FARM II Atch L-2 Past and Present Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 294 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Facilities Acquisitions for Restoration and Modernization (FARM II) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA9101-21-R-0001
About this file
This document contains a request for proposal for the Facilities Acquisitions for Restoration and Modernization II contract. The solicitation seeks proposals for mechanical, electrical, instrumentation, data and control systems, design-build, construction, and two-phase design/build services for military ground testing facilities at Arnold Engineering Development Complex locations including Arnold Air Force Base in Tennessee. The indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contract has a total estimated value of $300 million and a minimum guarantee of $1,000. The performance period is five years from award. A minimum of two and target of four contracts will be awarded. Proposals are due by July 13, 2021. Work will primarily be performed at Arnold AFB and geographically separated units including the National Full Scale Aerodynamics Complex, Mountain View, California and facilities in White Oak, Maryland; Eglin Air Force Base, Florida; Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico; Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico; and Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 28
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FARM II
FA9101-21-R-0001
Attachment 8
ATTACHMENT L-2
PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104
I. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION : Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
A. Contractor (Company/Division):
B. Point of Contact (Program Manager and Contracting Officer):
C. Telephone Number:
D. Cage Code: ________________
E. Contract Number:
F. Dollar Amount:
G. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, CPAF):
H. Contract Period of Performance:
I. Program Title:
J. Brief Program Description:
K. Program Phase: (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD))
L. Contractor Performed as the Prime Contractor Joint Venture Partner Subcontractor (If Joint Venture Partner, specifically identify the managing partner and other partners; if Subcontractor, identify Prime Contractor. If not Prime, state the specific role in executing the work).
Attachment 8
II. RESPONDENT(S) TO QUESTIONNAIRE
A. Name(s):
B. Address:
C. Phone Number(s):
D. Fax Number:
E. Email Address:
F. Position (e.g., Program Manager, PCO/ACO):
G. Other suggested points of contact:
III. GENERAL COMMENTS
IV. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Please indicate your performance rating for the contractor by circling or place an “X” over the appropriate code using the performance evaluation scale below. Ratings are defined as follows:
CODE PERFORMANCE RATING
B BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) many. Very few, if any, minor problems encountered. Contractor took immediate and effective corrective action.
P PURPLE/VERY GOOD - During the contract period, contractor is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) some. Some minor problems encountered. Contractor took timely corrective action
G GREEN/SATISFACTORY - During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements. For any problems encountered, contractor took effective corrective action.
Y YELLOW/MARGINAL - During the contract period, contractor performance is not meeting (or did not meet) some contract requirements. For problems encountered, corrective action appeared only marginally effective, not effective, or not fully implemented. Customer involvement was required.
R RED/UNSATISFACTORY - During the contract period, contractor performance is failing (or failed) to meet most contract requirements. Serious problems encountered.
Attachment 8 Corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent. Extensive Customer oversight and involvement was required.
N/A NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect. Do not know.
Respondents should explain their rating in the remarks section for any rating of Blue, Yellow, or Red, and ratings that might contradict official Past Performance documentation (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reports (CPARs)). If more space is needed, remarks may be continued on separate pages.
Please identify question number.
Attachment 8
(1) Original Contract Cost or Price $_____________________
(2) Value of Negotiated Contract Changes $_____________________
(3) Actual/Projected Cost to Complete $_____________________
(4) Baseline Estimate at Completion $_____________________
(5) Total Negotiated Changes EAC $_____________________
(6) Cost Underrun/Overrun (-) $_____________________
B. NARRATIVE SUMMARY
1. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated Blue/Exceptional, Yellow/Marginal, or Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
2. What were the contractor’s greatest strengths in the performance of the contract?
3. What were the contractor’s greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract?
B. NARRATIVE SUMMARY
1. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated Blue/Exceptional, Yellow/Marginal, or Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
Attachment 8
2. What were the contractor’s greatest strengths in the performance of the contract?
3. What were the contractor’s greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract?
C. GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS ONLY
1. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?
Yes_____ No_____
2. Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
Yes_____ Default_____ Convenience_______ Pending Termination______
No_____
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules) _______________
D. GENERAL COMMENT (Choose one of the following and explain your choice in the remarks)
Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what he promised in his proposal, I definitely would_____ probably would _____ might or might not _____ probably would not _____ definitely would not _____ award to him today given that I had a choice.
REMARKS:
Attachment 8
E. GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS ONLY: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
Yes_____ Default_____ Convenience_______ Pending Termination______
No_____
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules):
Evaluator’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please email this completed questionnaire to: aedc.sso@us.af.mil
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .