Attachment 26 -- Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 23 KB Posted

Attached to
U. S. Marine Corps Training & Education Command (TECOM) Range and Training Area Management Branch (RTAM) Military Operations Data Support Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
M67854-21-R-7901
Issued by
United States Marine Corps

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to U. S. Marine Corps Training & Education Command (TECOM) Range and Training Area Management Branch (RTAM) Military Operations Data Support, newest first.
File Type Posted
Attachment 26 -- Past Performance Questionnaire (Revised).docx DOCX document
Solicitation Amendment -- M67854-21-R-7901 U00001.docx DOCX document
Solicitation Questions -- M67854-21-R-7901 RTAM MILOPS GIS Data Svcs (Final).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 03 -- DoDI 8130 Installation Geospatial Information and Services (IGI-S) (9 April 2020).pdf PDF
Attachment 04 -- NAVFAC P-78 Real Property Inventory (RPI) Procedures Manual (July 2008).pdf PDF
Attachment 06 -- Real Property Inventory Requirements (RPIR) (January 2005).pdf PDF
Attachment 11 -- IGI-S Authoritative Data Store (ADS) Implementation Guidance (13 March 2019).pdf PDF
Attachment 02 -- Data Layer Specification for Military Operations Feature Classes (15 December 2015).pdf PDF
Attachment 12 -- IGI-S ADS Implementation Guidance Annex A - Reference Architecture (13 March 2019).pdf PDF
Attachment 13 -- SDSFIE Quality (SDSFIE-Q) (12 September 2018).pdf PDF
Attachment 16 -- GEOFidelis Data Management Guide Version 2.0.1 (23 September 2011).pdf PDF
Attachment 17 -- GEOFidelis Operations Guide Version 1.0 (March 2011).pdf PDF
Attachment 18 -- GEOFidelis Data Model Version 3.0.0.2 (9 October 2017).pdf PDF
Attachment 22 -- Military Operations Data Status Stoplight Diagram (September 2020).pdf PDF
Attachment 24 -- Example Deviations Map.pdf PDF
Attachment 05 -- Real Property Acceptance Requirements Document (RPAR) Version 2.0 (15 May 2014).pdf PDF
Attachment 07 -- Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) Small Arms Ranges (5 March 2020).pdf PDF
Attachment 08 -- UFC Ammunition and Explosives Storage Magazines (1 May 2015).pdf PDF
Attachment 09 -- MIMICS Standard Operating Procedure (March 2019).pdf PDF
Attachment 14 -- U.S. Army SRP Military Installation Map (MIM) Production (May 2019).pdf PDF
Attachment 19 -- Current Military Operations Related Feature Class List.docx DOCX document
Attachment 25 -- Latest version of MIM and MIMICS produced for each of the required Bases and Stati.pdf PDF
Solicitation (RFP) -- M67854-21-R-7901.pdf PDF
Attachment 01 -- Section C -- PWS -- RTAM MILOPS GIS Data Svcs.docx DOCX document
Attachment 10 -- GIS Data to iNFADS and RMFSS Comparison Excel Template Document.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 14a -- Appendix H - MIM Finishing Review Checklist.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 15 -- RTAM Range Inventory Real Property Form.docx DOCX document
Attachment 21 -- Example GPS Collection Summary.pdf PDF
Attachment 23 -- Example SDZ Map.pdf PDF
Attachment 27 -- Task Order Service Needs Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 20 -- Example Miramar SDZ Map.pdf PDF
Show all 31

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 25 Past Performance Questionnaire M67854-21-R-7901 Recent and Relevant Past Performance Questionnaire

1. Past Performance Assessment.

The United States Marine Corps (USMC) Program Manager for the Training and Education Command is soliciting competitive offers from qualified offerors. The Government is seeking proposals from potential offerors with the capability to provide Instructional Services Curriculum Management, and Advanced Instructor Development. One of the factors used to evaluate offeror proposals is Past Performance, to use an offeror’s performance on recent and relevant contracts as predictive of how they might perform on the solicited effort.

The offeror that forwarded this questionnaire to you requests that you complete this questionnaire and provide it, via regular mail or email, to the below listed individual no later than 08 May 2021 / 2:00 PM Local Time (Quantico, VA).

Attn: Mr. Christopher J. Bondy, Contract Specialist 2200 Lester Street Quantico, VA 22134 Christopher.Bondy@USMC.mil

*NOTE: IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OFFEROR TO ENSURE ALL PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRES ARE SUBMITTED TO THE GOVERNMENT BY 08 May 2021 / 2:00 PM Local Time (Quantico, VA).

If you need more space than that provided, please attach additional pages. If you have any questions, please contact the Contract Specialist at the above e-mail address.

2. Contract Information. Please complete the following.

Contractor:

Contract Number:

Period of Performance:____________ – ____________
Dollar Amount at Award:$____________
Dollar Amount at Completion*:$____________

*(or Current Dollar Amount, if not Completed)

Contract Type (e.g. Fixed-Price, Labor Hour or Time and Material, Cost Reimbursement (CPFF, CPAF, CPIF, etc.)): _________________________

Description of the Products or Services:

3. Contract Relevancy. For comparison with the size and scope of this requirement, please provide the following information pertaining to the contract identified in Section 2, above:

(a) Size: $____________ per year in contract services.

(b) Scope: Check all that apply:

____Program Management Support
____Integration Services
____Engineering Support
____Logistic Support
____Training Services
____Curriculum Development
____Other Support (please describe)___________________

4. Performance Assessment Values.

5 - Outstanding. Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements, to the Government's benefit. Contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

4 - Excellent. Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements, to the Government's benefit. Contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

3 - Good. Performance meets contractual requirements. Contractual performance of the element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to have been, or were, satisfactory.

2 - Satisfactory. Performance meets most some contractual requirements, but barely so. Contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions, or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective, or were not fully implemented.

1 - Unsatisfactory. Performance does not meet some or most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. Contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions, if any were attempted, appear to be or were ineffective.

0 - Not Applicable. Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable to effort assessed.

5. Assessment Elements. Please select/circle the appropriate performance assessment value for each item on the questionnaire and provide supporting narrative.

a. Cost Control. Rate the contractor's effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling cost (including reporting and analyzing variances) and ability to deliver at the agreed-to cost/price. Provide reasons for changes to the contract value (e.g., scope changes, over-run/under-run, Government-imposed schedule changes).

5 4 3 2 1 0

Comments:

b. Schedule. Rate the contractor's ability to deliver according to the agreed-to schedule. What were the causes of any schedule variances?

Comments:

c. Contract Requirements. Rate the contractor's ability to provide a product or service that met the contract requirements.

d. Quality. Rate the contractor's ability to provide a product or service that met the required level of quality. Assess the contractor's conformance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g., commonly accepted technical, professional, environmental or safety and health standards.)

e. Socioeconomic Goals. Rate the contractor's ability to meet any applicable subcontracting goals for utilization of Small Business (SB), Small Disadvantaged Businesses (SDB), Women Owned Small Businesses (WOSB), Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB), and HUBZone .

f. Subcontract Management. Rate the contractor's ability to meet the goals of the subcontracting plan, to include the ability to timely award and manage subcontracts.

g. Business Relations. Rate the contractor’s ability to integrate and coordinate all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness, quality of problem resolution, corrective action plans, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, customer satisfaction, and its ability to submit accurate invoices in a timely manner.

h. Management of Key Personnel. Assess the contractor’s performance in selecting, retaining, supporting, and replacing key personnel when necessary.

i. Recommendation. To what extent would you recommend this contractor for additional contracts? Rate on the following scale: 5 = Yes, definitely; 4 = Yes, likely; 3 = Maybe, 2 = No, not likely; 1 =No, not ever; 0 =N/A.

6. Other References. If you are aware of any other contract or a Point of Contact (POC) who is familiar with the contractor's performance under this contract, please identify.

Name, Phone and E-Mail Address:

7. Assessor Information. Please provide the following information about yourself:

Name:

Title:

Address:

Phone Number:

Email:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .