Attachment_12-_Cross_Reference_Matrix.xlsx

Sheet1

A. Technical Proposals will be evaluated to assess the offeror’s ability to successfully perform the prospective contract. The proposal will be evaluated against two Factors: Factor 1, Technical Understanding and Factor 2, Safety. To be eligible for award, a proposal must be found acceptable for each Factor. All information provided will be considered in determining the offeror's ability to perform.

3.2-3.2.1;

3.3.1-3.3.3.2.2;

3.3.3.2.4-3.3.3.10.2;

3.3.3.11-3.3.3.18.1;

3.4.3.2-3.4.3.5;

4.1.2.2-4.6

3-3.5.1;

3.5.1.3-3.5.1.4;

3.5.2 – 3.5.2.1.1;

3.5.2.2 – 3.7.1.1.5;

3.8.1.1 - 5 1. FACTOR 1 – Technical Understanding: TThis section of the technical proposal shall demonstrate the offeror's ability to perform the technical requirements.

a. Discuss your solution to provide contract line items that meet all the requirements of the Statement of Work (SOW) and System Specification (SPEC).

b. Describe the technical aspects of your design. Provide a Requirements Traceability Matrix that identifies each technical solution mapped to the SPEC/SOW requirements

a. Factor 1- Technical Understanding: The proposal will be evaluated to determine the offeror's technical knowledge and ability to perform technical requirements under Statement of Work paragraphs 3.2-3.2.1;3.3.1-3.3.3.2.2;3.3.3.2.4-3.3.3.10.2;3.3.3.11-3.3.3.18.1;3.4.3.2-3.4.3.5;4.1.2.2-4.6 and Specification paragraphs 3-3.5.1;3.5.1.3-3.5.1.4;3.5.2 – 3.5.2.1.1;3.5.2.2 – 3.7.1.1.5; 3.8.1. The Government’s evaluation will include:

i. Whether your Proposed approach, methodology, demonstrates an ability to accomplish the CLIN items requirements identified in the SOW and SPEC.

4-4.1.2.1 3.5.1.1-3.5.1.2;

3.5.1.5;

3.7.2 – 3.7.2.1;

3.7.4-3.7.5; 2. FACTOR 2 – SAFETY: This section of the technical proposal shall include operational policies and procedures that will demonstrate the offeror’s capability in meeting requirements of the SOW.

a. Provide a draft Safety Assessment of 2 systems, the Stationary Infantry Target (SIT RF, Battery Powered, Solar Panel) and Dust Generator. Address your approach to fulfill related safety requirements Safety: The proposal will be evaluated to determine the offeror's technical knowledge and ability to perform technical requirements under Statement of Work paragraphs section 4 - 4.1.2.2 and SPEC sections are 3.5- 3.9 in total. The Government’s evaluation will include:

i. Whether your Proposed Safety Assessment Report methodology demonstrates adequate safety precautions

ii. Assessment of whether your proposed approach fulfills safety requirements robert.platt: robert.platt:

Does this include the evaluation of safety approach, or just SARs?

Program Management/Logistics Proposal will be evaluated to assess the offerors ability to successfully perform the prospective contract. The proposal will be evaluated against four Factors: Factor 1, Integrated Master Schedule; Factor 2, Life Cycle Support, Factor 3, Technical Documentation, Factor 4, Quality Assurance Program.

3.1;

3.2.1 – 3.3;

3.4-3.4.3.1;

5.2.4.7-6 N/A 1. FACTOR 1 – Program Management/ IMS- multiple concurrent delivery orders

a. Discuss your planned Integrated Master Schedule for the RTS contract with two delivery orders from receipt of the delivery order through Government Final Inspection to include all milestones identified in the RFP.

a. Factor 1- Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) The proposal will be evaluated to determine the offeror's knowledge and ability to perform the requirements under Statement of Work paragraphs 3.1; 3.2.1 – 3.3;3.4-3.4.3.1 and 5.2.4.7-6. The Government’s evaluations will include:

i. Whether your Proposed IMS properly details milestones, tasks and prerequisite events and indicates resources within the project team for concurrent projects

Typo, should be "IMS" instead of "MS" " " " " " " " " b. Discuss your Program Management plan that outlines an ability to manage and deliver multiple Delivery Orders (DOs) concurrently; include the Work Breakdown structure from the Program Management team down to the installation team. The management plan should provide an overview of daily operations and procedures/policies to be implemented ii. Whether your Proposed management plan outlines your ability to meet the technical requirements, and provides an overview of daily operations and procedures/policies to be implemented robert.platt: robert.platt:

Section L type language, but in Section M

a. Provide a Subcontractor Management Plan that identifies all subcontractors to be utilized and describes their role under the contract. iii. Whether your proposed Subcontract Management Plan properly identifies subcontractors to be utilized and describes their role under the contract.

robert.platt: robert.platt:

Does not trace to section L. Language does not fit section L.

