Page_49_(sol._pkg)_Revised.doc

DOC document 27 KB Posted

Attached to
Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Dockside Repairs of CGC WHECs, WMSLs, and Other CG Cutters
Solicitation number
HSCG85-13-R-P45002
Issued by

About this file

Page 49 - REVISED

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
SF30-A006.pdf PDF
SF30-A005.pdf PDF
750-WMSL_512_46_4_-_D1_(2).pdf PDF
SF30-A004.pdf PDF
Page_2_-_A004.doc DOC document
SF30-A003.pdf PDF
Page_2_-_A003.doc DOC document
750-WMSL_512_46_1_-_D1_(2).pdf PDF
750-WMSL_512_46_3_-_D1.pdf PDF
750-WMSL_512_46_7_-_D1.pdf PDF
750-WMSL_512_46_6_-_D1_(2).pdf PDF
750-WMSL_512_46_5_-_D1.pdf PDF
SF30-A002.pdf PDF
750-WMSL_512_46_2_-_D1.pdf PDF
Page_2_-_A002.doc DOC document
Page_2_-_A001.doc DOC document
SF30-A001.pdf PDF
SF1449_(P45002).pdf PDF
6_SCHEDULE_OF_PRICES_FOR_CGC_RUSH_(IDIQ_DS).xls XLS spreadsheet
7_SCHEDULE_OF_PRICES_FOR_WMSL_(IDIQ).xls XLS spreadsheet
4_LIST_OF_ATTACHMENT_(IDIQ).doc DOC document
9_Request_for_Clarification_(IDIQ_DS).doc DOC document
8_Technical_Evaluation_Criteria_(IDIQ_DS).doc DOC document
10_GOVERNMENT_PROPERTY_REPORT_(Attachment_5).doc DOC document
1_NOTICE_TO_OFFERORS_(IDIQ_DS).doc DOC document
5_DS_IDIQ_Prototype_Specification.pdf PDF
6_WMSL_DS_Notional_Spec.doc DOC document
2_Cover_Sheet_(Solicitation_IDIQ).doc DOC document
3_Solicitation_Pkg_(IDIQ).doc DOC document
Show all 29

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Request for Proposal

Solicitation No. HSCG85-13-R-P45002 Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Dockside Repairs of San Francisco Bay Area and San Diego CGC CUTTERS Page 49of 68 (REVISED_

Schedule Was the contract completed on time? If not, reason why not (growth work, Contractor delayed, government delayed?)

· Business Relations How was the customer service? Was the Contractor committed to customer satisfaction?

Would you use this company again (Why/Why not)?

· Management of Key Personnel Were subcontracts involved? Comments?

In evaluating Contractors past performance, the government intends to also review U.S. Coast Guard Contractor Performance Assessment Reports and other existing past performance ratings on relevant contracts. General trends in a Contractor’s performance will also be considered.

(48).

FAR 52.212-2 EVALUATION—COMMERCIAL ITEMS (JAN 1999)

a.

The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

1. Price

2. Technical Factors (Understanding The Work & Facilities)

3. Past Performance

Technical and Past Performance when combined are weighted approximately equal to price. Technical subfactors in Factor 2 are in descending order of importance.

In selecting the best overall offer, the Government will consider the value of each offer in terms of the evaluated technical quality offered for the price. The relative quality of offerors will be based upon their ability to meet or exceed the minimum performance requirements of this solicitation resulting in less risk of nonperformance, defective performance, and late performance under the resulting contract. The quality in past performance offers will be compared with differences in the overall price to the Government.

The Government anticipates two or more multiple award contracts. Offerors must submit a proposal for both sites, San Francisco Bay Area & San Diego, CA, to be considered for this requirement. This requirement will be a multiple award but pricing will be evaluated on the aggregate total amount for both sites.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .