Attachment_1_-_FY16_Contract_DELIVERABLE_LISTS.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 42 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Systems Engineering Support Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HQ0034-16-R-0133
- Issued by
- DOD Washington Headquarters Service
About this file
Attachment 1 Contract Deliverables
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 48
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
MPS LIST
| Deliverables | |||
| FY 16 ODASD SE Support Contracts | |||
| Director, MPS Support | |||
| PWS Section | Section Title | Deliverable | Quantity or Frequency |
| 1 | Introduction | ||
| 1.1 | SE Mission | ||
| 1.2 | SE and Program Support Vision | ||
| 1.3 | SE and Program Support Initiatives | ||
| 1.4 | Org Chart (Projected CY15) | ||
| 2 | Specific Tasks | ||
| 3 | General Product and SME Support Expectations | ||
| 3.1 | SME Support for all Tasks | ||
| 3.2 | Data Management, Strategy, Process and Standards | ||
| 3.3 | SME Support and Product Development for all Tasks | ||
| 4 | Systems Engineering Oversight of Major Defense Acquisition Programs (MDAP) and Major Automated Information Systems (MAIS) and other special interest programs | ||
| 4.1 | Program Support Assessments (PSAs) | Support the conduct of cross-functional, multi-disciplinary reviews of MDAP, MAIS, and other programs as required | Dependent on the number of MDAP nd MAIS programs under development. The average has been 15 PSA's per year |
| 4.2 | Special Studies, Independent Ad-Hoc Reviews and Assessments | Conduct extremely focused, short turn-around highly technical program reviews on specific issues as directed by the DASD(SE) | Approximately 10 focused reviews per year |
| 4.3 | Defense Acquisition Executive Summaries (DAES) for MDAP and MAIS | Support the development and submission of Defense Acquisition Executive Summary (DAES) assessments for MDAP, MAIS and special interest programs on DASD(SE) oversight | 25 MDAP and MAIS programs per month, and 3 selected DAES program pre-briefs per month. |
| 4.4 | Advise AoA Working Group Meetings and Senior Advisory Group (SAG) meetings | Review and analyze AoA guidance and AoA plans and provide recommended changes for each SAG meeting | Support 30 SAG meetings per year |
| 4.5 | Advise Overarching Integrated Product Team (OIPT) meetings | support the Overarching Integrated Product Team (OIPT) process by preparing recommendations and findings, including strengths and risk areas, from PSAs and continuous engagement with program offices. | average of 60 OIPTs per year |
| 4.6 | Advise Defense Acquisition Board (DAB) meetings | support the DAB processes by assessing programs and preparing the DASD(SE), ASD(R&E) or other principals to participate in major program decision reviews. Assessment findings and recommendations and are presented in Power Point format. | average of 50 DABs per year. |
| 4.7 | Prepare Comments and Coordinate on OIPT Reports, DAB Acquisition Decision Memorandums, and DAB Readiness Functional Checklists | Support the OIPT and DAB processes by reviewing, preparing quality comments and recommendations to inform and prepare senior leadership, and coordinating for approval the individual reports and memorandums which support the program decision making process. |
| review Acquisition Decision Memorandum (ADMs) for accuracy of SE and SE-related data as they are submitted by the OIPT lead and/or ARA and provide written analysis to DASD(SE) for review and submit to ARA within 3 working days of receipt. | DASD(SE) reviews an average of 60 ADMs per year. | |||
| 4.8 | Coordinate on and prepare inputs for U.S. Code Title 10 Section 2366a and b Certifications | Assist and coordinate in the preparation of Milestone A Certifications in accordance with Section 2366a of Title 10 US Code focusing on the technical underpinnings of the certifications | Approx 15 Certifications per year | |
| 4.9 | Support Request for Proposal (RFP) Reviews and Peer Reviews | prepare DASD(SE) principals for participation in DPAP led Peer Reviews to provide independent OSD evaluation of MDAP and MAIS Requests for Proposals (RFPs) with a focus on Systems Engineering | Approximately 5 RFP reviews per year | |
| 4.1 | Outreach Support | develop and prepare presentations for meetings and conferences with the Services, Industry and Academia. Examples include OSD and Service SE Forums, NDIA SE Conference, specialty engineering conferences. | Approxiamately 5 per year | |
| 4.11 | Reach Back SMEs and consultants for assessment reviews, PSAs, performance assessments and specialized studies | N/A | N/A | |
| 5 | Program Support Activities | |||
| 5.1 | Development Planning | Support of Material Development Decision (MDD) by evaluating Initial Capabilities Documents (ICDs), Analysis of Alternative (AoA) plans and guidance, and Component planning for Materiel Solution Analysis phase execution |
support for DASD(SE)’s leading and managing the Department’s Development Planning Working Group (DPWG) activities inclinding develop, prepare, and coordinate meeting minutes for high level meetings such as the DPWG. Approxiamately five (5) MDDs per year, 20 AoA events and 30 SAG meetings.
DPWGs meet weekly.
| 5.2 | Systems Engineering Technical Reviews | support D,MPS and represent D,MPS by participating in Systems Engineering Technical Reviews (e.g. System Requirements Review (SRR), System Function Reviews (SFR), Preliminary Design Review (PDR), Critical Design Review (CDR), Production Readiness Review (PRR), Physical Configuration Audits, etc.) and advise the DASD(SE) and the Program Management Office (PMO) on best practices and procedures | Approximately 100 Technical Reviews per year of which approximately 15 are PDRs and CDRs. |
| 5.3 | Continuous Engagement with Programs | Observe and report on selected SE and DP and SE- and DP-related events as part of the continuing support to, and oversight of, MDAPs and MAIS | Approximately 175 active MDAP and MAIS programs and approximately 100 other additional programs |
| 5.4 | Systems Engineering (SE) Working Integrated Product Teams (WIPT) and Integrated Product Teams (IPT) Support | Represent DASD(SE) in Program Management Office (PMO) led SE IPTs and SE WIPTs to share best practices across the Department, clarify DoD policy and guidance, assist PMO staff in understanding and meeting OSD expectations and provide independent assessments of program strengths, issues and risks. . | approximately 150 IPTs and WIPTs per year |
| 5.5 | Report to Congress (Program Assessments and SE Activities) | Develop and maintain a program assessment template | One time product with updates as needed |
| 5.6 | Systems Engineering Domain Review Support | Access, acquire, review and comment on approximately 100 or more technical documents per program, and assess program risk based on the adequacy and quality of the program documentation. Assessment reports shall be maintained and kept current and reviewed with Government leadership. |
Provide preparation materials to the PSTL, DMPS and DASD(SE) as required, which may take the form of presentations, slides, figures, graphs, charts, models, tables, read-aheads and other relevant inputs. The contractor shall provide preparation for the PSTL at least 3 working days prior to the meeting. The contractor shall report results of meetings, track actions, impacts and provide recommendations to DASD(SE) staff via written reports delivered within 3 working days of the meeting or weekly.
| Develop detailed technical presentations for the PSTL to prepare the DASD(SE) principal for participation in various executive level working meetings with in OSD. The contractor shall deliver a final assessment report, with quality findings and recommendations, within 10-30 calendar days of any site visit, as specified by the Government lead | There are between 100 and 175 program and each may have 100 documents for review. | |||
| 5.7 | Domain Reviews | Develop and maintain Domain Review briefings periodically and shall deliver no less than two major Domain Reviews presentations per year for the program domains | There are 15 listed Domain Areas. Total will be 30 presentations per year. | |
| 5.8 | Response to GAO, IG and Congressional Actions | support DASD(SE) in their response to the GAO, IG and Congressional report review process by reviewing; preparing quality comments and recommendations; and coordinate for approval the individual comment resolution matrices which support the DASD(SE) position | Approximately 12 per year | |
| 6 | Program Metrics | |||
| 6.1 | Technical Performance Measures - metrics development and Assessments of performance to Plan | Design, develop, implement, analyze, and track metrics in support of cross-cutting, benchmarking and individual program systems engineering risk assessments to include process, progress, product and development performance and production metrics. |
Provide technical and analytical support for engineering and integration risk assessments to evaluate and trend these program risks and development status for all programs.
| Identify, collect, analyize and report on program technical performance metrics and product performance metrics, enterprise benchmarking goals, and other significant approaches relative to quantitative systems engineering assessments. | This would apply to all major programs (100-175 programs) | |||
| 7 | Schedule Performance Benchmarking | |||
| 7.1 | Development, operation & maintenance of a schedule risk analysis tool | Design, develop, deliver and maintain a schedule risk analysis tool using an equivalent application approved by the OSD CIO and DMPS. | One tool (software product) | |
| 7.2 | Schedule health checks and schedule risk assessments | Perform a 14 point health check of the major program IMS | ||
| 7.3 | Schedule synchronization with external programs | Perform analyses and independent schedule risk assessments of external programs strongly linked with the MDAP or MAIS program and identify synchronization issues and risks associated with the total program schedule. | For each active program (100-175) | |
| 8 | MDAP and MAIS Acquisition Document Development, Review and Coordination | |||
| 8.1 | Develop and Coordinate for Approval Systems Engineering Plans (SEPs) | review, comment on and coordinate SEPs submitted by the Services and Components for approval following the DASD(SE) SEP review process, adjudicate comments, post data in a contractor developed and maintained SEP database and prepare and coordinate SEP approval packages for signature by the DASD(SE) within 30 calendar days of receipt of the SEP | Approximately 40 SEPs per Year | |
| 8.2 | Coordinate on Acquisition Strategies and Acquisition Program Baselines | review the AS and APB for technical and systems engineering content focusing on performance, cost and schedule realism and compliance with policy, realism and risk and provide a report within 5 working days | Approximately 24 Acquistion strategies and 25 Acquisition Program Baselines per year | |
| 8.3 | Coordinate on DoDIG and GAO Reports | Review DoDIG and GAO Reports, and any DoD response to these reports for accuracy of SE and SE-related data as they are submitted from the appropriate office and provide written analysis to DASD(SE) for review and submit within 5 working days of receipt. | Approximately 20 reports per year | |
| 8.4 | Coordinate on Acquisition Decision Memorandum (ADMs) | review Selected Acquisition Reports (SARs) and Monthly Acquisition Reports (MARs) .for accuracy of SE and SE-related data as they are submitted by Program Managers and provide written analysis to DASD(SE) for review and submit to ARA within 3 working days of receipt. | Approxiamately 120 SARs per year | |
| 9 | Software (SW) Assessments | |||
| 9.1 | SW Acquisition Review and Analysis | Support quick-reaction SW reviews which will be required to meet ad-hoc or quick-reaction program engagement plans and requirements. | 30 Plus programs per year | |
| 9.2 | SW Acquisition Program Documentation Reviews | Support the review of acquisition documents to include, but not limited to, the following: Acquisition Strategy, CARD, Systems Engineering Plan, SW Acquisition Management Plan, SW Development Plan, DT&E/OT&E Plans, and the Life Cycle Sustainment Plan | Some products are covered in other sections as reviews for D,MPS. | |
| 9.3 | SW Performance Measurement, Parametric Modeling, and Analysis. | Establish a dedicated performance measurement, parametric modeling, and analysis capacity to support the DASD (SE) SW Team in executing its responsibility. The contractor shall provide to the DASD (SE) a detailed implementation plan describing the models, processes, and analytical approach to accomplish the scope of this task NLT 21 days after contract award. | For each Software Program | |
| 9.4 | SWE Policy & Guidance | Support DoD SWE policy and guidance analysis, development and improvement. DoD SWE policy and guidance includes, but is not limited to JCIDI 3170, DODI 5000.02 and other appropriate Directives and Instructions for system acquisition, sustainment, and life cycle management; government and non-governmental SWE standards; Defense Acquisition Guidebook (DAG) and the Defense Acquisition Programs (DAPS) Methodology; Component SWE policy and guidance; guidebooks; and other documents. | ||
| 9.5 | SWE Working Groups, Outreach and Community Engagement | Develop and present for approval, with a subsequent implementation strategy, a plan to enable the continuous assessment of the SWE Body of Knowledge. | ||
| 9.6 | Software Engineering Workforce | |||
| 10 | Program Protection / System Security Engineering | |||
| 10.1 | System Security Engineering | Produce guidance to support implementing SSE/PPP policies and best practices. | ||
| 10.2 | Safeguarding Information and Information Sharing Activities: | Support DASD(SE) in the implementation of safeguarding Controlled Defense Information, Controlled Technical Information and Controlled Unclassified Information, to include development of associated policies, guidance and oversight. The contractor shall also monitor Information Sharing activities, to include the Defense Industrial Base Cybersecurity/Information Assurance Voluntary program, to support development of guidance and best practices for use in protecting this information, as needed for the acquisition community. | ||
| 10.3 | Cybersecurity for Weapons systems MPS | Develop an implementation methodology to translate cybersecurity policy requirements into measurable and testable requirements and define blue-red teaming for weapons systems to allow for consistent development and operational test and evaluation of cybersecurity policy requirements applicable for weapons systems and their operational environments. |
| 10.4 | System Security Engineering Assessments | Assess Program Management Office Program Protection implementation and risks and mitigating strategies as part of the review of the program support activity and Program Protection Plan review. | |
| 10.5 | Program Protection Plans Review and Approval Process | assist DASD(SE) in Program Protection Plans (PPPs) review of PPP’s submitted by Service and Program Office representatives for review and approval following a standard PPP review process | 18 -25 Reviews per year |
| 10.6 | Program Protection Plan (PPP) Outline and Guidance | Provide an annual assessment and proposed recommendations of PPP Outline and Guidance. | 1 + |
| 10.7 | Approve Program Protection Plans Approval Process | Annual assessment and proposed recommendations | 1+ |
| 10.8 | Program Protection Plan (PPP) Preparation Guide Outline and Guidance | ||
| 11 | Process and Methodology | ||
| 11.1 | Defense Acquisition Program Support (DAPS) Methodology | develop and maintain the DAPS (Defense Acquisition Program Support) methodology to support program support reviews, assessments of operational test readiness, non-advocate reviews, and other review activities such as Defense Support Teams (DSTs) and Independent Review Teams (IRTs) | Approximately 450 pages per year |
| 11.2 | Systemic Root Cause Analysis | Conduct systemic root cause analysis (SRCA) on program issues revealed during PSAs and other reviews. Systemic analysis enables a deeper understanding of the root cause issues and allows for the generation of policy, guidance, human capital and other recommendations that focus objectively on ways to improve processes and products. | Products should be covered as part of program reviews listed above. |
| 11.3 | Program Support Process and Focus Areas | Develop, collect and analyze metrics in each process area (both process performance and programmatic metrics related to the process). The contractor shall deliver on-demand and periodic (at a minimum, twice annually) reports and products which summarize the process area performance and outputs in accordance with the Domain Review process and requirements | There are currently 26 Program Support process areas; no less than 17 Program Support areas require periodic reviews. |
| 11.4 | Integration Risk Assessment and Metrics | shall develop and maintain a methodology, processes and metrics to assess systems integration risk that will be used to support technical reviews and milestone decision points. The methodology and processes will also be used to provide risk status of all MDAP and MAIS programs for the annual report to Congress and allow PMOs to proactively reduce integration risk during each acquisition phase | To be completed within 6 months of award and updated as needed. |
| 11.5 | Mission Thread Analysis | Evaluate SE and development planning on MDAP and MAIS systems with critical interfaces, dependencies and schedule synchronization with other MDAP and MAIS systems | |
| 11.6 | Support to Lifecycle Intelligence Mission Data (IMD) Planning | ||
| 12 | DoD Policy and Guidance Support | ||
| 12.1 | Review and comment on DoD and JCIDS policy documents | ||
| 12.2 | Prepare inputs to DAG Chapter 4 | As needed | |
| 12.3 | Update and Maintain the Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) Outline | support updates and maintenance of the SEP Outline with qualified SME support, including the capability to analyze and present data concerning recommended improvements to the SEP outline and associated processes. | |
| 12.4 | Update and maintain the DoD Risk Management Guide | ||
| 12.5 | Systems Engineering Request for Proposal Review Guide | ||
| 12.6 | TPM Guide | ||
| 13 | Support to Joint Staff | ||
| 13.1 | Requirements and Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC) support | ||
| 13.2 | Support to Joint Mission Area Analysis and System Integration | ||
| 14 | Project Management and Process Support | ||
| 14.1 | Workflow Management | ||
| 14.2 | Continuous Process Improvement | ||
| 14.3 | Training | ||
| 15 | Other Requirements | ||
| 15.1 | Data Rights | ||
| 15.2 | Security | ||
| 15.3 | Work Location | ||
| 15.4 | Travel | ||
| 15.5 | Monthly Progress Reports |
PD-FO LIST
| PD-DASD(SE) and ODASD(SE) FO PWS | |||
| PWS Section | Section Title | Deliverable | Quantity or Frequency |
| 1 | Support to DASD(SE) & PD, DASD(SE) Functions | ||
| 2 | Defense Industrial Base (DIB) Cyber Security and Information Assurance (IA) | Cyber intrusion damage assessments, policy development, inter-agency coordination, and process development conducted on-site at the Defense Cyber Crime Center |
Develop draft policy and issuance documents establishing damage and risk assessment procedures for analyzing compromised technical information within the Department of Defense Develop recommended budget and resource estimates for conducting damage assessments Provide research, analyses, evaluations, studies, assessments and other activities to support OUSD(AT&L) decision-making based on results of specific damage and risk assessments and analysis of other indications of compromised defense information.
NOTE: WOrk on this does not start until 3 months after contract award, majority of work is SME support to DASD(SE)
| 3 | Systems Engineering Research Center Administration | Support DASD(SE) in administering the activities of the SERC, to include activities needed to plan and execute specific research tasks. | |||
| Monthy, review the SERC’s financial and technical performance statements for accuracy and completeness, and to address any shortcomings. | Montly Report to DASD(SE) | ||||
| 4 | Front Office Operations | ||||
| 4.1 | Organizational Leadership | Update the DASD(SE) Strategic Plan; includes written assessments of organizational alignment with higher headquarters, updating organizational goals and objectives, publishing new strategic guidance as required by DASD(SE) leadership, providing recommendations on better alignment of internal organizational elements and functional requirements. | As needed | ||
| 4.2 | Personnel Management | Document and maintain current personnel management system requirements. Provide tracking and suspense of personnel management requirements to enable timely completion of personnel management taskers and suspsense. Consolidate goals, interim performance review updates and final performance reviews and provide to appropriate supervisory leadership. | |||
| 4.3 | Hiring | Prepare paperwork to support hiring of Government personnel; includes job descriptions, evaluations, selection criteria, scoring results, notification letters, etc. Complete and submit required documents to intiate and complete personnel actions. | As needed | ||
| 4.4 | In and Out – Processing | Prepare in and out processing paperwork for new contractor and Government Personel to include security, IT and other requirements as needed | As needed | ||
| 4.5 | Rosters-personnel data management | Prepare and distribute required reports and rosters including but not limited to phone rosters by facility and organization, e-mail lists, recall rosters, confidential emergency contact data, lists of personnel occupying specific space/facilities, security clearance rosters, etc. | As needed | ||
| 4.6 | Specialty and Ad Hoc Tasks | Various potential products; estimated total requirements expected to be less than 80 hours total. | Approximately 2-3 requirements per year | ||
| 5 | Continuing Process Improvement | Support one Lean Six Sigma Green Belt certification class yearly to include instruction, required texts and materials. Provide monthly Continuous Process Improvement reports to the DoD CPI/Lean Six Sigma Office. Provide internal review and documentation of DASD(SE) processes. | ~25 documented processes and an average of 4 CPI projects per year. | ||
| 6 | Administration | Ensure timely and accurate responses to assigned actions. This work-flow management includes tracking actions through CATMS or a future follow-on program, controlling the flow of actions through DASD(SE) office, managing ASD(R&E) staff expectations and suspense’s, and verifying process, procedures and other protocols are followed. In conjunction with Task 5, conduct process assessments and document tasker process metrics for CPI purposes; provide monthly statistics on tasker system performance; conduct root cause analysis and provide recommendations on improving tasker processes. Maintain and update required annual training for office personnel. Submit weekly activity reports for leadership approval. | Various. ~5 staff packages per day, 3-5 trips per month; 50 weekly reports per year; annual refresher training (security, cyber, OPSEC, etc) | ||
| 7 | Travel | Provide DTS inputs and travel documents for all contract and Government employees | Approximately 15 trips per year per gov employee. | ||
| 8 | Technical Editing & Graphics Support | Provide technical editing for weekly activity reports, briefings, articles, and other written or visual information. Create specific graphics or other visual support needed to communicate technical content in reports, publications, or briefings. | As needed | ||
| 9 | Outreach | ||||
| 9.1 | DASD(SE) Website and Intranet | Maintain a current DASD(SE) website with relevant content as determined by gov leadership. Maintain DASD(SE) file drive for intuitive and logical organization of information. | Website updated twice monthly. Shared folders updated as needed. | ||
| 9.2 | Conferences | Coordinate initial planning, briefing development, graphics and editing support, and final review for all SE external speaking engagements. DASD(SE) participates in an average of two conferences per month requiring briefing package development | Six local and two non-local conferences and meetings per year with participation by 25 -100 people. | ||
| 9.3 | SE Forum | Coordinate SE Forum content to produce a final SE Forum briefing package, establish SE Forum agendas by bringing together lead systems engineers from across DoD to institutionalize SE discipline within the DoD and to collaborate and leverage SE activities across the Components. Provide alternative telecom options for external audiences (e.g. VTC, DCO, conference call, etc) | 6 SE Forums per year | ||
| 9.4 | Best Practices Clearing House (BPCh) | Provide documentation on Best Practices through discussion and research on Program Support Reviews, dialogue with PSTLs, and other sources of information. | BPCh Content Advisory Board meets 4 times per year. | ||
| 9.5 | Publications | Prepare periodic papers and articles for publication by DASD(SE) in professional journals. Document internal publication processes and update as needed. | As needed, but in general less than 10 per year. | ||
| 10 | GAO, IG and Congressional | Support response by ODASD(SE) to GAO, IG and Congressional Questions. Track congressional language in proposed, enrolled, and enacted language with DASD(SE) implications. | As needed | ||
| 11 | Executive Assistance | Provide calendars, documents, scheduling, telephonic support, travel vouchers, emails, briefings, correspondance control, coordination, etc. to support Presidentially appointed and career SES executives. | 4 SES members within DASD(SE) | ||
| 12 | Joint Congressional Report | Support data collection and drafting of the annual Congressional Report | Annually | ||
| 13 | Training | ||||
| 14 | Special/Other Requirements | ||||
| 14.1 | Data Rights | ||||
| 14.2 | Security | ||||
| 14.3 | Work Location |
EE LIST
| Deliverables for PWS - Dir Engineering Enterprise | |||
| PWS Section | Section Title | Deliverable | Quantity or Frequency |
1 System Assurance and Program Protection FTE Level: overall effort requires 7 senior engineers with the experience and education necessary to successfully execute the tasks in this section.
Travel Estimate – overall effort requires 17 CONUS trips per year; 1 OCONUS trip per year in support of Section 10.1; local travel as necessary.
1.1 Systems Engineering (SE) and SwA Capability Support the development and recommendation to DASD(SE) of SwA policy, guidance and methodologies that effectively implement SwA into programs and SE processes and disciplines.
(1) Develop and provide SwA-related assessments and recommendations.
(2) Interface with other DoD organizations and agencies, other Government departments and agencies, Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs), industry, academia, and coordination bodies
(3) Provide assistance to the DASD(SE) staff in preparing responses and reports
(4) Support additional actions to implement the Department’s SwA strategy that include review and development of acquisition documentation, e.g., updates to the DoD 5000 series and associated Instructions/Guidebooks, and efforts to further the community of SwA SME support and coordination that involves the National Security Agency (NSA), Services, agencies, and other coordination bodies.
FTE Level 6 Travel Estimate: 4 CONUS trips per year; local travel necessary
1.2 Joint Federated Assurance Center (JFAC) Support the JFAC, including the JFAC Steering Committee, which meets quarterly or as needed, the Action Officer (AO) Working Group (WG) which meets bi-weekly, the SwA WG which meets weekly, and the HwA Technical WG which meets as needed, and shall coordinate with the JFAC Coordination Center (CC).
FTE Level: N/A – Shared effort with Sections 1.1 and 1.5.
Travel Estimate – N/A – Shared effort with Sections 1.1 and 1.5.
1.3 Acquisition Security Database shall assist the DASD(SE) in the oversight and management of the ASDB, which supports the program protection process by providing the DoD CPI repository and cross-DoD Component access and searches of stored CPI in support of horizontal protection analysis of CPI in support of acquisition programs.
Support leadership of the quarterly ASDB Configuration Control Board, oversight of the execution of the ASDB support agreement, as well as the monthly stakeholder meetings.
FTE Level: .25 mid to senior level engineer.
Travel Estimate – 1 CONUS trip per year; local travel as necessary.
1.4 CPI Identification and Anti-Tamper Support the update of the DoD Instruction (DoDI) 5200.39 and the development and update of the DoD Manual supporting implementation of the on-going and any future updates to the DoDI 5200.39.
Support the on-going approval process for the DoD Directive (DoDD) for Anti-Tamper, any future updates to this DoDD, as well as the development and update of related policy and guidance, e.g., the Anti-Tamper Program Management Guidebook, Anti-Tamper Technical Implementation Guidebook, Anti-Tamper Security Classification Guidance, in coordination with the Anti-Tamper Executive Agent (ATEA), the DoD Component Offices of Primary Responsibility (OPR) for AT, the broader AT community, and related working groups and forums developing this policy and guidance.
FTE Level: .75 mid to senior level engineer.
Travel Estimate – 4 CONUS trips per year; local travel as necessary.
1.5 Microelectronics Support DASD(SE) in the advancement of HwA, to include the continued development and update of the trusted microelectronics strategy for Application-Specific Integrated Circuits, Field Programmable Gate Arrays, and other microelectronics, and HwA policy, guidance, studies and other activities in support of DoDI 5200.44 FTE Level: 1 senior level engineer.
Travel Estimate – 4 CONUS trip per year; local travel as necessary.
1.6 System Assurance and Program Protection Support Advise MDAP and MAIS Program Management Offices (PMOs) on the application of system assurance and program protection principles and practices provide system assurance and program protection training and oversight to ensure use of appropriate system assurance processes, methods and tools for selected MDAPs and MAISs.
FTE Level: 2 senior level engineers.
Travel Estimate – 4 CONUS trips per year; local travel as necessary.
1.7 Security Engineering Program Support. Assist the ODASD(SE)/MPS staff to help transfer knowledge of best practice countermeasures and program protection planning to acquisition program engineering and security staffs.
Anticipate 60 program engagements of various types per year.
FTE Level: N/A - Shared effort with Section 1.6 Travel Estimate – N/A - Shared effort with Section 1.6.Engineering Tools and Environments
| 2 | Engineering Tools and Environments | |
| 2.1 | Engineered Resilient Systems | Assist in establishing the yearly work effort for ERS, and for monitoring and tracking the technical maturity of the activities. |
Provide input to, and draft reports, presentations, etc., in order to convey the progress of the ERS elements, as well as to project the upcoming year's activities.
LEVEL of person - 1 senior engineer with experience in weapon system development, and policy.
TRAVEL ESTIMATE – 4 CONUS trips per year; 1 OCONUS trip per year
| 2.2 | Digital Engineering in Design and Engineering. | |
| 2.2.1 | Establishing and advance a stakeholder community | Assist with whitepapers, briefings, and analysis of current program use of models, in development of the weapon systems, and transition of those lessons into usable practice across the range of acquisition activities, identifying key players and enablers which influenced successful execution of digital engineering design. |
Assist in the identification of instantiation points, where model-centric tools and techniques, as well as digital artifacts, can be introduced into the defense acquisition system; building of transition plans, and creation of education modules to assist in training users of model-centric tools, as well as decision makers.
Establish a taxonomy and definitions to build the digital system model.
