IFB 27011 Addendum 5 Attachment A.pdf

HAZMAT REPORT

CITY OF SUFFOLK

GODWIN – VIRGINIAN PILOT

BUILDING RENOVATION

157 N MAIN STREET

SUFFOLK, VA 23434

PROJECT NO. 10015069.02

DOCUMENTS

12 AUGUST 2026

WOOLPERT

4433 CORPORATION LANE, SUITE 125

VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA 23462

(757) 549-3549; FAX (937) 461-0743

Former Virginian Pilot Building & Roof Inspection

157 N. Main Street Suffolk, VA

GER 130-8410

Woolpert #10015069.02

Prepared for

Woolpert 4433 Corporation Lane, Suite 125

Virginia Beach, VA 23462

Prepared by H. Nelson Adcock, Jr., P.E.

VA Asbestos Inspector # 3303001776

BEQ 288

REPORT OF

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

CONSULTING SERVICES

Southern Professional Center 1 2712 Southern Boulevard, Suite 101 Virginia Beach, Virginia 23452

(757) 463-3200 Fax (757) 463-3080 E-mail germail@geronline.com

August 12, 2026

Woolpert, Inc.

4433 Corporation Lane, Suite 125 Virginia Beach, VA 23462

Attention: Kristi Barker

Subject: Hazardous Materials Building & Roof Inspection Report Virginia Pilot Building Renovations 157 N. Main Street Suffolk, Virginia GER Project # 130-8410 Woolpert #10015069.02

GeoEnvironmental Resources, Inc. has completed our hazardous materials sampling of the subject facility. This work was completed in accordance with the scope of work and fee outlined in our proposal P25-130-8267 dated September 15, 2025. This report is relevant to the date of our field work and should not be relied upon for later dates.

We appreciate the opportunity of completing this work for Woolpert, Inc. (Woolpert). If there are any questions concerning this report, please contact us.

Sincerely, GeoEnvironmental Resources, Inc.

Wyatt S. Pine H. Nelson Adcock, Jr., P.E.

Hazardous Materials Project Manager President Virginia Asbestos Inspector (#3303004643) VA Asbestos Inspector (#3303001776)

Attachments: (1) Hazardous Materials Report

(2) Laboratory Reports

(3) Sample Location Plans

(4) Photographs

(5) Licenses

Southern Professional Center I 2712 Southern Boulevard, Suite 101 Virginia Beach, Virginia 23452

(757) 463-3200 Fax (757) 463-3080 E-mail germail@geronline.com

Section 2 Laboratory Analytical Results

Section 1 Report

Section 3 Sample Location Maps

Section 4 Photographs

Section 5 Licenses

ACRONYMS

AAS Atomic absorption spectroscopy ACBM Asbestos-containing building materials ACM Asbestos-containing materials ACT Acoustical ceiling tile ADA Americans with Disability Act AHERA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act ASHARA Asbestos Schools Hazard Abatement Reauthorization Act ASTM American Society of Testing and Materials CMU Cement masonry unit CFC Chlorofluoro carbons CHMM Certified Hazardous Materials Manager CFR Code of Federal Regulation CSP Certified Safety Professional DEHP Di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate DRO Diesel Range Organics ECD Electron capture detectors EA Each EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency GC Gas chromatography GRO Gasoline Range Organics GWB Gypsum wall board HBM Hazardous building material HID High intensity discharge HM Homogeneous material HUD U.S. Housing and Urban Development LBP Lead-based paint LF Linear feet LS Lump sum MDL Minimum detection limit mg/cm2 Milligrams per square centimeter mg/kg Milligrams per kilogram mg/L Milligrams per Liter ND none detected NVLAP National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration PCB Polychlorinated biphenyl PLM Polarized light microscopy ppm Parts per million RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act SAP Sample and Analysis Plan SF Square Feet TCLP Toxicity characteristic leaching procedure TPH Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons TSI Thermal System Insulation VAC Virginia Administration Code VOC Volatile Organic Compound XRF X-Ray Fluorescence

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

It is our understanding a renovation is planned for 157 N. Main street in Suffolk, VA. Renovations are to include removal and replacement of interior partition walls, removal and replacement of plumbing fixtures, removal and replacement of HVAC equipment, ceiling replacement and roof replacement.

The renovation work is limited to the first floor and a small portion of the second floor and the roof.

The renovation/demolition will require disturbance of existing suspect hazardous materials associated with the renovation project. Prior to the demolition work, existing hazardous materials must be identified and appropriate precautions taken prior to their disturbance in order to protect workers and the environment.

At the time of our initial inspection in October 2025 the building was generally intact with interior walls and ceilings. When we conducted our site inspection in July 2026, the interior of the building was generally gutted. Interior walls and ceilings were demolished.

SAMPLING METHODOLOGIES

SUSPECT ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS

(ACM)

The AHERA regulation, 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 763, is the primary governing regulation when performing asbestos surveys. This regulation was originally enacted for school buildings, but has since been applied to public and commercial buildings by the Asbestos School Hazard Abatement Reauthorization Act (ASHARA) in 1994 and by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) worker protection regulations in 1995, specifically 29 CFR 1926.1101(k).

The demolition of structures is also subject to 40 CFR Part 61 “National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants” (NESHAPs).

Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM) is specifically addressed in 40 CFR 61 Subpart M “National Emission Standard for Asbestos.”

ACM is generally divided into three primary classifications as follows: (a) Surfacing material, (b) Thermal System Insulation, and (c) Miscellaneous material. These classifications are defined in 40 CFR 763.83 as provided below.

Miscellaneous material means interior building on structural components, structural members or fixtures, such as floor and ceiling tiles, and does not include surfacing material or thermal system insulation.

Surfacing material means material in a building that is sprayed-on, troweled-on, or otherwise applied to surfaces, such as acoustical plaster on ceilings and fireproofing materials on Page 5structural members, or other materials on surfaces for acoustical, fireproofing, or other purposes.

Thermal system insulation means material in a building applied to pipes, fittings, boilers, breeching, tanks, ducts, or other interior structural components to prevent heat loss or gain, or water condensation, or for other purposes.

The sampling methodologies employed to address the ACM categories described above are as follows:

Surfacing material – An accredited inspector shall collect, in a statistically random manner that is representative of the homogeneous are, bulk samples from each homogeneous area of friable surfacing material that is not assumed to be ACM, and shall collect the samples as follows:

(1) At least three bulk samples shall be collected from each homogeneous area that is 1,000 SF or less.

(2) At least five bulk samples shall be collected from each homogeneous area that is greater than 1,000 SF but less than or equal to 5,000 SF.

GER

Hazardous Materials Inspection Report Former Virginian Pilot Building

157 N. Main Street Suffolk, VA

GER 130-8410

Woolpert #10015069.02

(3) At least seven bulk samples shall be collected from each homogeneous area that is greater than 5,000 SF.

Thermal system insulation - An accredited inspector shall collect the samples as follows:

(1) At least three bulk samples, in a random distributed manner from each homogeneous area of thermal system insulation that is not assumed to be ACM.

(2) Collect at least one bulk sample from each homogeneous are of patched thermal system insulation that is not assumed to be ACM if the patched section is less than 6 linear or square feet.

(3) In a manner sufficient to determine whether the material is ACM or not ACM, collect bulk samples from each insulated mechanical system that is not assumed to be ACM where cement or plaster is used on fittings such as tees, elbows, or valves.

(4) Bulk samples are not required to be collected from any homogeneous area where the accredited inspector has determined that the thermal system insulation is fiberglass, foam glass, rubber, or other non-ACBM.

Miscellaneous material - An accredited inspector shall collect the samples as follows:

(1) In a manner sufficient to determine whether material is ACM or not ACM from each homogeneous area of friable miscellaneous material that is not assumed to be ACM.

Non friable suspected ACBM - An accredited inspector shall collect the samples as follows:

If any homogeneous area of non friable suspected ACBM is not assumed to be ACM, then an accredited inspector shall collect, in a manner sufficient to determine whether the material is ACM or not ACM, bulk samples from the homogeneous are of non friable suspected ACBM that is not assumed to be ACM.

LEAD BASED PAINT (LBP)

Testing of painted surfaces for lead, cadmium and chromium was conducted by collecting bulk paint chip samples from various painted surfaces. It is important to note that this inspection was not intended to meet the requirements of HUD sampling protocols for lead paint and was not a comprehensive, surface-by-surface evaluation, but rather a screening inspection of major painted components, which may contain LBP.

MOLD WIPE AND TAPE LIFT SAMPLING

Mold samples were collected using tape lifts. Each sample was collected from surface areas exhibiting visual dust accumulations and or suspect fungal growth. Each tape lift sample was collected using clean disposable gloves.

The tape lift samples were collected using clean, laboratory provided Zefron Bio-Tape tape slides as follows:

1. Remove slide from provided slide mailer.

2. Document the sample location on the slide label and complete any required documentation for the laboratory.

3. Peel off protective liner from slide to expose adhesive.

4. Place slide with the adhesive side down on the surface to be sampled. (Use the centering line to orient the adhesive over the exact sample location desired).

5. Gently press down to ensure contact is made.

Do not press down hard. The adhesive is very tacky and only needs to be pressed gently.

6. Carefully remove slide from surface and place back into slide mailer. Do Not replace the plastic “Peel” liner.

7. Send slide to laboratory for analysis using chain-of-custody control.

ANALYTICAL METHODS

SUSPECT ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS

(ACM)

Suspect bulk ACM samples were analyzed using polarized light microscopy (PLM) and dispersion staining techniques. The analytical method was conducted in accordance with Method EPA-600/M4-82-020 and/or EPA 600/R-93/116.

Analysis was performed by EMSL Analytical, Inc., Cinnaminson, NJ NVLAP Lab Code 101048-0, AIHA-LAP, LLC-IHLAP Lab 100194, NYS ELAP

10872, NJ DEP 03036.

Former Virginian Pilot Building GER 130-8410 Page 2 157 N. Main Street, Suffolk, VA

GER

LEAD BASED PAINT (LBP)

Paint chip samples were analyzed for lead using inductively coupled plasma (ICP) emission spectroscopy (SW-846, 6010C). Analysis was performed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NELAP Certifications: 10896, PA 68-00367, AIHA-LAP, LLC ELLAP 100194, A2LA 2845.01.

MOLD TAPE LIFT SAMPLES

Mold tape lift samples were analyzed for quantitative spore count direct exam. Analysis was performed by Eurofins Built Environment Testing East, Inc., Chantilly, VA, AIHA-LAP, LLC accredited service, Lab ID #179623.

PREVIOUS HAZARDOUS MATERIAL

REPORTS

We were not provided with any previous hazardous material reports associated with the project.

BUILDING DESCRIPTION

The building is a 2-story structure constructed of structural steel components, CMU blocks and concrete. The building includes office areas, stairwells and an elevator. The exterior of the building is brick veneer. The building is heated and cooled with several HVAC systems. The building was reportedly constructed in or about 1950. The building contains approximately 38,380 square feet.

ASBESTOS INSPECTION AND BULK

SAMPLING RESULTS

The building was inspected on October 15, 2025. A visual inspection was performed to identify homogeneous areas (HAs) of suspect ACM. The inspection was performed on the first floor, a small portion of the second floor and a small portion of the roof.

A roof inspection was performed on June 19, 2026 The following interior and exterior finishes and building materials were observed.

1. Gypsum wallboard and joint compound partition walls.

2. Ceilings were drop-in suspended acoustical ceiling tile (SACT).

3. Piping and HVAC ducts were observed above ceilings. Black HVAC duct mastic was observed above ceiling on the existing metal HVAC ducts.

The metal HVAC ducts do not appear to be abandoned. Piping above ceiling was insulated with fiberglass pipe insulation.

4. Interior windows and doors incorporated frame sealant.

5. Exterior windows and doors incorporated frame sealant.

6. The floors were covered with ceramic tiles, floor tile and carpet.

7. The roof was a membrane roof over a built-up roof.

8. The exterior entrance area ceiling appeared to be asbestos cement board.

The following suspect material HAs were identified:

1. Green 12-inch floor tile with tan mastic.

2. Black 4-inch vinyl covebase with black mastic.

3. Grey carpet with yellow mastic and black residual mastic.

4. 2’x4’ SACT, crater.

5. Spray applied wall coating on gypsum wallboard, second floor.

6. Gypsum wallboard.

7. Gypsum wallboard joint compound.

8. Exterior window glazing on light well, roof level.

9. Black sealant on light well base flashing, roof level.

10. Built-up roofing beneath membrane roof.

11. White sealant above light well base flashing, roof level.

12. Not Used.

13. Tan 9-inch floor tile with tan mastic.

14. CMU block sealant.

15. Plaster lath ceiling, above SACT

16. 2’x4’ SACT, crater.

17. Grey carpet with tan mastic.

18. Black mastic on metal HVAC ducts.

19. Brown exterior door frame sealant.

Former Virginian Pilot Building GER 130-8410 Page 3

20. Spray applied wall coating on gypsum wallboard, first floor.

21. Grey carpet with tan mastic and residual black mastic.

22. Grey 4-inch vinyl covebase with tan mastic.

23. Gypsum wallboard

24. Gypsum wallboard joint compound.

25. Sink undercoating, white.

26. White 12-inch floor tile with tan mastic and residual black mastic.

27. Floor leveling compound.

28. Grey 4-inch vinyl covebase with tan mastic.

29. Floor leveling compound with yellow carpet mastic and residual black mastic.

30. Multicolor 12-inch floor tile with tan mastic and residual black mastic.

31. White interior door frame sealant.

32. Brown exterior door frame sealant.

33. Grey carpet with yellow mastic and residual black mastic.

34. Mauve 4-inch vinyl covebase with tan mastic.

35. White 12-inch floor tile with tan mastic and residual black mastic.

36. Grey carpet with yellow mastic and residual black mastic.

37. Pink sheetgood flooring and mastic.

38. Sink undercoating, black.

39. Brown adhesive behind wall panel.

40. Exterior asbestos cement ceiling panel.

41. Tar on roof deck

42. Pitch pockets

43. Parapet wall flashing

44. Pipe wrap on roof penetrations

45. Grey sealant on through-wall flashing One-hundred and four (104) bulk samples of suspect ACM were collected from the HAs.

The attached Table 1 in Section 2 lists the sample materials, sample locations, and laboratory results.

Drawings showing the approximate sample locations are attached in Section 3.

The following homogeneous materials sampled during the inspection were determined or assumed to contain asbestos:

1. Fire rated doors are assumed to contain

ACM.

2. Exterior wall cavity waterproofing is assumed to be ACM.

3. Green 12-inch floor tile with tan mastic and residual black mastic.

4. Grey carpet with yellow mastic and residual black mastic.

5. Exterior window glazing on light well, roof level.

6. Black sealant and silver paint on light well base flashing, roof level.

7. Tan 9-inch floor tile with tan mastic.

8. Black mastic on metal HVAC ducts.

9. White 12-inch floor tile with tan mastic and residual black mastic.

10. Floor leveling compound with yellow carpet mastic and residual black mastic.

11. Multicolor 12-inch floor tile with tan mastic and residual black mastic.

12. Exterior asbestos cement ceiling panel.

13. Parapet wall flashing.

14. Black sealant/adhesive on south interior wall near stairway.

ASBESTOS DISCUSSION

The EPA defines ACM as any material which contains greater than 1% asbestos by weight.

Laboratory analysis of bulk samples collected during the field investigation identified ACM in the building. The ACM is categorized as follows:

Assumed Friable ACM Fire Doors - Destructive techniques were not used to determine whether the existing fire rated doors contained ACM. The inspection techniques would have voided the doors fire rating. The fire rated doors are assumed to contain asbestos until proven otherwise.

Estimated Quantity: 10 Each.

Former Virginian Pilot Building GER 130-8410 Page 4

Exterior wall cavity waterproofing - Destructive techniques were not used to determine whether the existing wall construction contained ACM. The inspection techniques would have required the removal of exterior bricks which we didn’t feel comfortable matching. The wall cavity is assumed to contain asbestos waterproofing until proven otherwise. The wall cavity waterproofing may be disturbed during the window lintel repairs.

Estimated Quantity: 200 SF.

Friable ACM Exterior light well window glazing (5%

Chrysotile) - The ACM window glazing can be found on the exterior light well windows on the roof. The material was weathered and damaged. Estimated Quantity: 100 LF.

Non - Friable ACM Green 12-inch floor tile with tan mastic and residual black mastic (3% - 4% Chrysotile) - The floor tile was observed on the 2nd floor where renovations are planned.

The black mastic was determined to be ACM.

NESHAP classifies the floor tile and mastic as Category I non-friable ACM. The material was in good condition. Estimated Quantity: 227 Square Feet.

Residual black mastic associated with carpet, resilient flooring and floor leveling compound (2% - 4% Chrysotile) - Residual black mastic associated with carpet, resilient flooring and floor leveling compound was observed across the first floor. The black mastic appears to be a residual material possibly associated with a previous floor tile.

The residual black mastic was determined to be ACM. NESHAP classifies the residual mastic as Category I non-friable ACM. The material was in good condition. Estimated Quantity:

16,554 Square Feet.

Black sealant and silver paint on light well base flashing, roof level (2% Chrysotile) - This material was observed on the roof level at the base of the brick light well.

The silver paint was determined to be ACM.

NESHAP classifies the floor tile and mastic as Category II ACM. The material was in good condition. Estimated Quantity: 50 Square Feet.

Black mastic on metal HVAC ducts (3% - 8% - 10% Chrysotile) - The black mastic was observed on the joints of the metal HVAC ducts located above the existing ceilings. The HVAC ducts appeared to be abandoned. The black mastic was determined to be ACM.

NESHAP classifies the black mastic as Category II non-friable ACM. The material was in good condition. Estimated Quantity: 5,104 Square Feet.

Exterior asbestos cement ceiling panel (15% Chrysotile) - The ceiling panel was observed above the building’s entrance doors on Main Street. NESHAP classifies the material as Category II non-friable ACM. The material was in good condition. Estimated Quantity:

767 Square Feet.

Parapet wall flashing and silver paint, roof level (2-8% Chrysotile) - This material was observed under single-ply roofing on the roof level around the perimeter of the roof. The silver paint and asphalt flashing were determined to be ACM. NESHAP classifies the material as a Category I ACM. The material was in good condition. Estimated Quantity: 2500 Square Feet.

Black sealant/adhesive on south interior CMU wall (2% Chrysotile) - The black sealant was observed on the south interior CMU wall adjacent to a stairway. The material was not friable and was classified as NESHAP Category II ACM. The material was in good condition. Estimated Quantity: 200 Square Feet.

If during the project unexpected materials are identified or uncovered they must be assumed to be ACM until proven otherwise. Exercise extreme caution when opening concealed areas to prevent any inadvertent ACM fiber releases.

Any disturbance of ACM must be performed by a Virginia Licensed Asbestos Abatement Contractor.

Friable ACM or material that may be rendered friable must be removed prior to demolition.

Removal of Category I & II non-friable ACM is not required, prior to demolition, if the material is in good condition and is not friable. However, wet methods must be used during the demolition process and personal and area monitoring should be performed. Additionally, all demolition debris must be considered asbestos containing and be

Former Virginian Pilot Building GER 130-8410 Page 5 taken to a landfill that accepts Category I and II non-friable ACM. Therefore recycling will not be permitted, unless the ACM is abated prior to demolition.

If asbestos abatement work is necessary due to unforeseen conditions, it must be performed in accordance with local, state and Federal regulations including but not limited to:

29CFR1926.1101 - Asbestos 40CFR61 - National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants.

9VAC 20-81 - Virginia Solid Waste Management Regulations.

18VAC 15-20 - Virginia Asbestos Licensing Regulations.

PAINT SAMPLING

Six (6) paint chip samples were collected from painted surfaces in the building. The attached Table 2 summarizes the samples collected and their laboratory results. The laboratory analytical results are contained in Section 2. The purpose of our sampling was to obtain representative data on the concentrations of lead, cadmium and chromium in the existing painted surfaces scheduled to be disturbed by the work. Paint samples were collected from painted surfaces that may be disturbed by the planned renovation work.

LEAD, CADMIUM, & CHROMIUM PAINT

DISCUSSION

There are two frequently used standards to define lead-based paint, the Consumer Product and Safety Commission (CPSC) and the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). In 1978, the CPSC, acting under the authority of the Consumer Product Safety Act, banned the sale of paint containing more than 0.06% lead by weight to consumers. The Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 lowered the concentration of lead in paint that is permissible from 0.06% (600 ppm) to the new limit of 0.009% (90ppm), for specific paints and products. Paint which contains more than 0.009% lead by weight is defined as lead containing paint (LCP).

The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) defines Lead-based paint (LBP) as any paint, varnish, shellac, or other coating that contains lead equal to or greater than

1.0 mg/cm2 as measured by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analyzer or laboratory analysis, or 0.5% by weight as measured by laboratory analysis.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Lead in Construction Standard (29 CFR 1926.62) does not define lead-based paint.

However, to comply with OSHA, all painted surfaces with a lead concentration at or above the laboratory’s minimum detection limit (MDL) should be considered lead containing. Compliance with this standard is required even for paints with less than 0.5% or 0.009% lead by weight. Therefore, painted surfaces exceeding the MDL should not be disturbed without taking the appropriate precautions when performing certain high risk tasks. Activities such as scraping, sanding, welding/torching and disturbance of painted surfaces could potentially release leaded dust.

OSHA has categorized the following high risks tasks into three groups:

Group 1: manual demolition manual scraping heat-gun applications power tool cleaning with dust collection system spray paint with lead-based paints

Group 2: lead burning using lead-containing mortar power tool cleaning without dust collection system rivet blasting cleanup activities where dry expendable abrasives are used movement and removal of abrasive blasting enclosures

Group 3: abrasive blasting welding, cutting and burning on steel structures

Analytical results for lead paint indicate that four of the six samples collected and analyzed were found to have lead concentrations below the laboratory's minimum detection limit. The yellow paint on the structural steel was identified as LBP.

Former Virginian Pilot Building GER 130-8410 Page 6

Therefore, all existing painted surfaces scheduled for renovation/demolition should be considered lead containing for the purposes of complying with 29 CFR 1926.62 in order to protect workers and the environment.

Paints containing cadmium and chromium are often found as protective coatings on structural steel or exterior coatings on metal surfaces. These paints tend to be red, yellow or orange and are typically the first layer. The bulk paint chip samples were also analyzed for cadmium and chromium.

Three of the six samples collected and analyzed were found to have cadmium concentrations above the laboratory's minimum detection limit. Five of the six samples collected and analyzed were found to have chromium concentrations above the laboratory's minimum detection limit.

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) identifies chromium and cadmium as a confirmed carcinogen. Construction Standards established by OSHA for cadmium and lead are:

Chromium 29 CFR 1926.1126 Cadmium 29 CFR 1926.1127 Lead 29 CFR 1926.62

The permissible exposure limits (PEL) established by OSHA are 5 ug/m3 for cadmium, 5 ug/m3 for chromium (chromates) and 50 ug/m3 for lead. If the PEL is exceeded, appropriate measures must be taken to reduce the hazard and provide training and personal protective equipment.

The PEL is an airborne measurement to address worker exposure. There is no direct correlation between lead, cadmium, and chromium concentrations in paint and worker exposure. Only when these concentrations are below the laboratory’s MDL, is worker exposure not an issue.

Therefore, all existing painted surfaces scheduled for demolition should be considered lead, cadmium, and chromium containing for the purposes of complying with 29 CFR 1926.62, 29 CFR 1926.1127, and 29 CFR 1926.1126, and in order to protect workers and the environment.

Appropriate precautions should be taken during the disturbance of all painted surfaces to ensure protection of workers and the environment.

All paint disturbance work shall be performed in accordance with all local, state and Federal regulations to protect workers and the environment, including but not limited to:

29CFR 1926.62 - Lead.

29CFR 1926.1126 - Chromium.

29CFR 1926.1127 - Cadmium.

9VAC 20-60 - Virginia Hazardous Waste Management Regulations.

9VAC 20-81 - Virginia Solid Waste Management Regulations.

18VAC 15-30 - Virginia Lead-Based Paint Activity Regulations.

LEAD LINING

We observed a sheet of lead along the south interior wall (see photo #20). The sheet of lead appeared to be in the vicinity of a previous X-ray area in the building.

The sheet of lead was approximately 120 SF.

All lead disturbance work shall be performed in accordance with all local, state and Federal regulations to protect workers and the environment, including but not limited to:

29CFR 1926.62 - Lead.

9VAC 20-60 - Virginia Hazardous Waste Management Regulations.

9VAC 20-81 - Virginia Solid Waste Management Regulations.

WASTE CLASSIFICATION FOR PAINTED

BUILDING COMPONENTS

Building components and demolition waste streams which are painted must be properly characterized prior to disposal. The EPA RCRA regulations establish the limits for RCRA leachable metals.

Leachable metals means the concentration of metals likely to leach from the waste into the surrounding soil/groundwater system of a landfill.

The leachable concentration of chemicals in a waste stream is determined by an analytical method named TCLP. Waste stream TCLP concentrations that equal or exceed the RCRA limits shown in Table A are hazardous and must be

Former Virginian Pilot Building GER 130-8410 Page 7 transported to a hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility. Precautions should be implemented to prevent the storage of any hazardous waste for more the 90 days. Specific permits are necessary to store hazardous waste in excess of 90 days.

The contractor must be required to characterize the waste stream generated during the project to ensure the waste stream is nonhazardous. If the waste stream is determined to be hazardous, special management procedures will be required.

0.2Hg 5.0Ag 1.0Se 5.0Pb 5.0Cr 1.0Cd

100.0Ba 5.0As

TCLPAnalyte (Metal)

Table A - RCRA TCLP Regulatory Threshold (mg/L)

All waste management and disposal shall be performed in accordance with local, state and Federal regulations including but not limited to:

29CFR 1926.62 - Lead.

29CFR 1926.1126 - Chromium.

29CFR 1926.1127 - Cadmium.

9VAC 20-60 - Virginia Hazardous Waste Management Regulations.

9VAC 20-81 - Virginia Solid Waste Management Regulations.

FLUORESCENT LIGHTS AND

POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS

On January 1, 1979, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) banned the manufacturing of light ballasts which contain PCB’s and phased out most PCB uses. Therefore, all light ballasts manufactured prior to January 1, 1979 without “Non-PCB” markings must be considered PCB containing. The EPA’s actions subjects all substances containing over 50 ppm PCBs to regulatory control (with the exception of PCB-contaminated waste oil which is prohibited at any level).

Our field investigation of existing light fixtures indicated the fixtures inside the buildings were a mixture of T-8, and T-12 fluorescent lamps, as well as LED fixtures. Approximately 820 T-8 and T-12 fluorescent lamps were observed in the building.

T-8 fixtures generally contain electronic ballasts which are not PCB containing.

Any non-electronic ballast not marked “No PCB’s” must be considered to contain PCB’s.

All PCB work shall be performed in accordance with all local, state and Federal regulations to protect workers and the environment, including but not limited to:

40CFR273 - Standards for Universal Waste Management.

40CFR761 - Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Manufacturing, Processing, Distribution In Commerce, and Use Prohibitions.

9VAC 20-60 - Virginia Hazardous Waste Management Regulations.

9VAC 20-81 - Virginia Solid Waste Management Regulations.

MERCURY CONTAINING EQUIPMENT

Mercury containing equipment in buildings can sometimes be found in fluorescent light tubes, HVAC thermostats, etc. We performed an inspection for obvious mercury containing equipment in the building.

Fluorescent light tubes were observed in the building. All fluorescent light tubes should be considered to be mercury containing and disposed of as universal waste.

Several thermostats observed in the building contained mercury. Approximately 5 mercury containing thermostats were observed in the building.

All mercury work shall be performed in accordance with all local, state and Federal regulations to protect workers and the environment, including but not limited to:

9VAC 20-60 - Virginia Hazardous Waste Management Regulations.

9VAC 20-81 - Virginia Solid Waste Management Regulations.

Former Virginian Pilot Building GER 130-8410 Page 8

LOW LEVEL RADIOACTIVE COMPONENTS

The building was inspected for components that may contain low level radioactive (LLR) material such as smoke detectors and tritium containing exit signs.

Ionization smoke detectors contain a small amount of radioactive material, generally Americium-214 and use ionized particles to detect smoke.

Photoelectric smoke detectors use a light source or light sensor to detect smoke.

Smoke detectors were observed in the building.

The smoke detectors were not disassembled because they were energized. The smoke detectors did not appear to contain radioactive material, they appeared to be photoelectric smoke detectors;

however, to confirm they will have to be disassembled.

There are multiple types of emergency exit signs.

They can be electrically powered, photo luminescent (power free), or self-luminous (contain Tritium). Exit signs which contain Tritium are low level radioactive components (LLR). Fifteen emergency exit signs were observed in the building. The emergency exit signs in the building appeared to be electrically powered. They do not appear to be LLR.

EMERGENCY LIGHTING

The field investigation of existing lights in the buildings identified battery backup emergency light components in the building. Approximately 8 battery backup emergency light components were identified in the building’s first floor.

All battery backup emergency light components must be managed in accordance with all local, state and Federal regulations to protect workers and the environment, including but not limited to:

40CFR273 - Standards for Universal Waste Management.

9VAC 20-60 - Virginia Hazardous Waste Management Regulations.

9VAC 20-81 - Virginia Solid Waste Management Regulations.

MOLD VISUAL INSPECTION

A limited visual inspection was performed of the interior portions of the first floor of the building in July 2026.

Only accessible interior areas of the building were inspected for the presence of suspect mold, we did not attempt to move furniture or perform destructive testing in order to locate suspect mold.

During the inspection we observed a limited amount of mold growth on SACT and gypsum wallboard. The area of the mold impacted building materials was approximately 100 SF.

We performed another interior inspection of the first floor of the building in July 2026. At the time of the inspection the interior of the building had been demolished. The interior partition walls, ceilings and some HVAC ducts had been removed.

The mold impacted building materials discussed above had been removed.

The inspection in July 2026 identified a small area of exposed brick, approximately 25 SF, on the south wall of the first floor. The plaster lath covering the brick wall had been removed. The brick wall was discolored and thought to be impacted by mold growth.

MOLD SAMPLING

On July 30, 2026 two (2) mold tape lift samples, were collected from the exposed brick area on the south interior wall. The samples were placed under chain-of-custody control and forwarded to an accredited laboratory for analysis.

MOLD TAPE LIFT SAMPLES

Mold tape lift samples were collected from the following locations:

T1 - Exposed Brick, south interior wall. The sample was collected from a discolored area on the brick wall.

T2 - Exposed Brick, south interior wall. The sample was collected from a discolored area on the brick wall.

Former Virginian Pilot Building GER 130-8410 Page 9

MOLD ANALYTICAL RESULTS

The mold tape lift sampling confirmed the presence of mold on both tape lift samples. The mold species identified on the tape lift samples are described in Table B below. The laboratory analytical results are provided in Table B below and in Section 2 of this report.

NOTES:

(1) Fungal ID Abbreviations: ASC - Ascospores, CLA - Cladosporium, NSFS - Non-sporulating Fungal Structures, BD - Background debris (1-4)

2+2+BD

250-NSFS

281900CLA

-26ASC

T2T1 Sample LocationsID (1)

Table B - TAPE LIFT - QUANTITATIVE SPORE COUNT REPORT (spores/cm2)

FUNGI

Ascospores species: Ascospores are microscopic spores produced by fungal species belonging to the Ascomycota. With over 64,000 species in this division (1), it is apparent that the term Ascospores covers a wide range and variety of spores.

However broad the term may be, a single airborne spore, upon reaching a suitable damp, humid environment, can easily develop into a multicellular fungal growth, more commonly known as a mold.

Apart from being aesthetically displeasing, the mold will release more spores into the surrounding air, potentially leading to health issues for any inhabitants.

Cladosporium species: The most commonly identified outdoor fungus. The outdoor numbers are reduced in the winter and are often high in the summer. Often found indoors in numbers less than outdoor numbers. It is commonly found on the surface of fiberglass duct liner in the interior of supply ducts. A wide variety of plants are food sources for this fungus. It is found on dead plants, woody plants, food, straw, soil, paint and textiles.

Often found in dirty refrigerators and especially in reservoirs where condensation is collected, on moist window frames it can easily be seen covering the whole painted area with a velvety olive green layer.

Typically, this mold thrives indoors and can be found in items such as carpets, fabrics, and under floorboards. Its appearance is characterized by a brown or occasionally olive-green hue with a texture that resembles suede. Inhaling Cladosporium spores can trigger an array of allergic responses, such as itchiness in the eyes, runny nose, sore throat, and skin infections. Additionally, it has been linked to respiratory problems like asthma, sinusitis, and lung infections.

MOLD DISCUSSION

There are three common types of mold: allergenic, pathogenic, and toxigenic molds.

Allergenic Molds Allergenic molds are the most common type of molds encountered in buildings. Some of the most common allergenic molds include:

Aspergillus: Often found on damp walls, insulation, and air conditioning systems.

Penicillium: Commonly encountered on decaying fabrics, wallpaper, and carpets.

Alternaria: Frequently discovered in the grout of bathrooms and damp window sills.

Cladosporium: Typically identified on textiles, wood surfaces, and damp indoor spaces.

These molds can cause allergic reactions, such as sneezing, runny nose, and itchy eyes, particularly in individuals with mold allergies.

Pathogenic Molds Pathogenic molds can cause infections, especially in people with weakened immune systems. Some of these molds are:

Aureobasidium: Often found on wooden surfaces, wallpaper, and painted surfaces.

Mucor: Commonly discovered in damp areas like basements and near air conditioning units.

Ulocladium: Usually located in wet building materials and damp indoor spaces.

Former Virginian Pilot Building GER 130-8410 Page 10

Toxigenic Molds Toxigenic molds produce toxic compounds called mycotoxins, which can adversely impact your health. The most notorious toxigenic mold is Stachybotrys, also known as “black mold.” It produces harmful substances that can lead to severe health problems. Other toxigenic molds include:

Chaetomium: Generally found on water-damaged building materials such as drywall and insulation.

Fusarium: Commonly grows on water-damaged carpets and fabrics.

Acremonium: Usually discovered in humidifiers, window sealants, and cooling coils.

Geotrichum: Can be found on decaying food and damp surfaces.

Exposure to toxigenic molds can lead to temporary irritation or even long-term illness, depending on the individual (2).

According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), molds are very common in buildings and homes and will grow anywhere indoors where there is moisture. The most common indoor molds are Cladosporium, Penicillium, Aspergillus and Alternaria.

There are no Federal or State standards for the interpretation of wipe or bulk samples.

Microbiological laboratories often categorize results for these types of samples as low, moderate, or high; the limits of these categories are arbitrary, but are based on extensive experience in the analysis of samples from residential and commercial sites.

The tape lift samples identified the presence of the following fungi:

1. Ascospores

2. Cladosporium Tape lift samples T1 and T2 were collected from a discolored area on the brick wall on the south interior wall on the first floor.

Quantitative spore counting identified 2,000 total spores per cm2 for T1 and 280 total spores per cm2 for T2. The quantitative spore count on tape lift sample T1 is approximately seven (7) times higher than tape lift sample T2. The presence of Cladosporium spores indicates the moisture was present at some point in time.

MOLD FINDINGS AND REMEDIATION

The inspection identified mold growth on the south interior brick wall, on the first floor, behind the plaster lath finish. This potentially indicates moisture may be penetrating the exterior brick wall. We did not observe other areas on the south interior wall where the plaster lath finish was missing.

We observed HVAC condensation drain pipes on the outside of the building, in the general vicinity of the exposed brick wall on the inside of the building.

The HVAC condensate may be negatively impacting the exterior brick wall along with other moisture intrusion events.

Removing the plaster lath finish on the south wall may allow for a better assessment of the existing brick wall system.

The mold is related to the building materials becoming wet either through lack of humidity control or water leaks. These conditions need to be corrected to ensure the mold growth does not continue.

Some of the spores identified indoors do have the potential to cause allergies, hay fever, asthma, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis in individuals and could have originated from outdoor sources.

All mold removal/remediation work should be completed in accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) document “Mold Remediation in Schools and Commercial Buildings.”

PHOTOGRAPHS

Photographs of the building are provided in Section 4 of this report.

LIMITATIONS

This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Woolpert and/or their agents. This service was

Former Virginian Pilot Building GER 130-8410 Page 11 performed in accordance with generally accepted environmental practices. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Our conclusions and recommendations are based, in part, upon information provided to us by others and our site observations. We have not verified the completeness or accuracy of the information provided by others, unless otherwise noted. Our observations and recommendations are based upon conditions readily visible at the time of our site visit in October 2025 and June and July 2026, and upon current industry standards. During our inspection, accessible areas were visually inspected for the presence of asbestos and lead based paints. The findings at these locations area assumed to be representative throughout the impacted areas of the building. Inaccessible areas, such as inside HVAC equipment and ducts were not visually inspected. Areas inspected for the above-referenced materials were limited to those designated by the client. The inspection did not include the entire building and was limited to the areas described in the report on the first and second floor.

Under this scope of services, GER assumes no responsibility regarding response actions (e.g. O&M Plans, Remediation, Notifications, etc.) initiated as a result of these findings. GER assumes no liability for the duties and responsibilities of the Client with respect to compliance with local, state and Federal regulations. Compliance with regulations and response actions are the sole responsibility of the Client and should be conducted in accordance with local, state and Federal regulations and should be performed by appropriately licensed personnel, as warranted.

REFERENCES

(1) Bennett RJ, Turgeon BG (2016). Fungal Sex:

The Ascomycota. Microbiol Spectr. 4(5).

Former Virginian Pilot Building GER 130-8410 Page 12

SECTION 2

Bulk Sample Results / Laboratory Analysis Sheets

Table 1 - Asbestos Sample Results

Table 2 - Paint Sample Results

Mold Sample Results

Virginian Pilot Bldg. GER 130-8410

NO. HA SAMPLE LOCATION SAMPLE MATERIAL % & TYPE OF ASBESTOS

1 1 F2 Office floor over concrete Green blue floor tile with tan mastic

4% Chrysotile (Black Mastic)

2 1 F2 Office floor over concrete Green blue floor tile with tan mastic

3% Chrysotile (Black Mastic)

3 2 F2 Office wall base 4-inch black covebase with tan mastic None Detected

4 2 F2 Office wall base 4-inch black covebase with tan mastic None Detected

5 3 F2 Office floor over concrete Carpet with yellow mastic and residual black mastic

4% Chrysotile (Black Mastic)

6 3 F2 Office floor over concrete Carpet with yellow mastic and residual black mastic

4% Chrysotile (Black Mastic)

7 4 F2 Office ceiling 2'x4' SACT crater None Detected

8 4 F2 Office ceiling 2'x4' SACT crater None Detected

9 5 F2 Office wall texture Spray applied coating None Detected

10 5 F2 Office wall texture Spray applied coating None Detected

11 5 F2 Office wall texture Spray applied coating None Detected

12 6 F2 Office wall Gypsum wallboard (GWB) None Detected

13 6 F2 Office wall GWB None Detected

14 7 F2 Office wall GWB Joint Compound None Detected

15 7 F2 Office wall GWB Joint Compound None Detected

16 8 Roof light well windows Exterior window glazing 4% Chrysotile

17 8 Roof light well windows Exterior window glazing 5% Chrysotile

18 9 Roof light well base flashing Black sealant 2% Chrysotile (Silver Paint)

19 9 Roof brick chimnney base flashing Black sealant None Detected

20 10 Roof, existing membrane cut Built-up roofing None Detected

21 10 Roof, existing membrane cut Built-up roofing None Detected

22 11 Roof light well sealant, top of base flashing White sealant None Detected

23 11 Roof brick chimney sealant, top of base flashing White sealant None Detected

24 13 F2 stairwell floor 9-inch tan floor tile and tan mastic 2% Chrysotile

25 13 F2 stairwell floor 9-inch tan floor tile and tan mastic 2% Chrysotile

26 14 F2 stairwell floor CMU block sealant None Detected

27 15 F1 conference room above SACT grid Plaster lath ceiling None Detected

28 16 F1 conference room ceiling 2'x4' SACT crater None Detected

29 17 F1 conference room floor over concrete Grey carpet with tan mastic None Detected

Table 1 - Asbestos Bulk Sample Results

Table 1 - Asbestos Bulk Sample Results

30 18 F1 open area above SACT Black mastic on metal HVAC duct 10% Chrysotile

31 19 Exterior door frame Brown sealant None Detected

32 19 Exterior door frame Brown sealant None Detected

33 18 Medical records room above SACT Black mastic on metal HVAC duct 8% Chrysotile

34 17 Office flooring over concrete Grey carpet with tan mastic and residual black mastic <1% Chrysotile (Mastic)

35 15 Office ceiling above SACT Plaster lath ceiling None Detected

36 16 Office ceiling below plaster ceiling 2'x4' SACT crater None Detected

37 20 Office wall texture Spray applied coating None Detected

38 20 Office wall texture Spray applied coating None Detected

39 20 Office wall texture Spray applied coating None Detected

40 20 Office wall texture Spray applied coating None Detected

41 20 Office wall texture Spray applied coating None Detected

42 20 Office wall texture Spray applied coating None Detected

43 20 Office wall texture Spray applied coating None Detected

44 21 Office flooring over concrete Grey carpet with tan mastic and residual black mastic

3% Chrysotile (Black Mastic)

45 21 Office flooring over concrete Grey carpet with tan mastic and residual black mastic

<1% Chrysotile (Black Mastic)

46 22 Office wall base 4-inch grey covebase with tan mastic None Detected

47 22 Office wall base 4-inch grey covebase with tan mastic None Detected

48 23 Office wall GWB None Detected

49 23 Office wall GWB None Detected

50 24 Office wall GWB Joint Compound None Detected

51 24 Office wall GWB Joint Compound None Detected

52 25 Office stainless steel sink White undercoating None Detected

53 25 Office stainless steel sink White undercoating None Detected

54 26 Office flooring over concrete 12-inch white floor tile with tan mastic and residual black mastic

4% Chrysotile (Black Mastic)

55 26 Office flooring over concrete 12-inch white floor tile with tan mastic and residual black mastic

3% Chrysotile (Black Mastic)

56 27 Office concrete floor Floor leveling compound None Detected

57 27 Office concrete floor Floor leveling compound None Detected

58 28 Office wall base 4-inch grey covebase with tan mastic None Detected

Table 1 - Asbestos Bulk Sample Results

59 28 Office wall base 4-inch grey covebase with tan mastic None Detected

60 29 Office concrete floor Floor leveling with yellow carpet mastic and residual black mastic <1% Chrysotile

61 29 Office concrete floor Floor leveling with yellow carpet mastic and residual black mastic None Detected

62 28 Office wall base 4-inch grey covebase with tan mastic None Detected

63 30 Office flooring over concrete 12-inch multicolor floor tile with tan mastic and residual black <1% Chrysotile

64 29 Office concrete floor Floor leveling with yellow carpet mastic and residual black mastic

2% Chrysotile (Black Mastic)

65 30 Office flooring over concrete 12-inch multicolor floor tile with tan mastic and residual black

<1% Chrysotile (Black Mastic)

66 31 Office door leading to hallway Interior door frame sealant, white None Detected

67 31 Office door Interior door frame sealant, white None Detected

68 16 Office ceiling 2'x4' SACT crater None Detected

69 20 Office wall texture Spray applied coating None Detected

70 32 Entrance door store front Brown exterior frame sealant None Detected

71 32 Entrance door store front Brown exterior frame sealant None Detected

72 16 Office ceiling 2'x4' SACT crater None Detected

73 33 Office flooring over concrete Carpet with yellow mastic and residual black mastic 2% Chrysotile

74 33 Office flooring over concrete Carpet with yellow mastic and residual black mastic 2% Chrysotile

75 20 Office wall texture Spray applied coating None Detected

76 34 Office wall base 4-inch mauve covebase with tan mastic None Detected

77 35 Office flooring over concrete 12-inch white floor tile with tan mastic and residual black mastic

2% Chrysotile (Black Mastic)

78 36 Office flooring over concrete Carpet with yellow mastic and residual black mastic

3% Chrysotile (Black Mastic)

79 36 Office flooring over concrete Carpet with yellow mastic and residual black mastic

3% Chrysotile (Black Mastic)

80 37 Darkroom flooring over concrete Pink sheetgood and mastic None Detected

81 37 Darkroom flooring over concrete Pink sheetgood and mastic None Detected

82 35 Office flooring over concrete 12-inch white floor tile with tan mastic and residual black mastic

2% Chrysotile (Black Mastic)

83 34 Office wall base 4-inch mauve covebase with tan mastic None Detected

84 38 Development room sink Black undercoating None Detected

85 38 Development room sink Black undercoating None Detected

86 39…