Environmental_Report_Project_130068.pdf

HAZARDOUS MATERIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

Facility Number: 30206 Task # 16: Repair North & South Hangar Windows

Wright-Patterson Air Force Base WPAFB, Ohio

(L&A Project # 16-0425)

(WPAFB Project Number: 101005-16) (Contract No. FA8601-12-D-0006)

Prepared for:

Mr. Drew Titone, AIA, LEED AP Woolpert

4454 Idea Center Blvd.

Dayton, Ohio 45430

(937) 531-1729

Prepared by:

Lawhon & Associates, Inc.

1441 King Avenue

Columbus, Ohio 43212

13 December 2016

Table of Contents

Section 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................. Page 3

Section 2.0 Asbestos Containing Materials ............................................................. Pages 3 - 4

Section 2.1 Methodology

Section 3.0 Asbestos Containing Material Summaries ............................................ Pages 4 - 5

Section 3.1 Confirmed Asbestos Containing Materials

Section 3.2 Presumed Asbestos Containing Materials

Section 3.3 Non-Asbestos Containing Materials

Section 4.0 Other Environmental Issues ................................................................... Pages 5 - 6

Section 4.1 PCB Glazing and Caulking

Section 5.0 Conclusions ............................................................................................... Pages 7

Section 5.1 Asbestos Containing Materials

Schedule of Appendices

A. Inspector and Laboratory Certifications B. Asbestos and PCB Bulk Sample Location Diagram C. Inventory of Asbestos and PCB Containing Materials D. Analytical Results Summary Table E. Asbestos Laboratory Analysis Certificates and Chain of Custody F. Poly Chlorinated Biphenyl Laboratory Analysis Certificates and Chain of

Custody G. Elliot Environmental Management Windows Sampling Report H. AF Form 3052 Cost Estimate

Hazardous Material Assessment 3

Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

Hazardous Material Assessment Report Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

Facility Number: 30206 Repair North & South Hangar Windows

1.0 Introduction

Lawhon & Associates, Inc. (L&A) conducted a hazardous material assessment [including asbestos-containing materials (ACMs)] of the windows at Facility Number: 30206 located at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio. The windows were inspected on August 31, 2016 by Mr. Chris Gauger (Certified Asbestos Hazard Evaluation Specialist # ES3562) of L&A. The consultants’ certifications are attached in Appendix A.

The hazardous material assessment was conducted in preparation of the Repair North and South Hangar Windows Project and was conducted in accordance with the EPA National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS) standards.

Hazardous materials assessed as part of this assessment include, but are not limited to;

asbestos-containing materials, Lead Based Paint (LBP), and poly-chlorinated bi-phenyl (PCB) caulking. The assessment was limited to materials projected to be impacted by the project only and should not be construed as a full building assessment.

2.0 Asbestos Containing Materials

Asbestos containing materials are governed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Emission Standards of Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) during a renovation. These materials are defined as containing greater than one percent asbestos. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) govern building materials containing any amount of asbestos.

The Clean Air Act (CAA) of 1970 required the EPA to develop and enforce regulations to protect the general public from exposure to airborne contaminants that are known to be hazardous to human health; therefore, EPA promulgated the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) (Title 40, CFR Part 61) on April 6, 1973. NESHAP is intended to minimize the release of asbestos fibers during certain activities (i.e., renovations, demolition, and installations). It specifies work practices to be followed during renovations of buildings (except apartment buildings that have no more than four dwelling units), which contain a specific amount of friable asbestos.

NESHAP requires that buildings be inspected for asbestos containing building materials (ACBM) prior to renovation/demolition projects.

NESHAP also requires owners and operators subject to the asbestos rules to notify delegated state and local agencies and/or the regional EPA offices before demolition or renovation activities begin. In addition, NESHAP requires the removal of all regulated asbestos containing materials (RACM) prior to demolition. Regulated Asbestos- Containing Materials (RACM) are (a) friable asbestos material, which are materials easily reduced to powder with hand pressure (b) Category I non-friable ACM that has become friable, (c) Category I non-friable ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting, abrading or broken into pieces smaller than four square inches, or (d) Category II non friable ACM that has a high probability of becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the material in the course of demolition or renovation operations. Category I non-friable

Hazardous Material Assessment 4

Wright-Patterson Air Force Base materials consist of materials such as resilient floor covering products, roofing products, gaskets, and packing. Category II non-friable materials consist of all other non-friable materials such as transite. NESHAP also requires all ACM (including Category I and II) be removed prior to intentional burning, such as for a fire department training exercise.

The State of Ohio Department of Health (ODH) regulates asbestos activities within the state. Professionals performing asbestos related activities must be certified/ licensed by ODH. Much like the EPA – NESHAP, ODH must be notified prior to asbestos removal activities.

2.1 Methodology

A list of suspect ACMs was compiled from the investigation of the structure.

Materials were categorized into RACM, Category I, and Category II materials.

L&A inventoried and procured confirmatory samples of suspect materials. A bulk sample location diagram can found in Appendix B.

In accordance to EPA protocols, a sufficient number of samples from each suspect ACM were collected to confirm or deny the presence of asbestos.

Samples were placed into clean sealed containers and identified with a unique sample number. Sampling tools were decontaminated between each sampling episode.

All samples were sent to a certified National Voluntary Lab Accredited Program laboratory. The lab utilized for bulk sample Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis for this assessment was International Asbestos Testing Laboratories, IATL (NVLAP # 101165-0) located at 9000 Commerce Parkway, Mt. Laurel, New Jersey, 08054. Samples were analyzed by the EPA Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) 600 Method. Samples reported with low concentrations of asbestos, <10% asbestos content, were reanalyzed using the EPA Point Count Method to determine a more accurate content.

3.0 Asbestos Containing Material Summaries

The following tables present ACM summaries. Detailed summaries including locations and quantities can be found in the inventory of asbestos containing materials (Appendix C). A table of the analytical results (Appendix D), and laboratory analysis certificates and chain of custody (Appendix E) are found in the attached appendices.

Hazardous Material Assessment 5

Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

3.1 Confirmed Asbestos Containing Materials

The following is a list of materials sampled and confirmed to contain asbestos.

Appendix C provides an inventory of asbestos containing material locations and quantities. L&A collected a sample of the original siding and the Tar Paper was found to contain asbestos.

Confirmed Asbestos Containing Material

Exterior North Hangar Window Frame Caulking (1)

Exterior South Hangar Window Frame Caulking (1)

Tar Paper Portion of Original Siding (1)

Notes: (1) Category II Non-Friable Asbestos Containing Material

3.2 Presumed Asbestos Containing Materials

There are no materials presumed or assumed to contain asbestos. All suspect asbestos containing materials were bulk sampled as part of this assessment.

3.3 Non-Asbestos Containing Materials

The following are lists of materials bulk sampled with laboratory analysis revealing No Asbestos Detected (NAD) for the entire homogenous area number.

Reference Appendices D & E for sample information and laboratory data. A previous sampling by Elliot Environmental Management produced positive lab results for asbestos containing material for the interior window glazing compound in both hangars. The report can be found in Appendix G.

Confirmed Asbestos Containing Material

Interior North Hangar Window Glazing Compound (1)

Interior South Hangar Window Glazing Compound (1)

Exterior North Hangar Window Glazing Compound (1)

Exterior South Hangar Window Glazing Compound (1)

Notes: (1) A previous sampling by Elliot Environmental Management produced positive lab results for asbestos containing material for interior window glazing compound in both hangars.

4.0 Other Environmental Issues

L&A performed an assessment of hazardous materials throughout facility number 30206.

The following presents detailed summaries of other hazardous materials identified.

Hazardous Material Assessment 6

4.1 PCB Glazing and Caulking

PCBs are persistent manmade chemicals that were widely used in construction material (i.e. caulk/ glaze) and electrical products before 1978. In 1976, Congress banned the manufacture and use of PCBs because of concern about their health and environmental effects and they were phased out except for certain limited uses in 1978. The use and disposal of PCBs before the phase-out resulted in their widespread presence in our soil, air, water and food. PCBs are now regulated under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).

PCBs were used widely in caulking and elastic sealant materials, particularly from 1950 through the 1970s. These materials were primarily used in windows, door frames, stairways, masonry columns, and other masonry building materials.

PCBs were used in these building materials because of its properties as a plasticizer.

EPA regulations implementing the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) prohibit the use of PCBs at levels above 50 ppm, including continued use in caulk that is already in place.

4.1.1 PCB Sample Results

The following table presents laboratory bulk sample results for PCB content using the EPA Method 8082. Laboratory certificates and chain of custody information can be found in Appendix G. The laboratory used for the analysis of PCB samples was Advanced Analytics. Each sample collected was analyzed using seven (7) different chemical extraction methods.

Sample Number/ Material/ Location

Sub-Sample Method Number

Result (mg/kg)

Detectio n Limit (ppm)

PCB

containing as defined by

EPA?

30206PCB-1/

Interior Hangar Window Glazing

Compound/

North Hangar

PCB-1016 ND 0.2 No

PCB-1221 ND 0.2 No

PCB-1232 ND 0.2 No

PCB-1242 ND 0.2 No

PCB-1248 ND 0.2 No

PCB-1254 ND 0.2 No

PCB-1260 ND 0.2 No

30206PCB-2/

Exterior Hangar Window Glazing

Compound/

North Hangar

PCB-1016 ND 0.2 No

PCB-1221 ND 0.2 No

PCB-1232 ND 0.2 No

PCB-1242 ND 0.2 No

PCB-1248 ND 0.2 No

PCB-1254 ND 0.2 No

PCB-1260 ND 0.2 No

Hazardous Material Assessment 7

Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

Sample Number/ Material/ Location

Sub-Sample Method Number

Result (mg/kg)

Detectio n Limit (ppm)

PCB

containing as defined by

EPA?

30206PCB-3/

Exterior Hangar Window Frame

Caulking/

South Hangar

PCB-1016 ND 0.2 No

PCB-1221 ND 0.2 No

PCB-1232 ND 0.2 No

PCB-1242 ND 0.2 No

PCB-1248 ND 0.2 No

PCB-1254 ND 0.2 No

PCB-1260 ND 0.2 No

Notations: mg/kg = milligram per kilogram; ppm = parts per million; BDL = Below Detection Limit; ND = Not Detected

1 mg/kg = 1 ppm; the window caulking sample did not exceed the limit of PCBs as defined by EPA, which is set at 50 ppm

5.0 Conclusions

Lawhon & Associates, Inc. (L&A) conducted a hazardous material assessment [including asbestos-containing materials (ACMs)] of the windows at facility number 30206 located at WPAFB. The building was inspected on August 31, 2016 by Mr. Chris Gauger of L&A. The consultants’ certifications are attached in Appendix A.

5.1 Asbestos Containing Materials

The following confirmed Category II Non-friable materials are present throughout facility number 30206 located at WPAFB. These materials must be removed by a State of Ohio Licensed Asbestos Abatement Contractor prior to impact from demolition or renovation activities:

• Exterior North Hangar Window Frame Caulking

• Exterior South Hangar Window Frame Caulking

• Exterior Siding (Tar Paper)

A previous sampling by Elliot Environmental Management produced positive lab results for asbestos containing material for interior window glazing compound in both hangars. The report can be found in Appendix G.

Hazardous Material Assessment 8

Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

If you have any questions please contact Chris Gauger or Chuck Wilson at 614-481- 8600.

Sincerely, Chris Gauger, AHES 35621 Environmental Technician

Chuck Wilson Vice President

APPENDIX A

Inspector and Labratory Certifications

APPENDIX B

Asbestos and PCB Bulk Sample Location Diagram

Appendix C

Inventory of Asbestos and PCB Containing Materials

INVENTORY OF ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS

Wright-Patterson AFB Appendix C 1 Inventory of Asbestos Containing Materials

Location ACM Approximate

Quantity Condition

EPA NESHAP

Classification &

Comments

North Hangar Window Caulking/ Glazing Compound 516 Window Systems: 28,380 sf Window Systems:

2,365 sf ACM Fair to Poor Category II Non-Friable

South Hangar Window Caulking/ Glazing Compound 516 Window Systems: 28,380 sf (Window Systems):

2,365 sf ACM Fair to Poor Category II Non-Friable

Throughout Original Siding Not Quantified Covered with New Siding

Category II Non-Friable

APPENDIX D

Analytical Results Summary Table

Wright‐Patterson AFB Lawh Lawhon & Associates Inc.

Facility Number: 30206 1441 King Ave Date Sampled: 08/31/2016 Columbus, OH 43212

Asbestos Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) Bulk Sample Analysis Summary

Sample Number

Material Sampled Sample Location

Percent Asbestos

30206‐1 Interior Window Glazing Compound North Hangar Door NAD

30206‐2 Interior Window Glazing Compound North Hangar Door NAD

30206‐3 Interior Window Glazing Compound North Hangar Upper Level South End

NAD

30206‐4 Interior Window Glazing Compound North Hangar East Side NAD

30206‐5 Exterior Window Glazing Compound North Hangar Door 2.3% Chrysotile (PC)

30206‐6 Exterior Window Glazing Compound North Hangar Door 3.1% Chrysotile (PC)

30206‐7 Exterior Window Glazing Compound North Hangar North East Side

NAD

30206‐8 Exterior Window Glazing Compound North Hangar South East Side

NAD

30206‐9 Exterior Window Caulking North Hangar North East Side

4.5% Chrysotile (PC)

30206‐10 Exterior Window Caulking North Hangar South East Side

4.3% Chrysotile (PC)

30206‐11 Interior Window Glazing Compound South Hangar Door 2.3% Chrysotile (PC)

30206‐12 Interior Window Glazing Compound South Hangar Door 2.5% Chrysotile (PC)

30206‐13 Interior Window Glazing Compound South Hangar Upper Level South End

NAD

30206‐14 Interior Window Glazing Compound South Hangar East Side NAD

30206‐15 Exterior Window Glazing Compound South Hangar Door 1.4% Chrysotile (PC)

30206‐16 Exterior Window Glazing Compound South Hangar Door 1.8% Chrysotile (PC)

30206‐17 Exterior Window Glazing Compound South Hangar North East Side

NAD

30206‐18 Exterior Window Glazing Compound South Hangar South East Side

NAD

30206‐19 Exterior Window Caulking South Hangar North East Side

4.8% Chrysotile (PC)

30206‐20 Exterior Window Caulking South Hangar South East Side

4.5% Chrysotile (PC)

Bold text denotes an Asbestos Containing Material; as defined by EPA, ODH, and OSHA.

Italicized text denotes an Asbestos Containing Material as defined by OSHA.

Legend

Abbreviation Definition Abbreviation Definition

PC Point Count Method Performed NAD No Asbestos Detected

Wright‐Patterson AFB Lawh Lawhon & Associates Inc.

Facility Number: 30206 1441 King Ave Date Sampled: 08/31/2016 Columbus, OH 43212

PCB Window Glazing Compound/ Caulking Analysis Summary

Sample Number

Material Sampled

Sample Location

Result

30206PCB‐1 Interior Window Glazing Compound North Hangar Door Below Detection Limit

30206PCB‐2 Interior Window Glazing Compound North Hangar Door Below Detection Limit

30206PCB‐3 Interior Window Glazing Compound North Hangar Upper Level South End

Below Detection Limit

APPENDIX E

Asbestos Laboratory Analysis Certifications

Chain of Custody

Lab No.: 6020596 Client No.: 30206-1

Description: Grey Glazing Facility:

Location: North Hangar Door

Percent Asbestos:

None Detected

Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material:

Percent Non-Fibrous Material:

Lab No.: 6020597 Client No.: 30206-2

Lab No.: 6020598 Client No.: 30206-3

Location: North Hangar Upper Level South End

Lab No.: 6020599 Client No.: 30206-4

Location: North Hangar East Side

Lab No.: 6020600 Client No.: 30206-5

Description: Off-White Glazing

PC 2.3 Chrysotile

97.7

Lab No.: 6020601 Client No.: 30206-6

Description: Lt Grey Glazing

PC 3.1 Chrysotile

96.9

Laboratory Director Frank E. Ehrenfeld, III

Approved By:

Date Analyzed: 09/02/2016

9/1/2016Date Received:

Analyst: Ellen Smith

Analytical Method -US EPA 600, R93-116. Please refer to the Appendix of this report for further information regarding your analysis.

Signature:

9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054

Telephone: 856-231-9449 Email: customerservice@iatl.com

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Client: Lawhon & Associates Inc.

1441 King Avenue Columbus OH 43212

9/2/2016Report Date:

Report No.: 518676 - PLM Project: Woolpert WPAFB Bldg 30206 Windows Project No.: 16-0425

PLM BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY

Client: LAW411

Dated : 9/7/2016 4:29:31 PM Page 1 of 6

Lab No.: 6020602 Client No.: 30206-7

Description: Clear Glazing

Location: North Hangar North East Side

Lab No.: 6020603 Client No.: 30206-8

Location: North Hangar South East Side

Lab No.: 6020604 Client No.: 30206-9

Description: Tan Caulk

Location: North Hangar North East Side

PC 4.5 Chrysotile

95.5

Lab No.: 6020605 Client No.: 30206-10

Description: Tan Caulk

Location: North Hangar South East Side

PC 4.3 Chrysotile

95.7

Lab No.: 6020606 Client No.: 30206-11

Location: South Hangar Door

PC 2.3 Chrysotile

97.7

Lab No.: 6020607 Client No.: 30206-12

PC 2.5 Chrysotile

97.5

Laboratory Director Frank E. Ehrenfeld, III

Approved By:

Date Analyzed: 09/02/2016

9/1/2016Date Received:

Analyst: Ellen Smith

Analytical Method -US EPA 600, R93-116. Please refer to the Appendix of this report for further information regarding your analysis.

