MDDC Industry Day Brief 20110630 PAO approved.pptx

Missile Defense Data Center (MDDC) Program Industry Day Briefing 12 Jul 2011 Approved for Public Release 11-MDA-6250 (30 Jun 2011) DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

MDDC Program Industry Day

MDDC Program Industry Day Agenda

Chart #1 of 2

MDDC Program Industry Day Agenda Chart #2 of 2

12 Jul 2011 Ms. Julie Schumacher Deputy Director for Test (Acting)

MDA/DT

MDDC Program Opening Remarks

12 Jul 2011 Ms. Belinda Williams MDDC Program Contracting Officer

MDA/DACT

MDDC Program Administrative Remarks

Introductions/Administrative Introductions Facility Administrative Information

Facility Jackson Center

600 Genome Way Huntsville, AL 35806 256-327-7230 877-707-7471 (toll-free) 256-327-7338 (fax) www.jacksoncenter.net Parking is in the east lot off of Moquin Drive

Jackson Center Information Complimentary wireless internet Early morning beverages can be purchased Lunch will be not available at the Jackson Center – numerous food establishments are located near the Jackson Center The complete campus is smoke free Exterior and Interior of Facility Parking Lot

Administrative Information The MDDC Program Industry Day meeting is unclassified Please use Question Form for ALL Questions All questions will be answered in writing, and the answers will be posted to FedBizOpps Offerors are not allowed to put any proprietary restrictions on written questions Questions are to be placed in box at the back of the room Extra Question Forms are available next to the box The team is NOT authorized to discuss the Draft RFP during breaks/lunch Contact information is optional, but will not be published Print legibly Please use the Comment Form - Comment Forms will be used to improve future Industry Days Please wear your badge at all times Please see any Industry Day Support Staff if other assistance is needed MDA Visitor Control voice number for verifying VARs is: 256-313-9504

Mr. Barney Klehman Director, Acquisition Management

MDA/DA

MDDC Program Acquisition Management Remarks

Mr. Lee Rosenberg Director, Office of Small Business Programs

MDA/SB

MDDC Program Office of Small Business Programs Remarks

Ms. Belinda Williams MDDC Program Contracting Officer

MDA/DAC

MDDC Program Acquisition Path Ahead

Rules of Engagement Responsibility of Contracting Officer is to ensure impartial, fair, and equitable treatment of all contractors FAR 15.303(c) The contracting officer shall—

(1) After release of a solicitation, serve as the focal point for inquiries from actual or prospective Offerors

(2) After receipt of proposals, control exchanges with Offerors in accordance with 15.306

(3) Award the contract Contact Belinda Williams at belinda.williams@mda.mil or Emily McGee at emily.mcgee@mda.mil if you have any questions

MDDC Program Key Dates

PLANNED

Contract

Affiliation & Limitation on Subcontracting Rules Acquisition will be solicited/awarded as a Small Business Set-Aside Teams established via a Formal Teaming Agreement Small Business (SB) Prime Contractor with small and/or large business subcontractors may compete for SBSA when over 50% of the work will be performed by the “TEAM” (collective effort of all the small business members of the team)

MDDC Program CLIN Structure Base Period

CLIN Structure For Each 12 Month Option Period

Section M M-2.0 Basis for Award This is a competitive, best value, source selection that will be conducted in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 15.3 and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) Part 215.3. In using this best value approach, the Government seeks to award to an Offeror who gives the Missile Defense Agency the greatest confidence that it will best meet the Government’s requirements in an affordable manner The Government will strive for the maximum objectivity, the source selection process, by its nature, is subjective, and therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire process The Government may select for award a higher rated, higher priced Offeror where the decision is consistent with the evaluation factors and it is reasonably determined that the technical superiority, and/or overall business approach, and/or superior past performance, of the higher priced Offeror outweighs the cost difference M-3.0 Evaluation The lowest priced proposal may not necessarily receive the award; likewise, the highest technically rated proposal may not necessarily receive the award. The Government will select for award the proposal that is most advantageous and represents the best value to the Government

M-3.0 Evaluation Factors, Subfactors, and their relative order of importance – Expect Changes Factor 1: Technical Subfactor 1 – Information Technology Subfactor 2 – Software Subfactor 3 – Test and Evaluation Data Acquisition and Communications Subfactor 4 – Telemetry Operations Subfactor 5 – Truth Analysis Subfactor 6 – Library Operations * Factor 2: Management Subfactor 1 – Team and Approach Subfactor 2 – Management Approach Subfactor 3 – Programmatic Execution Approach Subfactor 4 – Transition Factor 3: Past Performance Factor 4: Cost / Price

* Supporting Document – Library Operations Sample Task

M-3.0 Evaluation Factors, Subfactors, and their relative order of importance – Expect Changes (continued) Technical and Management are of equal importance, and are more important than Past Performance. When combined, these three Factors are significantly more important than Cost/Price. Subfactors 1 through 5 under Technical are of equal importance and are more important than Subfactor 6. The subfactors under Management are of equal importance Past Performance will receive an overall performance confidence rating.

