Attachment_7_DASD(SE)_QASP_FY16.pdf

Office of the Under Secretary of Defense

Director, Systems Engineering

FY2016 Support Contracts

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan April 19, 2015

CONTENTS

1 PURPOSE

2 SCOPE

3 RESPONSIBILITIES

4 METHODS OF QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE

5 QUALITY STANDARDS AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR DELIVERABLES

APPENDIX A: SURVEILLANCE

TABLES

Table 1: Surveillance Activity Checklist ................................................................................................. A-1

DOCUMENT HISTORY

Version Date Author

1.0 4/24/15 R. Bunn Draft

1 PURPOSE

This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) ensures that systematic quality assurance methods are used in the administration of the support contracts to be awarded in support of the Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering (ODASD(SE) . Initially, there will be three call orders based on three separate Performance based Work Statements (PWSs), each PWS supporting one aspect of the ODASD(SE) assigned functions. The contracts will be cost plus to allow flexibility in adjusting the work to be done to best match the requirements of the Government. Given the “best effort” nature of cost plus contracts, adequate contract management will require establishment of metrics, performance feedback from Government managers within ODASD(SE) to the contractor and if needed corrective action to maintain optimal performs in accordance with performance metrics set forth in the contract documents and that the United States Government receives the quality of services called for in the contract.

2 SCOPE

U.S. Government surveillance oversight of the contractor’s quality control efforts ensures that they are timely, effective, and are delivering the results specified in the respective contract task. The QASP is not a part of the contract. It is expected that as a part of the contractor’s management plan there will be included a performance quality control system to ensure that products meet government standards with a minimum of required rework.

3 RESPONSIBILITIES

The following resources shall have responsibilities for the implementation of this QASP:

• Contracting Officer. The Contracting Officer ensures performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting ensures compliance with the terms of the contract and safeguards the interests of the U.S. Government in the contractual relationship. It is the Contracting Officer that assures that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under the contract. The Contracting Officer is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance.

• Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR). The COR provides detailed technical oversight of the contractor’s performance and reports his or her findings in a timely, complete and impartial fashion to support the technical administration activities. While the COR may serve as a direct conduit to provide U.S. Government guidance and feedback to the contractor on technical matters, he or she is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the Government’s behalf. Any changes that the contractor deems may affect contract, price, terms, or conditions shall be referred to the Contracting Officer for action.

• Government Technical Lead. For major sections of the contract, the work will be performed in support of a Government employee who is responsible for that related aspect of ODASD(SE) responsibilities. As with the COR, the Government Technical Lead will be responsible for day to day detailed guidance on tasks assigned and for reviewing the contractor’s products to ensure that they meet required standards of performance.

• The contractor’s management team. It is expected that the contractor will establish a team of key experts for each major sub-area of each of the given contracts. The COR will have direct day to day communications with the contractor’s designated Program Manager in order to provide feedback on day to day performance and to ensure that the Government and Contractor work efficiently in production of needed products under the contract.

4 METHODS OF QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE

Purpose. This section details the method(s) used to verify Contractor compliance with PWS requirements. The key elements of this process are the Contractor's quality program and Government identified Performance Objectives. The Performance Requirements of the contract dictate the suggested inspection and surveillance requirements the COR shall accomplish on a periodic basis. The procedures on how to document performance in a correct and effective manner are included below.

Performance Assessment Approach. To facilitate the performance assessment of the Contractor's quality program, the COR will verify Contractor compliance with the designated Performance Objectives of PWS. The intent of the performance assessment approach is to gain confidence in the Contractor’s ability to provide satisfactory services and then adjusting the level of Performance assessment to a point that maintains confidence. This Performance assessment approach is subject to change based on the Contractor’s performance. Methods of assessment or surveillance include, but are not limited to:

• 100% Review - This level of Review entails consideration of all performance requirements and deliverables established by and for the Performance Objective within a given timeframe.

• Random Monitoring - Random monitoring consists of unspecified observations of some or all requirements and deliverables established by and for the Performance Objective within a given timeframe.

