IN0096ZZ_-_R._Grant_FB_&_CTHSE_-_Asbestos_&_Lead_Based_Paint_Report_2007_(1).pdf

General Services Administration Building

Chicago, IL

Asbestos-Containing Material and Lead-Based Paint Survey Summary Report

Robert A. Grant Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse 204 South Main Street South Bend, Indiana

Prepared By

Carnow, Conibear & Assoc., Ltd.

300 West Adams Street, Suite 1200 Chicago, IL 60606

Table of Contents

Executive Summary……………………………………………………

1.0 Introduction ……………………………………………………

2.0 Building Description ……………………………………………

3.0 Asbestos Survey Protocol

3.1 Asbestos Survey…………………………………………….. 4

3.2 Asbestos Analysis…………………………………………… 5

3.3 Asbestos Survey Results……………………………………. 5

4.0 Lead Paint Survey

4.1 Lead Paint Survey ………………………………………….. 7

4.2 Lead Paint Analysis ………………………………………… 7

4.2 Lead Paint Survey Results………………………………….. 7

5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations

6.0 Study Limitations………………………………………………….. 9

7.0 Signature and Quality Control Page

Table 1 - Asbestos Inventory and Analytical Summary

Table 2 - Asbestos Containing Materials

Table 3 - Lead Paint Inventory Summary

Attachments

Attachment A - Facility Maps: Locations of ACM

Attachment B - Asbestos and Lead Laboratory Analytical Reports

Attachment C - Photographs

Attachment D - Field Notes

Attachment E - Cost Estimate

ACM and LBP Survey Summary Report Page 1 October 2007 Robert A. Grant Federal Building and US Courthouse

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Carnow, Conibear & Assoc., Ltd. conducted an asbestos containing material and lead-based paint survey at the Robert A. Grant Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse located at 204 South Main Street, South Bend, Indiana. The building was inspected by licensed and certified asbestos building inspector Heather Eckard on August 21, 2007. The asbestos survey was conducted in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.1101, 40 CFR Part 61, and applicable state and local requirements.

The asbestos containing material portion of the survey included identifying suspect friable and non-friable asbestos containing building materials (ACBM) and assessing the friability, assessing the current condition and potential for future disturbance, quantifying the suspect asbestos containing materials, and rating the overall condition of the materials. A total of thirty-six (36) bulk samples were collected from the building interior. A total of thirty-six (36) samples were analyzed for asbestos content by Davis Environmental Labs, Inc., located in Evanston, Illinois.

Asbestos was found in the following materials:

• Aircell Pipe Insulation

• Fittings Associated with Aircell Pipe Insulation

• Paperwrap Pipe Insulation

• Fittings Associated with Paperwrap Pipe Insulation

The following materials were not tested at the time of the inspection and should be assumed to contain asbestos until they can be tested.

• Vibration Damper

• Roofing Materials

• Elevator Outer Shell Materials

Based upon the results of lead-based paint (LBP) testing, LBP was identified on the following components:

• Brown on Exterior Wood Window Sill

• Beige on Plaster Wall

ACM and LBP Survey Summary Report Page 2 October 2007

1.0 INTRODUCTION

On behalf of the General Service Administration (GSA), Carnow, Conibear & Assoc., Ltd. (CARNOW CONIBEAR) conducted a survey of suspect asbestos containing materials (ACM) and lead-based paint (LBP) at the Robert A. Grant Federal Building and US Courthouse located at 204 South Main Street in South Bend, Indiana. This project was conducted in accordance with CARNOW CONIBEAR’s proposal to the GSA dated June 26, 2007.

The asbestos containing material portion of the project included conducting an AHERA-type building inspection for ACM and preparing an asbestos management plan to fulfill asbestos requirements as specified in 29 CFR Part 1910.1001 (OSHA Asbestos Standard) and the requirements of the Program Development Study (PDS) task for the GSA Prospectus Work.