Signature:

9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054

Telephone: 856-231-9449 Email: customerservice@iatl.com

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Client: Lawhon & Associates Inc.

1441 King Avenue Columbus OH 43212

9/2/2016Report Date:

Report No.: 518676 - PLM Project: Woolpert WPAFB Bldg 30206 Windows Project No.: 16-0425

PLM BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY

Dated : 9/7/2016 4:29:31 PM Page 2 of 6

Lab No.: 6020608 Client No.: 30206-13

Location: South Hangar Upper Level South End

Lab No.: 6020609 Client No.: 30206-14

Location: South Hangar East Side

Lab No.: 6020610 Client No.: 30206-15

PC 1.4 Chrysotile

98.6

Lab No.: 6020611 Client No.: 30206-16

PC 1.8 Chrysotile

98.2

Lab No.: 6020612 Client No.: 30206-17

Location: South Hangar North East Side

Lab No.: 6020613 Client No.: 30206-18

Location: South Hangar South East Side

Laboratory Director Frank E. Ehrenfeld, III

Approved By:

Date Analyzed: 09/02/2016

9/1/2016Date Received:

Analyst: Ellen Smith

Analytical Method -US EPA 600, R93-116. Please refer to the Appendix of this report for further information regarding your analysis.

Signature:

9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054

Telephone: 856-231-9449 Email: customerservice@iatl.com

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Client: Lawhon & Associates Inc.

1441 King Avenue Columbus OH 43212

9/2/2016Report Date:

Report No.: 518676 - PLM Project: Woolpert WPAFB Bldg 30206 Windows Project No.: 16-0425

PLM BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY

Dated : 9/7/2016 4:29:31 PM Page 3 of 6

Lab No.: 6020614 Client No.: 30206-19

Description: Tan Glazing

Location: South Hangar North East Side

PC 4.8 Chrysotile

95.2

Lab No.: 6020615 Client No.: 30206-20

Description: Tan Glazing

Location: South Hangar South East Side

PC 4.5 Chrysotile

95.5

Laboratory Director Frank E. Ehrenfeld, III

Approved By:

Date Analyzed: 09/02/2016

9/1/2016Date Received:

Analyst: Ellen Smith

Analytical Method -US EPA 600, R93-116. Please refer to the Appendix of this report for further information regarding your analysis.

Signature:

9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054

Telephone: 856-231-9449 Email: customerservice@iatl.com

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Client: Lawhon & Associates Inc.

1441 King Avenue Columbus OH 43212

9/2/2016Report Date:

Report No.: 518676 - PLM Project: Woolpert WPAFB Bldg 30206 Windows Project No.: 16-0425

PLM BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY

Dated : 9/7/2016 4:29:31 PM Page 4 of 6

APPENDIX F

Poly Chlorinated Biphenyl Laboratory Analysis Certificates & Chain of Custody

Project:

P.O. Number:

Project Manager:

Lawhon & Associates Inc. [Columbus]

1441 King Ave.

[none]

Chris Gauger

16-0425

Columbus, OH 43212

Date Reported: 9/9/16

30206 PCB-1

1609014-01 (Solid)

Client Sample I.D.:

AALI Sample I.D.:

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Date Received:

Date Collected: 8/31/16

9/2/16

Analyte

Reporting

Notes AnalystMethodAnalyzedPreparedLimitUnitsResult

Polychlorinated Biphenyls by EPA Method 8082

PCB-1016 0.2 EPA 8082mg/kg 9/6/16 9/8/16ND ATS

PCB-1221 0.2 EPA 8082mg/kg 9/6/16 9/8/16ND ATS

PCB-1232 0.2 EPA 8082mg/kg 9/6/16 9/8/16ND ATS

PCB-1242 0.2 EPA 8082mg/kg 9/6/16 9/8/16ND ATS

PCB-1248 0.2 EPA 8082mg/kg 9/6/16 9/8/16ND ATS

PCB-1254 0.2 EPA 8082mg/kg 9/6/16 9/8/16ND ATS

PCB-1260 0.2 EPA 8082mg/kg 9/6/16 9/8/16ND ATS

Surrogate: Tetrachloro-meta-xylene 10-130 9/6/16 9/8/16 EPA 808284.0 % ATS

Advanced Analytics Laboratories, Inc.

L. Eve Karnitis, President Page 1 of 3

Project Manager:

Lawhon & Associates Inc. [Columbus]

1441 King Ave.

[none]

Chris Gauger

16-0425

Columbus, OH 43212

Date Reported: 9/9/16

30206 PCB-2

1609014-02 (Solid)

Client Sample I.D.:

AALI Sample I.D.:

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Date Received:

Date Collected: 8/31/16

9/2/16

Analyte

Reporting

Notes AnalystMethodAnalyzedPreparedLimitUnitsResult

Polychlorinated Biphenyls by EPA Method 8082

PCB-1016 0.2 EPA 8082mg/kg 9/6/16 9/8/16ND ATS

PCB-1221 0.2 EPA 8082mg/kg 9/6/16 9/8/16ND ATS

PCB-1232 0.2 EPA 8082mg/kg 9/6/16 9/8/16ND ATS

PCB-1242 0.2 EPA 8082mg/kg 9/6/16 9/8/16ND ATS

PCB-1248 0.2 EPA 8082mg/kg 9/6/16 9/8/16ND ATS

PCB-1254 0.2 EPA 8082mg/kg 9/6/16 9/8/16ND ATS

PCB-1260 0.2 EPA 8082mg/kg 9/6/16 9/8/16ND ATS

Surrogate: Tetrachloro-meta-xylene 10-130 9/6/16 9/8/16 EPA 8082114 % ATS

L. Eve Karnitis, President Page 2 of 3

Project Manager:

Lawhon & Associates Inc. [Columbus]

1441 King Ave.

[none]

Chris Gauger

16-0425

Columbus, OH 43212

Date Reported: 9/9/16

30206 PCB-3

1609014-03 (Solid)

Client Sample I.D.:

AALI Sample I.D.:

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Date Received:

Date Collected: 8/31/16

9/2/16

Analyte

Reporting

Notes AnalystMethodAnalyzedPreparedLimitUnitsResult

Polychlorinated Biphenyls by EPA Method 8082

PCB-1016 0.2 EPA 8082mg/kg 9/6/16 9/8/16ND ATS

PCB-1221 0.2 EPA 8082mg/kg 9/6/16 9/8/16ND ATS

PCB-1232 0.2 EPA 8082mg/kg 9/6/16 9/8/16ND ATS

PCB-1242 0.2 EPA 8082mg/kg 9/6/16 9/8/16ND ATS

PCB-1248 0.2 EPA 8082mg/kg 9/6/16 9/8/16ND ATS

PCB-1254 0.2 EPA 8082mg/kg 9/6/16 9/8/16ND ATS

PCB-1260 0.2 EPA 8082mg/kg 9/6/16 9/8/16ND ATS

Surrogate: Tetrachloro-meta-xylene 10-130 9/6/16 9/8/16 EPA 808289.0 % ATS

Notes and Definitions

Analyte NOT DETECTED at or above the reporting limitND

Analyte DETECTEDDET

L. Eve Karnitis, President Page 3 of 3

APPENDIX G

Elliot Environmental Management Windows Sampling Report

ELLIOT ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

Collection and Analysis of Samples of Interior Window Pane Glazing Compound For Asbestos Content, Building 30206 Wright Patterson Air Force Base Dayton, Ohio 45433

Prepared for:

USAF AFMC 88 CEG/CENPL

Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, OH 45433

Prepared by:

Elliot Environmental Management 77 West Elmwood Drive, Suite 106

Dayton, Ohio, 45459

March 11, 2016

1047588347C Typewritten Text

ATTACHMENT G

ELLIOT ENVIRONMNETAL MANAGEMENT

Mr. Eric Buckingham Chief Construction Management

USAF AFMC 88 CEG/CENPL

WPAFB Dayton, OH 45431

Re: Collection and Analysis of Samples of Interior Window Pane Glazing Compound For Asbestos Content, Building 30206 Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, Ohio 45433

Dear Mr. Buckingham:

Elliot Environmental Management (EEM) conducted a limited inspection of suspect asbestos-containing window pane glazing compound on the interior of the north and south hangars of Building 30206, Area A, Wright Patterson Air Force Base (WPAFB) in Dayton, Ohio.

Project Background and Understanding

Elliot understands the following:

Interior glazing compound on interior windows is delaminating and in need of repair. Small pieces of debris have been observed on the hangar floors

Falling debris from the windows represents a potential Flying Object Debris (FOD) hazard for hangar operations.

Management of the FOD will require daily cleanup of the hangar floors until window clean up and repair can be completed.

Previous analysis of samples of glazing compound indicated that no asbestos has been detected in a limited number of samples and that a detailed inspection of this material is required to more accurately determine asbestos content.

Elliot also understands that the results of periodic air monitoring conducted by WPAFB have indicated that no airborne asbestos was detected.

This survey did not include characterization of asbestos content of windows on the flight line hangar doors as the glazing compound on these doors is minimal and the asbestos content of materials associated with the hangar doors was characterized during a previous asbestos survey.

The purpose of this inspection was to collect and analyze samples of window pane glazing from accessible areas for analysis to determine asbestos content.

Elliot’s task was to r to collect and analyze samples of window pane glazing from accessible areas for analysis to determine asbestos content The results of this inspection will be used to help ensure that appropriate hazardous materials controls and abatement measures can be implemented prior to, and in conjunction with, planned renovation and maintenance activities at Building 30206.

This letter report summarizes Elliot’s findings, conclusions, and recommendations. A Bulk Sample Data Summary is presented as Table 1.

Copies of the analytical laboratory reports are attached as Appendix A.

ASBESTOS INSPECTION

The survey was scheduled and coordinated with Mr. Eric Buckingham and Gary Friend with WPAFB. Elliot’s Ohio-certified Asbestos Hazard Evaluation Specialist conducted the asbestos inspection.

Mr. Tom Wenk (Ohio Department of Health certified Asbestos Hazard Evaluation Specialist # ES 32076) served as Elliot’s Project Manager and prepared this report.

Name ODH License No. Signature

Tom Wenk ES32076

The survey was limited to a visual inspection of the hangar floors and windows and ledges that could be safely accessed from a ladder or secure catwalk.

Sampling Methods

To avoid disturbing suspect ACM any more than necessary and to minimize the release of asbestos fibers, Elliot performed bulk sampling of suspect materials in accordance with generally accepted procedures outlined in the current Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidance documents. Each sample was collected and placed in a clean, sealable plastic container and labeled with a unique sample identification number. This sample number was recorded on project drawings and on the sample container.

Additional information, including the date of the inspection, the name of the inspector, the building name (or number), a brief description of the sample, the exact sampling location, and the type of material sampled (e.g., thermal insulation, ceiling tile, or floor tile) was also recorded in the field notes.

Elliot collected approximately 45 samples of suspect asbestos-containing glazing compound

Analytical Methods

Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM)

Selected samples of suspect ACM were submitted to an accredited laboratory for analysis by PLM in accordance with the prescribed EPA Test Method (EPA/600/R- 93/116), “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials,” 40 CFR Part 763, Appendix A to Subpart F. Elliot submitted samples to the following laboratories:

Schneider Laboratories in Richmond Virginia

Schneider Labs is fully accredited by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) under its National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP). The NVLAP is the quality assurance program for laboratories analyzing bulk samples for asbestos content by PLM.

The PLM method (visual estimation), which the EPA currently recommends for the determination of asbestos in bulk samples of friable insulation materials, is used for the qualitative identification of six morphologically different types of asbestos fibers:

chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, anthophyllite, tremolite, and actinolite asbestos.

The method specifies that the asbestos content in a bulk sample shall be determined by visual estimation and reported as a percentage (rounded to the nearest percent) within the range of 0 to 100. Minute quantities of asbestos in bulk samples may be reported as "trace" (tr) or less than one percent. The analytical method determined the "area percent" asbestos or the percentage of the area of a microscopic field of view that is occupied by asbestos fibers.

In November of 1991, the USEPA amended the analytical protocol for analysis of bulk samples for asbestos content to determine compliance with National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations. The revised protocol mandates the use of an additional analytical procedure, called "point-counting", if PLM analysis results show less than ten percent (10%) asbestos by weight. The amended protocol directly affects the status of those sample results at 0-1% asbestos. PLM analytical results that exhibit asbestos content to be less than 10% must be assumed to be asbestos-containing or point counted to verify results. The EPA and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) define ACM as any material that contains more than one percent asbestos (>1%).

The EPA and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) define ACM as any material that contains more than one percent asbestos by weight. The method specifies that the asbestos content in a bulk sample shall be determined by visual estimation and reported as a finite percentage (rounded to the nearest percent) within the range of 0 to 100. Minute quantities of asbestos in bulk samples may be reported as "trace" (tr), or less than one percent. The analytical method determined the "area percent" asbestos, or the percentage of the area of a microscopic field of view that is occupied by asbestos fibers.

DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

Results of analysis indicated that no asbestos was detected in 27 of 29 samples collected. However, the asbestos content of two samples indicated an asbestos content of 2% chrysotile (Sample Nos. IWG-11 and IWG-29). Further analysis by the PLM

Point Count Method confirmed asbestos contents of 0.25% and 0.75% Chrysotile in

Samples IWG 11 and 29 respectively.

Materials with asbestos contents less than 1% are not considered a regulated ACM under current EPA asbestos regulations. However, workers disturbing this must comply with applicable requirements of the OSHA Construction Standard for Asbestos (29 CFR

19126.1101).

Elliot appreciates the opportunity to provide technical assistance in conjunction with this project. Please do not hesitate to call our office at 937-776-3535 if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely, ELLIOT ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

Tom Wenk A.H.E.S.

#ES 32076

APPENDIX A

Laboratory Reports for Analysis of Suspect ACMs

Attn:

Address: 319 Shawnee Tr.

Order #: 161429

Dayton, OH 45458

Project: Bld 206 Window Glazing Comp.

Elliot Environmental Management (4819)Customer:

Number: PO Number:

Received 03/10/16

Schneider Laboratories Global, Inc 2512 W. Cary Street • Richmond, Virginia • 23220-5117 804-353-6778 • 800-785-LABS (5227) • Fax 804-359-1475

03/10/16

Location:

Analyzed

03/10/16Reported

Analysis Report

PLM Analysis

Cust. IDSample ID LocationCollected Asbestos Fibers Other Materials

EPA 600/R-93/116 & 600/M4-82-020Method:

Window Glazing Compound02/18/16 IWG-1161429-001

Gray, Brittle

Window GlazingLayer 1: None Detected NON FIBROUS MATERIAL100%

Window Glazing Compound02/18/16 IWG-3161429-002

Gray, Brittle

Window GlazingLayer 1: None Detected NON FIBROUS MATERIAL100%

Window Glazing Compound02/18/16 IWG-10161429-003

Gray, Brittle

Window GlazingLayer 1: None Detected NON FIBROUS MATERIAL100%

Window Glazing Compound02/18/16 IWG-11161429-004

Gray, Brittle

Window GlazingLayer 1: NON FIBROUS MATERIAL98%CHRYSOTILE2%

Window Glazing Compound02/18/16 IWG-12161429-005

Light Gray, Brittle

Window GlazingLayer 1: None Detected NON FIBROUS MATERIAL100%

Window Glazing Compound02/18/16 IWG-17161429-006

Gray, Brittle

Window GlazingLayer 1: None Detected NON FIBROUS MATERIAL100%

Window Glazing Compound02/18/16 IWG-22161429-007

Gray, Brittle

Window GlazingLayer 1: None Detected NON FIBROUS MATERIAL100%

Window Glazing Compound02/18/16 IWG-23161429-008

Light Gray, Brittle

Window GlazingLayer 1: None Detected NON FIBROUS MATERIAL100%

Reporting Limit: 1% PLM analysis is based on Visual Estimation and NESHAP recommends that any asbestos content less than 10 percent be verified by PLM Point Count or TEM Analysis. This report must not be reproduced except in full with the approval of the laboratory. The test results reported relate only to the samples submitted.

PLM Analysis

Cust. IDSample ID LocationCollected Asbestos Fibers Other Materials

EPA 600/R-93/116 & 600/M4-82-020Method:

Window Glazing Compound02/18/16 IWG-24161429-009

Gray, Brittle

Window GlazingLayer 1: None Detected NON FIBROUS MATERIAL100%

Window Glazing Compound02/18/16 IWG-25161429-010

White, Brittle

Window GlazingLayer 1: None Detected NON FIBROUS MATERIAL100%

Window Glazing Compound02/18/16 IWG-26161429-011

White, Brittle

Window GlazingLayer 1: None Detected NON FIBROUS MATERIAL100%

Window Glazing Compound02/18/16 IWG-27161429-012

White, Brittle

Window GlazingLayer 1: None Detected NON FIBROUS MATERIAL100%

Window Glazing Compound02/18/16 IWG-28161429-013

White, Brittle

Window GlazingLayer 1: None Detected NON FIBROUS MATERIAL100%

Window Glazing Compound02/18/16 IWG-30161429-014

Light Gray, Brittle

Window GlazingLayer 1: None Detected NON FIBROUS MATERIAL100%

Window Glazing Compound02/18/16 IWG-31161429-015

Gray, Brittle

Window GlazingLayer 1: None Detected NON FIBROUS MATERIAL100%

Window Glazing Compound02/18/16 IWG-32161429-016

Gray, Brittle

Window GlazingLayer 1: None Detected NON FIBROUS MATERIAL100%

Window Glazing Compound02/18/16 IWG-33161429-017

Gray, Brittle

Window GlazingLayer 1: None Detected NON FIBROUS MATERIAL100%

Window Glazing Compound02/18/16 IWG-34161429-018

Gray, Brittle

Window GlazingLayer 1: None Detected NON FIBROUS MATERIAL100%

Window Glazing Compound02/18/16 IWG-35161429-019

Gray, Brittle

Window GlazingLayer 1: None Detected NON FIBROUS MATERIAL100%

Reporting Limit: 1% PLM analysis is based on Visual Estimation and NESHAP recommends that any asbestos content less than 10 percent be verified by PLM Point Count or TEM Analysis. This report must not be reproduced except in full with the approval of the laboratory. The test results

PLM Analysis

Cust. IDSample ID LocationCollected Asbestos Fibers Other Materials

EPA 600/R-93/116 & 600/M4-82-020Method:

Window Glazing Compound02/18/16 IWG-36161429-020

Gray, Brittle

Window GlazingLayer 1: None Detected NON FIBROUS MATERIAL100%

Window Glazing Compound02/18/16 IWG-37161429-021

Gray, Brittle

Window GlazingLayer 1: None Detected NON FIBROUS MATERIAL100%

Window Glazing Compound02/18/16 IWG-38161429-022

Gray, Brittle

Window GlazingLayer 1: None Detected NON FIBROUS MATERIAL100%

Window Glazing Compound02/18/16 IWG-39161429-023

Gray, Brittle

Window GlazingLayer 1: None Detected NON FIBROUS MATERIAL100%

Window Glazing Compound02/18/16 IWG-40161429-024

Light Gray, Brittle

Window GlazingLayer 1: None Detected NON FIBROUS MATERIAL100%

Window Glazing Compound02/18/16 IWG-41161429-025

Light Gray, Brittle

Window GlazingLayer 1: None Detected NON FIBROUS MATERIAL100%

Window Glazing Compound02/18/16 IWG-42161429-026

Light Gray, Brittle

Window GlazingLayer 1: None Detected NON FIBROUS MATERIAL100%

Window Glazing Compound02/18/16 IWG-43161429-027

Light Gray, Brittle

Window GlazingLayer 1: None Detected NON FIBROUS MATERIAL100%

Window Glazing Compound02/18/16 IWG-44161429-028

Light Gray, Brittle

Window GlazingLayer 1: None Detected NON FIBROUS MATERIAL100%

Microscopy Supervisor

Reviewed By: Hind Eldanaf

Total layers analyzed on order: 28

161429-03/10/16 04:29 PM

Analyst: Hashim, Reel

Reporting Limit: 1% PLM analysis is based on Visual Estimation and NESHAP recommends that any asbestos content less than 10 percent be verified by PLM Point Count or TEM Analysis. This report must not be reproduced except in full with the approval of the laboratory. The test results

Order #: 161045

Dayton, OH 45458

Project: Bldg 206

Elliot Environmental Management (4819)Customer:

Number: PO Number:

Received 03/08/16

Schneider Laboratories Global, Inc 2512 W. Cary Street • Richmond, Virginia • 23220-5117 804-353-6778 • 800-785-LABS (5227) • Fax 804-359-1475

03/08/16

Location:

Analyzed

03/08/16Reported

Analysis Report

PLM Analysis

Cust. IDSample ID LocationCollected Asbestos Fibers Other Materials

EPA 600/R-93/116 & 600/M4-82-020Method:

Glazing Compound03/07/16 IWG-29161045-001

White, Brittle

GlazingLayer 1: NON FIBROUS MATERIAL98%CHRYSOTILE2%

Microscopy Supervisor

Reviewed By: Hind Eldanaf

Total layers analyzed on order: 1

161045-03/08/16 10:22 AM

Analyst: Hashim, Reel

Reporting Limit: 1% PLM analysis is based on Visual Estimation and NESHAP recommends that any asbestos content less than 10 percent be verified by PLM Point Count or TEM Analysis. This report must not be reproduced except in full with the approval of the laboratory. The test results

Order #: 161497

Dayton, OH 45458

Project: Bld 206 Window Glazing Comp.

Elliot Environmental Management (4819)Customer:

Number: PO Number:

Received 03/11/16

Schneider Laboratories Global, Inc 2512 W. Cary Street • Richmond, Virginia • 23220-5117 804-353-6778 • 800-785-LABS (5227) • Fax 804-359-1475

03/11/16

Location:

Analyzed

03/11/16Reported

Analysis Report

PLM Analysis

Cust. IDSample ID LocationCollected Asbestos Fibers Other Materials

EPA 600/R-93/116 & 600/M4-82-020 with Point CountMethod:

Window Glazing Compound02/18/16 IWG-11161497-001

Gray, Brittle, Homogenous

Window GlazingLayer 1: NON FIBROUS MATERIAL99.75%CHRYSOTILE0.25%

Microscopy Supervisor

Reviewed By: Hind Eldanaf

Total layers analyzed on order: 1

161497-03/11/16 09:42 AM

Analyst: Hashim, Reel

Reporting limit: 0.25% Samples analyzed by the EPA Point Count test method. This report must not be reproduced except in full with the approval of the lab, and must not be used to claim NVLAP or other government agency endorsement. The test results reported relate only to the samples submitted.

Order #: 161288

Dayton, OH 45458

Project: Bldg 206

Elliot Environmental Management (4819)Customer:

Number: PO Number:

Received 03/09/16

Schneider Laboratories Global, Inc 2512 W. Cary Street • Richmond, Virginia • 23220-5117 804-353-6778 • 800-785-LABS (5227) • Fax 804-359-1475

03/09/16

Location:

Analyzed

03/09/16Reported

Analysis Report

PLM Analysis

Cust. IDSample ID LocationCollected Asbestos Fibers Other Materials

EPA 600/R-93/116 & 600/M4-82-020 with Point CountMethod:

Glazing Compound03/07/16 IWG-29161288-001

White, Brittle, Homogenous

GlazingLayer 1: NON FIBROUS MATERIAL99.25%CHRYSOTILE0.75%

Microscopy Supervisor

Reviewed By: Hind Eldanaf

Total layers analyzed on order: 1

161288-03/09/16 01:52 PM

Analyst: Hashim, Reel

Reporting limit: 0.25% Samples analyzed by the EPA Point Count test method. This report must not be reproduced except in full with the approval of the lab, and must not be used to claim NVLAP or other government agency endorsement. The test results reported relate only to the samples submitted.

APPENDIX H

AF Form 3052 Cost Estimate

CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE BREAKDOWN

MATERIAL COST LABOR COSTS

LINE UNIT OTHER

NO. ITEM OF MANHOUR AVERAGE DIRECT LINE

MEASURE QUANTITY UNIT TOTAL RATE TOTAL COSTS TOTAL

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

1 ACM Window Caulking/ Glazing Compound (System) 2365 sf 16000 68.00$ 1,088,000.00$ 100,000.00$ 1,188,000.00$

2 Lead Based Paint 8000 68.00$ 544,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 594,000.00$

AF FORM 3052 Jan 88 PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE

OMB No. 0704-0193

Expires

CONTRACTOR

Lawhon & Associates, Inc.

ADDRESS

1441 King Avenue, Columbus, ohio 43212

CONTRACT FOR (Work to be preformed) Hazardous Materials Abatement

PROJECT NUMBER

101005-16

WORK LOCATION

Facility: Building 30206 Window Repair/ Replacement

PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER

PROPOSED TOTAL CONTRACT PRICE

$1,463,238.00

Atch 8

TOTAL MATERIAL COSTS $ -

TOTAL LABOR COSTS $ 1,632,000.00

TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ 150,000.00

TOTAL DIRECT COSTS $ -

OVERHEAD 5% $ 89,100.00

SUBTOTAL $ 1,871,100.00

PROFIT 5% $ 93,555.00

TOTAL PRICE $ 1,964,655.00

DATE _____ 12-Sep-16 FIRM NAME ______________Lawhon & Associates, Inc.

TITLE ____ Department Manager BY _________________________________________________

a. The existing, verifiable data.

b. The judgmental factors applied in projecting from known data to the estimate, and

c. The contingencies used by the offeror in his proposed price.

(Reverse of AF Form 3052, Jan 88)

Col 9 Other Direct Costs . Enter estimated costs of special equipment and other items (listed in column 1) which are special to the contract and of significant dollar value.

Col 10 Line Total. Self-explanatory.

Col 2 Unit of Measure. Description of the unit in which each item is to be estimated (examples - square yards - SY, cubic yards - CY, square feet - SF, linear feet - LF, board feet - BF, each - EA, pound - LB).

Col 3 Quantity . Contractor's estimate of quantity required in terms of unit of measure (column 2). Items and units of measure will be furnished by the Government. Quantity estimates will be furnished by the Government only when it is anticipated that a unit price contract will

Col 4 and 5 Material Costs. Enter unit cost (Col 4) of material to be supplied and total cost (col 5) for item listed in column 1.

Col 6, 7 and 8 Labor Costs. Enter in col 6 the estimated number of manhours or mandays needed to perform the work listed in column 1.

Enter in col 7 the average rate per manhour (manday) and in col 8 the total labor cost.

3. When attachment of supporting cost or pricing data to this form is impracticable, the data will be described (with schedules as appropriate), and made available to the contracting officer or his authorized representative upon request.

4. By submission of this proposal the offeror grants to the contracting officer, or his authorized representative, the right to examine, for the purpose of verifying the cost or pricing data submitted, those books, records, documents and other supporting data which will permit adequate evaluation of such cost or pricing data, along with the computations and projections used therein. This right may be exercised in connection with any negotiations prior to contract award.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING AF FORM 3052

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

NOTE: In addition to other totals entered on various pages, the grand total of column 10, plus overhead and profit will be shown on the last page as follows:

1. The purpose of this form is to provide a standard format by which the offeror submits to the Government a summary of incurred and estimated costs (and attached supporting information) suitable for detailed review and analysis. Prior to the award of a contract resulting from this proposal the offeror shall, under the conditions stated in ASPR 3-807.3, be required to submit a certificate of current cost or pricing data (see ASPR 3-807.3(e) and 3.807.4).

2. In addition to the specific information required by this form, the offeror is expected, in good faith, to incorporate in and submit with this form any additional data, supporting schedules, or substantiation which are reasonably required for the conduct of an appropriate review and analysis in the light of the specific facts of this procurement. For effective negotiations, it is essential that there be a clear understanding of

In short, the offeror's estimating process itself needs to be disclosed.

(Signature)

Col 1 Item. Description of materials required, work to be done, special equipment needed, etc. Breakdown should be in sufficient detail to permit itemizing of all direct costs.