Attach L-02 Past Performance Questionaire.docx

Attachment L-02: Past Performance Questionnaire

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Program Phase (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)):

H. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

I. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

J. Description of work performed:

K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel ☐ Other (Please specify):

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of services under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone number / e-mail address:

D. Respondent’s position (e.g., Program Manager, PCO/ACO, etc.):

E. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

F. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the tables below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

P1. How well did the contractor meet system/subsystem performance requirements? (Identify any waivers/deviations that were required.)

P2. How well did the contractor perform against the delivery schedules of the contract (or IMP/IMS if prior to delivery)? In the remarks, specify if the contractor met, exceeded, or failed to meet contractual delivery dates (or IMP/IMS if prior to delivery) and, if schedule slips occurred, state the number of slips and cumulative schedule variance.

P3. How well did the contractor define and implement a System Engineering Master Plan?

P4. How well did the contractor execute the System Engineering process and manage system and subsystem configuration data?

P5. How adequate/effective was the System Engineering Process?

P6. How well did the contractor implement open systems architecture design and development?

P7. How well did the contractor integrate the logistics support elements to provide effective support planning? (e.g., LRIP and/or fielded assets, CLS, ICS, Type 1 Training, and Life Cycle Cost visibility, provisioning)

P8. How well did the contractor execute the program to meet overall program schedules?

P9. How well did the contractor provide Training and Training Systems to support the program?

P10. How well did the contractor achieve performance-based logistics requirements?

P11. How well did the contractor meet the technical requirements of the specification?

P12. How was the quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts?

P13. How effective was overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, control and deliver on-time)?

P14. How reasonable and cooperative was the contractor when dealing with program staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)?

P15. How timely did the contractor resolve contract problems without extensive customer guidance?

P16. How effectively did the contractor resolve contract problems without extensive customer guidance?

P17. How well did the contractor understand customer objectives and technical requirements?

P18. How well did the contractor comply with customer objectives and technical requirements?

P19. How successfully did the contractor respond to emergency situations?

P20. How successfully did the contractor respond to surge situations?

P21. How effective was the contractor’s material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)?

P22. How effective was the contractor’s acquisition management?

P23. How effectively did the contractor implement responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support?

P24. How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts?

P25. How effectively was the contractor able to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort?

P26. How effectively was the contractor able to retain a qualified workforce on this effort?

P27. How effectively did the contractor provide experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

P28. How effectively did the contractor respond to contract changes?

Supporting Information: For all questions pertaining to Provision, Planning, and Execution Performance, please provide any supporting information that you feel is beneficial. Please state which question information applies to.

T1. How effectively did the contractor display initiative to solve technical problems?

T2. How effectively did the contractor display initiative to solve programmatic problems?

T3. How effectively did the contractor develop realistic progress schedules?

T4. How effective did contractor proposed alternative methods/processes reduce cost?

T5. How effective did contractor proposed alternative methods/processes improve maintainability?

Supporting Information: For all questions pertaining to Trade-off Management Performance, please provide any supporting information that you feel is beneficial. Please state which question information applies to.

S1. How successful was the contractor with timely award and effective management of subcontracts? In supporting information, discuss how well the contractor met small business participation in accordance with its small business subcontracting plan, (if applicable)?

S2. How effectively was the contractor able to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort through subcontracts?

S3. How effectively was the contractor able to retain a qualified subcontracts workforce on this effort?

S4. How well did the contractor develop, manage, and control system and subsystem interface requirements and communicate and manage system and subsystem requirements to the subcontractor?

S5. How well did the contractor manage quality/effectiveness of subcontracted efforts?

S6. How well did the contractor manage technical requirements of subcontracted efforts?

S7. How well did the contractor manage programmatic aspects of subcontracted efforts?

S8. How well did the contractor manage schedule and cost deviations of subcontracted work?

S9. How well did the contractor anticipate changes in cost of subcontracted work?

S10. How well did the contractor anticipate changes in schedule of subcontracted work?

Supporting Information: For all questions pertaining to Sub-Contract Management Performance, please provide any supporting information that you feel is beneficial. Please state which question information applies to.

E1. How effective was the contractor in identifying and tracking the program’s trends and progress, as well as mitigating potential problems in the areas of:

· organization

· planning, scheduling, and budgeting

· accounting

E2. How effective was the contractor in managing the sub-contractor’s performance in their identification and tracking of the program’s trends and progress, as well as managing the sub-contractor’s mitigation of potential problems in the areas of:

· organization

· planning, scheduling, budgeting

· accounting

Supporting Information: For all questions pertaining to the management of organization; planning, scheduling, and budgeting; and accounting, please provide any supporting information that you feel is beneficial. Please state which question information applies to.

C1. How accurately did the contractor forecast contract costs?

C2. How well did the contractor meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs?

C3. How successfully did the contractor alert the Government of unforeseen costs before they occurred?

C4. How sufficient and timely was the contractor’s cost reporting?

C5. How accurate was the contractor’s cost reporting?

C6. How accurate was the contractor in proposing and forecasting contract cost/price?

(2) Value of Negotiated Contract Changes

(3) Actual/Projected Cost to Complete

(4) Baseline Estimate at Completion

(5) Total Negotiated Changes EAC

(6) Cost Under run/Over run (-)

Supporting Information: For all questions pertaining to Cost Reporting Performance, please provide any supporting information that you feel is beneficial. Please state which question information applies to.

Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience, or are there any pending terminations?

☐ Yes ☐ Default ☐ Convenience ☐ Pending Terminations ☐ No

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

SECTION 5: GENERAL COMMENT

Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what he promised in his proposal, I [ click and select an item ] award to him today given that I had a choice.

REMARKS:

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

[click and pick the date]

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to: craig.keelen@us.af.mil

Section L Attachment L-02 Past Performance Questionaire