Indian Lake State Park Atlas ACM LCP Report.pdf

PRE-DEMOLITION ASBESTOS AND LIMITED LEAD-BASED

PAINT SURVEY

INDIAN LAKE STATE PARK

188BS22313

8970 W. County Road 442

Manistique, Michigan 49854

PREPARED FOR:

Michigan Department of Natural Resources

PREPARED BY:

Atlas Technical Consultants LLC 46555 Humboldt Drive, Suite 100 Novi, Michigan 48377 June 28, 2022

Page | 1

46555 Humboldt Drive, Suite 100 Novi, Michigan 48377

(248) 669-5147 | oneatlas.com

June 28, 2022

DENNIS GREEN

SUPERVISOR

INDIAN LAKE STATE PARK

Subject: Pre-Demolition Asbestos and Limited Lead-Based Paint Survey Toilet/Shower Building Indian Lake State Park

Manistique, Michigan 49854

Dear Mr. Green:

Atlas is pleased to present this report detailing the finding of the pre-demolition asbestos and limited lead-based paint survey performed at the above referenced site. The purpose of this sampling was to identify and collect samples of suspect asbestos containing (ACBM’s) and lead-based paint (LBP) building materials prior to demolition activities.

The pre-demolition asbestos and lead-based paint sampling was conducted on January 27, 2022 by Industrial Hygienist, Mr. Andrew Delodder, State of Michigan certified asbestos inspector. The sampling was conducted in accordance with sampling criteria specified in the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) Asbestos Construction Industry Standard (29 CFR 1926.1101), and the Asbestos Hazard and Emergency Response Act of 1987 (AHERA).

If you have any questions, please call us at 248.669.5140.

Respectfully submitted, Andrew Delodder Ryan Rae State of Michigan Asbestos Inspector Project Manager

Page | i

CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Purpose

1.2 Pre-Demolition Asbestos Survey

2. GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS

2.1 General Property and Building Information

2.2 Exterior Finish Descriptions

2.3 Interior Building Descriptions

3. PRE-DEMOLITION ASBESTOS SURVEY

3.1 Homogeneous Areas

3.2 Hazard Assessment Factors

3.3 Laboratory Analytical Methodology

3.4 Sampling Results

4. LEAD-CONTAINING PAINT SAMPLING

5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Asbestos Containing Materials

5.2 Lead-Containing Paint Containing Materials

6. ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS

TABLES

Table 3-1 ACM Sampling Results

Table 4-1 Lead-Based Paint Sampling Results

APPENDICES

Appendix A Asbestos Laboratory Report Appendix B Lead-Based Paint Laboratory Report Appendix C Qualifications

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Atlas representative Mr. Andrew Delodder completed the pre-demolition asbestos and limited lead-based paint survey of the toilet/shower building, located at Indian Lake State Park, 8970 W. County Road 442, Manistique, Michigan on May 16, 2022.

Thirty-six (36) asbestos bulk samples, taken from thirteen (13) homogenous areas, were collected and submitted for analysis by PLM. Fifty-one (51) sample layers were analysed. The results of laboratory testing during the pre-demolition asbestos survey conducted at the property indicate that none (0) of the materials sampled were found to contain asbestos.

Two (2) composite samples of paint, taken from exterior areas of the building, were collected and submitted for analysis by Flame AAS. The results of laboratory testing during the limited lead-containing paint sampling conducted at the property indicate that one (1) sample contained levels of lead greater than the method detection limits.

If any additional materials are discovered during renovation/demolition activities, such materials must be assumed to contain asbestos until sampling and analysis proves otherwise.

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Purpose

The purpose of this project was to conduct a pre-demolition asbestos survey of the toilet/shower building at Indian Lake State Park, located at 8970 W. County Road 442, Manistique, Michigan (herein referred to as “the property”).

1.2 Pre-Demolition Asbestos Survey

The scope of the pre-demolition asbestos survey included the following:

Review of existing asbestos reports for the building, if available;

Survey of the property building(s);

Identification of accessible suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACMs);

Collection and analysis of bulk samples of suspect friable and non-friable materials; and

2. GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS

2.1 General Property and Building Information

The purpose of this project was to conduct a pre-demolition asbestos and lead-based paint survey of the toilet/shower building, located at 29881 Co. Road 407, Manistique, Michigan (herein referred to as “the property”).

General property and building information is presented in the following table:

General Property and Building Information

Date of Inspection: May 16, 2022

Inspectors Andrew Delodder, Inspector # A48677

Property Address: 8970 W. County Road 442, Manistique, Michigan 49854

Property Owner Michigan Department of Natural Resources

Building Description: Toilet/Shower Building

Building Square Footage

(Approximate):

~1,310 SF

2.2 Exterior Finish Descriptions

The exterior of the building included wood siding with a shingled-sloped roof.

2.3 Interior Building Descriptions

The interior finishes of the building included floor tile, wood, plaster, and ceramic floor tiles.

3. PRE-DEMOLITION ASBESTOS SURVEY

Atlas representative Mr. Andrew Delodder conducted the pre-demolition asbestos inspection of the property building on May 16, 2022. Mr. Delodder is a State of Michigan Certified Asbestos Inspector’s (Certification

No. A48677). The building was visually inspected for the presence of building materials that are suspected to contain asbestos. Bulk samples of suspect ACMs were collected and placed into individual containers for transport to a National Voluntary Lab Accreditation Program (NVLAP)-accredited laboratory for analysis.

Materials typically known as non-asbestos items (i.e. fibrous glass, foam rubber, wood, etc.) were not sampled. The asbestos inspection consisted of the following three basic procedures:

> Conducting a visual inspection of the structures;

> Identifying homogeneous areas (HAs) of suspect surfacing, thermal system insulation, and miscellaneous materials; and

> Sampling accessible, friable and non-friable suspect materials.

3.1 Homogeneous Areas

Prior to collecting any samples, homogenous areas (HAs) were identified. A homogeneous sampling area can be described as one or more areas of material that are similar in appearance and texture and that have the same apparent installation date, appearance and function. Actual number of samples collected from each homogeneous sampling area may vary, based on the type of material and professional opinion of the inspector.

3.2 Hazard Assessment Factors

From the list of suspect homogeneous areas, a physical assessment was performed for each material on the list. A physical assessment includes evaluating the condition, assessing the potential for disturbance, and determining the friability of each material. By definition, "friable" materials are those that can be crumbled or reduced to powder by hand pressure when dry. Each material identified was further classified into one of three categories: surfacing materials, thermal systems insulation (TSI) and miscellaneous materials. Each of the three categories have specific sampling requirements, outlined below.

Surfacing Materials: Refers to spray-applied or troweled surfaces such as plaster ceilings and walls, fireproofing, textured paints, textured plasters, and spray-applied acoustical surfaces.

Thermal System Insulation: Refers to insulation used to inhibit heat gain or loss on pipes, boilers, tanks, ducts, and various other building components.

Miscellaneous Materials: Refers to friable and non-friable products and materials that do not fit in any of the above two categories such as resilient floor covering, baseboards, mastics, adhesives, roofing material, caulking, glazing, and siding. This category also contains wallboard and ceiling tile.

All materials were assessed related to their condition in one of the three categories: good (intact), fair

(damaged) or poor (significantly damaged) per Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 763. Material with localized, significant damage was also assessed as poor.

3.3 Laboratory Analytical Methodology

Bulk samples were analysed by Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc. (ETL) using polarized-light microscopy (PLM) and dispersion staining (Method Reference: 40 CFR Part 763, Volume 47, No. 103, May

27, 1982 pg. 23376). This laboratory participates in the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program

(NVLAP #201028-0), a quality assurance program for PLM analysis, and is accredited by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) as well as accreditation requirements under 15 CFR Part 25.

Copies of the laboratory analytical report and corresponding chain-of-custody forms are included in

Appendix A. Positive sample results are reported in percent asbestos by volume of the sample and the type of asbestos material within the sample. Other common non-asbestos components may also be noted on the analytical reports. Inspector and laboratory accreditations are provided in Appendix C.

3.4 Sampling Results

Bulk samples were collected from the site building and analysed by polarized light microscopy (PLM), EPA

Method 600/R-93/116. None of the materials sampled was found to contain concentrations of asbestos.

The following table provides a summary of accessible suspect and confirmed ACMs from the Site buildings:

Table 3-1 ACM Sampling Results

TOILET/SHOWER BUILDING

8970 W. COUNTY ROAD 442

MANISTIQUE, MICHIGAN 49854

SAMPLED: MAY 16, 2022

Sample ID/Material Location of Materials

Material Condition Friable

Yes/No

Estimated Quantity

Asbestos Content

1-CC-A,B,C

Building Exterior, Men’s and Women’s

Restrooms, Shower Rooms, Maintenance Room

Concrete Chip – Poured Concrete

Floor Good No 1800 SF ND

2-CC-A,B,C

Building Exterior –

West Side

Concrete Chip – Concrete Walkway

Patching Good No 5 SF ND

3-GM-A,B,C Shower Floor Ceramic Tile, Grout, Mortar

Good No 200 SF ND

4-BM-A,B,C

Restrooms and Shower Rooms

Brick Mortar – Ceramic Block

Walls Good No 2170 SF ND

5-RM-A,B,C Roof Roofing Material – Asphalt Shingles

Good No 1310 SF ND

6-IC-A,B,C Ceiling Perimeter Interior Caulk Good No 130 LF ND

7-FD Exterior Fire Door Good No 7 Doors Assumed

8-EC-A,B,C

Exterior Window Frames, Door Frames, and

Roofline

Exterior Caulk Good No 400 LF ND

9-GM-A,B,C

Men’s and Women’s

Restrooms

Ceramic Tile, Grout, Mortar (6” floor tile)

Good No 800 SF ND

10-GM-A,B,C

Men’s and Women’s

Restrooms

Ceramic Tile, Grout, Mortar

(2” countertop tile) Good No 80 SF ND

11-IC-A,B,C

Men’s Bathroom (around urinals)

Interior Caulk – White

Good No 20 LF ND

12-CA-A,B,C

Under Formica Stall

Dividers Construction

Adhesive Good No 180 SF ND

13-PL-A,B,C Maintenance Room Plaster on Mesh Good No 60 SF ND

ND: None Detected

In the event additional suspect material is discovered during renovation activities, this material should be treated as presumed asbestos-containing material (PACM) in accordance with regulations 29 CFR

1926.1101 and 1910.1001 and other applicable state and local regulations and either sampled to confirm or nullify asbestos content or be treated as ACM and handled accordingly.

4. LEAD-CONTAINING PAINT SAMPLING

Atlas representative Mr. Andrew Delodder conducted the lead-containing paint (LCP) sampling of the property building on May 16, 2022. The sampling included physical sampling of paint coatings that were deemed representative of the predominant paint coatings observed.

Two (2) paint chip samples were collected and submitted to Accurate Analytical Testing Laboratory, 30105

Beverly Road, Romulus, Michigan for lead analysis. Bulk samples were analyzed using the Environmental

Protection Agency's Test Method SW 846 -7420 and 3050B using Flame AAS to determine lead concentration in percent (%) by weight. Copies of the laboratory analytical report and corresponding chain-of-custody forms are included in Appendix B. Inspector and laboratory accreditations are provided in

Appendix C.

The following table provides a summary of the LBP sampling:

Table 4-1 Lead-Containing Paint Sampling Results

TOILET/SHOWER BUILDING

29881 Co. Road 407

MANISTIQUE, MICHIGAN 49854

SAMPLED: JANUARY 27, 2022

Sample ID Sample Location Sample

Compound Condition Color

Estimated Quantity

Lead Content (%)

1 LBP Exterior Wood Good Brown Unquantified 0.0025

S LBP Door Frames Metal Good Light Brown Unquantified <0.0018

5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Asbestos Containing Materials

The results of laboratory testing during the pre-renovation asbestos survey conducted at the property indicate that none (0) of the materials sampled was found to contain asbestos.

If any additional materials are discovered during renovation/demolition activities, such materials must be assumed to contain asbestos until sampling and analysis proves otherwise.

5.2 Lead-Containing Paint Containing Materials

Two (2) composite samples of paint, taken from exterior areas of the buildings, were collected and submitted for analysis by Flame AAS. The results of laboratory testing during the limited lead-containing paint sampling conducted at the property indicate that one (1) sample contained levels of lead greater than the method detection limits. Therefore, the OSHA lead in construction standard would not apply.

The presence of lead-containing paint requires, under OSHA 1926.62 requirements, that the contractor performing renovation, surface preparation, and other activities that impact or potentially impact the lead-coated components, evaluate potential worker exposures to airborne lead. This evaluation can be based, for the specific activities denoted in 1926.62, on objective data obtained by the contractor on other, similar, worksites within the prior calendar year. In addition, lead-containing paint and lead-coated waste and construction debris must be evaluated and, on a case-by-case basis depending on this evaluation, quantitative analysis be performed on these waste steams to ensure compliance with EPA waste disposal regulations.

The presence of lead-containing paint and/or LBP does not, in itself, trigger regulatory compliance actions.

However, when these materials are disturbed, the requirements of OSHA (1926.1101) and EPA may become operative. Appropriate actions in terms of removal methods, emissions control, worker protection, and waste disposal should be considered by the general contractor and applicable subcontractors while completing renovation activities.

6. ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS

The results, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in the report are based only on conditions that were noted during the NESHAP inspections conducted on May 16, 2022, performed by

Atlas. Selection of sample locations and frequency of sampling were based on EPA Guidance documents, Atlas’s observations, and the assumption that building vintage and renovation history information presented to Atlas allowed the proper designation of homogenous materials for each building.

This document does not contain the elements necessary for an Abatement Work plan, and this document does not contain, nor should it take the place of technical specifications for ACM removal.

Our professional services have been performed, our findings obtained, and our conclusions and recommendations prepared in accordance with customary principles and practices in the fields of environmental science and engineering. This statement is in lieu of other statements either expressed or implied. This report does not warrant against changes to material from future operations or conditions, nor does it warrant against operations or conditions against present ACM material in locations not investigated.

The scope of services performed in execution of this evaluation may not be appropriate to satisfy the needs of other users, and use or re-use of this document or the findings, conclusions, or recommendations is at the risk of said user.

APPENDIX A

ASBESTOS LABORATORY REPORT

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600

Fax: (734) 955-6604

To:

Attention:

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Novi, Michigan 48377

Project Location:

Indian Lake State Park

8970W County Rd 442, Manistique MI 49854

Client Project: 188BS22313

248048ETL Job:

Report Date: 5/23/2022

Robert Smith

Lab Sample Number Client Sample Number Sample Type Completed

1349322 Asbestos01-CC-A 05/23/2022

1349323 Asbestos01-CC-B 05/23/2022

1349324 Asbestos01-CC-C 05/23/2022

1349325 Asbestos02-CC-A 05/23/2022

1349326 Asbestos02-CC-B 05/23/2022

1349327 Asbestos02-CC-C 05/23/2022

1349328 Asbestos03-GM-A 05/23/2022

1349329 Asbestos03-GM-B 05/23/2022

1349330 Asbestos03-GM-C 05/23/2022

1349331 Asbestos04-BM-A 05/23/2022

1349332 Asbestos04-BM-B 05/23/2022

1349333 Asbestos04-BM-C 05/23/2022

1349334 Asbestos05-RM-A 05/23/2022

1349335 Asbestos05-RM-B 05/23/2022

1349336 Asbestos05-RM-C 05/23/2022

1349337 Asbestos06-IC-A 05/23/2022

This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please notify ETL immediately. Thank you.

Lab Sample Number Client Sample Number Sample Type Completed

1349338 Asbestos06-IC-B 05/23/2022

1349339 Asbestos06-IC-C 05/23/2022

1349340 Asbestos08-EC-A 05/23/2022

1349341 Asbestos08-EC-B 05/23/2022

1349342 Asbestos08-EC-C 05/23/2022

1349343 Asbestos09-GM-A 05/23/2022

1349344 Asbestos09-GM-B 05/23/2022

1349345 Asbestos09-GM-C 05/23/2022

1349346 Asbestos10-GM-A 05/23/2022

1349347 Asbestos10-GM-B 05/23/2022

1349348 Asbestos10-GM-C 05/23/2022

1349349 Asbestos11-IC-A 05/23/2022

1349350 Asbestos11-IC-B 05/23/2022

1349351 Asbestos11-IC-C 05/23/2022

1349352 Asbestos12-CA-A 05/23/2022

1349353 Asbestos12-CA-B 05/23/2022

1349354 Asbestos12-CA-C 05/23/2022

1349355 Asbestos13-PL-A 05/23/2022

1349356 Asbestos13-PL-B 05/23/2022

1349357 Asbestos13-PL-C 05/23/2022

This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this

Lab Sample Number Client Sample Number Sample Type Completed

Reviewed by:

Summary

Sample Layer MasticMethod

PLM 51Emily Nowacki

This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Novi,Michigan 48377

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Indian Lake State Park

8970W County Rd 442, Manistique MI 49854

ETC Job :

Client Project :

248048

188BS22313

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

05/12/2022

05/18/2022

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1349322

01-CC-A

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayConcrete Chip

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349323

01-CC-B

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayConcrete Chip

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349324

01-CC-C

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayConcrete Chip

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349325

02-CC-A

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayConcrete Chip

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349326

02-CC-B

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayConcrete Chip

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349327

02-CC-C

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayConcrete Chip

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Novi,Michigan 48377

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Indian Lake State Park

8970W County Rd 442, Manistique MI 49854

ETC Job :

