H92222-18-R-0004_0005.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to:

1. Correct the information in FAR clause 52.211-9, Desired and Required Time of Delivery, on page 20 for several contract Line Item Number

(CLINs). Amendment 4 inaccurately stated that the desired/required quantity w as the total yearly quantity for some CLINs in others the amounts w ere inaccurate.

2. Update section L page 2 to indicate the delivery of product samples by mail. Updated CLINS to reflect increased quantity, please review amendment for changes.

3. Updated quantities in section M to be consistent w ith the changes in quantities required in CLINs and Section L.

4. Contract Data Deliverable (CDRL)14 has been updated to change references to the I&KPT training to train-the-trainer and NET training to clarify that this is one course that include both aspects of the training.

5. SOW has also been updated to be consistent w ith the CDRL and CLINs references to the training.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

S 1 34

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 21-Jun-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X H92222-18-R-0004

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

16-May-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

21-Jun-2018

CODE

HQ USSOCOM

SOF AT&L-KR

7701 TAMPA POINT BLVD

TAMPA FL 33621-5323

H92403 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

H92222-18-R-0004

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

CLIN 0003

The CLIN description has changed from I&KPT and NET to Train the trainer and NET training.

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

Instructor and key Personnel Training (I&KPT) and New Equipment Training (NET) for up to 30 students, 15 per class IAW CDRL A014

To:

Train the trainer and New Equipment Training (NET) for up to 30 students, 15 per class IAW CDRL A014

The pricing detail quantity has decreased by 5.00 from 6.00 to 1.00.

CLIN 1001

The pricing detail quantity has decreased by 325.00 from 760.00 to 435.00.

CLIN 1003

The CLIN description has changed from I & KPT to Train the trainer and NET training.

Instructor and Key Personnel Training (I&KPT) and New equipment training for up to 30 students, 15 per class

Train the trainer and New Equipment Training (NET) for up to 30 students, 15 per class IAW CDRL A014

The pricing detail quantity has increased by 1.00 from 2.00 to 3.00.

CLIN 2001

The pricing detail quantity has increased by 331.00 from 352.00 to 683.00.

CLIN 2003

The CLIN description has changed from I & KPT to Train the Trainer and NET training.

Instructor and Key Personnel Training (I&KPT) and New equipment training for up to 30 students, 15 per class

Train the trainer and New Equipment Training (NET) for up to 30 students, 15 per class IAW CDRL A014

CLIN 2008

CLIN 2010

CLIN 3001

The pricing detail quantity has increased by 475.00 from 309.00 to 784.00.

CLIN 3003

nstructor and Key Personnel Training (I&KPT) and New equipment training for up to 30 students, 15 per class

Train the trainer and New Equipment Training (NET) for up to 30 students, 15 per class IAW CDRL A014

The pricing detail quantity has decreased by 2.00 from 2.00 to 0.00.

CLIN 3008

The pricing detail quantity has increased by 6.00 from 1,112.00 to 1,118.00.

CLIN 3009

CLIN 3010

The pricing detail quantity has increased by 6.00 from 1,112.00 to 1,118.00.

CLIN 4001

The pricing detail quantity has increased by 465.00 from 308.00 to 773.00.

CLIN 4003

nstructor and Key Personnel Training (I&KPT) and New equipment training for up to 30 students, 15 per class

Train the trainer and New Equipment Training (NET) for up to 30 students, 15 per class IAW CDRL A014

The pricing detail quantity has decreased by 2.00 from 2.00 to 0.00.

CLIN 4008

The pricing detail quantity has increased by 481.00 from 1,421.00 to 1,902.00.

CLIN 4010

The pricing detail quantity has increased by 481.00 from 1,421.00 to 1,902.00.

SECTION F - DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0003 has been changed from:

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

60 dys. ADC 6 NSWC CRANE

JOHN MUSCATELL

300 HIGHWAY 361

SUPPLY OPERATIONS BLDG 41

RECEIVING

CRANE IN 47522-5001

812-854-4843

FOB: Destination

N00164

60 dys. ADC 1 NSWC CRANE

300 HIGHWAY 361

SUPPLY OPERATIONS BLDG 41

RECEIVING

CRANE IN 47522-5001

812-854-4843

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 1001 has been changed from:

60 dys. ADC 760 NSWC CRANE

300 HIGHWAY 361

SUPPLY OPERATIONS BLDG 41

RECEIVING

CRANE IN 47522-5001

812-854-4843

60 dys. ADC 435 NSWC CRANE

300 HIGHWAY 361

SUPPLY OPERATIONS BLDG 41

RECEIVING

CRANE IN 47522-5001

812-854-4843

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 1003 has been changed from:

60 dys. ADC 2 NSWC CRANE

300 HIGHWAY 361

SUPPLY OPERATIONS BLDG 41

RECEIVING

CRANE IN 47522-5001

812-854-4843

60 dys. ADC 3 NSWC CRANE

300 HIGHWAY 361

SUPPLY OPERATIONS BLDG 41

RECEIVING

CRANE IN 47522-5001

812-854-4843

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 2001 has been changed from:

60 dys. ADC 352 NSWC CRANE

300 HIGHWAY 361

SUPPLY OPERATIONS BLDG 41

RECEIVING

CRANE IN 47522-5001

812-854-4843

60 dys. ADC 683 NSWC CRANE

300 HIGHWAY 361

SUPPLY OPERATIONS BLDG 41

RECEIVING

CRANE IN 47522-5001

812-854-4843

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 2008 has been changed from:

300 HIGHWAY 361

SUPPLY OPERATIONS BLDG 41

RECEIVING

CRANE IN 47522-5001

812-854-4843

300 HIGHWAY 361

SUPPLY OPERATIONS BLDG 41

RECEIVING

CRANE IN 47522-5001

812-854-4843

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 2010 has been changed from:

300 HIGHWAY 361

SUPPLY OPERATIONS BLDG 41

RECEIVING

CRANE IN 47522-5001

812-854-4843

300 HIGHWAY 361

SUPPLY OPERATIONS BLDG 41

RECEIVING

CRANE IN 47522-5001

812-854-4843

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 3001 has been changed from:

60 dys. ADC 309 NSWC CRANE

300 HIGHWAY 361

SUPPLY OPERATIONS BLDG 41

RECEIVING

CRANE IN 47522-5001

812-854-4843

60 dys. ADC 784 NSWC CRANE

300 HIGHWAY 361

SUPPLY OPERATIONS BLDG 41

RECEIVING

CRANE IN 47522-5001

812-854-4843

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 3003 has been changed from:

300 HIGHWAY 361

SUPPLY OPERATIONS BLDG 41

RECEIVING

CRANE IN 47522-5001

812-854-4843

60 dys. ADC 0 NSWC CRANE

300 HIGHWAY 361

SUPPLY OPERATIONS BLDG 41

RECEIVING

CRANE IN 47522-5001

812-854-4843

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 3008 has been changed from:

60 dys. ADC 1,112 NSWC CRANE

300 HIGHWAY 361

SUPPLY OPERATIONS BLDG 41

RECEIVING

CRANE IN 47522-5001

812-854-4843

60 dys. ADC 1,118 NSWC CRANE

300 HIGHWAY 361

SUPPLY OPERATIONS BLDG 41

RECEIVING

CRANE IN 47522-5001

812-854-4843

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 3009 has been changed from:

300 HIGHWAY 361

SUPPLY OPERATIONS BLDG 41

RECEIVING

CRANE IN 47522-5001

812-854-4843

300 HIGHWAY 361

SUPPLY OPERATIONS BLDG 41

RECEIVING

CRANE IN 47522-5001

812-854-4843

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 3010 has been changed from:

60 dys. ADC 1,112 NSWC CRANE

300 HIGHWAY 361

SUPPLY OPERATIONS BLDG 41

RECEIVING

CRANE IN 47522-5001

812-854-4843

60 dys. ADC 1,118 NSWC CRANE

300 HIGHWAY 361

SUPPLY OPERATIONS BLDG 41

RECEIVING

CRANE IN 47522-5001

812-854-4843

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 4001 has been changed from:

60 dys. ADC 308 NSWC CRANE

300 HIGHWAY 361

SUPPLY OPERATIONS BLDG 41

RECEIVING

CRANE IN 47522-5001

812-854-4843

60 dys. ADC 773 NSWC CRANE

300 HIGHWAY 361

SUPPLY OPERATIONS BLDG 41

RECEIVING

CRANE IN 47522-5001

812-854-4843

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 4003 has been changed from:

300 HIGHWAY 361

SUPPLY OPERATIONS BLDG 41

RECEIVING

CRANE IN 47522-5001

812-854-4843

60 dys. ADC 0 NSWC CRANE

300 HIGHWAY 361

SUPPLY OPERATIONS BLDG 41

RECEIVING

CRANE IN 47522-5001

812-854-4843

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 4008 has been changed from:

60 dys. ADC 1,421 NSWC CRANE

300 HIGHWAY 361

SUPPLY OPERATIONS BLDG 41

RECEIVING

CRANE IN 47522-5001

812-854-4843

60 dys. ADC 1,902 NSWC CRANE

300 HIGHWAY 361

SUPPLY OPERATIONS BLDG 41

RECEIVING

CRANE IN 47522-5001

812-854-4843

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 4010 has been changed from:

60 dys. ADC 1,421 NSWC CRANE

300 HIGHWAY 361

SUPPLY OPERATIONS BLDG 41

RECEIVING

CRANE IN 47522-5001

812-854-4843

60 dys. ADC 1,902 NSWC CRANE

300 HIGHWAY 361

SUPPLY OPERATIONS BLDG 41

RECEIVING

CRANE IN 47522-5001

812-854-4843

SECTION I - CONTRACT CLAUSES

The following have been modified:

52.211-9 DESIRED AND REQUIRED TIME OF DELIVERY (JUN 1997)

(a) The Government desires delivery to be made according to the following schedule:

DESIRED/REQUIRED DELIVERY SCHEDULE

CLIN Number Desired/Required

Quantity Per Month

Desired Delivery

Schedule After Receipt of Order (ARO)

Ship To Address

0001 10 Due 60 Days ARO BLDG: 2522

300 Highway 361

Crane, IN 47522-5001

DODAAC: N00164

0002 20 Due 60 Days ARO BLDG: 2522

300 Highway 361

0003 1 1 Training Session due

60 Days ARO

BLDG: 2522

300 Highway 361

Crane, IN 47522-5001

DODAAC: N00164

1001 40 The first 40 due 60

Days ARO, then 60 every 30 days thereafter until delivery order is complete

BLDG: 2522

1003-2003 As stated in desired delivery column

1 Training Session due

60 Days ARO - Year 2

(1003)- 3 trainings for entire year (as required) and Year 3

(2003) - 2 trainings for the entire year (as required)

