Amendment0003(09R6BX020).doc

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

COMMANDER (VPL)

MAINTENANCE & LOGISTICS COMMAND, PACIFIC

1301 CLAY ST. SUITE 807N

OAKLAND, CA 94612-5200

HSCG85-09-R-6BX020

9B. DATE (SEE ITEM 11)

02 DEC 09

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE

FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

FORMCHECKBOX

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers FORMCHECKBOX is extended, FORMCHECKBOX is not extended. Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods: (a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copys of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the Offer submitted: or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc)

SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority).

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor FORMCHECKBOX is not, FORMCHECKBOX is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

USCGC HEALY (WAGB 20) MULTI-OPTION SHIP REPAIR CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

BY

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

30-105

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

)PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE

Prescribed by GSA, FAR (48 CFR) 53.2

1. Response(s) to Request(s) for Clarification 0007 is/are provided as Attachment A.

2. As noted in Amendment 0001, several errors or omissions have been located in the specification (Attachment J.1). Most of these resulted from a recent agency-wide reorganization.

The following documents are provided to correct or clarify the specification errors or omissions.

Att J.1 Spec Corrections.doc (master list of corrections)

Item D-10 Pressure Gauges & Thermometers List.doc (corrected equipment list for D-10)

Item D-11 Pyrometers & Thermocouples List.doc (corrected equipment list for D-11)

Item D-12 Flexible Hose List.pdf (corrected equipment list for D-12)

Item D-29 Deck Coverings (Interior Polymeric) Renew.doc (location & sq ft for D-29)

Offerors are again reminded that the notional specification (Attachment J.1) is a representative package meant to assist offerors solely in developing technical and price proposals. The purpose in providing these corrections is to eliminate confusion in that process. As noted in Amendment 0001, the awardee will not have to perform any of Attachments J.1 or J.2 as currently written.

Date:

REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION

SHIP & HULL No.: HEALY MULTI-OPTION SHIP REPAIR PROCUREMENT

QUESTION:

We notice that the 3-Ton bow crane is addressed twice in the specification, first in D-25 as a Level II repair, and the second time in D-26 as part of a larger group of cranes, davits and A-Frames requiring a Level I repair.

What is the reason for listing competing repair efforts on a given system?

RESPONSE:

In developing the notional specification, MLC missed the inclusion of the Level I repair in Item D-26.

Nevertheless, since the purpose of the notional specification is to provide offerors a representative technical package upon which to base their technical and price proposals, the two (overlapping) requirements will remain in the package. Shipboard weight handling equipment is cycled through Level I and Level II repair efforts on a scheduled basis, and by including both in the package, offerors will be aware of the technical distinction between the inspection-oriented scope of a Level I repair and the overhaul-oriented scope of a Level II repair.