Heather Eckard, EPA certified Asbestos Building Inspector (IDPH license # 100-10397), performed the inspection and collected the bulk samples of the friable and non-friable suspect ACM. The inspection team and GSA field manager, Mr. Phil Ramos, were escorted through the facility by the GSA Building Manager. The ACM survey included an inspection of the facility to determine the amount, condition, and general location of suspect ACM, and the collection of bulk samples for laboratory analysis. The bulk samples were analyzed by polarized light microscopy (PLM) by Davis Environmental Labs., located in Evanston, Illinois. CARNOW CONIBEAR inspectors reviewed existing documents, drawings, and historical reports, when available, and incorporated all data and assumptions into this report.

As part of the LBP survey, the CARNOW CONIBEAR field team collected paint chips representative of interior building substrates, including interior walls and ceilings. The LBP survey was limited to readily accessible surfaces of painted interior building components. The LBP survey activities included visual observations of interior painted surfaces and substrates of fixed building components and analysis of the painted surfaces.

The analysis of painted surfaces was conducted by STAT Analysis Corporation utilizing flame Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS). It should be noted that the LBP survey was not intended to be comprehensive in nature: rather an attempt to evaluate lead content within the predominant paint types within the building.

ACM and LBP Survey Summary Report Page 3 October 2007

2.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION

The subject site’s address, 204 South Main Street, is within a business area of downtown South Bend, in St. Joseph County, Indiana. The subject site consists of a rectangular lot approximately 160 feet by 190 feet in size (approximately 0.69 acres), and is bounded by East Jefferson Boulevard to the north, West Main Street to the west, and alleyways to the east and south. The site contains the Robert A. Grant Federal Building and Courthouse, a three (3) floor federal court house and office building with one (1) basement floor with an interior parking lot, one (1) mezzanine, and a mechanical penthouse. The building was originally constructed in 1933, replacing building utilized by the post office and the Indiana Club. The building’s heating has been provided by natural gas-powered boilers and coal prior to that.

ACM and LBP Survey Summary Report Page 4 October 2007

3.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY PROTOCOL

3.1 Asbestos Survey

The ACM survey included an inspection of suspect friable and non-friable asbestos materials through-out the facility. Friable materials (such as thermal system pipe insulation (TSI)) are those which, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure, thereby releasing airborne fibers. Non-friable materials, such as floor tile, are those typically bound within a matrix, which do not readily release airborne fibers.

CARNOW CONIBEAR inspectors met with building representatives, reviewed drawings and historical data, and assigned Homogeneous Sampling Areas (HSA’s) based on the type of material, category, and appearance. The inventory of suspect materials identified during the walk-through includes a description of the material, location, condition, accessibility, and friability can be found in Table 1 - Asbestos Inventory and Analytical Summary.

Suspect ACM identified and sampled by CARNOW CONIBEAR as part of this survey included:

• Fittings Associated w/ Aircell Pipe Insulation

• 2’x4’ Smooth Ceiling Tiles

• 2’x4’ Ceiling Tiles w/ Holes

• Plaster

• Spray on Insulation

• Fiberglass Wall Paneling

• 2’x2’ Ceiling Tiles w/ Holes

• 2’x2’ Rough Ceiling Tiles

• White Sink Undercoating

Additional materials were identified during the survey; however these materials were not sampled and should be assumed to contain asbestos. The assumed materials were assessed as part of this survey and have been included in the report inventory.

Suspect ACM identified and assumed to contain asbestos included:

• Roof Material

• Elevator Outside Shell Materials

ACM and LBP Survey Summary Report Page 5 October 2007

The ACM survey only included identification of suspect ACM and did not include materials that are considered non-suspect in nature (e.g. fiberglass, concrete, wood, terrazzo, etc.) Per GSA, unique newly installed floor coverings were assumed NON-asbestos containing (see Table 1 for additional information).