Cost/Price will be evaluated for reasonableness and realism and will be considered as part of the integrated assessment of best value

M-4.3 Rejection of Unrealistic Offers The Government may reject any proposal that is determined to be unrealistic in terms of program commitments, including contract terms and conditions, or unrealistically high or low cost when compared to the Government estimate, such that the proposal is deemed to reflect an inherent lack of competence or failure to comprehend the complexity and risks of the program

Executive Summary Section L Executive Summary Requirements 15 Pages Maximum, 1 E-copy, 3+1 Original Paper Copies Approved for Public Release 11-MDA-6250 (30 Jun 2011) L-3.8 Executive Summary The Executive Summary shall be a concise summary of the Offeror’s proposal, including significant risks, and a highlight of any key or unique features, excluding cost/price. The Summary shall identify the Offeror and all proposed team members, subcontractors, and consultants. The name, division, and address of each company should be included. The Summary should follow the outline below:

Narrative Summary Teaming Arrangements Provide a name, title, and telephone number of the person authorized to obligate the company contractually

Volume III: Past Performance L-7.1 The Offeror shall submit a Past Performance Volume containing the following:

Table of Contents Summary Page describing the role of the Offeror and each subcontractor, teaming partner, and /or joint venture partner for which the Offeror is required to provide Past Performance Information Sheets in accordance with Section L Past Performance Information Sheets in accordance with Section J to the RFP Consent Letters executed by each subcontractor, teaming partner, and/or joint venture partner, authorizing release of adverse past performance information so the Offeror can respond to such information. A sample letter is attached as Section J Organization Structure Change History—See Section L

L-7.2 Past and Present Performance Information Sheets Submit information on contracts you consider most relevant in demonstrating your ability to perform the proposed effort This information is required on the Offeror and subcontractors, and/or teaming partners proposed to perform any of the proposed effort that the Offeror considers critical to overall successful performance The Offeror shall submit a maximum of five (5) and a minimum of three (3) Performance Information Sheets identifying active or completed contracts, either Government or commercial, for each prime and/or teaming partner; and three (3) Performance Information Sheets for each major and/or critical subcontractor

L-7.4 Organizational Structure Change History Many companies have acquired, been acquired by, or otherwise merged with other companies, and/or reorganized their divisions, business groups, subsidiary companies, etc.

To facilitate this relevancy determination, include in this proposal volume a "roadmap" describing all such changes in the organization of your company. As part of this explanation, show how these changes impact the relevance of any efforts you identify for past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment Since the Government intends to consider past performance information provided by other sources as well as that provided by the Offeror(s), your "roadmap" should be both specifically applicable to the efforts you identify and general enough to apply to efforts on which the Government receives information from other sources

L-7.5 Resolution of Problems Offerors may include a discussion of efforts accomplished by the Offeror to resolve problems encountered on prior contracts as well as past efforts to identify and manage program risk

The Offeror is required to clearly demonstrate management actions employed in overcoming problems and the effects of those actions, in terms of improvements achieved or problems rectified

Submittal of quality performance indicators or other management indicators that clearly support that an Offeror has overcome past problems is required

L-7.6 Questionnaires Government requests the Offeror send out Past Performance Questionnaires, Section J, to each of the Points of Contact (POCs) identified in the Past Performance Volume The Offeror shall fill in the project and evaluator information on the questionnaire prior to sending it to the POC. Completed questionnaires shall be submitted by the POC directly to the Contracting Officer A cover letter for transmitting the questionnaire to each POC is provided as Section J Each of the Offeror's POCs shall e-mail the completed Past and Present Performance Questionnaire to Belinda.williams@mda.mil with a courtesy copy to emily.mcgee@mda.mil

L-7.7 Subcontractor/Teaming Partner Consent Form Past performance information concerning key subcontractors or subsidiaries cannot be disclosed to a private party without consent The Government will need that consent before disclosing key subcontractor and/or subsidiary past performance information to the Offeror during exchanges In an effort to assist the Performance Risk Assessment Group (PRAG) in assessing past performance, the Government requires that a Subcontractor/Teaming Partner Consent Form for the Release of Past Performance Information (Attachment of Section J) be completed by each key subcontractor and/or subsidiary identified in the proposal. The completed consent forms should be submitted as part of Past Performance (not subject to page count limitation)

Past Performance Evaluation Section M M-7.0 Factor 3: PRAG Provides Subjective Integrated Assessment & Overall Confidence Rating Recency 5 yrs. preceding RFP release date Relevancy Higher relevancy will be assessed for contracts that are most similar to the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities called for under this solicitation Quality The Government will consider the performance level of recent, relevant efforts. In evaluating the Offeror’s past performance record, the Government will use past performance information obtained from various sources known or identified by the Government Overall Rating Based on integrated assessment of the Offeror’s recency, relevancy, and quality

Adverse Past Performance

M-7.5 Adverse Past Performance Adverse past performance information is defined as past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating on any evaluation aspect or any unfavorable comments received from sources without a formal rating system Government considers number and severity of the problems and appropriateness and effectiveness of corrective actions taken In accordance with FAR 15.306(b)(1)(i), communications must be held with any Offeror whose adverse past performance information is the determining factor preventing it from being included in the competitive range, unless the Offeror has previously had the opportunity to comment on such information

Summary DRFP Final Industry Comments Due 19 Jul 11 MDA Probable Amendment Release To DRFP 5 Aug 11 MDDC Bidders Library Release is TBD For Questions email Belinda Williams at belinda.williams@mda.mil or Emily McGee at emily.mcgee@mda.mil

