HT001125RE019 Atch 02 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 49 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- HT001125RE019
- Issued by
-
Defense Health Agency
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for the Defense Health Agency's (DHA) Data Governance solicitation (HT001125RE019). The questionnaire is designed to evaluate a contractor's performance across nine specific areas, including delivery schedule compliance, business practices, contract requirements adherence, data repository development, data governance capabilities, and overall performance. The evaluation uses a rating scale from Poor/Unsatisfactory to Excellent, with a neutral option for instances where no performance record exists.
The questionnaire focuses on technical capabilities related to data management, specifically assessing the contractor's ability to develop a searchable metadata repository, implement data governance practices, measure data quality compliance, support AI/ML use across an enterprise, and create a federated data model. Evaluators are asked to rate the contractor's performance and indicate whether they would purchase services from the contractor again. The document is part of a solicitation for transforming data management at DHA, with questions due by 11:00 AM ET on September 11th, 2025, and an anticipated 12-month performance period covering ten objectives in data governance and strategic data landscape transformation.
View the file
Other files
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
HT 001125 R 0001, Attachment B
PRESENT AND PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Offeror’s/Bidder’s Name (Company/Division): Reference Information TableBusiness Name of Reference & Address
Point of Contact
Phone number
E-mail address
Contract Number
Type
Contract Value
a. Original
b. Value at Completion
c. Reason for any Changes
Period of Performance
a. Date Completed/To Be Completed
b. Reason for Any Change
Description of Effort
HT 001125 R E019, Attachment 02
Evaluation KEY: Please use the following abbreviations to assign an applicable rating for questions 1 thru 6 below:
| P/U |
| S |
| G |
| VG |
| E |
| N |
| Poor Unsatisfactory |
| Satisfactory |
| Good |
| Very Good |
| Excellent |
| Neutral |
| Does not meet minimum acceptable standards in one or more areas; remedial action required in one or more areas; deficiencies in one or more areas, which adversely affect overall performance. |
| Meets or slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable deficiencies with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall performance. |
| Effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; reportable deficiencies, but with little identifiable effect on overall performance. |
| Very effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; contract requirements accomplished in a timely, efficient, and economical manner for the most part; only minor deficiencies with minimal effect on overall performance |
| Of exceptional merit; exemplary performance in a timely, efficient, and economical manner; very minor (if any) deficiencies with no adverse effect on overall performance |
| No record of relevant past performance or past performance information is not available |
Return completed surveys to andrea.v.rivas.civ@health.mil and linda.m.walker38.civ@health.mil
1. How would you rate the Contractor’s compliance with the delivery schedule / performance milestones?
Comments:
P/U |_| S |_| G |_| VG|_| E |_|
N |_|
2. How would you rate the Contractor’s business practices (e.g. maintaining a positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively resolution of any problems etc.)?
Comments:
P/U |_| S |_| G |_| VG|_| E |_|
N |_|
3. How would you rate the Contractor’s record of conforming to contract requirements and to standards of good workmanship/quality of the product or service/timeliness of performance/report submission?
Comments:
P/U |_| S |_| G |_| VG|_| E |_|
N |_|
4. How would you rate the Contractor’s previous work for developing a searchable metadata repository and performance of data governance/management practices?
Comments:
P/U |_| S |_| G |_| VG|_| E |_|
N |_|
5. How would you rate the Contractor’s ability to measure compliance with data quality (DQ) rules, contract-based access controls, and semantic tagging protocols.
Comments:
P/U |_| S |_| G |_| VG|_| E |_|
6. How would you rate the Contractor’s previous work to evaluate the data mesh’s ability to support responsible, scalable, and secure use of artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) across a large enterprise?
P/U |_| S |_| G |_| VG|_| E |_|
7. How would you rate the Contractor’s overall compliance with the terms and conditions of your purchase order /contract?
P/U |_| S |_| G |_| VG|_| E |_|
8. How would you rate the Contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction; and generally, the contractor’s business-like concern for the interest of the customer?
P/U |_| S |_| G |_| VG|_| E |_|
9. How would you rate the Contractor’s overall performance? Comments:
P/U |_| S |_| G |_| VG|_| E |_|
10. Would you purchase services from this Contractor again? Comments:
YES |_| NO |_|
EVALUATOR NAME/TITLE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .