Attach L-05 Contractor Relevancy Assessment v2.pdf

Attachment L-05

Relevancy Assessment

RFP FA9304-19-R-0002

EZSource PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY TABLE

(To be Completed by Offeror/Joint Venture Member/ and Critical Subcontractor)

(Complete for each effort identified for evaluation and provide in CD and hard copy)

Request the offeror/joint venture member/and Critical Subcontractor complete a separate Relevancy Table for each effort identified for evaluation. The table below will assist the PCO in evaluating the relevancy of the proposed effort to the instant requirements. Offerors/joint venture members shall only complete column three. Offerors’/joint venture members’ answers are applicable only to the efforts identified, not the offeror’s proposed solutions to the instant effort. Please be as specific as possible with the fill-in information provided.

If the contract being submitted is an ordering type contractual vehicle (for example, including but not limited to an

Indefinite Delivery “D” type contract per FAR 16.5), only after issuance of a delivery/task order does performance occur. The Contract Number, Total Contract Dollar Value, Period of Performance, Quantities produced/repaired, Type and Complexity of Data Deliverable submitted here should be for the order, the offeror has performed under this ordering type contractual vehicle. Series of orders will not be considered, see Section L for details.

Offeror Name:

Cage Code:

Contract Number:

(If submitting Ordering Type Contract: List the Basic Contract Number and Order Number)

Program Title:

Contractor/Agency/Customer:

Original Total Contract Dollar Value: PCO Note: Tailor to match what you have identified for

Programmatic/Logistical evaluation in Section M-900, Paragraph II.D.4 Note.

(If submitting Ordering Type Contract: List the Original Total Contract Dollar Value for each Order or Order within the Series of Orders)

Current Total Contract Dollar Value: PCO Note: Tailor to match what you have identified for

Programmatic/Logistical evaluation in Section M-900, Paragraph II.D.4 Note.

(If submitting Ordering Type Contract: List the Current Total Contract Dollar Value for each Order or Order within the Series of Orders)

Period of Performance:

(If submitting Ordering Type Contract: List the Period of Performance for each Order or Order within the Series of

Orders)

Type/Complexity of Data Deliverables:

If submitting Ordering Type Contract: List the Type/Complexity of Data Deliverables for each Order or Order within the Series of Orders)

Attachment L-05

Relevancy Assessment

Category Example (PCO Note:

provided as an example only – remove this column)

Fill in for the Proposed Effort (GOVT has completed this column)

(DO NOT CHANGE)

Fill in for the Effort Identified in Paragraph B Above (Offeror/joint venture member/critical subcontractor completes)

The effort in Paragraph B required:

1. Nature of Business Area(s) Involved

Development, production, repair, services

2. Required Levels of Technology

State of the Art, COTS, Modified component

3. Materials and Production Processes

Forgings, weldings, etc.

4. Performance Location

Facility 1:

address/prototype

Facility 2: production

5. Contract Type(s) FFP, T&M, CPFF

6. Program Similarity

7. Program Complexity

8. Program Phase Design, development, production

9. Extent of subcontractor involvement

Prototype, production, specific assembly/role

10. Other

Was this contract effort (as identified above) submitted as a past performance source of data for a previous name of installation procurement. Yes No . If yes, identify the buyer and/or contracting officer, their phone number and office symbol and solicitation number of the procurement for which this effort was submitted.