8_Technical_Evaluation_Criteria_(IDIQ_DS).doc

TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA

Solicitation No. HSCG85-13-R-P45002 IDIQ FOR DOCKSIDE REPAIRS OF San Francisco Bay area & San Diego, CA CGC Cutters

TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA

1. Technical proposals from offerors will be evaluated to determine if they meet current requirements.

2. Technical proposals should describe how the offeror plans to meet the requirements of the specification, and be consistent with the requirements of the solicitation. Specifically, the offeror must address each of the following categories listed below.

A.

Understanding Scope of Work

B.

Facilities

Offers, which do not present sufficient information to permit a complete technical evaluation by the government, may be determined technically unacceptable. Past performance is more important than Understanding the Scope of Work and Facilities/Equipment is less important than the other two factors.

3. Technical proposals will be evaluated separately from the price proposals by independent teams and should be clearly labeled as the “Technical Proposal”. Price shall not be discussed in the technical proposal.

4. Submit the following information:

SUBFACTOR 1: UNDERSTANDING SCOPE OF WORK

B.1 Overall Scope of Work. Provide a time-phased progress sequencing network for the sample project including optional items. Include milestones for each specification work item (i.e. sub-tasks) that demonstrated an understanding of the work, the interdependencies in the immediate solicitation, and the plan to accomplish that work. Emphasis should be placed on the following work items, but all work items must be addressed:

ITEM NO.

DESCRIPTION

D-08

Evaporators (general) Overhaul

D-12

MDE Filter Pod Renewal

D-15

Fuel Oil Manifold Valves Overhaul

D-25

Fan Room (1-280-1-Q) Deck preservation and Repair

FOR WMSL – NATIONASL SECURITY CUTTERS

ITEM NO.

DESCRIPTION

D-09

Helicopter ASIST System Tracks, Remove

D-10

HF Antenna, Relocate

D-16

Overhead Light Fixtures, Modify

D-22

Weather Deck Drains, Removal

Indicate whether the availability can be completed early, which work items are critical to be completed on time, and when optional items need to be authorized for timely completion. Identify if the plan will be used as a detailed work scheduling and progress tool to ensure on time project completion. A successful presentation generally requires discussion and a graphical presentation. Advanced techniques such as CPM or PERT may facilitate presenting this information, whereas in some cases, a thorough Gantt Chart may suffice. Electronic files may be included and MS project 98 is available for reading such files.

B.2 Problem Areas. Identify any potential problem areas or difficulties in accomplishing the work requirement and optional items within the allotted contract period and proposed solutions to those work items in which the contract intends to use a Technical Representative to facilitate the performance of the work.

SUBFACTOR 2: FACILITIES:

Submit facility information in the local area that demonstrates the contractor’s ability to perform the work outlined in the sample specifications. Provide information on your shop facilities, and key equipment required for this contract.

Attachment 3