is a new requirement. At this time, the Government is not releasing what it believes the action's level of effort will cost. | ||
| 30 | Solicitation | L.4.4 | Does the five (5) page limitation for Factor 2 – Past Performance in the Technical/Non-Price Proposal apply to both subfactor A and subfactor B as defined in RFP Paragraph L.5.1. | Subfactors are not used in this solicitation. The Factor elements Offerors are to propose against are listed by factor under section L.5.1. | |
| 31 | Solicitation | L.5.2.C | Please clarify the requirement for price files on a CD-ROM | See response to Question 28. | |
| 32 | Solicitation | L.3.7 | Will the Government be extending the submission date? | Yes. Please refer to the updated Section L for this information. | |
| 33 | Attachment 26 | Section 1 | Section 1 of the PPQ refers to an opportunity to provide Instructional Services Curriculum Management service which appears to be a different opportunity than the current Request for Proposal for TECOM MILOPS. |
| Will the government be revising attachment 26 or should the contractor revise the attachment before sending out? | The Government has made the description changes. | |||
| 34 | Attachment 26 | Section 1 | Section 1 of the PPQ lists dates for responses to be returned in May of 2021 which has passed. |
Will the government be revising attachment 26 or should the contractor revise the attachment before sending out? The Government has updated the submission deadline.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .