RFP_Atch_1_-_RFP_Questions_and_Answers_07_AUG_2018.docx

118 KB Posted

Attached to
HEMP Protected Fiber Optic Cable System
Solicitation number
HC101318R0016
Issued by

About this file

From the source

Q&A response for questions from 02 AUG 2018.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
RFP_HC1013-18-R-00160007_as_of_20_AUG_2018.pdf PDF
RFP_HC1013-18-R-00160006_as_of_07_AUG_2018.pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_5_-_Price_Template_as_of_06_AUG_2018.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFP_HC1013-18-R-00160005_as_of_07_AUG_2018.pdf PDF
RFP_HC1013-18-R-00160004_as_of_26_JUL_2018.pdf PDF
RFP_HC1013-18-R-0016003_as_of_25_JUL_2018.pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_1_-_RFP_Questions_and_Answers_26_JUL_2018.doc DOC document
RFP_HC1013-18-R-0016002_as_of_10_JUL_2018.pdf PDF
HEMP_Site_Visits_June_2018_Registration.pdf PDF
Appendix_B_Site_Visit_Agenda.docx DOCX document
Appendix_A_Map_and_directions.pdf PDF
Appendix_C_Industry_HEMP_Site_Visit_Information.docx DOCX document
RFP_Atch_2_-_HEMP_PWS_HC1013-18-R-0016_as_of_12_JUN_2018.pdf PDF
QandA_as_of_6-12-18.docx DOCX document
RFP_Atch_5_-_Price_Template_as_of_12_June_2018.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFP_HC1013-18-R-00160001_HEMP_Re-award.pdf PDF
commercial_solicitation_evaluation_and_award_basis_Final.docx DOCX document
QandA_as_of_6-1-18.pdf PDF
RFP_HC1013-18-R-0016_HEMP_Re-award.pdf PDF
Show all 19

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

RFQ Questions & Answers

Reference
Questions
Government Response

Steel Pipe Diagram.PPT

Price Template: CLINs 0001, 0003, 0004, 0005, 0007, 0008

Base Year & All Option Years & 6 Month Extension Tab

The Diagram, the Pricing Template & The Steel Pipe Diagram indicates nodal connectivity for a qty of 2x OC48 Unprotected East and West (E & W) between each of the following:

1) CMAFS Node 1 (3301) & Schriever AFB (Bldg 700)

2) Schriever AFB (Bldg 700) & Peterson AFB (Bldg 1040)

3) Peterson AFB (Bldg 1040) & CMAFS Node 2 (3101) But the Pricing Template indicates 2x OC48 (4 Ports) between the following:

1) CMAFS Node 1 (3301) & Schriever AFB (Bldg 700)

2) Schriever AFB (Bldg 700) & Peterson AFB (Bldg 1040)

3) Peterson AFB (Bldg 1040) & CMAFS Node 1 (3301)

4) CMAFS Node 2 (3101) & Schriever AFB (Bldg 700) Which builds the following:

1. A “triangular” ring comprising of the following links:

a. CMAFS (Node 1)<>SAFB<>PAFB<>CMAFS (Node 1)

Continued below…

Yes, this interpretation of the “square” four nodal rings is correct. The corrected template attached does more accurately reflect the requirement of the PWS.

The Government will provide the fiber necessary to connect the two CMAFS nodes so that circuits may be provisioned between any two nodes on the ring. CLINs (0004 and 0008) are added between the two CMAFS nodes. Mileage does not apply, but the ports/equipment lease does.

2. And a “stick” ring comprising of only the following:

a. CMAFS (Node 2)<>SAFB

Does the Government really prefer this to be a “square” nodal ring comprising of all four (4) nodes as follows?:

CMAFS Node 1 (Rm 3301)<>SAFB(Bldg 700)<>PAFB(Bldg 1040)<>CMAFS Node 2 (Rm 3101)<>CMAFS Node 1 (Rm 3301)…see diagram below:

With only 2x OC48 Unprotected East and West (E & W) between each of the following three node pairs:

1) CMAFS Node 1 (3301) & Schriever AFB (Bldg 700)

2) Schriever AFB (Bldg 700) & Peterson AFB (Bldg 1040)

3) Peterson AFB (Bldg 1040) & CMAFS Node 2 (3101)

If so, shouldn’t, then, the Pricing Template be corrected to match the following (attached) modified Pricing Template?:

The Price template has been updated.

image2.emf

Microsoft_Visio_Drawing2.vsdx image3.emf

Microsoft_Visio_Drawing3.vsdx image4.emf

Microsoft_Visio_Drawing4.vsdx image1.emf

Microsoft_Visio_Drawing1.vsdx

File details come from the government source that posted it.