Pre_Award_RFI-2_Response.pdf

Solicitation #: FA8601-13-R-0052

ZHTV 11-0002, RENOVATE RESTROOMS F/20016

Pre-Award RFI-2

Q1. 1. Drawing page A2. In room 152 note #23 accompanies note #38 but in room 151 note #6 and note #38 are paired together, which seems more accurate. In both rooms the trash receptacle is scheduled to remain per note #6 of the demolition key. Were the pairing notes 23 and 38 together in room 152 the architect’s intent?

Response: The pairing of notes 23 & 38 are correct in this instance. The existing receptacle to remain is acceptable.

Q2. Drawing page A3. Note #10 was used in Rms. 151.A, 152.A and 153. In similar installations throughout the drawings note #27 was typically used in these instances. Should note #27 have been used in these rooms in lieu of note #10?

Response: The use of Note #10 on the Vestibule Ceilings is in error in this instance. Coded notes 11

(gyp soffit to remain) and 27 (paint gyp soffit) are applicable. The finish drawings indicate these gyp. brd. ceilings shall be painted per note 10.

Q3. This note is being submitted for informational purposes; there is currently no room identification signage (note #34) used on drawing page A4 for rooms 141 and 142. Was this the architect intent?

Response: A future Addendum #1 will clarifyrestroom signage at each restroom shall be in the scope of work.

Q4. Drawing page A5. Note #11 is used in Rm. 118. In similar installations throughout the drawings note #27 was typically used in this instance. Should note #27 have been used in this room in lieu of note #11?

Response: The finish drawings indicate these gyp. brd. ceilings shall be painted per note 10.