Attachment_12_Past_Performance_Questionnaire__17Nov15.doc

Past Performance Questionnaire

Non-Standard Commercial Vehicles (NSCV)

H92222-15-R-0037

The purpose of this questionnaire is to obtain an evaluation of past performance on a contract that has been completed or is currently being performed by the Contractor identified in Area 1 below. You have received this questionnaire because the Contractor selected you to provide this evaluation in response to a request by the United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) for past performance information. The information is to be provided directly to USSOCOM. Please return this questionnaire no later than 11 January 2016 to Ms. Michelle Cames, michelle.cames@socom.mil, and Mr. Michael White, michael.white@socom.mil.

1. CONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION

1. Contractor: __________________________

2. Program Title: _______________________

3. Contract Number: ____________________

4. Type of Contract: ___________________ Percent Complete: __________

5. Award Fee (if applicable):__________ Percent of Award Fee Received: ____________

Note: For prime contractors, higher relevancy will be assessed for contracts that are most similar to the effort i.e. system design and integration of modifications (suspension upgrades, armor, electrical modifications) to commercial vehicles which are required to meet Special Operations mission profile; production/assembly of various variants of modified commercial vehicles (pick-up trucks and sport utility vehicle).

If you have any knowledge of other contracts for the identified contractor, you are requested to complete a questionnaire for each contract or subcontract similar to this acquisition.

2. RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION

1. Name: __________________________________________________

2. Agency: ________________________________________________

3. Position: ________________________________________________

4. Relation to Program: ______________________________________

5. Phone/Fax Number/Email Address: ___________________________

3. PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS

1. Please provide a short description of the subject contract.

4. PERFORMANCE LEVELS

1. PERFORMANCE GRADES (Use these grades to provide the overall rating where requested below).

5. QUESTIONS

1. TECHNICAL AND QUALITY PERFORMANCE

a. What kind of technical and/or production performance problems or strengths were experienced by the contractor?

b. Did the contractor fulfill the requirements of the PWS/SOW? Please explain.

c. What kind of repair and return and/or logistical problems or strengths were experienced by the contractor?

d. Has the contractor experienced any technical certification issues or have any significant strengths related to certification of capabilities with other government organizations?

e. What was the cause of these problems or strengths?

f. To what extent have corrective actions been taken to correct problem(s) identified above and to what extent have the corrective actions been effective? Describe the progress made to date. Also explain to what extent the corrective actions addressed the root cause of the problem(s) and led to systemic improvement such that similar problems would not reoccur.

g. Overall, the contractor's technical and/or production performance is rated: _________________________

2. SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE

a. Did the contractor provide accurate, current, and complete data and reports that met the required timeline?

b. What kinds of delivery/schedule problems or strengths were experienced by the contractor?

c. What was the cause of these delivery/schedule problems or strengths?

d. To what extent have corrective actions been taken to correct problem(s) identified above and to what extent have the corrective actions been effective? Describe the progress made to date.

e. Overall, the contractor's delivery/schedule performance is rated: ____________

3. COST PERFORMANCE

a. What kinds of Cost problems or strengths were experienced by the contractor?

b. If the contractor experienced an overrun please provide the percentage. _______

c. What was the cause of these Cost problems or strengths?

d. To what extent have corrective actions been taken to correct problem(s) identified above and to what extent have the corrective actions been effective? Describe the progress made to date.

e. Overall, the contractor's Cost performance is rated ________________

4. MANAGEMENT

a. Was the contractor’s management team responsive and professional? I.e. Did they effectively solve problems? How involved was the KO/PM in day to day issues to resolve contractor issues? Did the contractor management get issues resolved at the lowest levels?

b. Was the contractor able to complete their responsibilities relating to the contract with minimal layers of ineffective management and oversight?

c. What was the contractor's record of timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals (especially responses to change orders, engineering change proposals, or other undefinitized contract actions), and the contractor's history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, effective business relations, and customer satisfaction?

5. SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT

a. What was the contractor's success with timely award and management of subcontracts, including whether the contractor met or exceeded small business, small disadvantaged business, small business HUB Zone, veteran-owned small business, service disabled veteran owned small business, women-owned small business participation, and subcontracting goals?

6. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND OTHER MANAGEMENT

a. To what extent does the contractor discharge their responsibility for integration and coordination of all activity needed to execute the contract; identify and apply resources required to meet schedule requirements; assign responsibilities for tasks/actions required by contract; and communicate appropriate information to affected program elements in a timely manner?

b. What were the contractor's risk management practices, especially the ability to identify risks and formulate and implement risk mitigation plans?

c. Was the contractor flexible in responding to changing needs, including surge/sag capacity and reach back capability for subject matter experts and key personnel?

d. Did the contractor display streamlined decision making while maintaining accountability? Please explain.

e. If applicable, identify and provide information on any other areas that are unique to the contract, or that cannot be captured elsewhere under the Management Assessment.

7. Overall Management Assessment

a. Overall, the contractor's management performance is rated: ________

8. OTHER

a. Is there any other information regarding this acquisition that you think would be helpful to our evaluation? If so please explain. Examples of additional information that could be helpful to our evaluation include information on (1) problems or strengths with regard to key personnel and (2) the kind of business relationship problems or strengths with regard to management of subcontracts, cooperation with business partners/customers, customer satisfaction, etc.

6. SUMMARY

1. If you were given the choice, knowing what you know today, would you (pick one), 1)Definitely would not, 2) probably would not, 3) might, 4) might not,5) probably would, 6) definitely would award this contract to this contractor? Please explain.

PPQ-1

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

DefinitionsRatings

Exceptional/blue Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

Very Good/Purple Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

Satisfactory/Green Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Unsatisfactory/Red Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.