BLDG: 2522

300 Highway 361

Crane, IN 47522-5001

DODAAC: N00164

2001 60 The first 60 due 60

Days ARO, then 30 every 30 days

Crane, IN 47522-5001

DODAAC: N00164

2008 40 The first 40 due 60

Days ARO, then 30 every 30 days

Crane, IN 47522-5001

DODAAC: N00164

2010 40 The first 40 due 60

Days ARO, then 30 every 30 days

Crane, IN 47522-5001

DODAAC: N00164

3001 70 The first 70 due 60

Days ARO, then 30 every 30 days

Crane, IN 47522-5001

DODAAC: N00164

3008 100 The first 100 due 60

Days ARO, then 30 every 30 days

3009 40 The first 40 due 60

Days ARO, then 60 every 30 days

Crane, IN 47522-5001

DODAAC: N00164

3010 100 The first 100 due 60

Days ARO, then 60 every 30 days

Crane, IN 47522-5001

DODAAC: N00164

4001 70 The first 70 due 60

Days ARO, then 30 every 30 days

Crane, IN 47522-5001

DODAAC: N00164

4008 160 The first 160 due 60

Days ARO, then 60 every 30 days

Crane, IN 47522-5001

DODAAC: N00164

4010 160 The first 160 due 60

Days ARO, then 60 every 30 days

If the offer or is unable to meet the desired delivery schedule, it may, without prejudicing evaluation of its offer, propose a delivery schedule below. However, the offer or's proposed delivery schedule must not extend the delivery period beyond the time for delivery in the Government's required delivery schedule as follows:

Offers that propose delivery of a quantity under such terms or conditions that delivery will not clearly fall within the applicable required delivery period specified above, will be considered nonresponsive and rejected. If the offeror proposes no other delivery schedule, the desired delivery schedule above will apply.

OFFEROR'S PROPOSED DELIVERY SCHEDULE

Proposed Quantity Per

Month

Proposed Delivery

Schedule After Receipt of Order (ARO)

Ship To Address

0001 BLDG: 2522

300 Highway 361

0002 BLDG: 2522

0003 BLDG: 2522

Crane, IN 47522-5001

DODAAC: N00164

1001 BLDG: 2522

300 Highway 361

Crane, IN 47522-5001

DODAAC: N00164

1003-4003 BLDG: 2522

300 Highway 361

Crane, IN 47522-5001

DODAAC: N00164

2001 BLDG: 2522

300 Highway 361

2008 BLDG: 2522

2010 BLDG: 2522

Crane, IN 47522-5001

DODAAC: N00164

3001 BLDG: 2522

300 Highway 361

Crane, IN 47522-5001

DODAAC: N00164

3008 BLDG: 2522

300 Highway 361

Crane, IN 47522-5001

DODAAC: N00164

3009 BLDG: 2522

300 Highway 361

Crane, IN 47522-5001

DODAAC: N00164

3010 BLDG: 2522

300 Highway 361

4001 BLDG: 2522

Crane, IN 47522-5001

DODAAC: N00164

4008 BLDG: 2522

300 Highway 361

Crane, IN 47522-5001

DODAAC: N00164

4010 BLDG: 2522

300 Highway 361

(b) Attention is directed to the Contract Award provision of the solicitation that provides that a written award or acceptance of offer mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror results in a binding contract. The

Government will mail or otherwise furnish to the offeror an award or notice of award not later than the day the award is dated. Therefore, the offeror shall compute the time available for performance beginning with the actual date of award, rather than the date the written notice of award is received from the Contracting Officer through the ordinary mails. However, the Government will evaluate an offer that proposes delivery based on the Contractor's date of receipt of the contract or notice of award by adding (1) five calendar days for delivery of the award through the ordinary mails, or (2) one working day if the solicitation states that the contract or notice of award will be transmitted electronically. (The term "working day" excludes weekends and U.S. Federal holidays.) If, as so computed, the offered delivery date is later than the required delivery date, the offer will be considered nonresponsive and rejected.

(End of clause)

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Attachment 1 Performance Specification 40 30 April 2018

Attachment 2 Statement of Work (SOW) 13 21 June 2018

Attachment 3 Go/No-Go Matrix 1 30 April 2018

Attachment 4 Past Performance Questionnaire 4 N/A

Exhibit A CDRLS (A001-A017) 17 21 June 2018

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

SECTION L

Section L

Addendum to 52.212-1 -- Instructions to Offerors -- Commercial Items (Jan 2017)

L.1 General Instructions to Offerors

L.1.1 This is an all-electronic solicitation release. No Government paper hard copies will be mailed. Amendments to the solicitation will be posted to www.fbo.gov. It is the responsibility of each offeror to review the webpage for notice of amendments, updates, or changes to current information. The exclusive responsibility for the source selection will reside with the

Government. Proprietary information submitted in response to this solicitation will be protected from unauthorized disclosure as required by Subsection 27 of the Office of Procurement Policy

Act as amended (41 U.S.C. 423) as implemented in the FAR. The proposal and corresponding program will be unclassified and treated as Source Selection Sensitive Information. Each offeror is limited to one proposed solution to the solicitation requirement.

L.1.2 All proposals must be complete, self-sufficient, and respond directly to the requirements of the solicitation. Any commitments made in the proposal shall become part of the resultant contract. Any significant inconsistency, if unexplained, raises a fundamental issue of the offeror’s understanding and/or ability to perform under a contract and may be a basis for rejection of the proposal. Mere parroting of the requirements of the solicitation is not acceptable and may be a basis for rejection of the proposal. In no case shall words like “we will comply with the requirements of the contract,” or equivalent statements, be acceptable to meet the requirements of this RFP. Failure to comply with these instructions may result in an offeror’s proposal being excluded from further consideration for award. Offerors shall submit with their proposal a list of names and telephone numbers of persons authorized to conduct negotiations.

L.1.3 Mailing Instructions. Proposals are due by 2:00 PM EST 27 August 2018. Hand delivering proposals is not permitted. Electronic proposals (CD-ROMs/DVDs) shall be mailed and clearly marked as follows:

USSOCOM

ATTN: INDIRA R PHILLIPS, SOF AT&L-KR

Re: Solicitation Number H92222-18-R-0004

7701 Tampa Point Boulevard

MacDill AFB, FL 33621-5323

Primary Telephone: (813) 826-0320

Email: indira.phillips@socom.mil and

John E Helfert, SOF AT&L-KR

Secondary Telephone: (813) 826-4581

Email: john.helfert@socom.mil

Product Samples (PS) are due by 2:00 PM EST 09 July 2018 and shall be delivered by mail

(contractor shall not hand delivered PS) to the following address:

Commanding Officer, NSWC

Attn: JXNL – JOHN MUSCATELL

BLDG: 2522

300 Highway 361

L.1.4 The evaluation will consist of an evaluation of the GO/NO-GO Product Samples, Technical, Past Performance, and Price as outlined below. After completion of the evaluation, the Government may establish a competitive range and conduct discussions. The Government reserves the right for efficiency purposes to only include the most highly rated proposals in the competitive range. The Government may award a single five (5) year Indefinite

Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) type contract with Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Contract Line

Item Numbers (CLINs) or make multiple contract awards resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror(s) conforming to the solicitation. However, the Government may award a contract without discussions based on the initial offers received; therefore, each initial proposal should contain the offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. Absent an immediate award without discussions, in accordance with FAR 15.306(c) a competitive range will be established to limit discussions to the number which will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated offerors. For efficiency purposes the competitive range may be further limited to the most highly rated proposals.

L.1.5 Volumes.

mailto:indira.phillips@socom.mil mailto:john.helfert@socom.mil

L.1.5.1 Written Proposal Volumes and Format. Format of the proposal volumes and any resulting responses to Evaluations Notices (ENs) will be provided in electronic format. The titles and contents of the volumes shall be as defined in Table 1, all of which shall be within the required page limits and with the number of copies as specified and up to 10MB file size may be sent.

Table L-1: Proposal Volumes

Proposal

Submissions

Volume Electronic

Copies

Number of Pages

Phase I A-C

Go/No-Go

Documentation

And Product

Samples (3 each)

1 1 20 (Response to Table 1: Phase 1 Testing)

Phase I D

Technical 1 1 50 (includes Technical data sheets, Quality

Assurance, or Configuration Management

Plan)

Past Performance 2 1 10 (does not include Consent Letters, Performance Information Sheets submitted)

Price 3 1 No Limit

Contract

Documentation and

Attachments

4 1 10 pages (does not include in the 10 page maximum: the Signed Standard Form 33 for basic solicitation and each amendment and the

Signed Representations, Certifications and

Acknowledgements)

Each volume must contain the following information which is not included in the page count:

Cover and title page

Title of proposal

Offeror’s name, address and Point of Contact (POC) (name/telephone/email)

RFP number

Proposal volume number

Table of Contents (The table of contents must provide sufficient detail to enable easy location of important elements)

L.1.5.2 Page Size and Format. A page is defined as each face of a sheet of paper containing information. Page size shall be 8.5 x 11 inches, not including foldouts. Foldouts shall not exceed

11 x 17 inches and may be used only for large tables, charts, graphs, diagrams and schematics, not for pages of text. Pages shall be single spaced. Except for the reproduced sections of the solicitation document, the text size shall be no less than what is equivalent to Microsoft Word, Times New Roman, 12 point, uncompressed font. Tracking, kerning and leading values shall not be changed from the default values of the word processing or page layout software. Use at least

1 inch margins on the top and bottom and 1 inch on the side margins. Pages shall be numbered sequentially by volume. These page format restrictions shall apply to responses to Evaluation

Notices (ENs) in the event discussions are held. Embedded tables, charts, graphs and figures shall be used wherever practical and shall be uncomplicated and legible. For tables, graphs and figures, the text shall be no smaller than 8 point.