CARNOW CONIBEAR inspectors walked through the building, inventoried suspect materials and quantities, took photographs, and wrote a narrative description of each suspect material. CARNOW CONIBEAR inspectors reviewed existing documents, drawings, and historical reports, when available, and incorporated as much data from the survey to create a building specific sampling plan. CARNOW CONIBEAR then collected the required number of samples and photographed each HSA. Photographs are located in Appendix C.

CARNOW CONIBEAR collected a total of thirty-six (36) bulk samples from various accessible materials during the survey. See Table 1 for a detailed description of the materials and analytical data. CARNOW CONIBEAR exercised care in selecting the locations from which the samples were collected. Each sample was immediately placed in a zip lock sample bag to reduce the possibility of fiber release and cross-contamination during sampling and shipment. Each collected sample was documented on a chain of custody sheet and relinquished to the asbestos laboratory by the inspector.

3.2 Asbestos Analysis

Bulk samples collected during the survey were submitted for analysis to Davis Environmental Labs, Inc. (DEL), of Evanston, Illinois. DEL is an American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) accredited laboratory that successfully participates in the National Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST) National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for asbestos bulk sample analysis.

CARNOW CONIBEAR collected a minimum of three bulk samples from each HSA.

Bulk samples were analyzed by polarized light microscopy (PLM) with dispersion staining and quantified in accordance with the Method for determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (USEPA Method 600/R-93/116).

3.3 Asbestos Survey Results

This section presents a summary of the analytical results of samples collected during the asbestos survey. Refer to Table 1 for further descriptions and additional information for the suspect materials identified during the survey. Facility maps which show the locations of materials can be found in Attachment A. The analytical laboratory report prepared by DEL for the analysis of bulk asbestos samples can be found in attachment B.

If a building material is determined to contain greater than or equal to 1% asbestos, it is considered to be ACM. If one sample in a HSA is determined to be positive for asbestos, the entire HSA is considered to be an ACM.

ACM and LBP Survey Summary Report Page 6 October 2007

Asbestos was identified in quantities greater than or equal to 1% in the following materials:

• Fittings Associated with Aircell Pipe Insulation

The following materials were not sampled at the time of the survey and are assumed to be

ACM:

• Roof Material

• Elevator Outside Shell Materials

The condition of the ACM observed at the time of the survey is listed in Table 1. Any materials encountered during the survey that could not be accessed or that would have required destructive sampling were not sampled. These materials include, but are not limited to roofing materials.

ACM and LBP Survey Summary Report Page 7 October 2007

4.0 LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY PROTOCOL

4.1 Lead Paint Survey

The lead based paint (LBP) survey included an inspection of the predominant types of paint within the building. Heather Eckard, an Illinois Department of Public Health licensed lead inspector/ risk assessor (IDPH license # L-10996), performed the inspection on August 21, 2007. During the survey of the building, CARNOW CONIBEAR collected two (2) samples for suspect LBP. (See Table 3 – Lead Paint Inventory Summary).

4.2 Lead Paint Analysis

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) defines LBP as any paint, varnish, shellac or other coating that contains lead in concentrations that are equal to or in excess of one milligram per square centimeter (1.0 mg/cm2), 0.5% by weight or 5,000 parts per million (ppm). The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) recognizes LBP as paint that contains any detectable amount of lead. Under OSHA, paints containing lead in concentrations less than the trigger level are subject to regulation under OSHA Lead in Construction; Interim Final Rule (29 CFR 1926.62).

Although the use of lead paint was banned in 1978 by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), consumer paints still contain up to 0.06% lead by weight or 600 ppm. Lead based paints are still commonly used in many applications.

4.3 Lead Paint Survey Results

Based upon results of the lead-based paint testing, LBP was identified on the following:

• Brown on Exterior Wood Window Sill

• Beige on Plaster Wall

See Table 3 – Lead Paint Inventory and Analytical Summary, for LBP descriptions, sample identification numbers and locations, and paint conditions. The analytical laboratory report for the analysis of paint chips can be found in Attachment B.

ACM and LBP Survey Summary Report Page 8 October 2007

5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMENDATIONS

CARNOW CONIBEAR recommends the following:

• Prior to Prospectus Design and & Construction work, additional building investigations should be conducted in order to ascertain quantities and to verify that conditions have not changed since the most recent inspection.

• GSA should notify employees, tenants, contractors, and vendors working in the building of the presence, quantity, and location of identified or assumed ACM.

• All friable ACM, damaged non-friable ACM, and all non-friable ACM which may become friable during renovation or demolition, should be removed from the affected areas of the building prior to these activities.

• Areas of the building not inspected during this investigation (inaccessible areas, pipe chases, etc.) should be inspected and sampled for asbestos prior to any renovation, demolition, or disturbance of potential ACM.

• The owner should develop and/or maintain an Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan for ACM remaining in the facility.

The EPA’s NESHAP (40 CFR Part 61) requires building owners to inspect of ACM in areas of a building where renovation or demolition will take place. Prior to renovation or demolition of a building, all regulated friable ACM must be removed from the affected area. In addition, non-friable materials, which are in a damaged condition or are likely to become friable during the process of renovation or demolition also, require removal. Non-friable materials, which are in good condition at the time of inspection and most likely will not become friable during demolition may under certain circumstances, remain in place prior to demolition.

Under current federal regulations, lead-based paint that is intact does not need to be removed prior to demolition, however, the contractor performing the demolition is required to comply with the OSHA Lead in Construction Standard (29 CFR 1926.62).

Demolition or salvage of structures where lead or materials containing lead are present is on section of OSHA Regulation (1926.62 (a)(1)). OSHA requires employers to conduct personal air monitoring during construction work where painted surfaces that contain detectable amounts of lead are impacted. OSHA defines construction work as work for the purposes of construction, alteration and/or repair (including repainting and decorating). The purpose of the exposure monitoring is to ensure that employees are not exposed to lead at concentrations that exceed the permissible exposure level (PEL) of fifty micrograms of lead per cubic meter of air (50 mg/m3) or the action level (AL) of thirty micrograms of lead per cubic meter of air (30 mg/m3) over an 8-hour period. Should the exposure exceed the AL or PEL over an 8-hour time period, the employer will be required to provide the employee with some or all of the following: appropriate respiratory protection, personal protective clothing, change areas, hand washing facilities, biological monitoring (blood sampling and analysis), and the proper training.

ACM and LBP Survey Summary Report Page 9 October 2007

6.0 STUDY LIMITATIONS

This report and all field data, notes, and laboratory test data were gathered and/or prepared by CARNOW CONIBEAR in accordance with the agreed-upon scope of work and generally accepted engineering and scientific practices in effect at the time of CARNOW CONIBEAR’s investigation of the building.

The statements, conclusions, and opinions contained in this report are only intended to give approximations of the environmental conditions of the site limited to the particular environmental issues actually targeted by CARNOW CONIBEAR’s investigation as agreed upon by the GSA and CARNOW CONIBEAR. This survey was conducted to fulfill the requirements of the Program Development Study (PDS) for the Prospectus Report and is not recommended to be used a guide to facilitate renovation, demolition, or removal of ACM or LBP. CARNOW CONIBEAR inspection team did not pull up all carpet or check above every ceiling tile throughout the building. The inspection team did not conduct any destructive sampling, nor sample materials that appeared to have historical value. CARNOW CONIBEAR’s inspection team assumed that certain portions of tenant build-out spaces were uniform with the remainder of the space in many areas.

There were many areas not made accessible to CARNOW CONIBEAR inspectors due to security issues or access limitations.

This report and supporting field data, notes, and laboratory test data, where applicable, where prepared or collected by CARNOW CONIBEAR for its client, to be utilized by GSA in the Program Development Study (PDS) for the Prospectus Report. CARNOW CONIBEAR’s client may release the information to third parties, who may use and rely upon the information at their discretion. However, any use or reliance upon the information by a party other than specifically named above shall be solely at the risk of such third party and without legal recourse against CARNOW CONIBEAR, or their respective employees, officers or directors, regardless of whether the action in which recovery of damage is sought based upon contract, tort (including the sole, concurrent, or other negligence and strict liability of CARNOW CONIBEAR), statute, or otherwise.

This information shall not be used or replied upon by a party that does not agree to be bound the above statement.

ACM and LBP Survey Summary Report Page 10 October 2007

7.0 SIGNATURE AND QUALITY CONTROL PAGE

BY:

DATE: October 2007

Lindsey Felker Report Author

TITLE: Industrial Hygiene Technician

QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW BY:

BY: DATE: October 2007 Heather Eckard

TITLE: Licensed Asbestos Building Inspector (IDPH #:100-10397)

Licensed Lead Inspector/ Risk Assessor (IDPH #: L-10996)

TABLE 1 – ASBESTOS INVENTORY AND ANALYTICAL

SUMMARY

Inspector:

Heather Eckard (IDPH #100-10397)

Building:

Robert A Grant Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse 204 South Main Street South Bend, Indiana

Survey Date: August 21, 2007

HSA ID Material Type Material Description Sample # Sample Location Condition Friability Accessibility Assessment Category Quantity Asbestos % & Type Notes

HSA-1-1 Basement Storage 5-10% Chrysotile HSA-1-2 Basement Storage 5-10% Chrysotile HSA-1-3 Basement Storage 5-10% Chrysotile HSA-2-1 Basement Storage 1-5% Chrysotile HSA-2-2 Basement Storage 1-5% Chrysotile HSA-2-3 Basement Storage 1-5% Chrysotile HSA-3-1 Stockpile ND HSA-3-2 Stockpile ND HSA-3-3 Stockpile ND HSA-4-1 Stockpile ND HSA-4-2 Stockpile ND HSA-4-3 Stockpile ND HSA-8-1 SW Stairway ND HSA-8-2 SW Stairway ND HSA-8-3 SW Stairway ND

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

HSA-13-1 Parking Garage ND HSA-13-2 Parking Garage ND HSA-13-3 Parking Garage ND

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

HSA-15-1 Penthouse ND HSA-15-2 Penthouse ND HSA-15-3 Penthouse ND HSA-16-1 Storage ND HSA-16-2 Storage ND HSA-16-3 Storage ND HSA-17-1 Storage ND HSA-17-2 Storage ND HSA-17-3 Storage ND

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

HSA-22-1 Mezzanine Level Break Room ND HSA-22-2 Mezzanine Level Break Room ND HSA-22-3 Mezzanine Level Break Room ND

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

HSA-25-1 Basement 1-5% Chrysotile HSA-25-2 Basement 1-5% Chrysotile HSA-25-3 Basement 1-5% Chrysotile

ACMFriable 2 X 3,000 lfHSA - 25 TSI Paperwrap Pipe Insulation 1

Assume Non-ACM per GSA

HSA - 24 MISC 12" x 12" Grey Mix Floor Tile Mastic 1 Non-Friable 1 X NQ Assume Non-ACM per GSA

Non-Friable 3 X NQHSA - 23 MISC 12" x 12" Grey Mix Floor Tile 1

Assume Non-ACM per GSA

HSA - 22 MISC White Sink Undercoating 1 Non-Friable 3 X NQ Non-ACM

Non-Friable 1 X NQHSA - 21 MISC 12" x 12" Light Blue Floor Tile Mastic 1

Assume Non-ACM per GSA

HSA - 20 MISC 12" x 12" Light Blue Floor Tile 1 Non-Friable 3 X NQ Assume Non-ACM per GSA

Non-Friable 1 X NQHSA - 19 MISC 12" x 12" Light Yellow Floor Tile Mastic 1

3 X NQ Assume Non-ACM per GSAMISC 12" x 12" Light Yellow Floor Tile 1 Non-Friable

Non-ACM

HSA - 17 MISC 2' x 2' Rough Ceiling Tile 1 Friable 2 X NQ Non-ACM

NQ Non-ACM

HSA - 16 MISC 2' x 2' with Holes Ceiling Tile 1 Friable 2 X NQ

1 Non-Friable 3 X

20 sf Assume ACMNon-Friable 3

3 X NQ

Friable 3 X NQ

Table 1: Asbestos Inventory and Analytical Summary

HSA - 11 MISC 12" x 12" Tan Mix Floor Tile 1 Assume Non-ACM per GSANon-Friable

Non-ACM Non-Friable 3

HSA - 13 SURF Spray-on Fireproofing

HSA - 14 MISC Vibration Damper

HSA - 15 MISC

HSA - 18

Fiberglass Wall Paneling

1 Non-ACM

Non-Friable 1 X NQ Assume Non-ACM per GSA

1 X

HSA - 12 MISC 12" x 12" Tan Mix Floor Tile Mastic 1

X NQHSA - 8 SURF Plaster 1

Non-ACM

HSA - 4 MISC 2' x 4' with Holes Ceiling Tile 1 Friable 2 X NQ Non-ACM

Friable 2 X NQHSA - 3 MISC 2' x 4' Smooth Ceiling Tile 1

ACM

HSA - 2 TSI Fittings Associated w/ Aircell Pipe Insulation 1 Friable 2 X 100 lf ACM

Friable 2 X 7,000 lfHSA - 1 TSI Aircell Pipe Insulation 1

Building:

Robert A Grant Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse 204 South Main Street South Bend, Indiana

Survey Date: August 21, 2007

HSA ID Material Type Material Description Sample # Sample Location Condition Friability Accessibility Assessment Category Quantity Asbestos % & Type Notes

Table 1: Asbestos Inventory and Analytical Summary

HSA-26-1 Basement 1-5% Chrysotile HSA-26-2 Basement 1-5% Chrysotile HSA-26-3 Basement 1-5% Chrysotile

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

NS- No Sample Material Type: Condition: Accessibility: Assessment Category:

ND- Non-Detect TSI - Thermal System Insulation 1 - No Damage 1 - Low 1 - Damaged or significantly damaged TSI.

NA-Not Analyzed SM - Surfacing Material 2 - Slightly Damaged 2 - Medium 2 - Damaged friable surfacing ACM.

NQ- Not Quantified MISC - Miscellaneous Material 3 - Damaged 3- High 3 - Significantly damaged friable surfacing ACM.

lf-Linear Foot 4 - Significant Damage 4 - Damaged or significantly damaged friable miscellaneous ACM.

sf-Square Foot 5 - ACBM with potential for significant damage

6 - ACBM with potential for damage.

7 - Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspected ACBM

Assume ACM

MISC Elevator Outer Shell Material 1 Non-Friable 1 X NQ Assume ACM

Non-Friable 1 X 30,000 sfHSA - 27 MISC Roofing Material 1

HSA - 26 TSI Fittings Associated w/ Paperwrap Pipe Insulation 1 Friable 2 X 30 lf ACM

HSA - 28

TABLE 2 – ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS

Inspectors:

Building:

Robert A. Grant Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse 204 South Main Street South Bend, Indiana

Survey Date: August 21, 2007

HSA ID Material Type Material Description Sample # Sample Location Condition Friability Accessibility Assessment Category Quantity Asbestos % & Type Notes

HSA-1-1 Basement Storage 5-10% Chrysotile HSA-1-2 Basement Storage 5-10% Chrysotile HSA-1-3 Basement Storage 5-10% Chrysotile HSA-2-1 Basement Storage 1-5% Chrysotile HSA-2-2 Basement Storage 1-5% Chrysotile HSA-2-3 Basement Storage 1-5% Chrysotile