LEVEL of person - 3 people - 1 senior, 2 junior TRAVEL ESTIMATE – 4 CONUS trips per year; 1 OCONUS trip per year.
2.2.2 Digital Artifact Management Engage with this community in order to gain understanding and benefit of their activities for the engineering community. This includes, but is not limited to attendance of meetings, production of minutes, and completion of actions and white papers to aid in understanding the significance of the problem and solutions paces.
LEVEL: 1person – mid-level with both weapon system development and contract or intellectual property experience.
TRAVEL ESTIMATE: - none expected
2.2.3 Transition current education, training, guidance, and where practical Support DASD(SE) in the transition of current education, training, guidance and where practical, policy from document centric to model centric activities LEVEL: 1 senior TRAVEL ESTIMATE: - none expected
2.2.4 Assist in cross-cutting efforts in Engineering Tools and Environments Assist in cross-cutting efforts in Engineering Tools and Environments; function as main action officer for tasks, collaboration, etc LEVEL: 1 junior TRAVEL ESTIMATE: - none expected
2.3 Modular Open System Architecture (MOSA). provide an initial report to the DASD (SE) NLT 60 days after contract award that identifies, organizes, summarizes, and analyses the portfolio of MOSA policy and guidance documents in DOD and annually update this report.
update the SE guidance web page on OSA; manage the SE input to, and responses to tasking from the OSA DSC WG. In concert with the SE Workforce development lead, update and manage updates to the curriculum within the Engineering FIPT scope regarding modularity and open systems.
Level of person - 2 mid-range individual, with SW development and SE experience in modular breakdown of tasks TRAVEL ESTIMATE: - 3 CONUS trips per year
| 3 | Systems Engineering (SE) Policy and Guidance (P&G) | |
| 3.1 | SE Policy and Documentation | Recommended SE policy development or changes for DASD(SE) consideration and, when accepted, develop, prepare and coordinate draft policy for DASD(SE) approval. The contractor shall support the DASD(SE) in reviewing and assessing the DODI 5000.02 and DODI 5134.16 for currency and completeness, and, as necessary, preparing periodic updates. |
Review proposed DoD issuances and other documents to ensure SE equities are appropriately addressed and ensure SE is consistently integrated into non-DASD(SE) issuances.
LEVEL: 2 FTE - 1 at senior level and 1 at junior/mid level TRAVEL ESTIMATE: No overnight travel anticipated – only potential is for local travel
3.2 SE Guidance Propose, for DASD(SE) consideration, recommendations for new and revised guidance necessary to ensure compliance with acquisition and SE policy.
develop, prepare and coordinate draft guidance for DASD(SE) approval.
Prepare periodic updates to the Defense Acquisition Guidebook, Chapter 4 on Systems Engineering and contribute to other chapters, as necessary, to ensure appropriate SE guidance is addressed across the lifecycle and integrated throughout the DAG.
LEVEL: 1 FTE on average at senior level TRAVEL ESTIMATE: No overnight travel anticipated – only potential is for local travel
3.3 Acquisition Documentation Reviews for SE P&G Implementation Review program documentation (i.e. Systems Engineering Plans, Acquisition Strategies, Acquisition Program Baselines, Requests for Proposal, Acquisition Decision Memorandum, etc) to ensure they are consistent with SE policy. (Approx 60 per year) LEVEL: 1.5 FTE - 1 at senior level and 0.5 at mid/junior level TRAVEL ESTIMATE: No overnight travel anticipated – only potential is for local travel
3.4 DAU Course and Community of Practice Content Reviews for Consistency with SE P&G Review the Defense Acquisition University’s (DAU’s) courseware for the Engineering (ENG) and Production, Quality, and Manufacturing (PQM) career fields, and ensure they are consistent with SE P&G.
Review and monitor the content of the Acquisition Community Connection’s (ACC’s) Systems Engineering Community of Practice (SECoP) for consistency with acquisition and SE P&G.
LEVEL: 0.5 FTE on average at senior level TRAVEL ESTIMATE: No overnight travel anticipated – only potential is for local travel
3.5 SE P&G Reporting and Outreach Provide recommended inputs for DASD(SE) weekly staff meetings and weekly activity reports. The contractor shall provide technical and management inputs to data calls, briefings, articles, and reports as required. The contractor shall develop, prepare, and coordinate meeting minutes for high level meetings such as the DAG Chapter 4 Working Group.
LEVEL: 0.5 FTE on average at junior/mid level TRAVEL ESTIMATE: No travel anticipated
| 4 | Specialty Engineering | |
| 4.1 | Manufacturing and Quality Engineering | |
| 4.1.1 | Manufacturing and Quality Engineering Policy, Guidance, and Outreach | Review DoD manufacturing and quality policies, practices and procedures in coordination with representatives from the Services, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Missile Defense Agency (MDA), and Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), MIBP on proposed manufacturing and quality policy changes. |
Support DASD(SE) in the interaction and outreach with industry association quality and manufacturing organizations associated with the MRL working groups to continuously refresh the manufacturing and quality body of knowledge. This includes NDIA division meetings, NNMI, AIA, SAE.
Continuously refine the Manufacturing and Quality Engineering body of knowledge (BoK) by participating in the quarterly and annual MRL BoK refresh, MRL criteria matrix review, guidebook updates, user roll-out activities of AS-6500 and other professional associations.
Propose to the DASD(SE) updates to the Manufacturing and Quality Engineering sections of the DAG.
Support DASD(SE) with planning and administration of the Manufacturing and Quality Component Senior lead meetings. These meetings will occur a minimum of six times a year.
Provide recommended Manufacturing and Quality inputs for DASD(SE) weekly staff meetings and weekly activity reports FTE: 1 (Manufacturing and Quality Lead Engineer for paragraphs 4.1.1-4.1.3 must be a subject matter expert with engineering degree (Master’s degree in related field preferred) and minimum of 20 years DoD manufacturing experience.)
