Q A 4.doc
DOC document 23 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Space Control Effects Modeling & Assessment (SCHEMA) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA9451-09-R-0003
About this file
Q A 4
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Q A 7.doc | DOC document | |
| Q A 6.doc | DOC document | |
| Q A 5.doc | DOC document | |
| Q A 3.doc | DOC document | |
| Q A 2.doc | DOC document | |
| Amendment 1 - 19 Nov 09.pdf | ||
| Q A 1.doc | DOC document | |
| TO 0002 Space Superiority SOW.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment L-2 - Base Support Equipment.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| FA9451-09-R-0003.pdf | ||
| Atch L-3 DFARS Pricing Guidance.doc | DOC document | |
| TO 0001 Vulnerability SOW.doc | DOC document | |
| Atch L-1 CROSS REFERENCE MATRIX.doc | DOC document | |
| NOCA.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Space Control Effects Modeling & Assessment (SCHEMA)
FA9451-09-R-0003
Questions and Answers #4
Question: Page M-3, paragraph b. (1)(b), Subfactor 2 - Corporate Experience states, “The proposal shall be evaluated on the quantity and relevancy of the offeror's corporate experience as it relates to the [IDIQ] SOW.” Given the ten-page limit of the response, did the government intend to evaluate “quality” instead of “quantity”?
Response: The proposal shall be evaluated on the quantity and relevancy of the offeror's experience -- proposal shall be provided within the page limits as stated in the RFP.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .