PPQ.pdf

Source Selection Team Guidance

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE 20 Aug 2018

I. Evaluation of Offeror:

Company/Division Providing Services: ___________________________________________

Address: ___________________________________________________________________

Description of Services Provided: _______________________________________________

Contract Number: _____________________ Dollar Value: ______________

Performance Period: ___________________ Performance Location: ______________

Type of Contract:

Check One:

Fixed Price ______ Cost Reimbursement ______ Other (Please Specify) _______

Check One:

Negotiated ______ Sealed Bid ______Competitive ______Non-Competitive _________

Basis of Payment:

Commodity ______ Labor/Equipment Hours ______ Other (specify) ______________

Type & Extent of Subcontracting: ________________________________________________

II. Evaluated by:

Company/Organization/Address: _________________________________________________

Name & Title: ________________________________________________________________

Signature: ______________________________________ Date: _______________________

Telephone: _________________________ FAX: ____________________________

III. Evaluation:

Please answer questions 1 through 15 using the following criteria. Circle only one response per question. For elements rated "unsatisfactory", please comment on the specific problem(s) or performance failure(s) that prompted this rating.

4 - Exceptional: Performance met and exceeded many of the contractual requirements to the organization's benefit. The contractual performance of the element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions were highly effective.

3 - Very Good: Performance met and exceeded some to the contractual requirements to the organization's benefit. The contractual performance of the element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions were effective.

2 - Satisfactory: Performance met contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions were satisfactory.

1 – Marginal: Performance barely met contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which corrective actions have not yet been identified, appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

0 – Unsatisfactory: Performance did not meet some contractual requirement and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being evaluated reflects serious problems for which corrective actions were ineffective.

N/A: Not Applicable or not observed.

1. Evaluate the contractor's overall commitment to quality performance and customer satisfaction.

4 3 2 1 0 N/A

Comment:

2. Evaluate the contractor's overall technical competence to operate in CONUS and OCONUS, recruit senior academic and professional staff that meet PWS and can meet deliverables, and maintain excess capability.

3. Evaluate the contractor's ability, cooperation and willingness to work as a team (with your personnel, other contractors, supporting institution, and USG, etc.).

4. Evaluate the contractor's compliance with contractual deliverables/requirements to include completeness of billing documentation and ability to provide on-the-spot financial data for funds obligated.

5. Evaluate the contractor's responsiveness to contract, program and/or schedule changes with academic and professional staff operating in the CONUS and OCONUS simultaneously.

6. Evaluate the effectiveness of the contractor's overall quality control procedures to ensure compliance with performance requirements and deliverables with minimum interface

(communications with employees regarding policies, excess personnel and capital capability, and morale plan).

7. Evaluate the contractor’s effectiveness at ensuring personnel are capable of meeting PWS standards and are capable to travel international.

8. Evaluate the effectiveness of the contractor's on-site management and supervision.

9. Evaluate the contractor's ability to overcome technical problems, labor issues, and/or other performance difficulties associated with executing an academic program composited of senior academic and professional personnel in the CONUS and OCONUS simultaneously.

10. Evaluate the contractor's ability to plan and conduct operations in the most price effective manner (Travel, Conferences, Services and Boards).

11. Evaluate the contractor's ability to adhere to schedules, complete work on time, and within budget.

12. Evaluate the quality and stability of the contractor's workforce to include the ability to maintain excess capability to place people on-site on short notice due to surge requirements.

13. Evaluate the availability, adequacy and suitability of the contractor's staffing for the academic and professional work required and their ability to response to customer and employee work or information requirements.

14. Evaluate the availability, adequacy and suitability of the contractor's ability to provide information for support services prior to committing funds?

Assessor’s Signature Date