GDR App H.pdf

Schafer Dam Spillway Enlargement Project Geotechnical Data Report

APPENDIX H – TULE RECREATION AREA BORINGS AND LAB

TESTING RESULTS

pete.nix Rectangle Schafer Dam Spillway Enlargement Project

EB

EB

EB

EB

EB

EB

3:1 3:1

3:1 3:1

2F-20-01

2F-20-02

2F-20-03

2F-20-04

2F-20-05

SO

LI

C

IT

AT

IO

N N

O

D

ES

IG

N

ED

B

Y:

D

ES

C R

IP

TI

O N

A

M

AR

K

SI

ZE

SU

BM

IT

TE

D B

Y:

D

AT

E

C O

N

TR

AC

T

N O

C

H

EC

KE

D

B Y:

D R

AW

N

B Y:

IS

SU

E D

AT

E:

B

C

D

E

F

G

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

SHEET ID

TU

LA

R E

C O

U N

TY

, C

AL

IF

O R

N

IA

TU

LE

R

IV

ER

S

PI

LL

W

AY

E N

LA

R

G

EM

EN

T

PR

O

JE

C

T

PH

AS

E

US Army Corps of Engineers

A.

G

O N

G

S.

C

AS

TE

LL

AN

O

YH

C

H

EN

A.

G

O N

G

SP

EC

N O

AN

SI

D

U .S

. A R

M Y

C O

R

PS

O F

EN

G

IN

EE

R S

SA

C

R

AM

EN

TO

D

IS

TR

IC

T

J

. S

TR

EE

T

SA

C

R

AM

EN

TO

, C

AL

IF

O

R N

IA

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 65%SUBMITTAL

FI

LE

N

AM

E:

KT

-1 -0

9-

TL-09-B-105-TULE GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOCATION.dwg

B-105

N

PLAN VIEW

SCALE: 1" = 100'

TU

LE

R

EC

R

EA

TI

O

N A

R

EA

BO

R

IN

G

L O

C

AT

IO

N

M

AP

GEOTECHNICAL NOTES:

GEOTECHNICAL OR SUBSURFACE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE PROJECT PLANS

IS STRICTLY FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED

A PART OF THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS OR CONTRACT.

Feet 0 100 200

2.5

5.0

7.0

9.5

10.0

10 58 32

LEAN CLAY (CL); dry; very dark gray (GLEY1 3/N); 100% low plasticity fines.

LEAN CLAY with Sand (CL); dry;

very dark gray (GLEY1 3/N); Trace, angular to subangular to 3" gravel;

75% low plasticity fines; 25% fine, angular to subangular sand; At 3' color change to Reddish brown (10YR 3/6) increasing gravel content.

SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL); dry;

brownish yellow (10YR 6/6); Trace to 1/2" gravel; 70% low plasticity, Predominatly clay; clay bound or cemented forming false 'sand' breaks up with finger/grinding. fines; 30% fine to medium, angular sand; Very stiff.

SILTY SAND with Gravel (SM); dry;

brownish yellow (10YR 6/6); 65% fine to coarse, angular sand; 20% nonplastic fines; 15% fine to medium, angular to subangular, 1/2" gravel; Material in sample has appearance of pulverization from sampling - very possibly cemented.

Scattered highly weathered gravel sized inclusions.

SILTY SAND with Gravel (SM); dry;

As at 7.0.

ASTM D2488

Classification used for field descriptions.

Surface: Grass Hand Auger to 5' Offset approximately 10' towards lake to avoid underground utilities.

Sample 1

Sample 2

Drill chatter

Sample 3 material has a pulverized appearence.

0950 Auger refusal @ 9.5 attempting SPT.

material has a pulverized appearence.

10. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT

BEARING

SHEETS

1. PROJECT

UNDISTURBED

South Pacific

NAD83

16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING

5. DIRECTION OF BORING DEG FROM

VERTICAL

HORIZONTAL

Chris Miner

Sacramento District

VERTICAL

NAVD88

--- DATE COMPLETED 3/3/20

N 1,911,194.5 E 6,590,131.2

6. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN

7. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK

8. TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING 10.0

USACE Omaha

8in HSA

GP 1300C

Success Dam Tule River-Lk Success,Spillway

CHECKED BY

14. DEPTH GROUND WATER

INITIAL STATICVERTICAL

INCLINED

OF

3. DRILLING AGENCY

LOCATION COORDINATES

4. NAME OF DRILLER

2. HOLE NUMBER

DISTURBED

DIVISION

V. Brown

11. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL

17. TOTAL CORE RECOVERY FOR BORING

State Plane CA Zone 4

2F-20-01

INSTALLATION SHEET

DRILLING LOG

12. TOTAL SAMPLES

15. DATE STARTED 3/3/20

13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES

9. COORDINATE SYSTEM

N/A

E. Hayes

18. LOGGED BY

ELEV

SPK FORM 1836-A

SEP 05

SHEET 1 of 2Boring Designation 2F-20-01

Boring Designation 2F-20-01

0.0

2.5

5.0

7.5

10.0

DEPTH

Sa m p N o.

G ra ve l

Sa nd

Fi ne s

PI M

C

AS

TM

C la ss%

REC

FIELD CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS

(Description)

LE

G

EN

D

N60Nf REMARKS

Bl ow s/ 0.

ft Laboratory

SA

M

PL

E

LL

50/3"

50/2"

The gINT log summarizes the soil conditions encountered and logged in the field as well as the soil properties determined by the lab where samples were selected for analysis. In some cases the Field Classification and description may result in different classification of the material than classified by the lab as ASTM class (e.g. CL vs. SC). These differences arise as a result of two ASTM methods being applied - D2488 for field classification and D2487 for lab - as well as possible variability over the sampled interval. Both results are presented in the gINT log. These differences should be noted and any use of the data presented should be used with the intent that the most conservative interpretation of the data be appropriately applied by the user in design or other decision documents.

SHEET

DRILLING LOG (Cont Sheet)

INSTALLATION

ELEVATION TOP OF BORINGLOCATION COORDINATES

COORDINATE SYSTEM

N 1,911,194.5 E 6,590,131.2

State Plane CA Zone 4 NAVD88NAD83

PROJECT

SHEETS

HORIZONTAL VERTICAL

2OFSacramento District

Success Dam Tule River-Lk Success,Spillway

ELEV

SPK FORM 1836-A

SEP 05

SHEET 2 of 2Boring Designation 2F-20-01

Boring Designation 2F-20-01

DEPTH

Sa m p N o.

G ra ve l

Sa nd

Fi ne s

PI M

C

AS

TM

C la ss%

REC

FIELD CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS

(Description)

LE

G

EN

D

N60Nf REMARKS Bl ow s/

0.

ft Laboratory

SA

M

PL

E

LL

5.5

7.5

9.0

The gINT log summarizes the soil conditions encountered and logged in the field as well as the soil properties determined by the lab where samples were selected for analysis. In some cases the Field Classification and description may result in different classification of the material than classified by the lab as ASTM class (e.g. CL vs. SC). These differences arise as a

16 43 41

LEAN CLAY (CL); dry; very dark gray (GLEY1 3/N); low plasticity fines.

Trace fine gravel.

LEAN CLAY (CL); Trace fine gravel;

As above @ 0.

SILTY SAND with Gravel (SM); dry;

brownish yellow (10YR 6/8); 60% fine to coarse, angular sand; 25% subangular, to 2" gravel; 15% nonplastic fines; Material appears to be partially lithified/cemented.

SILTY SAND with Gravel.

ASTM D2488

Classification used for field descriptions.

Surface grass Hand auger to 5' Due to proximity to underground utilities

Sample 1

Sample 2

Auger grinding, hard drilling

Sample 3 Sample has pulverized appearence.

1122 auger refusal @ 9 ft.

Attempted SPT- no recovery.

10. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT

BEARING

SHEETS

1. PROJECT

UNDISTURBED

South Pacific

NAD83

16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING

5. DIRECTION OF BORING DEG FROM

VERTICAL

HORIZONTAL

Chris Miner

Sacramento District

VERTICAL

NAVD88

--- DATE COMPLETED 3/3/20

N 1,911,149.6 E 6,590,094.6

6. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN

7. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK

8. TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING 9.0

USACE Omaha

8in HSA

GP 1300C

Success Dam Tule River-Lk Success,Spillway

CHECKED BY

14. DEPTH GROUND WATER

INITIAL STATICVERTICAL

INCLINED

OF

3. DRILLING AGENCY

LOCATION COORDINATES

4. NAME OF DRILLER

2. HOLE NUMBER

DISTURBED

DIVISION

V. Brown

11. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL

17. TOTAL CORE RECOVERY FOR BORING

State Plane CA Zone 4

2F-20-02

INSTALLATION SHEET

DRILLING LOG

12. TOTAL SAMPLES

15. DATE STARTED 3/3/20

13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES

9. COORDINATE SYSTEM

N/A

E. Hayes

18. LOGGED BY

ELEV

SPK FORM 1836-A

SEP 05

SHEET 1 of 2Boring Designation 2F-20-02

Boring Designation 2F-20-02

0.0

2.5

5.0

7.5

DEPTH

Sa m p N o.

G ra ve l

Sa nd

Fi ne s

PI M

C

AS

TM

C la ss%

REC

FIELD CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS

(Description)

LE

G

EN

D

N60Nf REMARKS

Bl ow s/ 0.

ft Laboratory

SA

M

PL

E

LL

50/1" result of two ASTM methods being applied - D2488 for field classification and D2487 for lab - as well as possible variability over the sampled interval. Both results are presented in the gINT log. These differences should be noted and any use of the data presented should be used with the intent that the most conservative interpretation of the data be appropriately applied by the user in design or other decision documents.

SHEET

DRILLING LOG (Cont Sheet)

INSTALLATION

ELEVATION TOP OF BORINGLOCATION COORDINATES

COORDINATE SYSTEM

N 1,911,149.6 E 6,590,094.6

State Plane CA Zone 4 NAVD88NAD83

PROJECT

SHEETS

HORIZONTAL VERTICAL

2OFSacramento District

Success Dam Tule River-Lk Success,Spillway

ELEV

SPK FORM 1836-A

SEP 05

SHEET 2 of 2Boring Designation 2F-20-02

Boring Designation 2F-20-02

DEPTH

Sa m p N o.

G ra ve l

Sa nd

Fi ne s

PI M

C

AS

TM

C la ss%

REC

FIELD CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS

(Description)

LE

G

EN

D

N60Nf REMARKS Bl ow s/

0.

ft Laboratory

SA

M

PL

E

LL

3.0

6.5

7.0

The gINT log summarizes the soil conditions encountered and logged in the field as well as the soil properties determined by the lab where samples were selected for analysis. In some cases the Field Classification and description may result in different classification of the material than classified by the lab as ASTM class (e.g. CL vs. SC). These differences arise as a result of two ASTM methods being applied - D2488 for field classification and D2487 for lab - as well as possible variability over the sampled interval. Both results are presented in the gINT log. These differences should be noted and any use of the data presented should be used with the intent that the most conservative interpretation of the data be appropriately applied by the user in design or other decision documents.

37 44 20

LEAN CLAY (CL); dry; very dark gray (GLEY1 3/N); Trace sand; Trace gravel to 2 Inches gravel; 100% low plasticity fines; hard; Gravel/rock in sample shoe.

SILTY SAND with Gravel (SM); dry;

brownish yellow (10YR 6/8); 60% fine to coarse sand; 25% coarse to fine, subangular to subrounded gravel 2"; 15% nonplastic fines;

Sample appears to be partially lithified/cemented.

GRANODIORITE, light gray, highly weathered, very weak to weak, fine to medium grained, Medium grained fragments in sample shoe.

ASTM D2488

Classification used for field descriptions.

Surface: Grass and topsoils 1228 -Sample 1

Auger grinding and stopped by what appears to be a large rock.

Offsetting boring by about 2 feet

1245 Sample 2

1255 Sample 3

Hard drilling, grinding

1302 Auger refusal at 7 feet. Attempting SPT -granodiorite fragments in shoe 1308 TD at 7 feet bgs

10. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT

BEARING

SHEETS

1. PROJECT

UNDISTURBED

South Pacific

NAD83

16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING

5. DIRECTION OF BORING DEG FROM

VERTICAL

HORIZONTAL

Chris Miner

Sacramento District

VERTICAL

NAVD88

--- DATE COMPLETED 3/3/20

N 1,911,165.4 E 6,589,913.9

6. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN

7. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK

8. TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING 7.0

USACE Omaha

8in HSA

GP 1300C

Success Dam Tule River-Lk Success,Spillway

CHECKED BY

14. DEPTH GROUND WATER

INITIAL STATICVERTICAL

INCLINED

OF

3. DRILLING AGENCY

LOCATION COORDINATES

4. NAME OF DRILLER

2. HOLE NUMBER

DISTURBED

DIVISION

V. Brown

11. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL

17. TOTAL CORE RECOVERY FOR BORING

State Plane CA Zone 4

2F-20-03

INSTALLATION SHEET

DRILLING LOG

12. TOTAL SAMPLES

15. DATE STARTED 3/3/20

13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES

9. COORDINATE SYSTEM

N/A

E. Hayes

18. LOGGED BY

ELEV

SPK FORM 1836-A

SEP 05

SHEET 1 of 1Boring Designation 2F-20-03

Boring Designation 2F-20-03

0.0

2.5

5.0

DEPTH

Sa m p N o.

G ra ve l

Sa nd

Fi ne s

PI M

C

AS

TM

C la ss%

REC

FIELD CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS

(Description)

LE

G

EN

D

N60Nf REMARKS

Bl ow s/ 0.

ft Laboratory

SA

M

PL

E

LL

50/5"

3.5

5.8

8.5

The gINT log summarizes the soil conditions encountered and logged in the field as well as the soil properties determined by the lab where samples were selected for analysis. In some cases the Field Classification and description may result in different classification of the material than classified by the lab as ASTM class (e.g. CL vs. SC). These differences arise as a result of two ASTM methods being applied - D2488 for field classification and D2487 for lab - as well as possible variability over the sampled interval. Both results are presented in the gINT log. These differences should be noted and any use of the data presented should be used with the intent that the most conservative interpretation of the data be appropriately applied by the user in design or other decision documents.

0 40 60 47 21 CH67

LEAN CLAY (CL); dry to moist; very dark gray (GLEY1 3/N); Trace sand;

Trace gravel to 0.5 inches; 100% nonplastic to low plasticity fines.

As above at 0.0.

SILTY SAND with Gravel (SM); dry;

brownish yellow (10YR 6/8); 60% fine to coarse, angular sand; 25% fine to coarse, subangular to subrounded gravel to 1.5 inches;

15% nonplastic fines; Deposit appears to be partially lithified/cemented.

As above at 3.5 feet.

GRANODIORITE, light gray, decomposed, fine to medium grained, Quartz, Plagioclase, Ferromag minerals.

As at 5.8 feet except highly weathered.

As at 5.8 feet except highly weathered.

ASTM D2488

Classification used for field descriptions.

Grass

1328 Sample 1

1336 Sample 2

Augers grinding

1343 Sample 3

Hard drilling, grinding

1347 Hard drilling, grinding 1355 Sample 4 1400 More hard grinding drilling 1402 Auger refusall at 8.5 feet 1405 Attempting SPT sample 5 - rock fragments in shoe 1408 TD at 8.5

10. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT

BEARING

SHEETS

1. PROJECT

UNDISTURBED

South Pacific

NAD83

16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING

5. DIRECTION OF BORING DEG FROM

VERTICAL

HORIZONTAL

Chris Miner

Sacramento District

VERTICAL

NAVD88

--- DATE COMPLETED 3/3/20

N 1,911,255.2 E 6,590,010.8

6. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN

7. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK

8. TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING 8.5

USACE Omaha

8in HSA

GP 1300C

Success Dam Tule River-Lk Success,Spillway

CHECKED BY

14. DEPTH GROUND WATER

INITIAL STATICVERTICAL

INCLINED

OF

3. DRILLING AGENCY

LOCATION COORDINATES

4. NAME OF DRILLER

2. HOLE NUMBER

DISTURBED

DIVISION

V. Brown

11. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL

17. TOTAL CORE RECOVERY FOR BORING

State Plane CA Zone 4

2F-20-04

INSTALLATION SHEET

DRILLING LOG

12. TOTAL SAMPLES

15. DATE STARTED 3/3/20

13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES

9. COORDINATE SYSTEM

N/A

E. Hayes

18. LOGGED BY

ELEV

SPK FORM 1836-A

SEP 05

SHEET 1 of 1Boring Designation 2F-20-04

Boring Designation 2F-20-04

0.0

2.5

5.0

7.5

DEPTH

Sa m p N o.

G ra ve l

Sa nd

Fi ne s

PI M

C

AS

TM

C la ss%

REC

FIELD CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS

(Description)

LE

G

EN

D

N60Nf REMARKS

Bl ow s/ 0.

ft Laboratory

SA

M

PL

E

LL

50/1"

2.0

3.4

5.5

The gINT log summarizes the soil conditions encountered and logged in the field as well as the soil properties determined by the lab where samples were selected for analysis. In some cases the Field Classification and description may result in different classification of the material than classified by the lab as ASTM class (e.g. CL vs. SC). These differences arise as a result of two ASTM methods being applied - D2488 for field classification and D2487 for lab - as well as possible variability over the sampled interval. Both results are presented in the gINT log. These differences should be noted and any use of the data presented should be used with the intent that the most conservative interpretation of the data be appropriately applied by the user in design or other decision documents.

0 45 56 27 11 CL67

LEAN CLAY with Sand (CL); dry;

reddish brown (5YR 5/4); Trace, angular to 0.5 inches gravel; 85% low plasticity, Very stiff fines; 15% fine to medium sand; Grass and roots upper 6 inches of sample.

SILTY SAND with Gravel (SM); dry;

brownish yellow (10YR 6/8); 50% fine to coarse, angular sand; 30% fine to coarse, angular to subangular gravel to 1.5 inches; 20% nonplastic fines; Sample appears to be at least partially lithified/cemented.

GRANODIORITE, light gray, decomposed, fine to medium grained, Quartz, Plagioclase, Ferromags.

GRANODIORITE, As at 3.4 feet except highly weathered.

ASTM D2488

Classification used for field descriptions.

Surface: Grass 1428 Sample 1

Stopping temporarly at 2 feet, hitting something hard. Cleaning out with hand auger. Large rock 1450 Sample 2

1458 Sample 3 1502 Augering 1509 Auger refusal at 5.5 feet

10. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT

BEARING

SHEETS

1. PROJECT

UNDISTURBED

South Pacific

NAD83

16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING

5. DIRECTION OF BORING DEG FROM

VERTICAL

HORIZONTAL

Chris Miner

Sacramento District

VERTICAL

NAVD88

--- DATE COMPLETED 3/3/20

N 1,911,793.0 E 6,590,226.8

6. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN

7. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK

8. TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING 5.5

USACE Omaha

8in HSA

GP 1300C

Success Dam Tule River-Lk Success,Spillway

CHECKED BY

14. DEPTH GROUND WATER

INITIAL STATICVERTICAL

INCLINED

OF

3. DRILLING AGENCY

LOCATION COORDINATES

4. NAME OF DRILLER

2. HOLE NUMBER

DISTURBED

DIVISION

V. Brown

11. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL

17. TOTAL CORE RECOVERY FOR BORING

State Plane CA Zone 4

2F-20-05

INSTALLATION SHEET

DRILLING LOG

12. TOTAL SAMPLES

15. DATE STARTED 3/3/20

13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES

9. COORDINATE SYSTEM

N/A

E. Hayes

18. LOGGED BY

ELEV

SPK FORM 1836-A

SEP 05

SHEET 1 of 1Boring Designation 2F-20-05

Boring Designation 2F-20-05

0.0

2.5

5.0

DEPTH

Sa m p N o.

G ra ve l

Sa nd

Fi ne s

PI M

C

AS

TM

C la ss%

REC

FIELD CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS

(Description)

LE

G

EN

D

N60Nf REMARKS

Bl ow s/ 0.

ft Laboratory

SA

M

PL

E

LL

Sample Depth Water Content (%) Gravel (%) Sand (%) Fines (%) #200 finer (%) LL PI 2F‐20‐01 3 7.5‐8.17 9.9 10 58.4 31.6 2F‐20‐02 1 5‐6.5 14.3 15.6 43.1 41.3 2F‐20‐03 3 5‐6.5 5.2 36.6 43.9 19.5 Grayish brown clayey Sand with gravel (SC) 2F‐20‐04 1 0‐1.5 21.4 60.1 67 47 2F‐20‐05 1 0‐1.5 10.5 55.5 43 27

Soil Description Grayish brown clayey Sand (SC) Yellowish brown clayey Sand with gravel (SC)

Very dark brown sandy Fat Clay (CH) Dark brown sand Lean Clay (CL)

C:\Laboratory\Projects\Tule River\PSD Tule River 2F-20-01 s03.xlsx USACE

UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION

Sieve Dia. %

No. mm Finer

3" 75.0 100.0

2" 50.0 100.0

1.5" 37.5 100.0

1" 25.0 100.0

3/4" 19.00 100.0

1/2" 12.50 98.7

3/8" 9.50 97.2

#4 4.75 90.0

#10 2.00 77.3

#20 0.850 62.7

#40 0.425 53.5

#60 0.250 47.0

#100 0.150 40.8

#140 0.106 36.0

#200 0.075 31.6

10.0 58.4 31.6

D60

D30

D10

Location Sample No. Depth (ft) SYMBOL Wn (%) LL PI % -2 µm Description and Classification Cu

2F-20-01 3 7.5 9.9 --- --- --- Cc

PROJECT NAME: Tule River / Success Dam

PARTICLE-SIZE

DISTRIBUTION CURVE

0.694

H yd ro m et er

A na ly si s

% Cobbles % Gravel % Sand % Fines

#N/A

#N/A

NA

Grayish brown clayey Sand (SC) NA

50 5 0.5 0.05 0.005

#2003" 2" 1" 3/4" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #100

0.0010.010.1110100

P E

R C

E N

T P

A S

S

IN

G B

Y W

E

IG

T

GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS

U. S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZES

C O B B L E S

GRAVEL SAND SILT AND CLAY

COARSE FINE COARSE FINEMEDIUM

HYDROMETER

C:\Laboratory\Projects\Tule River\PSD Tule River 2F-20-02 s01.xlsx USACE

Sieve Dia. %

No. mm Finer

3" 75.0 100.0

2" 50.0 100.0

1.5" 37.5 100.0

1" 25.0 94.3

3/4" 19.00 94.3

1/2" 12.50 92.1

3/8" 9.50 88.0

#4 4.75 84.4

#10 2.00 77.1

#20 0.850 69.1

#40 0.425 61.0

#60 0.250 54.3

#100 0.150 48.3

#140 0.106 44.5

#200 0.075 41.3

15.6 43.1 41.3

D60

D30

D10

Location Sample No. Depth (ft) SYMBOL Wn (%) LL PI % -2 µm Description and Classification Cu

2F-20-02 1 5.0 14.3 --- --- --- Cc

PROJECT NAME: Tule River / Success Dam

PARTICLE-SIZE

DISTRIBUTION CURVE

0.393

H yd ro m et er

A na ly si s

% Cobbles % Gravel % Sand % Fines

#N/A

#N/A

NA

Yellowish brown clayey Sand with gravel (SC) NA

50 5 0.5 0.05 0.005

#2003" 2" 1" 3/4" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #100

0.0010.010.1110100

P E

R C

E N

T P

A S

S

IN

G B

Y W

E

IG

C O B B L E S

GRAVEL SAND SILT AND CLAY

C:\Laboratory\Projects\Tule River\PSD Tule River 2F-20-03 s03.xlsx USACE

Sieve Dia. %

No. mm Finer

3" 75.0 100.0

2" 50.0 100.0

1.5" 37.5 100.0

1" 25.0 92.0

3/4" 19.00 92.0

1/2" 12.50 80.0

3/8" 9.50 74.0

#4 4.75 63.4

#10 2.00 51.6

#20 0.850 40.9

#40 0.425 32.8

#60 0.250 27.9

#100 0.150 24.1

#140 0.106 21.7

#200 0.075 19.5

36.6 43.9 19.5

D60

D30

D10

Location Sample No. Depth (ft) SYMBOL Wn (%) LL PI % -2 µm Description and Classification Cu

2F-20-03 3 5.0 5.2 --- --- --- Cc

PROJECT NAME: Tule River / Success Dam

PARTICLE-SIZE

DISTRIBUTION CURVE

3.702

H yd ro m et er

A na ly si s

% Cobbles % Gravel % Sand % Fines

0.314

#N/A

NA

Grayish brown clayey Sand with gravel (SC) NA

50 5 0.5 0.05 0.005

#2003" 2" 1" 3/4" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #100

0.0010.010.1110100

P E

R C

E N

T P

A S

S

IN

G B

Y W

E

IG

C O B B L E S

GRAVEL SAND SILT AND CLAY

Limits Tule River 2F-20-04 s01.xlsx USACE

DESCRIPTION / CLASSIFICATION

Project Name:

PLASTICITY CHART

Very dark brown sandy Clay (CH)

Tule River / Success Dam

2F-20-04 1 0.0 21.4 67 47

PILocation Sample Number

Depth (ft) Water

Content (%)

LL

CL-ML

CL or OL CH or OH

ML or OL MH or OH

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110

P L

A S

T

IC

IT

Y

I N

D E

X

LIQUID LIMIT (%)

Limits Tule River 2F-20-05 s01.xlsx USACE

DESCRIPTION / CLASSIFICATION

Project Name:

PLASTICITY CHART

PILocation Sample Number

Depth (ft) Water

Content (%)

LL

Dark brown sandy Clay (CL)

Tule River / Success Dam

2F-20-05 1 0.0 10.5 43 27

CL-ML

CL or OL CH or OH

ML or OL MH or OH

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110

P L

A S

T

IC

IT

Y

I N

D E

X

LIQUID LIMIT (%)

Wash 200 Tule River 2F-20-04 s01.xlsx USACE

Location:

Project Name: Tule River / Success Dam Sample No.:

Depth (ft.):

Visual Description:

SPECIMEN: Selected From: Selection Method(s) & Sieve Range:

Bulk Sample x Other - _______ Sieves (1) - whole sample used SPT Sample Thin-Walled Tube Sieves (1) - partial sample used & selected by Method(s)

Calif. Sample Engr. Test Specimen's WC c Selection Method Whole sample used (a): Splitter; (use for dry soils or that which will segregate) See Bulk Sample Processing Form (b): Quartering; (use for dry soils or that which will segregate)

Preparation: Sample/Specimen: Proccesing Method (c) : Representative scoop after mixing, or slice of intact sample.

As-Received x Method A scalped (use for moist soils or that which will not segregate)

Air Dried Method B x Oven-Dried Soil Broken Up Before:

Oven-Dried Selecting partial sample: No Yes

Washing: No Yes x Whole Specimen Washed on No. 200 sieve ? x By: Mortar & Pestle Hand

Retained Fraction: 1st Split Washed ? Pulverizer Other Fine Fraction Washed on No. 200 sieve ? and Soil Soaked for: 4 hrs.

As Recieved or Container No.

Min.sieve size in sieving sequence (3) Wet, M1 (g)

Container Number Dry, M2 (g)

Mass of Container and Dry Soil, (g) Cont.,M3 (g)

Mass of Container, (g)

Dry Soil, Ws (g) SIEVING RESULTS Req. Mass of Test Spec. for 1% (kg) % error:

See Sieve Cum. Mass

(1) No. / (2) Retained (g)

3 " 3 " 2700

2 " 2 " 2000

1 1/2" 1-1/2" 1500

1 " 1 " 1100

3/4 " 3/4 " 900

1/2 " 1/2 " ---

3/8 " Shape of Grains 3/8 " 550

4 Rounded #4 325

Pan Angular #10 180

SUMMARY: Shape & Filter Parameters Flat #20 115

% COBBLES D60 D85 #40 75

% GRAVEL D30 D50 #60 60

% SAND D10 D15 #100 40

% FINES Cu = Cc = #140* 30

* Denotes sieve added to better define gradation curve Cc = D30^2 / (D60 * D10) #200 20

(1) X in box denotes sieve on which split was made. Cu = D60 / D10 Pan

(2) Allowable amount of soil retained on 8" dia. Sieve. (g) Mica Noted: x No Yes Amount Adjective:

(3) Sieve size given, denotes min. sieve size used in the appropriate sieving sequence. Particle Hardness

Hard Soft Weathered

SET-UP BY: DATE SIEVED BY: CALCULATED BY: TJO

3/4"= 1.3

84.48

Total Specimen % Finer N'

Partial Test Specimen

1 1/2"=10

190.77

1" = 3

156.69

34.08

156.66

2"= 25

3"= 70 Sieve No.

