GS08P14JAD0019_Attachment_01_and_Attachment_02.docx
DOCX document 16 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- GS-08P-14-JA-D-0019
About this file
GS08P14JAD0019 Attachment 01 and Attachment 02
View the file
Other files
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Operations, Maintenance and Repair Services 2014 Denver Federal Center Team 4 Buildings and Cesar E. Chavez Memorial Building Solicitation Number GS-08P-14-JA-D-0019
Attachment 01: Past Performance/Experience Offerors shall complete this page prior to submitting it to the selected Evaluator. Offeror shall provide the following information for each contract/task order submitted for Past Performance evaluation factor.
Offeror Name _________________________________ Evaluation Project # ____
Name of Project ________________________________________________________ Contract/Task Order Number ___________________________________________________ Type of Contract (i.e. Firm-Fixed Price, IDIQ, etc.) ___________________________________ Place of Performance ___________________________________________________________
Approximate Individual Building Square Footage for Each Building ______________________ Multiple Buildings: YES ______ NO ______ How Many Buildings? ______________ Approximate Combined Square Footage (if Multiple Buildings) ____________________________
Award Date _____________________________ Period of Performance ______________________________________ Percentage of work performed as Prime Contractor ___________%
How does this contract/task order the meet similar complexity definition?
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________How does this contract/task order meet the similar in scope definition? _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Attachment 02: Past Performance Evaluation Form Evaluators shall complete survey and submit directly to Jill C. Long, GSA Contracting Officer, at jill.long@gsa.gov.
Contractor’s Name: ________________________________________________________________ Evaluator Name and Title: _________________________________________________________________________ Evaluator Phone Number: __________________________________________________________________ Evaluator Email Address: ___________________________________________________________________ Do you concur with the information provided by the Offeror on Attachment 01, Past Performance/Experience Project, with regards to this evaluation? YES _____ NO _____ If no, please clarify discrepancy: ____________________________________________ PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 5 that most accurately describes the Contractor’s performance.
| 5 |
| 4 |
| 3 |
| 2 |
| 1 |
| Excellent |
| Very Good |
| Average |
| Marginal |
| Poor |
1. QUALITY
| Contractor implemented effective quality control procedures to meet contract/task order requirements. |
| 5 |
| 4 |
| 3 |
| 2 |
| 1 |
Would you please explain why you gave them that rating?
2. TIMELINESS
| Contractor performed Operations and Maintenance Services in a timely manner. |
| 5 |
| 4 |
| 3 |
| 2 |
| 1 |
Would you please explain why you gave them that rating?
3. Problem Resolution
| Contractor was able to resolve problems effectively. |
| 5 |
| 4 |
| 3 |
| 2 |
| 1 |
Would you please explain why you gave them that rating?
4. OVERALL CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
| Contractor’s overall performance was satisfactory? |
| 5 |
| 4 |
| 3 |
| 2 |
| 1 |
Would you please explain why you gave them that rating?
Would you contract with this company again? YES _____ NO _____
Why or why not? _________________________________________________________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .