20100324__AMEND0003_MSC_NGW_Section_J_Attachment_C_Cross_Reference_Matrix.pdf

Section J, Attachment C: Compliance and Cross Reference Matrix v 2.0 1 of 7

ATTACHMENT C: COMPLIANCE AND CROSS REFERENCE MATRIX

The offeror shall fill out the following Compliance and Cross Reference Matrix indicating the proposal reference information as it relates to the SOO, CLIN numbers, Sections L and M, CDRL references found therein, and the corresponding paragraph in the

Technical volume which addresses the referenced item.

The offeror can also add rows to the matrix as they see fit to provide clarity to their submittal. If this matrix conflicts with any other requirement, direction, or provision of this solicitation, the other reference shall take precedence over this matrix. In addition, to the extent this matrix discloses details as to the extent or manner by which the Government intends to evaluate the offeror’s proposals for award, Section M references in the matrix are for information purposes only and the Government shall be obligated to evaluate proposals solely in conformance with the provisions of Section M of the solicitation.

Objectives, Constraints and Related Documentation Technical Proposal Volume

Evaluation Criteria

Section M, Subfactors for

Technical/ Management

Factor

SOO

Instructions to Offerors

Section L

CDRL CLIN SAS PWS QASP

Transition

Plan Technical Proposal

Risk Matrix

1 2a SF1 CLINs 0001–0076

1 2d SF1

1a, 1d 5a SF1 1 CLINs 0001–0032

1b 5b SF1 CLIN 0076

1c 5c SF1 Even CLINs 0002–

1 6.2a SF1 CLINs 0001–0032

1 6.2b SF1

1 6.2c SF1

1 6.2d SF1

1 6.2e SF1

1 6.2f SF1

1 6.2g SF1

1 6.2h SF1 1

1 6.2i SF1 1

Section J, Attachment C: Compliance and Cross Reference Matrix v 2.0 2 of 7

Evaluation Criteria

Section M, Subfactors for

Technical/ Management

Factor

SOO

Instructions to Offerors

Section L

CDRL CLIN SAS PWS QASP

Transition

Plan Technical Proposal

Risk Matrix

1 6.3a SF1 CLINs 0035–0063 pertaining to terminal equipment

1 6.3b SF1

1 6.3c SF1

1 6.4.1a SF1 CLINs 0035–0063

1 6.4.1b SF1

1 6.4.2a SF1

1 6.4.2b SF1

1 6.4.2c SF1

1 6.4.2d SF1

1 6.5 SF1 CLINs 0035–0063

1 6.5.1a SF1

1 6.5.1b SF1

1 6.5.2a SF1

1 6.5.2b SF1

2 2c SF2 CLINs 0035–0063 pertaining to installation services

2 2d SF2

2d 2e SF2

2a 5b SF2 CLIN 0076

2a 5d SF2 1

2b 5e SF2

Section J, Attachment C: Compliance and Cross Reference Matrix v 2.0 3 of 7

Evaluation Criteria

Section M, Subfactors for

Technical/ Management

Factor

SOO

Instructions to Offerors

Section L

CDRL CLIN SAS PWS QASP

Transition

Plan Technical Proposal

Risk Matrix

2 5g SF2d 5 CLIN 0071

2 5h SF2d CLINs 0035–0063 pertaining to training in SOO 5h

2 5i SF2 10

2 6.2b SF2

2 6.2c SF2

2 6.2d SF2

2 6.2e SF2

2 6.2f SF2

2 6.2g SF2

2 6.2h SF2 1

2 6.2i SF2 1

2 6.7a SF2 CLINs 0064–0067 pertaining to Deployment/ Installation

2 6.7b SF2 4, 5, 8, 11, 12

2 6.7c SF2

2 6.7d SF2

2c 6.1a SF2

2c 6.1b SF2

2c 6.1c SF2

2c 6.1d SF2 CLIN 0072

2c 6.1e SF2 CLIN 0072

2c 6.1f SF2

Section J, Attachment C: Compliance and Cross Reference Matrix v 2.0 4 of 7

Evaluation Criteria

Section M, Subfactors for

Technical/ Management

Factor

SOO

Instructions to Offerors

Section L

CDRL CLIN SAS PWS QASP

Transition

Plan Technical Proposal

Risk Matrix

3 2b SF3 CLINs 0035–0063 pertaining to installation services as part of the transition plan

3 2c SF3 CLINs 0035–0063 pertaining to installation services

3 5f SF3 2, 11 CLINs 0035–0073, 3 5g SF2d 5 CLIN 0071 pertaining to role of training in SOO 5g as part of the transition plan

3 5h SF2d CLINs 0035–0063 pertaining to role of training in SOO 5h as part of the transition plan

3 6.6 SF3 2, 3, 6,

7, 9

CLIN 0035–0063

pertaining to Deployment/ Installation

4 2 SF4

4 5 SF4 2, 11 CLINs 0035–0073, 4 6.1 SF4

4 6.2 SF4

4 6.6 SF4

4 6.7 SF4

Section J, Attachment C: Compliance and Cross Reference Matrix v 2.0 5 of 7

Evaluation Criteria

Section M, Factor 1

Reference Factor 1 Evaluation Criteria

1 Subfactor 1: System Performance: All relevant standards.

1a System Performance, Standard a: This subfactor is met when the offeror’s system architecture:

a. Offers per-mobile-platform voice and data communications capacity in an efficient and cost-effective manner to optimize:

1) Service availability and quality of service.

2) Total primary Committed Information Rate (CIR) and secondary Burstable Information Rate (BIR) bandwidth available to each mobile platform (ship or MSOC van). . The preferred per-ship CIR is 64 Kbps (symmetric), ideally providing assured access without contention, whether during session initiation or information transfer. The preferred per-ship minimum for BIR is 256 Kbps downlink/128 Kbps uplink.

3) The ability to multicast large data packages (estimated maximum size of 500MB) to the fleet (e.g., software updates/patches/service packs).

4) Coverage area with emphasis on the concentration areas (see SOO Section 6.8), commercial sea routes, and areas of publicly disclosed major Naval operations. Land mass coverage is littoral with the exception of the Mobile Sealift Operations Center (MSOC) vans, which operate inland occasionally (98% littoral, 2% inland).

5) Service delivery, as necessary, to provide highest data rates in the aforementioned concentration areas (see SOO Section 6.8), commercial sea routes, areas of publicly disclosed major Naval operations, and land mass coverage where MSOC vans operate. Best effort service delivery provided in all other covered regions.

1b System Performance, Standard b: This subfactor is met when the offeror’s system architecture: Maximizes flexibility in the allocation of primary and contingent space segment resources to maintain full service across the MSC fleet as ship deployments change locations.

1c System Performance, Standard c: This subfactor is met when the offeror’s system architecture: Offers the means to acquire additional capacity to support unanticipated growth in fleet size or per-ship consumption as it pertains to scalability, capacity, and allocation of contingent space segment resources (i.e., surge).

1d System Performance, Standard d: This subfactor is met when the offeror’s system architecture: The effectiveness of terminals and other required equipment to provide service requested in the SOO.

2 Subfactor 2: Operations and Maintenance: All relevant standards

2a Subfactor 2: Operations and Maintenance, Standard a: The staging, delivery, and O&M support processes of the offeror’s solution maximize flexibility to maintain full system support process and team service across the MSC fleet as ship deployments change locations.

2b Subfactor 2: Operations and Maintenance, Standard b: The staging, delivery, and O&M support processes of the offeror’s solution minimize the role of shore and shipboard personnel in satellite communication (SATCOM) sustainment activities.

2c Subfactor 2: Operations and Maintenance, Standard c: The staging, delivery, and O&M support processes of the offeror’s solution demonstrate the ability to meet DoD information assurance requirements as defined in the SOO.

2d Subfactor 2: Operations and Maintenance, Standard d: The staging, delivery, and O&M support processes of the offeror’s solution present a policy for warranties and non-obsolescence. This includes a process for addressing parts obsolescence, including periodic technology updates for commercial hardware and software changes through the operational life of the system.

Section J, Attachment C: Compliance and Cross Reference Matrix v 2.0 6 of 7

Reference Factor 1 Evaluation Criteria

3 Subfactor 3: Transition Plan: The offeror’s Transition Plan and related documents (WBSs, OCD Plan, and installation package) articulate an efficient approach to deliver a full system-wide operational capability no later than December 2012 . The approach includes:

• Performance metrics and means to meet them

• Utilization of government and contractor resources to accomplish the work

• Articulation of risks and ways to mitigate the risks

• Clear understanding of MSC operational and mission requirements and how they impact the transition

4 Subfactor 4: Management: All relevant standards:

4a Subfactor 4: Management Approach: Standard a: A comprehensive and effective management structure for the NGW program.

4b Subfactor 4: Management Approach: Standard b: An effective resource management structure to include key personnel and subcontractors.

Instructions to Offerors

Section L

Reference Instructions to Offerors, Section L

The relevant instructions to address the SOO subject specified in the row are in section:

SF1 “Subfactor 1: System Performance”

SF2 “Subfactor 2: Operations and Maintenance”

SF3 “Subfactor 3: Transition Plan”

SF4 “Subfactor 4: Management Approach”

CLIN

Reference Description

CLINs 0001–0032 Bandwidth CLINs

CLIN 0033 Terrestrial Circuits (MSC PoPs for all NGW active ships)—(inclusive CLIN providing all circuit costs from Teleport to the PoP)

CLIN 0034 Management

CLINs 0035–0063 Shipboard/Van Equipment/Deployment: Offerors shall provide a detailed listing of the equipment (including spares) with prices required to support each type of ship

CLINs 0064–0067 Shipboard/Van Equipment Maintenance (Depot level maintenance starts after warranty expires)

Section J, Attachment C: Compliance and Cross Reference Matrix v 2.0 7 of 7

CLINs 0068–0069 NOCs: Fleet SATCOM System Equipment

CLIN 0070 Personnel Support Services

CLIN 0071 Training

CLIN 0072 Integration (Start-up, IA Certificate/Accreditation, MAC Levels)

CLIN 0073 Travel (Government Directed Only): Will not be paid via this CLIN; travel costs will be paid in accordance with the Joint Travel Regulations

CLIN 0074 CDRLs

CLIN 0075 Upgrades/Enhancements

CLIN 0076 Portability

CLIN 0077 OCD Demonstration

CDRL

Reference CDRL Item Name

1 Monthly metrics report and bandwidth usage reports

2 Installation Report

3 Material List for each ship package

4 Ship Support Visit Report

5 Classroom Training Report

6 Engineering Reference Package

7 Technical Manuals

8 Onboard Repair Parts (OBRPs) Data

9 Installation and Checkout Spares (INCOs) Data

10 Configuration Baseline Data

11 List of Support Equipment

12 Monthly Support Service Report

13 Cost Summary Report