• Passive Monitoring – Passive monitoring includes observations by other Government personnel to be substantiated by the COR, that relate to some or all requirements and deliverables established by and for the Performance Objective within a given timeframe.

The handling of complaints is included in this method of surveillance.

• Annual Review. The COR must review QASP Performance Objectives, assess their applicability and recommend the addition or subtraction of Performance Objectives as conditions warrant at least on an annual basis.

• Special Audits. The COR must be alert to conditions that would warrant a special quality audit. Any time the COR observes that a functional area is out of acceptable tolerance or that the technical expertise is not available, a request for a functional area quality audit should be addressed to the Contractor.

• Performance Assessment Folders. A Performance Assessment Folder must be created and maintained by the COR. The folder will be maintained in hard copy. The Performance assessment folder must contain the following sections and may contain other sections or information that the COR finds pertinent or necessary.

• Section 1. Approved QASP.

• Section 2. ACTIVITY LOG. A chronological log of actions taken in the accomplishment of Quality Assurance by the government based on assigned Performance Requirements. The purpose of this log is to provide a brief synopsis of an inspection of Contractor provided services or of a meeting with the contractor regarding performance in a given functional area. Documentation that supports activity log entries may be maintained in the RECORDS section of the Performance assessment folder.

5 QUALITY STANDARDS AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR

DELIVERABLES

All deliverables will meet the following quality standards and acceptance criteria as applicable:

• The deliverable was delivered in a timely manner

• The deliverable is complete and acceptable to the Government Technical lead

• The deliverable is written in clear, concise language, and the information in the deliverable is technically feasible and correct

• Applicable Government policies, processes, procedures, and protocols were adhered to in the generation of the deliverable

• The meeting/outreach was coordinated in a timely manner to include necessary preparations

• The meeting/outreach was conducted in a manner consistent with applicable Government policies, processes, procedure, and protocols

• The support was delivered in a timely manner and consistent with applicable Government policies, processes, procedure, and protocols

• Any training required was completed on time and personnel do not continually appear on the DASD(SE) outstanding training list

A-1 HPTi Document Number 1.1

APPENDIX A: SURVEILLANCE

Table 1: Surveillance Activity Checklist – Support to ODASD(SE) Director, Enterprise Engineering

MPS 1

PWS

Section

Title Page Performance Standards

Metric Acceptable Quality Level

Method of Surveillance

Date Accomplished

1 Introduction 3 This paragraph is background information that defines the area of work and expectations of the Government for all tasks below.

1.1 SE Mission 3 This paragraph is background information that defines the area of work and expectations of the Government for all tasks below.

1.2 SE and Program Support

Vision

3 This paragraph is background information that defines the area of work and expectations of the Government for all tasks below.

1.3 SE and Program Support

Initiatives

4 This paragraph is background information that defines the area of work and expectations of the Government for all tasks below.

1.4 Org Chart (Projected CY15) 5 This paragraph is background information that defines the area of work and expectations of the Government for all tasks below.

2 Specific Tasks 6 This paragraph is background information that defines the area of work and expectations of the Government for all tasks below.

3 General Product and SME Support Expectations

6 Acceptable to

ODASD(SE)

Government Lead (Gov't tech lead or

Director (100%

Review)

Percentage of products delivered on time which are acceptable.

No Rework based on contractor effort requiring return to the contractor

SME

Review by Government

Lead

As established at time of task assignment

3.1 SME Support for all Tasks 6 As above

3.2 Data Management, Strategy, Process and Standards

6 As above

3.3 SME Support and Product

Development for all Tasks

7 As above

4 Technical Oversight and Program Support Activities

7 As above

5 Program Support Activities 7 As above

5.1 Development Planning 8 As above

5.2 Systems Engineering

Technical Reviews

8 As above

5.3 Continuous Engagement with

Programs

8 As above

5.4 Systems Engineering (SE)

Working Integrated Product

Teams (WIPT) and Integrated Product Teams (IPT) Support

8 As above

5.5 Report to Congress (Program

Assessments and SE

Activities)

8 As above

5.6 Systems Engineering and

Program Management

Support

9 As above

5.7 Domain Reviews 10 As above

5.8 Response to and

Coordination on GAO, IG and Congressional Reports and

Actions

10 As above

6 Program Metrics and Technical Performance

Measures

10 As above

7 Schedule Performance Benchmarking

11 As above

7.1 Development, operation &

maintenance of a schedule risk analysis tool

11 As above

7.2 Schedule health checks and

schedule risk assessments

12 As above

7.3 Schedule synchronization

with external programs

12 As above

8 MDAP and MAIS Acquisition Document Development, Review and Coordination

12 As above

8.1 Systems Engineering Plans

(SEPs)

13 As above

8.2 Acquisition Strategies and

Acquisition Program

Baselines

13 As above

9 Software (SW) Assessments 13 As above

9.1 SW Acquisition and

Development Review and

Analysis

13 As above

9.2 SW Acquisition Program

Documentation Reviews

14 As above

9.3 SW Performance

Measurement, Parametric Modeling, and Analysis.

15 As above

9.4 SWE Policy & Guidance 16 As above

9.5 SWE Working Groups, Outreach and Community

16 As above

Engagement

9.6 Software Engineering

Workforce

17 As above

10 Process and Methodology 17 As above

10.1 Systemic Root Cause

Analysis

17 As above

10.2 Program Support Process

and Focus Areas

18 As above

11 DoD Policy and Guidance Support

18 As above

11.1 DoD and JCIDS policy

documents

18 Acceptable to

ODASD(SE)

Government Lead (Gov't tech lead or

Director (100%

Review)

Percentage of products delivered on time which are acceptable.

No Rework based on contractor effort requiring return to the contractor

SME

Review by Government

Lead

As established at time of task assignment

11.2 DAG Chapter 4 18 As above

11.3 Systems Engineering Plan

(SEP) Outline

18 As above

11.4 DoD Risk Management Guide 19 As above

11.5 Systems Engineering

Request for Proposal Review

Guide

19 As above

11.6 TPM Guide 19 As above

12 Project Management, Workflow Management and

Process Support

19 As above

12.1 Continuous Process

Improvement

19 As above

12.2 Training 20 As above

13 Other Requirements 20 As above

13.1 Data Rights 20 As above

13.2 Security 20 As above

13.3 Work Location 20 As above

13.4 Travel 20 As above

13.5 Monthly Progress Reports 20 As above

MPS 2

Para Title Page Performance Standards

Metric Acceptable Quality Level

Method of Surveillance

Date Accomplished

1 Introduction 3 This paragraph is background information that defines the area of work and expectations of the Government for all tasks below.

1.1 SE Mission 3 This paragraph is background information that defines the area of work and expectations of the Government for all tasks below.

1.2 SE and Program Support

Vision

3 This paragraph is background information that defines the area of work and expectations of the Government for all tasks below.

1.3 SE and Program Support

Initiatives

4 This paragraph is background information that defines the area of work and expectations of the Government for all tasks below.

1.4 Org Chart (Projected CY15) 5 This paragraph is background information that defines the area of work and expectations of the Government for all tasks below.

2 Specific Tasks 6 This paragraph is background information that defines the area of work and expectations of the Government for all tasks below.

3 General Product and SME Support Expectations

6 Acceptable to

ODASD(SE)

Government Lead (Gov't tech lead or

Director (100%

Review)

Percentage of products delivered on time which are acceptable.

No Rework based on contractor effort requiring return to the contractor

SME

Review by Government

Lead

As established at time of task

3.1 SME Support for all Tasks 6 As above

3.2 Data Management, Strategy, Process and Standards

6 As above

3.3 SME Support and Product

Development for all Tasks

6 As above

4 Systems Engineering Oversight of Major Defense

Acquisition Programs (MDAP) and Major Automated

Information Systems (MAIS) and other special interest programs

7 As above

4.1 Program Support

Assessments (PSAs)

7 As above

4.2 Special Studies, Independent

Ad-Hoc, Focused Reviews &

Assessments

7 As above

4.3 Defense Acquisition

Executive Summaries (DAES) for MDAP and MAIS

8 As above

4.4 AoA Working Group Meetings 8 As above

and Senior Advisory Group (SAG) meetings

4.5 Overarching Integrated

Product Team (OIPT) meetings

8 As above

4.6 Defense Acquisition Board

(DAB) meetings

9 As above

4.7 OIPT Reports and DAB

Acquisition Decision

Memorandums

9 As above

4.8 U.S. Code Title 10 Section

2366a and b Certifications

9 As above

4.9 Request for Proposal (RFP)

Reviews and Peer Reviews

9 As above

4.1 Outreach Support 10 As above

4.11 Reach Back SMEs and

consultants for assessment reviews, PSAs, performance assessments and specialized

10 As above studies

5 Program Support Activities 10 As above

5.1 Development Planning 10 As above

5.2 Systems Engineering

Technical Reviews

11 As above

5.3 Continuous Engagement with

Programs

11 As above

5.4 Systems Engineering (SE)

Working Integrated Product

Teams (WIPT) and Integrated Product Teams (IPT) Support

11 As above

5.5 Report to Congress (Program

Assessments and SE

Activities)

12 As above

5.6 Domain Systems Engineering

and Program Management

Support

5.7 Domain Reviews 13 As above

5.8 Response to and

Coordination on GAO, IG and Congressional Reports and

Actions

13 As above

6 Program Metrics and Technical Performance

Measures

13 As above

7 MDAP and MAIS Acquisition Document Development, Review and Coordination

15 As above

7.1 Systems Engineering Plans

(SEPs)

15 As above

7.2 Acquisition Strategies and

Acquisition Program

Baselines

15 As above

7.3 Selective Acquisition Reports

(SAR) and MAIS Annual

Reports (MAR)

15 As above

8 Program Protection / System Security Engineering

16 As above

8.1 System Security Engineering

Policy and Guidance

16 As above

8.2 Safeguarding Information and

Information Sharing

Activities:

16 As above

8.3 Cybersecurity for Weapons

Systems

16 As above

8.4 System Security Engineering

Assessments

16 As above

8.5 Program Protection Plans and

Approval Process

16 As above

8.6 Program Protection Plan

(PPP) Preparation Guide

Outline and Guidance

17 As above

9 Process and Methodology 17 As above

9.1 Defense Acquisition Program

Support (DAPS) Methodology

17 As above

9.2 Systemic Root Cause

Analysis

17 As above

9.3 Program Support Process

and Focus Areas

18 As above

9.4 Integration Risk Assessment

and Metrics

18 As above

9.5 Mission Thread Analysis 18 As above

9.6 Lifecycle Intelligence Mission

Data (IMD) Planning

18 As above

10 DoD Policy and Guidance Support

18 As above

10.1 DoD and JCIDS policy

documents

19 As above

10.2 DAG Chapter 4 19 As above

10.3 Systems Engineering Plan

(SEP) Outline

19 As above

10.4 DoD Risk, Issues, and

Opportunities Management

Guide

19 As above

10.5 Systems Engineering

Request for Proposal Review

Guide

19 As above

10.6 TPM Guide 19 As above

11 Support to Joint Staff 20 As above

11.1 Requirements and Joint

Requirements Oversight Council (JROC) support

20 As above

11.2 Support to Joint Mission Area

Analysis and System

Integration

20 As above

12 Project Management, Workflow Management and

Process Support

20 As above

12.1 Continuous Process

Improvement

20 As above

12.2 Training 21 As above

13 Other Requirements 21 As above

13.1 Data Rights 21 As above

13.2 Security 21 As above

13.3 Work Location 21 As above

13.4 Travel 21 As above

13.5 Monthly Progress Reports 21 As above

EE

PWS

para

Title Page Performance Standards

Metric Acceptable Quality Level

Method of Surveillance

Date Accomplished

1 System Assurance and Program Protection

3 Acceptable to

ODASD(SE)

Government Lead (Gov't tech lead or

Director (100%

Review)

Percentage of products delivered on time which are acceptable.

No Rework based on contractor effort requiring return to the contractor

SME

Review by Government

Lead

As established at time of task assignment

1.1 Systems Engineering (SE)

and SwA Capability

3 As above

1.2 Joint Federated Assurance

Center (JFAC)

5 As above

1.3 Acquisition Security

Database

5 As above

1.4 CPI Identification and Anti-

Tamper

6 As above

1.5 Microelectronics 7 As above

1.6 System Assurance and

Program Protection Support

7 As above

1.7 Security Engineering

Program Support.

8 As above

2 Engineering Tools and Environments

8 As above

2.1 Engineered Resilient Systems 8 As above

2.2 Digital Engineering in Design

and Engineering.

9 As above

2.2.1 Establishing and advance a

stakeholder community

9 As above

2.2.2 Digital Artifact Management 10 As above

2.2.3 Transition current education, training, guidance, and where

10 As above practical

2.2.4 Assist in cross-cutting efforts

in Engineering Tools and

Environments

10 As above

2.3 Modular Open System

Architecture (MOSA).

10 As above

3 Systems Engineering (SE) Policy and Guidance (P&G)

11 As above

3.1 SE Policy and Documentation 11 As above

3.2 SE Guidance 12 As above

3.3 Acquisition Documentation

Reviews for SE P&G

Implementation

12 As above

3.4 DAU Course and Community

of Practice Content Reviews for Consistency with SE P&G

3.5 SE P&G Reporting and

Outreach

13 As above

4 Specialty Engineering 13 As above

4.1 Manufacturing and Quality

Engineering

13 As above

4.1.1 Manufacturing and Quality

Engineering Policy, Guidance, and Outreach

13 As above

4.1.2 Acquisition Review and

Analysis.

14 As above

4.2 Diminishing Manufacturing

Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS)

15 As above

4.3 Value Engineering 15 As above

4.4 Human Systems Integration

(HSI)

16 As above

4.5 System Safety Engineering . 17 As above

4.6 Reliability and Maintainability

(R&M) Engineering

18 As above

4.6.1 R&M Engineering, Policy, Guidance and Outreach

18 As above

4.6.2 Acquisition, Review and

Analysis.

19 As above

5 Systems Engineering and Analysis

20 As above

5.1 Family of Systems (FoS) and

Systems of Systems (SoS)

Analysis

20 As above

5.2 Systems of Systems (SOS)

and Families of Systems

(FOS)

21 As above

6 Specifications and Standards --Defense Standardization

21 As above

Program Office (DSPO)

7 Workforce Development 22 As above

7.1 Acquisition Workforce 22 As above

7.2 Engineering (Non-

construction) (ENG(NC))

Workforce

22 As above

7.3 Workforce Policy and

Documentation

23 As above

7.4 Workforce Data Analytics and

Workforce Studies

23 As above

7.5 Workforce Reporting and

Outreach

23 As above

8 Systems Engineering Specifications and Standards

(SESS)

23 As above

9 Information Technology 24 As above

Support

9.1 Interoperability Senior Review

Panel

24 As above

9.2 Information Technology (IT)

Standards

24 As above

9.3 Spectrum Management 25 As above

10 International Engagement 25 As above

10.1 The Technical Cooperation

Program (TTCP)

25 As above

11 Support Tasks 25 As above

11.1 Data Management 26 As above

11.2 Communities of Practice 26 As above

11.3 Training 26 As above

11.4 Special/Other Requirements

(Draft)

26 As above

11.4.1 Data Rights 26 As above

11.4.2 Security 26 As above

11.4.3 Work Location 27 As above

Front Office

PWS

para

Title Page Performance Standards

Metric Acceptable Quality Level

Method of Surveillance

Date Accomplished

1 Support to DASD(SE) & PD, DASD(SE) Functions

3 Acceptable to

ODASD(SE)

Government Lead (Gov't tech lead or

Director (100%

Review)

Percentage of products delivered on time which are acceptable.