L.1.5.3 Electronic Format

(a) Electronic copies shall be provided on CD-ROMs/DVDs, read-only memory, and not re-writeable (RW). A proposal submitted in other than read-only memory format will not be evaluated. Changes, as a result of negotiations, shall be conformed on CD-ROMs/DVDs and have changed information clearly marked by a vertical line in the right margin. Modeling and

Simulation data must be provided on separate CD-ROMs/DVDs and marked accordingly directly onto the media (i.e. permanent marker) NOTE: The submission of Modeling and Simulation data is required only if deviating from Guide requirements set forth in the performance specifications and is required to be submitted with product sample. These media discs must not have adhesive labels attached. All appropriate markings including those prescribed IAW FAR 52.215-1, Restriction on Disclosure and Use of Data, and FAR 3.104, Disclosure, Protection, and Marking of Contractor's Bid or Proposal Information, Source Selection Information, and classification will be applied.

(b) For the electronic copy, indicate on each CD-ROM/DVD the volume number and title.

Use separate files to permit rapid location of all portions, including sub-factors, exhibits, annexes, and attachments, if any. Each volume shall be in a different directory on a CD. If files are compressed, the necessary decompression program must be included. The electronic copies of the proposal shall be submitted in a format readable by Microsoft (MS) Office Word 2007, MS Office Excel 2007, MS Office Project 2007, MS Office Power Point 2007, and Portable

Document Format (PDF) (Adobe Acrobat) as applicable. Video files should not be embedded in other files. Each volume shall contain a more detailed table of contents to delineate the subparagraphs within that volume. Each volume shall contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used, with an explanation for each.

(c) Submit Picture documentation in Joint Photographic Experts Group (*.jpg) or Portable

Network Group (*.png) compatible format.

(d) Submit Video media in Microsoft Windows Media File (*.wmv) compatible format.

L.2 PROPOSAL CONTENT

L.2.1 PHASE I (A-C)

L.2.1.1 VOLUME 1 - GO/NO-GO Product Sample (PS)

GO/NO-GO Criteria. This solicitation requires a PS and contains GO/NOGO criteria. Offerors shall submit three (3) functional PS’s of their best product design as it exists at the time of the proposal submission due date for Government testing/evaluation. Be advised that the PS shall be functional for the PS evaluation as a stand-alone solution. The PS shall include an operator’s manual or quick reference guide explaining operation of the ASR, not limited to assembly/disassembly and cleaning procedures. All items submitted with the PS will be used for both GO/NO-GO testing and if applicable, follow-on PS evaluation testing. The PS shall be delivered at no expense to the Government and will be returned at the contractor’s expense in the condition that it completes the evaluation process. The Government shall not remit any payments for an offerors submitted PS’s. The offeror shall deliver PS in casings which adequately secure and protect their PS while transporting and for storage during all phases of evaluation as stated in this solicitation. Offerors’ shall submit a PS that meets the GO/NO GO criteria as stated in

Attachment 03 of this solicitation.

L.2.2 PHASE I (D)

L.2.2.1 VOLUME 1 - FACTOR 1 – TECHNICAL

L.2.2.1.1 Sub-factor 1: Technical Approach, Configuration Management, Quality Assurance, and Delivery Schedule and Production Capability/Capacity

1. Technical Approach – Offerors shall provide responses to the performance specification and demonstrate how the solution intends to meet all requirements, identify areas of non-compliance and risk. These identified area shall be accompanied by an acceptable mitigation strategy which is able to manage and/or overcome the shortfalls to deliver a timely quality product. The Offeror may propose to the objective specifications and describe how the solution demonstrates its capabilities as advantageous to the Government. Proposals that merely restate RFP requirements without sufficient evidence to support the offeror’s ability to meet the requirements may receive a less than acceptable rating for that requirement.

2. Configuration Management Approach - The proposal shall include a Configuration

Management Plan. The offeror’s identification of high risk areas and solutions or mitigation strategies are clearly described by providing supporting documentation regarding proposed solutions/actions to avoid high risk areas/actions to minimize performance risk. The contractor’s ability to manage changes to the system configuration, document those changes and notify the USG will be evaluated.

3. Quality Assurance - The proposal shall include a Quality Assurance Plan (QAP).

The QAP will demonstrate the offeror’s ability to deliver a reliable product and how corrective action will be implemented during the production process to ensure that the product(s) will continue to meet contract requirements, comply with applicable regulations and meet environmental objectives throughout production life-cycle. The

Quality Assurance Plan will detail all in-process inspections, Acceptable Quality

Levels (AQLs), actual sample audits from inspection of raw materials through packaging of the final product, copies of ISO 9001:2008 certifications (or equivalent

Quality Management System); and significant partners or subcontractors shall provide ISO 9001:2008 certifications (or equivalent Quality Management System).

4. Delivery Schedule and Production Capability/Capacity - The Offeror shall complete RFP Section F FAR clause 52.211-9. The proposal shall thoroughly discuss and clearly demonstrate the offeror’s ability to meet the proposed delivery schedule and the impact facilities, equipment and personnel has on the desired, required and proposed delivery schedules. The proposal shall clearly demonstrate the offeror’s monthly capacity and clearly explain its ability to handle ASR production. The offeror shall discuss in detail the proposed warranty. The offeror’s submission of PS will be used along with the offeror’s written proposal demonstrating compliance with performance specification requirements.

L.2.3 VOLUME 2 - FACTOR 2 - PAST PERFORMANCE

L.2.3.1 Contents. The offeror shall submit a Past Performance Proposal (Volume 2) containing the following:

1. Table of Contents

2. Summary Page describing the role of the offeror and each subcontractor, teaming partner, and/or joint venture partner that the offeror is required to provide Past

Performance Information Sheets IAW paragraph L.2.3.2 below.

3. Past Performance Information Sheets, paragraph L.2.3.2 below.

4. Consent Letters executed by each subcontractor, teaming partner, and/or joint venture partner, authorizing release of adverse past performance information so the offeror can respond to such information.

L.2.3.2 Past and Present Performance Information Sheets. Submit information on contracts considered most recent (within the last three years) and relevant (see paragraph L.2.3.4) in demonstrating the ability to perform the proposed effort. The offeror shall submit a maximum of three (3) and a minimum of one (1) Performance Information Sheets identifying active or completed contracts, either Government or commercial, for each prime, and a maximum of three

(3) and a minimum of one (1) Past Performance Information Sheet for each major subcontractor, teaming partner, and/or joint venture (”major” is defined as those subcontractors, teaming partners, or joint ventures who are projected to perform 25% or more of the total contract effort).

The Government defines “recent” as contracts that have been performed during the past three years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. Performance Information Sheets for each contract is limited to five (5) pages (does not include organizational history and any

Organizational Structure Change History, SF 294, Subcontracting Report for Individual

Contracts, SF 295, Summary Subcontract Report, or audit data). Offerors are cautioned that the

Government will use the information provided by each offeror in this volume and information obtained from other sources for the overall evaluation of past and present performance. The

Government requests the offeror provide references including current points of contact (POCs) for each contract identified. Contact information for each POC and reference shall include both a phone number and email address.

L.2.3.3 Offerors shall submit information on contracts that are considered relevant in demonstrating the ability to perform the proposed overall effort in the information sheets.

Information sheets shall include specific information for each effort regarding experience IAW the following areas outlined below. NOTE: If the experience in the following areas was not required under the referenced contract, the offeror shall also indicate that it was not applicable or relevant on the Information Sheet. Offerors should clearly:

1. Provide a brief narrative for each contract or subcontract listed. Explain the nature of the work involved and the extent the work involved was/is similar to the ASR effort in terms of technical requirements, operations, contract scope, schedule, and risk.

2. Demonstrate the ability to deliver production items IAW established delivery schedules.

3. Provide examples of reasonable and cooperative behavior with previous customers.

4. Describe times of commitment to customer satisfaction or customer service.

5. Provide an explanation of any technical issue(s) for each contract that resulted in a failure and/or production stoppage.

6. Provide a copy of any Government Stop Work, Cure, Show Cause or Termination

Notices.

L.2.3.4 Relevant Contracts. Relevancy will be determined based on contract references reflecting past and present performance over the past three years which is relevant to the following:

L.2.3.4.1 For the prime offerors, relevancy is defined as contracts that are most similar to this overall effort. Relevant contracts that qualify are precision rifle sales to state and federal law enforcement and military customers to include foreign entities. Some of the factors in determining relevancy include but are not limited to: (1) Technical and (2) Program

Management, the diversity of required expertise, scope of performance, magnitude, project complexity, security classification requirements, business management and control processes, contract type(s), number of employees required, special operations support, other DoD support, and some major functional areas as the weapons and suppressors, etc. The more the overall effort is similar in all areas, the more relevant it becomes.

L.2.3.4.2 For proposed subcontractors/teaming partners, relevancy is defined by that which reflects experience in the area of expertise the subcontractor is projected to actually perform under the weapons program, (i.e. specific areas in the Performance Specification).

L.2.3.4.3 When making the relevancy determination the definitions contained within Table L-2 below will be utilized.

Table L-2: Relevancy Criteria Table

Very Relevant (VR)

Past Performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant (R)

Past Performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant (SR)

Past Performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant (NR)

Past Performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

L.2.3.5 No Relevant Contracts. If an offeror does not have any recent/relevant contracts it must be clearly noted in the proposal as such.

L.2.4 VOLUME 3 - FACTOR 3 – PRICE

L.2.4.1 The offeror shall complete the pricing in the Schedule for all Contract Line Item Number

Structure CLINS considering pricing for economic order quantities (e.g., 1-99, 100 – 350, 351 –

5,500, etc.). Offerors shall propose range/stepladder order quantities and unit pricing for all

CLINS and maximize economies of scale. Offerors shall provide pricing for the entire 5 year ordering period. The price volume shall describe all the elements that were used to develop the fully loaded rate.

L.2.4.2 The proposal shall provide an estimated cost for each report/data identified in the

Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) even though they are not separately priced. The

Department of Defense (DoD) requires estimates of data in order to evaluate the cost to the

Government of data items in terms of their management, product, or engineering value in accordance with DFARS 215.470. Cost for each “not separately priced” data submission shall include a basis of estimated and be provided IAW 5652.215-9005 Estimated Prices for Data

(2000) for evaluation purposes.

L.2.4.3 VOLUME 4 - CONTRACT DOCUMENTATION & ATTACHMENTS

The proposal shall include a completed and signed copy of the Standard Form (SF) 33 to include

Sections A through K with appropriate “fill-ins” completed and each amendment, if applicable, either acknowledged (SF 33 block 14) or signed and returned.

L.2.4.4 Representations, Certifications, and other Statements of Offerors. The offeror shall provide completed representations, certifications, acknowledgments, and statements requiring explanation or instruction.

L.2.4.5 Exceptions to Solicitation Requirements. Proposals are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors. Proposals must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide accompanying rationale. Each exception shall be specifically related to each paragraph and/or specific part of the solicitation to which the exception is taken. Provide rationale in support of the exception and fully explain its impact, if any, on the performance, schedule, price, and specific requirements of the solicitation. The proposal shall be consistent across all volumes (i.e., the Price volume must be consistent with the Technical Volume and shall reflect the understanding and ability to perform according to the performance specification of the contract). Any apparent inconsistency between the promised performance and Price must be explained.

(End of provision)

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

SECTION M

Section M

ADDENDUM to 52.212-2 -- EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

M.1 BASIS FOR AWARD

M.1.1 The Government may award a single five year Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity

(IDIQ) type contract with Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Contract Line Items (CLINs) or make multiple contract awards resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror(s) conforming to the solicitation who is determined to represent the best value with appropriate consideration given to the major Factors listed in descending order of importance: Technical, Past Performance, and

Price. Technical is significantly more important than Past Performance, which is significantly more important than Price. When combined, Technical and Past Performance are significantly more important than Price. The Government reserves the right to not make any awards.

Table M-1: Evaluation Methodology

Proposal Submissions Evaluation Method GO / NO GO Criteria Pass/Fail Technical Factor 1 Color/Risk

Past Performance Factor 2 Confidence Rating Price Factor 3 Total Price (All Years) Contract Documentation & Attachments Acceptable/Unacceptable

Evaluation of offers will be taken into consideration the advantages and disadvantages to the

Government that might result from making an award, particularly the risk to the Government from a technical integration, logistics, and administrative cost perspective. The Government will make appropriate tradeoffs when required and select the proposal that is most advantageous to the Government.

Offerors are cautioned that an award may not necessarily be made to the lowest price offeror. If multiple awards are made, contractors will be provided a fair opportunity to compete for delivery orders. Each proposal will be evaluated on technical merit and best overall value to the

Government, price and other factors considered.

The Government may award a contract on the basis of initial offers received, without discussions. Therefore, each initial offer should contain the offeror’s best terms from a cost or price and technical standpoint. Absent an immediate award, a competitive range determination will be made in accordance with FAR 15.306(c) to limit discussions to the number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated offerors.

Proposals shall provide adequate information to enable the Government evaluators to determine the offeror’s capability to meet the Government’s requirements. Any exceptions to the solicitation's terms and conditions must be fully explained and justified. Offeror’s are cautioned that mere repetition or parroting of the Government’s requirements without explanation or demonstration of how the proposal shall meet the Government’s requirements may be considered a deficiency. Offerors are cautioned that a deficiency in the area, factor, sub-factor, or element of evaluation may be grounds for exclusion of the proposal from further consideration for award.

M.1.2 EVALUATION PHASES, FACTORS AND SUBFACTORS

PHASE I (A-C): GO/NO GO PS’s - Measurements, Technical Testing and Destructive

Testing

PHASE I (D). Only the proposal(s) evaluated as passing the Go/No-Go Criteria in Phase I A-C will be evaluated in Phase I D. The Technical Factor (Factor 1) is significantly more important than the Past Performance Factor (Factor 2), Past Performance Factor (Factor 2) is significantly more important than the Price Factor (Factor 3).

Factor 1 –TECHNICAL Technical Approach, Configuration Management, Quality Assurance, Delivery Schedule and

Production Capacity/Capability

Factor 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE

Factor 3 – PRICE

M.2. EVALUATION CRITERIA

M.2.1 PHASE I (A-C)

M.2.1.1 VOLUME 1 - GO/NO-GO PS. Phase I (A-C) is a Go/No-Go evaluation conducted in accordance with RFP Attachment 03, Go/No-Go Matrix criteria. The Government will evaluate the content of the offeror’s Go/No-Go proposal and PS to determine whether it meets the

Government requirements in accordance with the criteria identified in Request for Proposal

(RFP). Any proposal not meeting all Go/No-Go Criteria characteristics constitutes failure of the entire proposal and shall be removed from further consideration of award without Phase I (D)

Government evaluation. At the first point of failure, offerors proposal will be removed from further consideration. Only proposals passing all the Go/No-Go criteria will be considered for a

Phase I (D) evaluation.

M.2.2 PHASE I (D)

M.2.2.1 VOLUME 1 - FACTOR 1: TECHNICAL

Technical Approach, Configuration Management, Quality Assurance, and Delivery Schedule and

Production Capability/Capacity

1. Technical Approach. The Government will evaluate offeror’s proposal based on the extent to which the offeror capabilities meet the performance specification and the extent to which the bid sample articles met or exceeded the go/no-go test criteria. The Government will determine the extent to which the proposal meets the requirements and to what degree the proposed approach indicates an understanding of the requirements per the definitions contained within

Table M-3. The Technical Factor proposals shall be evaluated and rated using the evaluation ratings of a combined technical rating and risk rating. If information regarding evaluation factors is contained elsewhere in the proposal the Government will evaluate such information, but the Government has no responsibility to research and find improperly referenced information.

The Offeror shall submit a Cross Reference Matrix (CRM) for the Technical Volume, similar to the example below, to help ensure that all solicitation requirements are addressed and to facilitate the Government’s review of the Offeror’s proposal. The CRM should be a single integrated matrix and cross-reference the proposal volume and paragraphs to specific RFP requirements, as well as other parts of the proposal that contain relevant information. The Offeror’s CRM may be identical to the example below or revised such as to add columns to indicate the page number on which information may be found, identify where other relevant information in the proposal is located, or provide other comments. The CRM does not count against any of the proposal page limitations.

Table M-2: Example of a Cross Reference Matrix (CRM)

Section L.

Proposal Inst

Government Performance

Specification

Section M.

Evaluation

Factor

Offeror’s

Proposal

Reference

CLIN

Reference

Volume I

Technical

Example: Para 3.1 Note: This column addresses all paragraphs in

Section’s xx and yy of the P-Spec

2.A Refer to proposal page # and para

CLIN 0001

2. Configuration Management. The configuration management plan will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the offeror’s potential to successfully complete this contract. The contractor’s ability to manage changes to the system configuration, document those changes and notify the USG will be evaluated. The system or methods to document, approve and distribute these CM changes both internally and externally, will be evaluated. The offeror’s identification of high risk areas and solutions or mitigation strategies which are clearly described by providing supporting documentation regarding proposed solutions/actions to avoid high risk areas/actions to minimize performance risk will be evaluated.

3. Quality Assurance. The Government will evaluate the extent to which the offeror’s proposed Quality Assurance Plan meets the requirements in the performance specification and solicitation. The plan will be evaluated for its maturity and effectiveness at assuring defect free products are manufactured and delivered to the

Government throughout the life of the contract. The inspection plans, Acceptable Quality

Levels (AQLs), and audits will be evaluated to ensure clear and effective procedures are in place that can distinguish a conforming product from a non-conforming product.

Inspections will be further evaluated to ensure that the offeror has a clear and systemic process in place to aid in the inspection of materials, production lines, and implementing corrective actions. The Government will evaluate the submitted ISO 9001:2008 (or equivalent Quality Management System) certifications to ensure validity and currency from the prime Offeror, significant partners, and subcontractors.

4. Delivery Schedule and Production Capacity/Capability. The offeror’s proposal will be evaluated by the extent to which the offeror has described the necessary facilities, resources and processes in place to consistently, continually, and successfully manage, manufacture, and make required on-time delivery in accordance with the requirements of this RFP throughout the contract period of performance and any warranty periods.

Table M-3: Combined Technical (Color) and Risk Ratings

Color Rating Description

Blue Outstanding Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low. Purple Good Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Green Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Yellow Marginal Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high. Red Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies. Proposal is un-awardable.

M.2.3. VOLUME 2 - FACTOR 2: PAST PERFORMANCE. The Past Performance evaluation considers the offeror’s (including prime and subcontractor) demonstrated record of performance in providing similar and/or related contracts, in terms of size, scope, and technical complexity, for the last three years. Emphasis will be placed on recent, relevant experience as defined in Section L. During the source selection process, the Government will assess the relative risk associated with each offeror’s past performance.

M.2.3.1 The Government will conduct an in-depth review and evaluation of all performance data obtained to determine how closely the work performed under those efforts relates to the current requirement. The performance evaluation will be based on the data gathered by information sheets, questionnaires, Electronic Subcontracting Evaluation System (eSRS) data base, and/or the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) reports as available through the Past Performance Retrieval System (PPIRS), and Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity

Information System (FAPIIS). The Government is not limited to these resources. Offerors are cautioned that the Government may also use data obtained from other sources. Since the

Government may not necessarily interview all of the sources provided by the offerors, it is incumbent upon the offeror to explain the relevance of the data provided. Offerors are reminded that while the Government may elect to consider data obtained from other sources, the burden of proving good past performance rests with the offeror. If no relevant historical or current data exists then the procedures of FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv) will apply.

M.2.3.2 The Government will evaluate the past performance efforts (that meet the recency and relevancy criteria in Section L) in order to determine the Government’s overall level of confidence in the offeror’s ability to successfully perform the required effort. In the

Government’s evaluation of the offeror’s proposal, the following aspects will be considered:

Schedule Planning and Control, Quality Assurance, and Customer Service. This includes administrative aspects of performance, offeror’s history for reasonable and cooperative behavior, and commitment to customer satisfaction and the offeror’s professionalism and concern for customer interests, as well as, the offeror’s ability to meet delivery schedules. The results of this evaluation will form the basis of the offeror’s Confidence Rating. The Confidence Ratings with definitions that will be utilized are contained within the DoD Source Selection Procedures dated

01 May 2016. The definitions found in Table M-4 will be utilized.

Table M-4: Performance Confidence Assessments

M.2.3.3 Contractor must clearly state in the proposal if they have no relevant prior past performance. If left blank, the proposal will be considered deficient and may be excluded from further consideration for award.

M.2.4 VOLUME 3 - FACTOR 3: PRICE EVALUATION. Price will be evaluated in order to determine that it is complete and balanced, as well as fair and reasonable IAW FAR 15.404 to include ensuring it is commensurate with the Technical proposal and the price is not unrealistically low or unreasonably high without valid explanation.

M.2.4.1 Total Evaluated Price (TEP) Price will not receive a color rating or score. A TEP will be calculated for evaluation purposes and the proposal will be evaluated for completeness, realism, and reasonableness.