12 Jul 2011 Ms. Beverly Harbin Deputy Director, MDA/DTD

MDDC Program Program Overview

MDDC Overview The MDDC Contract is a product-oriented, test data focused effort MDDC supports DT and the greater MDA test community MDDC core operations include the Data Center, IMTP Lab Analysis Infrastructure, Truth, and Test Support System MDDC reduce BMDS risks by promoting test data sharing across MDA and reduces costly duplication of mission data MDDC Provides MDA a Single Effective, Flexible, and Cost Efficient Test Data Capability

MDA/DT

MDA Test Organization

Test Policy & Controls

DTP

Test Planning & Design

DTD

Flight Test Execution

DTF

Ground Test Execution

DTG

Test Resources

DTR

Target Execution

DTT

Warfighter Operations Support

DTW

Director and Test Functional Manager Deputy Director (Acting) Technical Director Deputy for Operations Senior Technical Advisors Legend:

MDA Military (MM) OGA Military (OM) MDA Civilian (MC) OGA Civilian (OC) *: Supervisor

- - - Direct Coordination

Business & Financial Manager GCC Assistants to the Director (ATD): CENTCOM, EUCOM, PACOM

Test Element Integration

DTM

MDDC Challenges Balances mission support surge activities while executing core requirements Executes the mission while proficiently dealing with short timelines and changing requirements Maintains the infrastructure through procurement, property accountability, and maintenance across geographically dispersed locations Integrates and accredits new equipment into current infrastructure as required Continually researches, develops, delivers, and certifies new capabilities Ensures MDDC products, data, and infrastructure maintain accountability

Funding and Interdependencies

Interdependencies Customers

MDDC

IC

DPF

DoD Security

MDA Security

MDDC

DE

TC

Elements

SN

DTF

DTG

COCOMs

Navy

DARPA

DTR

Test Product Assets Managed Under

MDDC (W9113M-05-D-0003)

Key Product Contract Metrics

MDDC Purchases Over $6M HW/SW Yearly

Contractor Manages Over $24M In Total Property

Contractor Manages Over 7,000 GFE Items Worldwide In Over 30 Locations

Contractor Maintains Over 330 Software Licenses

Contractor Manages Over 240,000 data items in the Data Center

Contractor Is Responsible For Rapid Turnaround of Classified and Unclassified Data Shipping All Over CONUS/OCONUS

New MDDC Contract Vision Flexibility is crucial with test asset development in order to provide critical mission performance Overall contract management activities are closely aligned and integrated with all technical decisions to achieve maximum efficient operations Risk reduction and cohesiveness across the contract:

Increased program support, management efficiency and surge capacity through cross-training across applicable functional areas Increased integrated functional support for multiple assets Comprehensive, integrated approach to Information Technology management and Information Assurance Unified SW development, testing, and configuration management practices and processes Single integrated data collection, transfer, management and archival system

Bidders Library * MDDC has experienced significant growth, consolidation and change over the last five years As a result, documents in the Bidders Library contain references to organizations, projects, functionality, etc. that are obsolete. Some primary examples are:

* No Offeror is allowed to release classified, FOUO, or controlled unclassified information without prior Missile Defense Agency approval

Functions No Longer Supported Under Current MDDC Program

Applied Data Analysis Center (ADAC) – program shuttered: Data Analysis and Phenomenology Expertise

Functions Will be Moved to MDDC Huntsville as of FY12

Advanced Missile Signature Center (AMSC): Located at Arnold AFB, is a national facility supporting the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) and other DoD programs and customers with analysis, modeling, measurement, archival and distribution services.

Project Hercules (PH) – program shuttered: Algorithm Evaluation and Improvement

AMP (ADAC + MDDC + PH) network designated by SMDC to provide data processing services for these three programs ADAC, MDDC and PH.

Mr. Robert Karl

MDA/DTD

MDDC Program Statement of Work (SOW)

Statement of Work (SOW) Overall Requirements Provide test product data management across MDA, including data center operations, test design, planning, and products, and analysis infrastructure operations for the Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS) Test Program Directly support all phases of flight and ground testing with detailed pre-mission data planning; organizational coordination across the elements and MDA directorates; prompt collection, secure dissemination, and thorough archiving of mission data; and other specialized data services Deliver Real-Time Data Acquisition/Processing/Distribution and Situational Awareness (SA) during MDA mission execution, the MDDC Program provides data collection from various sensor(s), networks, and platforms to include telemetry collection and decommutation, track data, translated Global Positioning System (GPS) data, video, and voice communications

Statement of Work (SOW) Overall Requirements (cont.)

Support the management and planning of resources necessary for test execution and identify test resource conflicts and provide resolution options for event planners.

Develop and sustain BMDS and Element level truth data plans for ground tests, flight tests, and post-flight reconstructions Develop and deliver multiple Truth Data products and other analysis and documentation products Develop, sustain and modernize operations of BMDS dedicated test data management and data analysis lab infrastructure, test data transfer network connections, distributed operations systems and servers, and other systems Improve and/or advance areas of integration, process improvement, development, and lean execution in order to succeed within a challenging and dynamic test environment

SOW Overview

* Separate Task Order To Be Issued

Reference Documents BMDS Test Concept of Operations, 8 APR 2009 MDA Directive 3002.03, BMDS Test Policy, 21 JUN 2010 MDA Integrated Master Test Plan, v11.1, 23 FEB 2011 MDA Directive 3200.06, Mission-Related Scientific and Technical Data/Information Management, 13 JUN 2008 Pacific Range Support Team Memorandum of Agreement, 04 November 2010

Management Provide management and programmatic support to direct, assist and facilitate all aspects of the MDDC Program and test support activities and services.