Client Project :

248048

188BS22313

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

05/12/2022

05/18/2022

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1349328

03-GM-A

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseBrownCeramic Tile

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349328

03-GM-A

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseBrownGrout

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349328

03-GM-A

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseGrayMortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-3 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349329

03-GM-B

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseBrownCeramic Tile

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349329

03-GM-B

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseBrownGrout

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349329

03-GM-B

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseGrayMortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-3 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Novi,Michigan 48377

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Indian Lake State Park

8970W County Rd 442, Manistique MI 49854

ETC Job :

Client Project :

248048

188BS22313

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

05/12/2022

05/18/2022

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1349330

03-GM-C

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseBrownCeramic Tile

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349330

03-GM-C

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseBrownGrout

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349330

03-GM-C

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseGrayMortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-3 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349331

04-BM-A

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseRedBrick

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349331

04-BM-A

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayMortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Novi,Michigan 48377

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Indian Lake State Park

8970W County Rd 442, Manistique MI 49854

ETC Job :

Client Project :

248048

188BS22313

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

05/12/2022

05/18/2022

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1349332

04-BM-B

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseRedBrick

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349332

04-BM-B

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayMortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349333

04-BM-C

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseRedBrick

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349333

04-BM-C

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayMortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349334

05-RM-A

PLM 99% OtherPLM 1% CelluloseGrayRoofing Material-Asphalt Shingle

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349335

05-RM-B

PLM 99% OtherPLM 1% CelluloseGrayRoofing Material-Asphalt Shingle

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Novi,Michigan 48377

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Indian Lake State Park

8970W County Rd 442, Manistique MI 49854

ETC Job :

Client Project :

248048

188BS22313

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

05/12/2022

05/18/2022

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1349336

05-RM-C

PLM 99% OtherPLM 1% CelluloseGrayRoofing Material-Asphalt Shingle

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349337

06-IC-A

PLM 99% OtherPLM 1% CelluloseWhiteInterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349338

06-IC-B

PLM 99% OtherPLM 1% CelluloseWhiteInterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349339

06-IC-C

PLM 99% OtherPLM 1% CelluloseWhiteInterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349340

08-EC-A

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseBrownExterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349341

08-EC-B

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseBrownExterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Novi,Michigan 48377

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Indian Lake State Park

8970W County Rd 442, Manistique MI 49854

ETC Job :

Client Project :

248048

188BS22313

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

05/12/2022

05/18/2022

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1349342

08-EC-C

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseBrownExterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349343

09-GM-A

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseTanCeramic Tile

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349343

09-GM-A

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseTanGrout

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349343

09-GM-A

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseGrayMortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-3 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Novi,Michigan 48377

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Indian Lake State Park

8970W County Rd 442, Manistique MI 49854

ETC Job :

Client Project :

248048

188BS22313

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

05/12/2022

05/18/2022

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1349344

09-GM-B

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseTanCeramic Tile

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349344

09-GM-B

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseTanGrout

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349344

09-GM-B

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseGrayMortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-3 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349345

09-GM-C

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseTanCeramic Tile

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349345

09-GM-C

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseTanGrout

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349345

09-GM-C

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseGrayMortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-3 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Novi,Michigan 48377

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Indian Lake State Park

8970W County Rd 442, Manistique MI 49854

ETC Job :

Client Project :

248048

188BS22313

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

05/12/2022

05/18/2022

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1349346

10-GM-A

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayMortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349347

10-GM-B

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayMortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349348

10-GM-C

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayMortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349349

11-IC-A

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseWhiteInterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349350

11-IC-B

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseWhiteInterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349351

11-IC-C

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseWhiteInterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Novi,Michigan 48377

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Indian Lake State Park

8970W County Rd 442, Manistique MI 49854

ETC Job :

Client Project :

248048

188BS22313

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

05/12/2022

05/18/2022

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1349352

12-CA-A

PLM 95% OtherPLM 5% CelluloseBrownConstruction Adhesive

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349353

12-CA-B

PLM 95% OtherPLM 5% CelluloseBrownConstruction Adhesive

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349354

12-CA-C

PLM 95% OtherPLM 5% CelluloseBrownConstruction Adhesive

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349355

13-PL-A

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseBrownPlaster - on mesh

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349356

13-PL-B

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseBrownPlaster - on mesh

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

PLM None Detected 1349357

13-PL-C

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseBrownPlaster - on mesh

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 05/23/2022

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Novi,Michigan 48377

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Indian Lake State Park

8970W County Rd 442, Manistique MI 49854

ETC Job :

Client Project :

248048

188BS22313

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

05/12/2022

05/18/2022

Date Collected :

Date Received :

Lab Supervisor/Other Signatory

Dave Cousino

Analyst:

400 Point Count Results by EPA 600/R-93/116 PLM (denoted by "PC")

Item 198.1: PLM Methods for Identifying and Quantitating Asbestos in Bulk Samples

Item 198.6: PLM Methods for Identifying and Quantitating Asbestos in Non-Friable Organically Bound Bulk Samples

EPA 600/R-93/116: Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials

EPA 600/M4-82-020: Interim Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples

A % Asbestos result of "Trace" indicates that the analyzed material was found to contain less than 1% asbestos and would not be considered an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM).

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

APPENDIX B

LEAD-BASED PAINT REPORT

Certificate of Analysis: Lead In Paint by EPA SW-846 7420 and 3050B*

Client Project :

797769

05/18/2022

05/18/2022

Date Reported :

Date Analyzed :

Date Received :

AAT Project :

Phone :

Email :

Fax : 734-727-7165 dawn.winther@atcassociates.com

248-669-5140

Dawn Winther

ATC Group Services LLC

Attn :

Client :

8970 W COUNTY ROAD 442 INDIAN LAKE STATE PARKProject Location :

188BS22313

Novi, MI 48377

46555 Humboldt Dr.

30105 Beverly Road

Romulus, MI 48174

Ph: 734-629-8161; Fax: 734-629-8431

Sampling Date : 05/12/2022

05/19/2022

Lab Sample ID Result Lead

(% by weight) PPMSample DescriptionClient Code

Calculated R L

(% by weight)

1 LBP EXT BROWN PAINT7441442 25 0.0025 0.0008

S LBP LGHT BRWN PAINT ON DOOR FRAMES7441443 <18 <0.0018 0.0018

Analyst Signature

Derek Kibler

797769 AAT Project:Date Printed: 05/19/2022 4:21AM

RL= Reporting Limit * For true values assume (2) significant figures. The method and batch QC is acceptable unless otherwise stated. Current

EPA/HUD Interim Standard for lead in paint samples is: 5000 PPM (parts per million) or ug/g which is equivalent to 0.5% by weight. AAT internal sop

S203. The laboratory operates in accord with ISO 17025 guidelines and holds limited scopes of accreditation under AIHA-LAP and NY State DOH

ELAP programs. These results are submitted pursuant to AAT LLC current terms and conditions of sale, including the company's standard warranty and limitation of liability provisions.Analytical results relate to the samples as received by the lab. AAT will not assume any liability or responsibility for the manner in which the results are used or interpreted. Reproduction of this document other than in its entirety is not permitted. All Quality control requirements for the samples this report contains have been met. AAT does not blank correct reported values. Sample data apply only to items analyzed. Samples are stored for 15 days following report date. *= Validated modified method

AIHA LAP- Lab ID #100986, NY State DOH ELAP -Lab ID #11864, State of Ohio- Lab ID # 10042

ATC Group Services LLCTo :

Attn :

Phone :

AAT Project :

Client Project :

Date Reported :

Project Location :

Email :Dawn Winther

248-669-5140 dawn.winther@atcassociates.com

797769

188BS22313

8970 W COUNTY ROAD 442 INDIAN LAKE STATE PARK

46555 Humboldt Dr.

Novi, MI 48377

30105 Beverly Road

Romulus, MI 48174

Ph: 734-629-8161; Fax: 734-629-8431

05/19/2022

Sample CompletedAnalysis RequestedClient Code Analyst

7441442 05/18/2022Lead Paint1 LBP Derek Kibler

7441443 05/18/2022Lead PaintS LBP Derek Kibler

Quality Assurance Coordinator - Stephen NorthcottReviewed By

797769 AAT Project:Date Printed: 05/19/2022 4:21AM

This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please notify AAT immediately. Thank you.

AIHA LAP- Lab ID #100986, NY State DOH ELAP -Lab ID #11864, State of Ohio- Lab ID # 10042

APPENDIX C

QUALIFICATIONS