No Rework based on contractor effort requiring return to the contractor

SME

Review by Government

Lead

As established at

2 Defense Industrial Base (DIB) Cyber Security and

Information Assurance (IA)

3 As above

3 Systems Engineering Research Center Administration

5 As above

4 Continuing Process Improvement

6 As above

5 MDAP / MAIS Database 7 As above

6 Technical Editing & Graphics Support

7 As above

7 GAO, IG and Congressional 8 As above

8 Outreach 8 As above

8.1 DASD(SE) Website and

Intranet

9 As above

8.2 Conferences 9 As above

8.3 SE Forum 10 As above

8.4 Publications 10 As above

8.5 DASD(SE) Webinars 11 As above

8.6 SE Excellence Awards 11 As above

9 Special/Other Requirements 11 As above

9.1 Data Rights 11 As above

9.2 Security 11 As above

9.3 Work Location 12 As above

9.4 Training 12 As above

Table 2: Surveillance Activity Checklist – Support to ODASD(SE) Front Office and PD-DASD(SE)

Work to be Performed Per Task Work Statement (TWS)

Performance Standard Metric Acceptable Quality Level Method of

Surveillance Date

Accomplished

1.0 Support to DASD(SE) & PD, DASD(SE)

Functions

Acceptable to

ODASD(SE)

Government Lead (Gov't tech lead or Director (100% Review)

Percentage of products delivered on time, which are acceptable.

No Rework based on contractor effort requiring return to the contractor

SME

Review by Government Lead

As established at time of task assignment

2.0 Defense Industrial Base (DIB) Cyber

Security and Information Assurance (IA)

Acceptable to

ODASD(SE)

Government Lead (Gov't tech lead or Director (100% Review)

Percentage of products delivered on time, which are acceptable.

No Rework based on contractor effort requiring return to the contractor

SME

Review by Government Lead

As established at time of task assignment

3.0 Systems Engineering Research Center

Administration

Acceptable to

ODASD(SE)

Government Lead (Gov't tech lead or Director (100% Review)

Percentage of products delivered on time, which are acceptable.

No Rework based on contractor effort requiring return to the contractor

SME

Review by Government Lead

As established at time of task assignment

4.0 Front Office Operations

Acceptable to

ODASD(SE)

Government Lead (Gov't tech lead or Director (100% Review)

Percentage of products delivered on time, which are acceptable.

No Rework based on contractor effort requiring return to the contractor

SME

Review by Government Lead

As established at time of task assignment

5.0 Continuing Process Improvement

Acceptable to

ODASD(SE)

Government Lead (Gov't tech lead or Director (100% Review)

Percentage of products delivered on time, which are acceptable.

No Rework based on contractor effort requiring return to the contractor

SME

Review by Government Lead

As established at

6.0 Administration

Acceptable to

ODASD(SE)

Government Lead (Gov't tech lead or Director (100% Review)

Percentage of products delivered on time, which are acceptable.

No Rework based on contractor effort requiring return to the contractor

SME

Review by Government Lead

As established at time of task assignment

7.0 Travel

Acceptable to

ODASD(SE)

Government Lead (Gov't tech lead or Director (100% Review)

Percentage of products delivered on time, which are acceptable.

No Rework based on contractor effort requiring return to the contractor

SME

Review by Government Lead

As established at time of task assignment

8.0 Technical Editing & Graphics Support

Acceptable to

ODASD(SE)

Government Lead (Gov't tech lead or Director (100% Review)

Percentage of products delivered on time, which are acceptable.

No Rework based on contractor effort requiring return to the contractor

SME

Review by Government Lead

As established at time of task assignment

9.0 Outreach

Acceptable to

ODASD(SE)

Government Lead (Gov't tech lead or Director (100% Review)

Percentage of products delivered on time, which are acceptable.

No Rework based on contractor effort requiring return to the contractor

SME

Review by Government Lead

As established at time of task assignment

10.0 GAO, IG and Congressional

Acceptable to

ODASD(SE)

Government Lead (Gov't tech lead or Director (100% Review)

Percentage of products delivered on time, which are acceptable.

No Rework based on contractor effort requiring return to the contractor

SME

Review by Government Lead

As established at time of task assignment

11.0 Executive Assistance

Acceptable to

ODASD(SE)

Government Lead (Gov't tech lead or Director (100% Review)

Percentage of products delivered on time, which are acceptable.