Cum. Mass Retained (g)

GRADATION OF SOILS by Sieving using Soil Sieve Sizes & with Water Content

ASTM D1140 and D2216

Total Test Specimen with Coarse FractionMASS OF TEST SPECIMEN (g)

Very dark brown sandy Clay (CH)

2F-20-04

Water Content x7 x

Partial or Whole Test Specimen

Soil Retained (after washing)

3/8"= 0.165

#4 = 0.075

#10 = 0.050

XXXXXXXX

60.1

8.61 18.29

# 200

241.14 x7

+200

Water Content x7

67.1

259.2

241.14

156.66

21.38

0.24

60.1

78.3

Finer N'

CB

03/16/20 CB

33.7

27.76--

XXXXXXXXXX

Wash 200 Tule River 2F-20-05 s01.xlsx USACE

Location:

Project Name: Tule River / Success Dam Sample No.:

Depth (ft.):

Visual Description:

SPECIMEN: Selected From: Selection Method(s) & Sieve Range:

Bulk Sample x Other - _______ Sieves (1) - whole sample used SPT Sample Thin-Walled Tube Sieves (1) - partial sample used & selected by Method(s)

Calif. Sample Engr. Test Specimen's WC c Selection Method Whole sample used (a): Splitter; (use for dry soils or that which will segregate) See Bulk Sample Processing Form (b): Quartering; (use for dry soils or that which will segregate)

Preparation: Sample/Specimen: Proccesing Method (c) : Representative scoop after mixing, or slice of intact sample.

As-Received x Method A scalped (use for moist soils or that which will not segregate)

Air Dried Method B x Oven-Dried Soil Broken Up Before:

Oven-Dried Selecting partial sample: No Yes

Washing: No Yes x Whole Specimen Washed on No. 200 sieve ? x By: Mortar & Pestle Hand

Retained Fraction: 1st Split Washed ? Pulverizer Other Fine Fraction Washed on No. 200 sieve ? and Soil Soaked for: 4 hrs.

As Recieved or Container No.

Min.sieve size in sieving sequence (3) Wet, M1 (g)

Container Number Dry, M2 (g)

Mass of Container and Dry Soil, (g) Cont.,M3 (g)

Mass of Container, (g)

Dry Soil, Ws (g) SIEVING RESULTS Req. Mass of Test Spec. for 1% (kg) % error:

See Sieve Cum. Mass

(1) No. / (2) Retained (g)

3 " 3 " 2700

2 " 2 " 2000

1 1/2" 1-1/2" 1500

1 " 1 " 1100

3/4 " 3/4 " 900

1/2 " 1/2 " ---

3/8 " Shape of Grains 3/8 " 550

4 Rounded #4 325

Pan Angular #10 180

SUMMARY: Shape & Filter Parameters Flat #20 115

% COBBLES D60 D85 #40 75

% GRAVEL D30 D50 #60 60

% SAND D10 D15 #100 40

% FINES Cu = Cc = #140* 30

* Denotes sieve added to better define gradation curve Cc = D30^2 / (D60 * D10) #200 20

(1) X in box denotes sieve on which split was made. Cu = D60 / D10 Pan

(2) Allowable amount of soil retained on 8" dia. Sieve. (g) Mica Noted: x No Yes Amount Adjective:

(3) Sieve size given, denotes min. sieve size used in the appropriate sieving sequence. Particle Hardness

Hard Soft Weathered

SET-UP BY: DATE SIEVED BY: CALCULATED BY: TJO

Finer N'

CB

49.02

03/16/20 CB

48.53

38.26--

XXXXXXXXXX

64.9

266.96

255.5

146.35

10.50

0.08

55.5

79.1

# 200

255.5 sna8

+200

Water Content sna8

55.5

0.162

11.57 22.78

#10 = 0.050

Sieve No.

Cum. Mass Retained (g)

GRADATION OF SOILS by Sieving using Soil Sieve Sizes & with Water Content

ASTM D1140 and D2216

Total Test Specimen with Coarse FractionMASS OF TEST SPECIMEN (g)

Dark brown sandy Clay (CL)

2F-20-05

Water Content sna8 x

Partial or Whole Test Specimen

Soil Retained (after washing)

3/8"= 0.165

#4 = 0.075

3/4"= 1.3

109.15

Finer N'

Partial Test Specimen

1 1/2"=10

195.45

1" = 3

146.39

49.06

146.35

2"= 25

3"= 70