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

HSA-25-1 Basement 1-5% Chrysotile HSA-25-2 Basement 1-5% Chrysotile HSA-25-3 Basement 1-5% Chrysotile HSA-26-1 Basement 1-5% Chrysotile HSA-26-2 Basement 1-5% Chrysotile HSA-26-3 Basement 1-5% Chrysotile

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

NS NS NS

Key:

NS- No Sample Material Type: Condition: Accessibility: Assessment Category:

ND- Non-Detect TSI - Thermal System Insulation 1 - No Damage 1 - Low 1 - Damaged or significantly damaged TSI.

NA-Not Analyzed SM - Surfacing Material 2 - Slightly Damaged 2 - Medium 2 - Damaged friable surfacing ACM.

NQ- Not Quantified MISC - Miscellaneous Material 3 - Damaged 3- High 3 - Significantly damaged friable surfacing ACM.

lf-Linear Foot 4 - Significant Damage 4 - Damaged or significantly damaged friable miscellaneous ACM.

sf-Square Foot 5 - ACBM with potential for significant damage

6 - ACBM with potential for damage.

7 - Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspected ACBM

Non-Friable 1 XHSA - 28 MISC Elevator Outer Shell Material 1 900 sf Assume ACM

30 ACM

Assume ACM30,000 sfHSA - 27 MISC Roofing Material 1

X

HSA - 25

Non-Friable 1 X

HSA - 26 TSI Fittings Associated w/ Paperwrap Pipe Insulation 1

TSI Paperwrap Pipe Insulation 1

Assume ACMX 20 sf

X 3,000 ACM

Non-Friable 3

Friable 2

Friable 2

HSA - 14 MISC Vibration Damper 1

ACM

Table 2: Asbestos Containing Materials

Friable 2 X 7,000HSA - 1 TSI Aircell Pipe Insulation 1

HSA - 2 TSI Fittings Associated w/ Aircell Pipe Insulation 1 ACMFriable 2 X 100 lf

TABLE 3 – LEAD PAINT INVENTORY SUMMMARY

Heather Eckard (L-10996)

Building:

Robert A. Grant Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse 204 South Main Street

South Bend, Indiana 46601

Survey Date: September 20, 2007

Sample ID # Sample Location Component Substrate Color Result

LBP-01 Exterior (Roof) Window Sill Wood Brown 230,000 mg/Kg

LBP-02 1st Floor Wall Plaster Beige 160,000 mg/Kg

Table 3: Lead Paint Inventory Summary

ATTACHMENTS

ATTACHMENT A – FACILITY MAPS: LOCATIONS OF ACM

ATTACHMENT B – ASBESTOS AND LEAD LABORATORY

ANALYTICAL REPORTS

ATTACHMENT C – PHOTOGRAPHS

ATTACHMENT D – FIELD NOTES

ATTACHMENT E – COST ESTIMATE

Building:

Robert A. Grant Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse

204 South Main Street South Bend, Indiana

ASBESTOS COST ESTIMATE

Survey Date: August 21, 2007

Material Descripton Quantity Unit Unit Price Line Total Asbestos Pipe Insulation 10,000 lf $25.00 $250,000.00 Asbestos Pipe Fittings 130 each $25.00 $3,250.00 Elevator Shell Material 900 sf $25.00 $22,500.00 Vibration Damper 3 sf $500.00 $1,500.00 Roof Materials 30,000 sf $2.75 $82,500.00

ESTIMATED ABATEMENT COSTS: $359,750.00

Other Costs: Fee

Asbestos Project Design and Bid Award Services

Abatement Monitoring and Air Testing

Approximately 10% of Project Award for Abatement

$480.00/day and $15.00 per sample

*Unit Price for each material includes labor costs (containment construction, abatement, cleanup), materials, equipment, suplies, disposal, and insurance

** Roofing materials unit price assumes roof is "built-up" (multiple layers).