Program Management Responsive to inevitable changes in emphasis and significant changes in program direction with respect to approved projects Contract Management Responsive to changes defined in Task Orders (T/Os) with respect to new, revised, or terminated efforts Cost Management Requires controls to allow management / tracking of expenditures by:

Government fiscal year funding by ACRN at the Task Order Level Users’ and core funding

Mission Assurance Quality Assurance Develop, implement, and maintain a quality assurance program to ensure that products and services conform to requirements and provide customer satisfaction Identify and develop a system of metrics that are both strategic and tactical to track those processes that are critical to MDDC Program operations Coordinate with the Government to develop an appropriate Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP)

Environmental Safety & Health Integrate applicable federal, state, and local ESH laws and regulations, Executive Orders, treaties, and policies into all phases of program execution to minimize impact on program life cycle cost All applicable facilities, processes, and operations (including those of subcontractors) shall be compliant to ensure a safe work environment

Operations and Sustainment Library Operations Test Support System (TSS) Currently offsite Data Management Truth Analysis Software Development Information Technology Infrastructure

Mission Focus Provide direct support capabilities for MDA Flight and Ground Tests, external organization tests, and ‘real world’ events.

Pre-Mission Activities All mission support activities are coordinated with the MDDC Program Government Mission Team Mission Execution All mission support activities are coordinated with the MDDC Program Government Mission Team Post-Mission Activities All mission support activities are coordinated with the MDDC Program Government Mission Team

Security Continually demonstrate to MDA that it is properly staffed and capable of handling, processing, and protecting classified data IAW with all DoD and MDA security requirements

Special Provisions Relocation of Operations Develop and execute an effective, coordinated transition/move plan that ensures delivery of uninterrupted service for relocating the MDDC Program and test analysis lab infrastructure pursuant to issuance of a T/O Transition Develop and execute a transition plan to ensure an efficient process, an orderly transition, and minimal disruption to the operation and sustainment of the MDDC Program, associated labs, and on-going missions Transition period of no more than 45 days

15 Minute Break

Mr. Dennis Stout

MDA/DEW/DTD

MDDC Program Security / Tours

Purpose Address security responsibilities and expectations related to the execution of the Missile Defense Data Center Contract:

MDDC Industrial Security Requirements Information Security / Documents Control Physical Security / Access Control Infrastructure / Security Coordination Back Up Charts:

Definitions Facility Clearance

Key Points:

All work on-site or direct mission support, with the exception of TEDAC and TM Ops On-Site, MDA Inspection Authority Off-Site, DSS Inspection Authority (MDA Retains the right for compliance inspections) Contractor is expected to have the ability to encrypt FOUO/CUI at all performance locations International Traffic in Arms (ITAR) Exemptions will be required from time to time Defense Logistics Information Service (DLIS) Registration Required No SCI or SAP requirement COMSEC account is required Almost all Caveats of classified information resident within the MDDC Contract Security Classification Specifications

“DD-254”

MDDC Industrial Security Requirements Identified in MDDC procurement package Scope of Work DoD Contract Security Classification Specification (DD 254) Classified access at Government location & test specific locations LIMITED classified storage at contractor facility LIMITED classified processing at contractor facility TOP SECRET facility clearance is required All personnel required to have a SECRET clearance Interim SECRET clearances are acceptable but can/will impact access Adequate number of personnel must possess a TOP SECRET clearance All responsibilities executed IAW applicable DoD and MDA Security Policy

Information Security / Document Control ~ 30 Years of Mission Related Scientific & Technical Data ~ 240,000 data item catalog (Classified & Unclassified) Paper Digital Film Tape Microfiche 9 Track Tape 14 Track Tape Other Ship/Receive from ~ 400 Government & Contractor facilities ~ 40,000 data items processed annually ~ 2000 registered/approved On-Line catalog users Federally mandated records management Support DoD & MDA Declassification Program

Physical Security / Access Control 2 accredited collateral open storage facilities ~50,000 Square Feet Multiple Internal Labs Common User Areas Conference Rooms Classified/Unclassified VTC’s Transient Work Space

~ 600 persons with access ~270 Full Time ~50 Transient

24/7 test support as required

Support multiple MDA Organizations

Infrastructure / Security Coordination Assist DT/DTD management with day-to-day lab operations in support of:

Test Planning Test Analysis Test Range/Asset De-Confliction Test Data Providers / Test Data Recipients Joint Analysis Teams Element Analysis Groups (As Required/Directed) Failure Investigation Teams (As Required/Directed) Assist in Uniform Security – Standard Operating Procedures (S-SOP) and Process:

Development Implementation Education Maintenance

VBIII DT Lab Tours

14 July 2011: 0800 / 0900 / 1000 / 1100 / 1300 / 1400 / 1500 Note:

2 persons per company 12 - 14 persons per tour 1 tour per person Do not bring electronic devices Questions will be collected and addressed if submitted in writing Do not ask questions of those working in the toured areas

BACKUP

UNCLASSIFIED

Definitions

Classified Contract: Any Contract that requires or will require access to classified information by the contractor or his employees in the performance of the contract. Access to classified information may take place at the contractor’s facility, the Government site, or another contractor facility. (A contract may be classified even though the contract document is not classified).

Facility: A plant, laboratory, office, college, university, or commercial structure with associated warehouses, storage areas, utilities and components which, when related by function and location, form an operating entity.

Facility Security Clearance: An administrative determination that, from a security standpoint, a facility is eligible for access to classified information of a certain category (and all lower categories).

Industrial Security: That portion of information security which is concerned with the protection of classified information in the custody of U.S. industry.

Personnel Security Clearance: An administrative determination that an individual is eligible, from a security point of view, for access to classified information of the same or lower category as the level of personnel clearance being granted.

Safeguarding: Measures and controls that are prescribed to protect classified information. Safeguarding and Protection of classified information are synonymous terms.

Facility Clearance

Sponsorship (Request for a Facility Clearance) Government for Prime Contractor Cleared Contractor for Sub-Contractor Facility Can Not “Self Sponsor”

Sponsorship Letter & DD Form 254 to Defense Industrial Security Clearance Office, Facility Clearance Division Reviews Request Forwards Request to Appropriate DSS Regional Office DSS Regional Office Assigns Facility to a DSS Industrial Security Representative

Industrial Security Representative Contacts Facility Obtains Information About Facility Provides Facility with Instructions on Completing Paperwork Provides Basic Information about the NISP Provides Guidance in Establishing an Industrial Security Program

Five Essential Elements of Facility Clearance Process Sponsorship Business Structure/Organization Security Agreement Foreign Ownership, Control, Interest (FOCI) Key Management Personnel

Final Facility Clearance will be granted as soon as all final clearance requirements are satisfied Issuance of final personnel clearances for the Key Management Personnel (KMPs) Execution of the DoD Security Agreement between the contractor and DSS A favorable foreign ownership, control, or influence (FOCI) determination

Mr. Brian Sisk

MDA/DTD

MDDC Program Operations and Sustainment Information Technology / Infrastructure

Background DTD has two distinct primary infrastructure enclaves Test and Data Analysis Network (TDAN)

Test Support System (TSS) Mr. Kevin Woodard

Test and Data Analysis Network (TDAN)

Purpose Provide the Test Analysis community and the Data Centers Program network, computing and file resources to handle and process mission/event data Provide this functionality IAW MDA and DoD Information Assurance guidelines and directives that would otherwise contravene MDA Admin network and IA constraints (E.g.: FTP, USB-connected devices) Allow users MDA-wide to easily reach data remotely w/controlled access Provide MDA/DT w/ capabilities to meet highly constrained test event analysis requirements timelines

Why TDAN?

TDAN Infrastructure Overview DTD responsible for O&S of the Classified and Unclassified TDAN Infrastructure Facilities/Customers:

Von Braun Complex Bldg III (VBIII) - Primary Data Center Missile Defense Data Center (MDDC-H) Test Functional Analysis Infrastructure TRUTH Data Analysis and Development Lab - DTD Flight Test Data Planning – DTD Ground Test Planning – DTD IMTP Analysis Lab – DEJ, DET, GM, DTD Huntsville Data Analysis Center – TH Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC), Corona, CA - MDDC-C Arnold Engineering Development Center (AEDC), Arnold AFB, Tullahoma, TN - MDDC-A MDDC Operations phasing out at end of FY11 Disaster Recovery Ops to continue until other provisions identified Missile Defense Integration and Operations Center (MDIOC), Colorado Springs, CO BMDS Laboratory for Analysis and Data Evaluation (BLADE) Multi-function, reconfigurable Product Integrations Centers (PICs)

TDAN Infrastructure Overview DTD Contractor Responsibilities All Classified and Unclassified TDAN IT activities/operations Information Assurance, System/Network Administration, Helpdesk Operations, System-wide and Focused Backup and Recovery efforts, System enhancements/upgrades, Software configuration, etc.

Work very closely with MDA/IC groups for IA, network engineering activities Manage the Mobile Joint Analysis Team (MJAT) infrastructure Laptops, small servers to provide analysis infrastructure where TDAN connectivity does not exist Connects to MDA CNET wherever CNET connection exists Provides data transfer capabilities back to CTDAN via FTP

TDAN Capabilities

U-TDAN

Allows TDAN, MDA UNET users and white-listed (WL) sites access to MDDC resources User Registration, DMS via HTTPS (UNET / WL / TDAN) Data transfer via HTTPS (UNET / WL / TDAN) Data via file shares (Internal TDAN) Thick-client DMS (Library Control Center) software (TDAN/MDDC) Unclassified Development Network (UDEV)

C-TDAN

Allows TDAN, MDA CNET users access to MDDC resources Data transfer via FTP (CNET / SIPRNET / TDAN) Data via file shares (Internal TDAN) Thick client-based Library Control Center software (TDAN/MDDC) CNET Enterprise mail access via the CTDAN (ECD: AUG 11) Classified Development Network (CDEV) RD Standalone Network Used to store restricted data in support of the DCP Confidential Standalone Network Capability Used to store unclassified confidential data in support of the DCP and Analysis efforts

Network Architecture

MDDC Program

CTDAN

UTDAN

MDA CNET

Accessible to all MDA CNET Users: PMRF / WSMR / Ramstein / etc.

SIPRNET

MDA UNET

Accessible to Internet Users: .gov / .mil / “whitelisted”

Accessible to all MDA UNET Users Data Analysis processing and file storage FTP Services for Electronic Data Delivery Library / Data Management Software Development resources Disaster Recovery services Easy accessibility by MDA CNET users

Unclassified Data Analysis processing and file storage HTTPS Data Transfer for Electronic Data Delivery Integrated Library / User / IDMP Management Software Development resources Disaster Recovery services Easy accessibility by MDA UNET / ’whitelisted’ users

Classified Services Unclassified Services

Hardware Overview 240+ Servers (physical and virtual) UTDAN virtualization Numbers can quickly fluctuate based on user requirements 550+ User PCs for CTDAN, UTDAN, and dedicated networks (physical & virtual) ~580 TB Classified & Unclassified data storage 200+ Peripheral Devices - printers, scanners, ext HDs, barcode devices, etc.

~2800 user accounts on all networks in support of MDDC Programs Mobile Joint Analysis Team (MJAT) servers/laptops/accounts (CNET)

Physical Connectivity Connection through MDA/IC H/W via separate switches and encryptors Data flows through UNET/CNET on the DREN but is not directly embedded in UNET/CNET stream MDA Enterprise Level enclave that allows DT to manage equipment and networks in accordance with MDA/DoD regulations

TDAN Hardware and Connectivity

Network Architecture

Defense Research & Engineering Network

MDA C/UNET

C/UTDAN

TEDAC

SIPRNET

MDA Enterprise Sites

MDIOC-JNIC

ABL-Kirtland AFB

STSS

ABL-Edwards AFB Internet

NIPRNET

GMD

Vandenberg

NCR-FOB2

THAAD-Wynn Dr.

Vandenberg AFB Los Angeles AFB Edwards AFB Eglin AFB Arnold AFB Kirtland AFB Eareckson AFS Hanscom AFB Ft. Richardson Ft. Greeley Reagan TS/Kwaj

WSMR

SPAWAR

MDIOC

AMRDEC

NSWC Corona 106 Wynn - HSV VB Complex

ARC (ISTC-1)

5000 Bradford Dr.

FOB2-NCR

John Hopkins / APL Raytheon-Tucson

LMSSC/THAAD

Ramstein AFB Boeing (HSV) MIT/LL - Hanscom AFB BCA Hanscom AFB Boeing ABL - Kirtland AFB KHILS – Eglin AFB Lockheed MDNTB MHPCC - Maui

PMRF DAC

PMRF THAAD DART

AN/TPY-2 & HWIL

AN/TPY-2 Japan Patriot HWIL AEGIS HWILs

THAAD HWIL

MDDC-A

BLADE (MDIOC)

MDDC-C

JDAC

MDDC-H

HDAC

Approved for Public Release 11-MDA-6250 (30 Jun 2011)

MDIOC

VB II

TTS 1 - Pacific Collector TTS 2 – Pacific Tracker KMRSS/Worthy

MLP

HALO II

PT Mugu

RTS

PMRF

VAFB

WSMR

SPAWAR

NCR

VB III

NMCC

STRATCOM

PACOM

SBX

JFCC-Space

JFCC-IMD

NORTHCOM

MIT/LL

Interdependencies Multiple aspects of the MDDC Program utilizing the IT Infrastructure:

Each of these internal customer groups are interdependent upon one another and utilize the MDDC Program IT Infrastructure to accomplish their various missions Collaboration and coordination with internal/external MDA, Element, and associated programs and customers for mission, development, analysis requirements is CRITICAL

IT

Infrastructure Data Management Software Development Library Operations Truth Analysis

Elements

MDA/IC

Analysis Labs

Internal Infrastructure Users External Users

IT / Infrastructure Goals MDA expects the contractor to capably perform:

Operate, sustain, and improve MDDC Program associated networks, hardware, and software utilizing a cross-trained workforce in the application of industry best practices, processes and procedures Continued adherence to MDA / DoD Directives for IA / IT operations (DIACAP/FISMA/CTOs/certifications/etc.)

Improved collaboration and coordination with internal/external MDA, Element, and associated programs and customers for mission, development, analysis requirements Maintain cognizance of BMDS test schedule and interdependencies with regards to MDDC Program requirements and operations Maintain and enhance documentation for all aspects of IT / IA operations Continued conduct of periodic Disaster Recovery operations and tests IAW documented processes and procedures Development, operation and enhancement of a single efficient and effective help desk across the MDDC Program Provide short- and long-term technical upgrade/enhancement plans to encompass efficient procurement methodologies and material purchase / maintenance plans to maximize Government IT expenditures

IT / Infrastructure Goals MDA expects to gain efficiencies within the IT Infrastructure Management and Information Management arenas:

Infrastructure Management US budget deficit, DoD budget cuts, Federal Data Center Consolidation Initiative, the ‘greening’ of DoD and MDA… Efficient use of resources Data Store Optimization Virtualization Inventory Management Doing MORE with LESS

Information Management We are dealing with more and more data every year, every test GTD-03 data ingested/processed: ~ 430 GB GTI-04b data ingested/processed: ~ 6.65 TB We need to get smarter about managing data – no matter where it is, or how it arrives into the infrastructure

Holistic, planned approach combining these 2 primary aspects of IT

Operational Overview MS Windows Server (2003/8) administration Security Active Directory Services Cluster services Virtualization Backup and Recovery Linux Server administration Security Virtualization Windows integration Network administration Cisco, PIX firewalls, Tumbleweed servers, etc.

MS SQL Server database (2005/8) administration Database design and administration principles Stored procedures Information Assurance Multiple DIACAP packages Familiarity with DoD and MDA IA- and IT-related Regulations and Policies IAVA Compliance / Command Task Orders Change and Configuration Management Security / Network Scans HelpDesk Operations Inventory Management Customer / MDA/IC Relationship Management

Mr. Brian Sisk

MDA/DTD

MDDC Program Operations and Sustainment Software Development

MDDC Program Software manages/processes data for:

Library Operations Security, Ingestion, Storage, Duplication, Shipping Catalog User Registration User Management, Search, Request Management Data Management Activities IDMP Document Management

Truth Data Analysis Sensor, GPS, TM Data Analysis

Test Support System Resource Deconfliction Real-time Data Distribution Real-time Situational Awareness Telemetry Operations Software Development Overview

DMS

ASTER

TRMP-T

TEDAC, TM Ops

Data Management System (DMS) Scope DMS is an integrated software solution utilized by the MDDC Program to meet the data security, handling, distribution, and archival of MDA Flight and Ground Test data Mature product; complex interactions with internal s/w entities; majority of user interface is unclassified, software changes as internal processes and external requirements change Library / Data Management operations Thin Client – Integrated Data Management Plan creation and maintenance; User Registration and Management; Data Requests Thick Client – Library Ops Comprised of:

Government-owned / Contractor-developed software Microsoft C# Microsoft SQL Server Backend GOTS/COTS/Open Source integration Various supporting tools and utilities (installation, key word search, etc.)

Stakeholders – Data Management, Library, User Community

All Sensors Truth and Evaluation Reporting (ASTER) Scope ASTER is an integrated software solution utilized by the MDDC Program Truth Team to evaluate and analyze trajectory, sensor, optical and other data gathered from MDA Flight and Ground Test Events to support the overall MDA Test mission Utilized for Truth Data Package construction Statistical analysis, visualization Standardized modular design for ‘plug-and-play’ development Multiple data format capability Comprised of:

Government-owned / contractor-developed software Microsoft C# Microsoft SQL Server Backend COTS/GOTS/Open Source integration Stakeholders: BMDS Joint Analysis Teams (JATs)

Test Resource Management Planning Tool (TRMP-T) Scope Two components to the TRMP-T:

TRMP-T (U) - assist Flight & Ground Test Resource Managers and MDA Test Planners with scheduling and de-conflicting test resources across multiple MDA missions TRMP-T (C) - develop MDA Integrated Master Test Plan (IMTP); maintain data needed for Test Configuration Sheets Accessed via the MDA UNET and CNET Portals and hosted on the MDDC infrastructure Comprised of:

Government-owned / Contractor-developed software Adobe ColdFusion Server Microsoft SQL Server Backend 3rd party add-ins / applications Stakeholders: Test Resource Managers, Test Planners, IMTP

Software Development Interactions Software Development is an interdependent effort expanding across all areas of the MDDC Program DMS requirements gathered from both internal (Library Operations, Data Management, IA, etc.) and external (Joint Analysis Team, Elements, etc.) sources ASTER requirements gathered from internal (Truth) and external (JAT, Elements, etc.)

sources

Coordination between the development team, requirements sources, and internal groups are

CRITICAL

Development Team must efficiently work with …Data Management/Library Ops to ensure evolving requirements are managed appropriately and without interruption of MDDC Program data services …IT to ensure Development environment is kept in sync with current configuration of Production environment and all applicable MDA and DoD IA requirements to ensure tested and verified software is ready for deployment

We cannot ‘throw it over the fence’

Data Management

Software Development

Truth

IT Infrastructure

Development Goals MDA expects the contractor to capably perform:

Effective and efficient software project planning, monitoring, and control Software Requirements development, management, verification and validation Economical product integration activities Maintain and enhance documentation across all aspects of the MDDC Program in regards to software development Continued adherence to MDA / DoD Directives for IA aspects of software development (User management/PII, Authentication and Authorization, etc.)

Improved collaboration and coordination with internal/external MDA, Element, and associated programs and customers for mission, development, analysis requirements Maintain cognizance of BMDS test schedule and interdependencies with regards to MDDC Program requirements and operations

Development Goals MDA expects to gain efficiencies in software development:

Common utilization of development resources Implement common utilities across the program Integrated team approach Process, not person Eliminate ‘stove-piping’ Increase communication across teams Common utilization of industry standard, best-practice processes and procedures Processes and procedures commensurate with SEI CMM Level 3

Development Skill Sets Utilized Windows thick-client applications Web application development and services External hardware libraries integration Active Directory services and Kerberos-based security paradigms .NET 3 and greater frameworks Complex mathematical operations 3D Visualization tools and concepts MS SQL Server Database design and administration principles SQL construction and application integration Reporting Services Stored procedures Toolsets / languages:

MS Visual Studio / Adobe Dreamweaver C# / ColdFusion Markup Language (CFML) / HTML / CSS / JavaScript Bugzilla / Subversion Lucene search engine Systems engineering Requirements collection and interpretation Business domain/ processes and procedures familiarity Integration of complex hardware and software systems Definition of hardware/software controls and implementation plans Business domain familiarity in the following areas: customer service, order provisioning, library management, digital media production, knowledge management, shipping logistics

90 Minute Lunch (on your own)

Ms. Tiffany Anderson

MDA/DTD

MDDC Program Operations and Sustainment Data Management

DTD Mission Support Roles and Responsibilities

DMS/TDAN

DMS/TDAN

IDMP / Ad Hoc Product Receipt and Distribution Customer Registration BMDS Data Archival Product Management Test Location Connectivity Monitor Connectivity / Rates IDMP Coordination, Development, Management Customer Interface On-Site Support

Data Managers

Library Ops

DTD Planning & Test Execution

IT Network

Data Management Overview Data Management – Planning, Documenting, Coordinating, Receiving, Reproducing, Distributing, Transferring, and Archiving of BMDS Flight/Ground Test Data Integrated Data Management Plan (IDMP): A single source document integrating all mission data documentation (UDS, DMAPs, TDIPs, etc…) Identifies data collection requirements based on the Test Objectives Memo (TOM) and Operational Objectives, mission evaluation criteria for each Element/Org, validation and verification for modeling and simulations, and end user analysis requirements Data Handling Plan (DHP): Subset of data collected for quick-look post-mission analysis and reporting Data Management Outside of MDDC Contract Government Data Manager: Serves as the Integrated Event Test Team (IETT) Government Data Lead; Oversight of all data requirements, test data documentation, and On-Site/Integrated Data Management Plan (IDMP) data distribution Data Management Support: Supports the IETT Data Lead with BMDS test data coordination and MDA/DTD flight and ground test documentation development Element Data Managers: Identifies and documents element/component level data requirements and collection for their element; Utilizes the Data Management System (DMS) Data Providers: Collects, generates and disseminates data to MDDC for further distribution and archival; Utilizes the Data Management System (DMS)

Data Management

- Contract Support - Data Management Within MDDC Contract Data Management System (DMS) Services Tool Development: Tool kit used by data managers and MDA community at large for BMDS data management Training Documentation: Role-based training packages for external DMS users, revised for each new software release Network Infrastructure: Backbone of DTD Test Planning Execution Responsibilities Mobile Joint Analysis Team (MJAT): IT CNET/FTP support infrastructure used at remote test sites File Transfer Protocol (FTP): Primary mechanism for data transfer at various test locations Product Support Specialist: Supports data coordination efforts, manages test data receipt and distribution, and provides on-site mission support

Library Ops CONOPs Data Management Within MDDC Contract (cont.)

Library Operations:

Perform all aspects of IDMP and Ad Hoc data configuration management and distribution for to the MDA and Operational Asset communities Tracking of BMDS Flight/Ground test data using DMS Tool Kit Work flow is valid for day-to-day and extended hour mission support Extended support facilitates expedited data delivery supporting all quick-look analysis reporting timelines

User Management Account creation User validation Access permissions User Support Account management Ad Hoc requests / SME Support Administrative Records Management Security Functions Operational Execution Item Receipt Item Identification Item Review Item Dissemination Mission/IDMP ID Security Markings Usability Mission Association Metadata Definition Content Ingestion Revision Control Media Conversion Physical/Electronic Delivery Item Tracking Metric Reporting Physical / Electronic Receipt Acknowledgement

Mission Planning and Execution Approved for Public Release 11-MDA-6250 (30 Jun 2011) *Timeline not to scale

LIBRARY OPS

Authenticate/manage data recipients security requirements Coordinate/manage/maintain readiness for critical IT network support infrastructure Expedite pre-mission critical planning data distribution Execute/manage high volume data distribution requirements Awareness and execution of prioritized critical deliveries per DM guidance Identify network issues impacting delivery timelines Health & status to Data Manager and Test Community Provide overall data configuration management to include records management for test data Data dissemination per IDMP and/or Failure Review Board (FRB) direction

DATA MANAGERS

Participate in working-level meetings Cross-walk data documentation / resolve inconsistencies Anticipate/resolve data handling & distribution issues prior to test execution Identify/coordinate all data transfer paths required Identify data collection requirements per approved test configuration Communicate TEDAC transfer requirements and priorities Manage/Execute on-site data distribution Collaborate/Direct DTD deployed personnel at all test sites Resolve data handling & distribution issues Continued coordination with test analysis team, data providers Adhere to security and IA guidelines during on-site support Convert/duplicate various media formats FRT/FRB interface, responsible for data configuration management Report DTD status at Analysis and Executive Reviews Support mission data reviews to educate/communicate lessons learned and recommendations to Test Community & document in policy Resolve data handling & distribution issues Continued coordination with test analysis team, data providers T-180 T-90 T- 30 T+5 T+90 T-270

AD HOC

IDMP DISTRIBUTION ELEMENT RETAINS DRA

Phased Event Activities Attend Test Team Meetings – JATs, MPMs, OR Reviews, MDRs, JSWGs Track Data Deliveries, Coordination of DIDs, and Approval of Data Requests

Phase 1 Planning and Design

OPR: DE

Phase 3 Readiness

OPR: MD

Phase 2 Planning and Design

OPR: DT

Phase 4 Execution

OPR: MD

Phase 5…