3.3.3.2.3;

3.3.3.10.3;

5 - 5.2.4.6 3.7.3;

3.7.6 – 3.7.6.2.4

2. FACTOR 2 - Life Cycle Support

a. Discuss your life cycle support strategy for the systems under RTS

b. Discuss your strategy to meeting the requirements for spare parts with the CLS contractor.

b. Factor 2- Life Cycle Support The proposal will be evaluated to determine the offeror's knowledge and ability to perform the requirements under Statement of Work paragraphs 3.3.3.2.3; 3.3.3.10.3; 5 - 5.2.4.6 and SPEC paragraphs 3.7.3; 3.7.6 – 3.7.6.2.4

i. Whether your proposed life cycle support strategy demonstrates an ability to accomplish the requirements identified in the SOW and SPEC

All CDRLs N/A 3. FACTOR 3 - Technical Documentation

a. Discuss your Technical Documentation strategy to include format, access and approach to each drawing package submittal.

b. Discuss your New Equipment Training Plan

c. Provide an example of your O&M manual

c. Factor 3- Technical Documentation. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the offeror's knowledge and ability to perform the requirements under Statement of Work paragraphs 3.4, 4.0, and 7.0

i. Whether your proposed TD Format and access process properly addresses the requirements of the solicitation

ii. Whether your proposed drawing package properly addresses the requirements of the solicitation

iii. Whether your proposed New Equipment Training plan meets the requirements identified in the SOW

iv. Whether your proposed O&M Manuals meet the requirements identified in the SOW

3.4.4 N/A 4. FACTOR 4- Quality Assurance Program

a. Discuss your Quality Assurance Program/System, any certifications you may have received, and methods for continuous quality improvement. Describe your Quality Assurance (QA) plan that discusses the QA program and incorporates inspections as part of the overall QA plan

d. Factor 4, Quality Assurance Program The proposal will be evaluated to determine the offeror's knowledge and ability to perform the requirements under Statement of Work paragraphs 3.4.4 and whether

i. Your proposed Quality Assurance Program and methods demonstrates an adequate approach for continuous quality improvement.

(i) Total Price. The price of all Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINS) (basic).

Utilizing Attachment 11- Evaluation Pricing Worksheet the Total Evaluated Price will be derived as follows:

- Example - Each CLIN unit price will be multiplied by the CLIN quantity stated in Attachment 11- Evaluation Pricing Worksheet = Total Evaluated CLIN Price.

The Total Evaluated CLIN Prices will then be summed.

f) No stepladder or incremental pricing shall be proposed. Offerors proposing stepladder or incremental pricing will be considered deficient and ineligible for award.

g) No ordering restrictions, aside from those set forth in 52.216-18 and 52.216-19, shall be proposed. Offerors proposing incremental ordering requirements or other restrictions beyond what is stated in 52.216-18 and 52.216-19 will be considered deficient and ineligible for award.

h) No economic price adjustment shall be proposed. Offerors proposing a variation in price or economic price adjustment will be considered deficient and ineligible for award.

There is no section M factor for stability robert.platt: robert.platt:

Does this include the evaluation of safety approach, or just SARs?

robert.platt: robert.platt:

Typo, should be "IMS" instead of "MS" robert.platt: robert.platt:

Section L type language, but in Section M robert.platt: robert.platt:

Does not trace to section L. Language does not fit section L. N/A N/A i) Small Business Subcontracting Plan; Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) Utilization. Describe the extent to which the offeror proposes to utilize SDB in the performance of the contract. Where possible describe firms to include NAICS Code qualifications germane to this effort, the type of arrangement to be used, along with the complexity and variety of the work. Indicate the dollar amount of the proposed effort and give its relative impact with respect to total price of the proposal. Detail how the offeror will meet the DoD’s goal of a minimum of 5% small disadvantaged business subcontracting utilization.

(iii) The offeror’s Small Business Subcontracting Plan will be evaluated on a pass/fail basis only. Offerors that include a small disadvantaged business goal of at least 5% will “pass” this area of evaluation.

N/A N/A Offerors must provide the following documents in order to be considered for award:

(a) A completed and signed SF 33.

(b) All applicable representations, certifications, acknowledgements, and statements set forth in Section K and any other section, as applicable.

(c) A brief corporate history.

(d) A corporate organizational (wiring) diagram (identify Demo POC and Negotiations POC).

(e) Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA) Quality Assurance Representative (QAR) information.

(f) Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) auditor contact information.

N/A N/A (g) The government will not make multiple awards as a result of this solicitation. Only one contractor will be selected for award. Thus, for purposes of the government's application of the Buy American Act price adjustment evaluation factor, the RFP is a solicitation that evaluates a group of line items and specifies that award can be made only on all line items contained in the solicitation. Accordingly, the government will first determine whether each offeror's offer is a "domestic offer." If the proposed price of domestic end products exceeds 50 percent of the total proposed price for the contract, the government will evaluate the offer as a domestic offer. If all offers received are domestic offers, then there will be no application of a Buy American Act evaluation factor.

If an offer is not a domestic offer, however, then it will be considered a foreign offer. Pursuant to FAR 25.503(c), FAR 25.504-4(b), and DFARS 225.502(c)(iii), the government will apply a 50 percent Buy American Act evaluation factor to the price of all foreign end products of the foreign offer. Thus, if the price of foreign end products comprises 60% of the foreign offer's total proposed price, the government will apply a 50 percent evaluation factor to that 60% of the foreign offer's total proposed price.

N/A N/A

Squad Immersive Training Environment (SITE) Live Enhancements Cross Reference Matrix M67854-13-R-7802

RFP

Reqts