No Rework based on contractor effort requiring return to the contractor

SME

Review by Government Lead

As established at time of task assignment

12.0 Joint Congressional Report

Acceptable to

ODASD(SE)

Government Lead (Gov't tech lead or Director (100% Review)

Percentage of products delivered on time, which are acceptable.

No Rework based on contractor effort requiring return to the contractor

SME

Review by Government Lead

As established at

Table 3: Surveillance Activity Checklist – Support to ODASD(SE) Director, Major Program Support

Work to be Performed Per Task Work Statement (TWS) Performance Standards Metric Acceptable Quality Level

Method of Surveillance

Date Accomplished

1.0 Introduction

2.0 Specific Tasks

2.1 General Product and SME Support Expectations

Acceptable to ODASD(SE) Government Lead (Gov't tech lead or Director (100% Review)

Percentage of products delivered on time, which are acceptable.

No Rework based on contractor effort requiring return to the contractor SME

Review by Government Lead

As established at time of task assignment

2.2 Systems Engineering Oversight of Major Defense

Acquisition Programs (MDAP) and Major Automated Information Systems (MAIS) and other special interest programs

Acceptable to ODASD(SE) Government Lead (Gov't tech lead or Director (100% Review)

Percentage of products delivered on time, which are acceptable.

No Rework based on contractor effort requiring return to the contractor SME

Review by Government Lead

As established at time of task assignment

3.0 Program Support Activities

Acceptable to ODASD(SE) Government Lead (Gov't tech lead or Director (100% Review)

Percentage of products delivered on time, which are acceptable.

No Rework based on contractor effort requiring return to the contractor SME

Review by Government Lead

As established at time of task assignment

4.0 MDAP and MAIS Acquisition Document Development, Review and Coordination

Acceptable to ODASD(SE) Government Lead (Gov't tech lead or Director (100% Review)

Percentage of products delivered on time, which are acceptable.

No Rework based on contractor effort requiring return to the contractor SME

Review by Government Lead

As established at

5.0 System Security Engineering

Acceptable to ODASD(SE) Government Lead (Gov't tech lead or Director (100% Review)

Percentage of products delivered on time, which are acceptable.

No Rework based on contractor effort requiring return to the contractor SME

Review by Government Lead

As established at time of task assignment

7.0 Support to Joint Staff

Acceptable to ODASD(SE) Government Lead (Gov't tech lead or Director (100% Review)

Percentage of products delivered on time, which are acceptable.

No Rework based on contractor effort requiring return to the contractor SME

Review by Government Lead

As established at time of task assignment

9.0 Developmental Planning

Acceptable to ODASD(SE) Government Lead (Gov't tech lead or Director (100% Review)

Percentage of products delivered on time, which are acceptable.

No Rework based on contractor effort requiring return to the contractor SME

Review by Government Lead

As established at time of task assignment

10.0 Risk Management

Acceptable to ODASD(SE) Government Lead (Gov't tech lead or Director (100% Review)

Percentage of products delivered on time, which are acceptable.

No Rework based on contractor effort requiring return to the contractor SME

Review by Government Lead

As established at time of task assignment

11.0 Software Engineering (SWE)

Acceptable to ODASD(SE) Government Lead (Gov't tech lead or Director (100% Review)

Percentage of products delivered on time, which are acceptable.

No Rework based on contractor effort requiring return to the contractor SME

Review by Government Lead

As established at time of task assignment

12.0 Project Management Support

Acceptable to ODASD(SE) Government Lead (Gov't tech lead or Director (100% Review)

Percentage of products delivered on time, which are acceptable.

No Rework based on contractor effort requiring return to the contractor SME

Review by Government Lead

As established at time of task assignment

13.0 PROCESS REQUIREMENTS

Acceptable to ODASD(SE) Government Lead (Gov't tech lead or Director (100% Review)

Percentage of products delivered on time, which are acceptable.

No Rework based on contractor effort requiring return to the contractor SME

Review by Government Lead

As established at