4.1.2 Acquisition Review and Analysis. Participate in MPS Program Support Team Lead domain (Fixed Wing, Space & Missile Defense, Ships/Subs, Land Combat/Communications, Rotary Wing and C3ISR/Business systems) program engagements.
Manufacturing and quality engineering reviews include, but are not limited to the following program acquisition documents: Acquisition strategies, systems engineering plans, test and evaluation master plans, Defense Acquisition Executive System Manufacturing Reviews, Preliminary and Critical Design Review Reports. It is anticipated that a minimum of 90 acquisition documents will be reviewed during the 12 month period. The Contractor shall:
(1) Review assigned documents to determine adherence to applicable R&M policy, guidance, and best practice;
(2) Document, justify, and provide proposed comments using prescribed formats and tools for approval by DASD (SE)
(3) Interface with program offices as well as OSD/Component staff during this process as appropriate; and
(4) Participate in DASD (SE) and other OSD led adjudication reviews of these documents.
FTE 2.5 (Subject Matter Expert with an engineering degree (Master’s degree in related field preferred) and at least 20 years Manufacturing Engineering experience.)
4.2 Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) Review the engineering design considerations for the DMSMS portions of LCSPs. The contractor shall also review acquisition strategies and Systems Engineering Plans to assess program strategies to address obsolescence, DoD industrial base issues, parts obsolescence management, technology needs, manufacturing sources and material shortages. The Contractor shall propose to the DASD(SE) updates to the DMSMS sections of the DAG to reflect life cycle DMSMS activities.
FTE .5 (Subject matter expert with an engineering degree and 15 years DMSMS Engineering experience.)
4.3 Value Engineering Support ODASD(SE) in the implementing DoDI 4245.14 Value Engineering requirements for the DoD.
Support DASDSE in the call for DoD’s VE performance metrics, tracking their collection, analysis, evaluation and subsequent submission to OMB.
Provide annual assessments of the DoD’s VE program using the metrics and plans submitted by the Components. The Contractor shall support the DASDSE in the request for VE award nominations, tracking their collection, and supporting MAG deliberations with their evaluation and preparation of announcement memo. The Contractor shall support the planning for the annual VE Awards Ceremony hosted by USD(ATL).
support ODASD(SE) in the review and update of VE training for CLE 001.
FTE: 1.0 (VE Lead Engineer with 5-10 years CPI/VE experience.)
4.4 Human Systems Integration (HSI) Review DoD HSI policies and engineering management practices and procedures.
Support the Joint HSI Steering Committee co-chaired by the DASD(SE)/EE, the Joint HSI Working and HSI Standards development working groups. The Steering Committee and Working Group meets semiannually at the initiation of the co- chairmen with the HSI and standards working groups meeting at least quarterly.
Review and monitor the content of the Acquisition Community Connection’s (ACC’s) Human Systems Integration (HSICoP) for consistency with acquisition and SE P&G.
FTE .5 (HSI Lead Engineer must be a subject matter expert with engineering degree (Master’s degree in related field preferred) and minimum of 20 years HSI experience.)
4.5 System Safety Engineering . Coordinate with the DoD safety community on guidance and tools related to Systems Safety considerations in design.
Review DoD system safety policies and engineering management practices and procedures. The contractor shall also perform reviews of System’s Engineering plans and relevant safety program documents.
Provide recommended System Safety inputs for DASD(SE) weekly staff meetings and weekly activity reports.
FTE .5 (System Safety Lead Engineer must be a subject matter expert with engineering degree (Master’s degree in related field preferred) and minimum of 20 years System Safety experience.)
| 4.6 | Reliability and Maintainability (R&M) Engineering | |
| 4.6.1 | R&M Engineering, Policy, Guidance and Outreach | Continually review and evaluate legislation, DOD acquisition policy, R&M Body of Knowledge (to include but not limited to Government and non-Government Standards & Handbooks, Parts Requirement & Application Guide, standard document 18 (SD-18), R&M design & test documents, reliability growth modeling techniques and plans, physics based reliability estimation techniques, RAM-C reports, service policies, R&M standard work packages from Industry/Government, publications, etc.) and R&M technology advances to assess impacts to DOD R&M policy, guidance and practice. |
Support the promulgation of R&M guidance and lessons learned via the DASD(SE) SE website and the DAU R&M CoP.
Propose written updates to the DAG aligned by phase of the DoD acquisition life cycle.
Support in monitoring DAU's progress in the development of R&M training courses (CLE-301R&M, RAM-C Rationale course, advance topics in R&M engineering and the R&M engineering modules 12 & 13 of ENG-301).
Review and monitor the content of the Acquisition Community Connection’s (ACC’s) R&M (R&M CoP) for consistency with acquisition and SE P&G and R&M engineering best practices.
Support updates to the RAM-C manual with content driven by and directly attributable to policy. Participate in all RAM-C reviews and periodically interface with PMOs, Service representatives, and other members of DASD(SE) government and contractor staff to identify and assess potential areas for improvement in the RAM-C Manual.
Support DASD(SE) with planning and administration of the quarterly R&M working groups with the Services, Agencies and other DoD components to include preparing read-ahead packages, distributing invitations, taking minutes, recording action items, as well as developing agendas and briefings for the working group meetings.
Provide policy analyses, written reports, records, agendas, briefing presentations, action items, minutes, to support DASD (SE) staff participation in conferences and other activities.
Assess the current DAES Reliability Growth Reporting and develop recommendations on the implementation of RGC phase II requirements. The contractor shall develop analytical methods to assimilate individual DAES spreadsheets to establish trending data, techniques to establish triggers, growth effectiveness parameters.
FTE 1.5 (R&M Lead Engineer for paragraphs 4.6.1-4.6.2 must be a subject matter expert with engineering degree (Master’s degree preferred) and minimum of 20 years R&M DoD Engineering experience.)
4.6.2 Acquisition, Review and Analysis. Review and analysis task includes reviews to support the MPS MDAP/MAIS Program Support Team Lead domain (Fixed Wing, Space & Missile Defense, Ships/Subs, Land Combat/Communications, Rotary Wing and C3ISR/Business systems) program engagement, Nunn-McCurdy and other acquisition certification reviews, Component and program office requested reviews, system engineering and R&M engineering technical reviews, and other reviews conducted consistent with policy and program directions. It is likely that the need for quick reaction R&M reviews will be required to meet unplanned requirements.
It is anticipated that a minimum of 384 engagements during the 12 month period.
R&M engineering reviews include, but are not limited to the following program acquisition documents: Acquisition strategy, systems engineering plans, test and evaluation master plans, defense acquisition executive system reviews to report growth status, Preliminary and Critical Design Review Reports, RAM-C cost rationale reports, Systems Engineering Plans, Reliability growth plans (at subsystem, system including growth curves) and other Systems Engineering Technical Reviews. It is anticipated that a minimum of 125 acquisition documents will be reviewed during the 12 month period. The Contractor shall:
(1) Review assigned documents to determine adherence to applicable R&M policy, guidance, and best practice;
(2) Document, justify, and provide proposed comments using prescribed formats and tools for approval by DASD (SE)
(3) Interface with program offices as well as OSD/Component staff during this process as appropriate; and
(4) Participate in DASD (SE) and other OSD led adjudication reviews of these documents.
FTE 5.5 (2.5 FTE Subject Matter Expert with over 20 years R&M Engineering experience and 3.0 FTE Engineers with 5-10 years R&M Engineering experience. Advance degrees preferred.)
| 5 | Systems Engineering and Analysis | |
| 5.1 | Family of Systems (FoS) and Systems of Systems (SoS) Analysis | evaluate SE and development planning on MDAPs and other programs affecting MDAPs for family of systems (FoS) and system of systems (SoS) solutions. Provide flexible, user- configurable database tools and experienced analytical capability to enable cross system, system of system and family of system analysis of component systems, capabilities, and organizations. |
DASD(SE) anticipates supporting five programs per year in early SOS and FOS. Approximately 2 FTE equivalent.
5.2 Systems of Systems (SOS) and Families of Systems (FOS) develop SE SoS Guidance and assist the DASD(SE) in overseeing its implementation. As the Department recognizes SoS solutions are required to meet capability needs and developing investment approaches, support addressing these challenges through the development, piloting, and roll-out of a guide for SoS SE and education and training materials
| 6 | Specifications and Standards --Defense Standardization Program Office (DSPO) | support the DSPO in analyses and studies related to standardization and parts management. |
| 7 | Workforce Development | |
| 7.1 | Acquisition Workforce | Support the execution of DASD(SE) functional leader/functional advisor duties, as defined in DoDI 5000.66, for managing and overseeing the Engineering (ENG) and Production, Quality, and Manufacturing (PQM) acquisition career fields |
Provide oversight and support for DASD(SE) Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund (DAWDF) proposals including coordinating a consolidated DASD(SE) submission to the USD(AT&L)’s Human Capital Initiatives (HCI) office.
2.5 FTE on average with 2 senior level and 0.5 at junior/mid level TRAVEL ESTIMATE: Up to 3 CONUS trips (related to BBP3.0 or DAWDF initiatives) anticipated per year with additional potential for local travel
7.2 Engineering (Non-construction) (ENG(NC)) Workforce Develop and recommend engineering workforce development strategies and plans for DASD(SE) review and approval.
1 FTE on average at senior level TRAVEL ESTIMATE: No overnight travel anticipated – only potential is for local travel
7.3 Workforce Policy and Documentation develop, prepare and coordinate draft recommended policies and procedures for DASD(SE) consideration and approval pertaining to the workforces under DASD(SE) cognizance, namely the ENG and PQM workforces as well as the ENG(NC) functional community.
0.5 FTE on average at senior level
7.4 Workforce Data Analytics and Workforce Studies Mine and gather workforce data, conduct data analyses, and develop assessments of the Department’s engineering (ENG and ENG(NC)) and PQM workforces.
Develop and propose recommended workforce initiatives to address the identified workforce-related gaps and issues. In addition, the contractor shall recommend workforce data inquiries and studies to mitigate existing data gaps.
Support DASD(SE) sponsored Systems Engineering Research Center (SERC) research studies and tasks within the Human Capital Development research areas.
2 FTE on average at senior level TRAVEL ESTIMATE: Up to 2 CONUS trips (related to SERC meetings) anticipated per year with additional potential for local travel
7.5 Workforce Reporting and Outreach Provide recommended inputs for DASD(SE) weekly staff meetings and weekly activity reports. The contractor shall provide technical and management inputs to data calls, briefings, articles, and reports as required. The contractor shall develop, prepare, and coordinate meeting minutes for high level meetings such as the ENG and PQM FIPTs.
0.5 FTE on average at junior/mid level.
TRAVEL ESTIMATE: No travel anticipated.
8 Systems Engineering Specifications and Standards (SESS) Assist in the management of the SESS portion of the ASSIST database by tracking over-age documents and project requests as well as coordinating new/revised documents for adoption or deletion/cancellation Support the development of SESS related documents (i.e. specifications, standards, DIDs and related DD forms as well as any associated implementation guidance, handbooks and tools) and interact with the appropriate government working groups and/or non-government standards committees.
Review, assess and provide comments on DoD proposed…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .