Attach 1_CATP_PWS.pdf

PDF 5 MB Posted

Attached to
LITENING AN/AAQ-28 Contractor Logistic Support (CLS)
Solicitation number
FA8540-24-R-0007
Issued by

About this file

This is a Performance-Based Work Statement (PWS) for the Comprehensive Advanced Targeting Pod AN/AAQ-28 LITENING Targeting Pod System (LTPS) issued by the United States Air Force Combat Avionics Program Office. The document outlines contractor logistics support (CLS) requirements for the LITENING Advanced Targeting Pod (ATP) across multiple military platforms, including Combat Air Forces, Air Force Reserve Command, Air National Guard, United States Marine Corps, and United States Navy.

The PWS covers a 10-year Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (ID/IQ) contract with a base one-year ordering period and four additional annual ordering periods, with an option for five more one-year periods. Key objectives include maintaining a 92% fleet availability rate, providing engineering, production, repair, integration, configuration management, test, and logistics support for the LITENING targeting pod system. The contractor (Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation) will be responsible for pod fleet sustainment, logistics management, hardware/software upgrades, technical manual updates, site activations, and maintaining a minimum of 200 Mean Time Between Removals (MTBR). The contract includes various contract line item numbers (CLINs) covering fixed and variable support costs, hardware production, maintenance training, and engineering services.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
FA854024R0007-0008.pdf PDF
Attach 9_GFP.pdf PDF
Attach 8_SectionLPricingInstructions.pdf PDF
Attach 7_ConsolidatedClauseList.pdf PDF
Attach 5_TandE_OandA.pdf PDF
Attach 2_AFMC_FORM158_Packaging.pdf PDF
Attach 3_DDFORM1653_Transportation.pdf PDF
Attach 6_WageDeterminations.pdf PDF
Exhibit 1_DD1423_CDRLsPkg.pdf PDF
A00Y TMCR GUEE 24-16 LITENING Updated6_12_2025.pdf PDF
FA854024R0007-0007 FINAL.pdf PDF
JUL2025A01G.pdf PDF
JUL2025A00Z.pdf PDF
JUL2025A01F.pdf PDF
JUL2025A00Y.pdf PDF
AUG2025A00J.pdf PDF
FA8540-24-R-0007-0006.pdf PDF
FA854024R0007-0005.pdf PDF
FA854024R0007_0004.pdf PDF
FA854024R0007_0003.pdf PDF
FA854024R0007_0002.pdf PDF
Attach_6_DD1423Pkg.pdf PDF
Attach_1_2025_CATP_PWS_RevC.pdf PDF
FA854024R0007-0001.pdf PDF
Show all 24

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Performance- Based Work Statement

For

Comprehensive Advanced Targeting Pod

AN/AAQ-28 LITENING Targeting Pod System (LTPS)

F3QCAB4100A001

xx December 2025

Prepared/Approved by: United States Air Force (USAF) Combat Avionics Program Office

Air Force Life Cycle Management Center (AFLCMC)/WNX

Robins AFB, GA 31098-1813

Change Page during Draft Phase

This page will be removed once Final PWS is edited/updated during the RFP Phase.

Revision No Date Changes Made

Rev A - Original

Rev B 10 Oct 24 1. Added draft change page

2. Edited CLINs to match PKs RFP

3. Created 4.4.8.1.1 and 4.4.8.2 to delineate OAA T&E versus

O&E Repair and added CLINs

4. Edited 4.6.2 Title to include Obsolescence Redesign and map to CLIN x051

5. Edited Section regarding RAMPOD. Going to be Integrated

Maintenance Data System (IMDS) in the future. We also put approved Maintenance Information System (MIS) just to cover all bases. This is really new and we don’t exactly know what is going on and/or if it will work!

6. Edit PWS per discussions held on 9/30/24 and 10/10/24

7. Updated all published documents

8. Added page numbers because, bless it…

Rev C 30 Oct 24 1. Added Quality CDRL requirement per QASP instructions

2. Edited language in 6.1 CM and Data Management to reflect

CDRL submission quality requirements.

3. Corrected 3.7.6 to match SPOT checklist

4. Updated recommended spelling typos and sections as requested by NGC

5. Updated the following sections per USG PWS and QASP guide. References and simplified some language-overall intent has not changed in these sections:

a. 3.2, 3.7.2, 3.7.3, 3.7.4, 3.7.6, 4.2, 4.3.2, 7.5, 7.6, 8.1, 8.2, 8.2.1, 8.2.2, 8.2.2.1, 8.2.2.2, 8.2.2.3, 9.2

b. Removed 3.8.4 Generic Support (Subtasks)

c. Replaced NISPOM w/updated 32 CFR part 117

d. Removed “Access to Robins AFB” from section 8.2

(formerly 8.2.2.4)

e. Moved 8.2.2.7 Mishap Notification/Investigation to

Safety Section 9.2

f. Added Safety Section 9.4, 9.5, 9.6, 9.9, 9.10 and associated CDRLs

Rev D 6 Dec 24 1. Updated CDRL tables

2. Updated FAR references and dates

3. Updated language based on NGC’s named

CATP_PWS_RevC_NGSC Comment (8-8-25)

4. Added Table of Contents (TOC)

Contents

1. Description

1.1 Scope:

1.2 Objective(s):

2. Documents

2.1 Applicable Documents and Order of Precedence:

2.2 LITENING Form, Fit, Function Documentation:

2.3 DoD, Air Force, and Military Standards/Instructions:

2.4 Other Documents:

3. Technical Requirements

3.1 Period and Place of Performance:

3.2 Item Unique Identification (IUID):

3.3 Packaging, Handling, Storage, and Transportation (PHS&T):

3.3.1 LITENING Shipping Containers (CLIN x040):

3.4 Counterfeit Electronic Parts:

3.5 Data Management System/Support Data:

3.6 Travel/Taxes & Shipping (CLIN x049):

3.7 Government Property and Services:

3.7.1 Definitions:

3.7.2 Reporting of Government Property:

3.7.3 Loss of Government Property:

3.7.4 Return/Retention of Government Property:

3.7.5 Government System(s):

3.7.6 Government Provided Logistics Support for OCONUS Contractor

Employees:

3.8 Systems Engineering

3.8.1 Integrated Production & Process Development & Risk Management:

3.8.2 Operations Safety, Suitability, and Effectiveness (OSS&E) Support:

3.8.3 Prohibited Materials – Class I Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS):

3.8.4 Design Engineering:

4. Contractor Logistics Support, Sustainment, and Engineering Services

4.1 Availability Support (AS) Scope

4.2 Availability Support Services Summary (SS):

4.3 AS Fixed Cost (CLIN x001, x002, x003, x004, x005, x006, x007, x008): . 2422

4.3.1 General Program Management

4.3.2 Quality Management

4.3.3 Risk Management

4.3.4 Meeting Support

4.3.5 Contractual and Financial Management

4.3.6 Associated Contractor Agreements (ACA):

4.4 AS Variable Cost (CLIN x009, x010, x011, x012, x013, x014, x015, x016):

4.4.1 Flight Hour Reconciliation:

4.4.2 Availability Support Organizational Level (O-Level Maintenance):

4.4.3 Classified Video and Advanced Digital Recorder (VAADR)

Removable Memory Module (VRMM) Repair, Transportation, and Handling

4.4.4 Availability Support Deficiency Reporting/Corrective Action:

4.4.6 Pod Repair Support (PRS)-USMC/USN:

4.4.7 Availability Support/Service Life:

4.4.8 Sustainment Spares and Repair parts:

4.5 Availability Support Requirements Withhold

4.6 Mean Time Between Removals (MTBR)

4.6.1 Failure Reporting and Corrective Action System (FRACAS):

4.6.2 Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages

(DMSMS)/Obsolescence Redesign (CLIN X051):

4.7 Supply Chain Management:

4.7.1 Standard Base Supply System (SBSS) (CLIN x052):

4.7.2 SubVendor 3-5 Year Supply Chain Plan:

4.8 CONUS/OCONUS Site Activations (SA) (CLINs x033, x034, material x050):

4.8.1 Site Survey:

4.8.2 Site Activation Support equipment:

4.9 Operational Flight Program (OFP) Software Development, Contractor Design

Try-Out (DTO), Software Sustainment (CLIN x044):

4.9.1 Contractor Design Try-out (DTO):

4.9.2 OFP Software Loading off-site:

5. Hardware

5.1 Hardware Scope (CLIN x039, x040, x041, x042, x043):

5.1.1 Production Pods, Replenishment Pods, and LRU/WRA (CLIN x039, x042, x043):

5.1.2 Hardware Upgrade/Modification Kits (CLIN x042, x043):

5.1.3 Initial Spares/Support Equipment (CLIN x039, x041, x042):

5.1.4 Right to Title of Initial Spares (LRU/WRAs):

5.1.5 Provisioning:

5.2 Maintenance (Mx) Aircrew Training/Familiarization (CLINs x035, x036) 3938

6. Configuration and Data Management (CLIN x048)

6.1 Configuration Management Scope:

6.2 Technical Orders/Technical Manuals (CLIN x047):

6.3 Engineering Data (CLIN x048):

6.3.1 Engineering Data Guidance Conference:

6.3.2 Relationship of Contractor with Sub-Contractors/Vendors:

6.3.3 Engineering Data Updates and Revisions:

6.4 Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs) and Notice of Revisions (NORs): . 4442

6.5 Variances:

7. Other Requirements

7.1 Special Studies/Analysis and Quick Reaction Efforts (CLIN x045):

7.2 Information Assurance/Cyber Security (CLIN x046):

7.3 Status and Technical Reports:

7.4 Inspection of Services:

7.5 Service Contract Reporting:

7.6 Invoicing/Payment and Receipt/Acceptance:

8. General Information

8.1 Continuation of Mission-Essential Services during a Crisis:

8.2 Security Requirements and Regulations:

8.2.1 Cyber Security Considerations, Operations Security (OPSEC), and

Communications Security (COMSEC):

8.2.2 Security Clearance, Incident or Violation:

8.3 Trafficking In Persons:

9. Safety Requirements

9.1 Contractor Environmental, Safety, and Occupational Health Compliance: 4847

9.2 Mishap Notification/Investigation:

9.3 Voluntary Protection Program (VPP):

9.4 Hazardous Materials Management Program (HMMP) Plan:

9.5 Hazardous Materials Management Program (HMMP) Plan:

9.6 System Safety Hazard Analysis Report (SSHAR):

9.7 Safety Assessment Report (SAR):

9.8 Engineering Change Proposal System Safety Report (ECPSSR):

9.9 Waiver or Deviation System Safety Report (WDSSR):

9.10 System Safety Program Plan (SSPP):

9.11 Hazard Tracking System (HTS) Data:

10. Appendices

1. Description

1.1 Scope:

The overall scope of this Performance Work Statement (PWS) defines the Northrop

Grumman Systems Corporation (NGSC) effort for the Laser Infrared Targeting and

Navigating (LITENING) Advanced Targeting Pod (ATP), the ATP-Technology Insertion

(ATP-TI) Precision Attack program of record, and all previous and future derivatives. NGSC

(hereafter referred to as the “Contractor”) shall provide resources required for the management, engineering, production, repair, fabrication, integration, configuration management, test, and logistics support of the LITENING ATP system. The Contractor, when direction and funding are provided, shall provide all efforts required for, but not limited to, an agreed-to pod fleet availability rate which defines the effort for the sustainment, logistics, and associated management support of the LITENING Targeting Pod System

(LTPS) for the Combat Air Forces (CAF) which includes but is not limited to Air Combat

Command (ACC), Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC), and Air National Guard (ANG), as well as United States Marine Corps (USMC) and United States Navy (USN).

1.2 Objective(s):

This PWS describes the supply and services required to support and sustain the LITENING

LTPS. Supply support efforts include, as a minimum, LITENING LTPS production, fabrication, integration, hardware and software upgrades, hardware and software testing, host platform integration, aircrew and maintenance training, Site Activations (SA), technical manual and Technical Order (TOs) updates, information assurance support. Services required to sustain the LITENING LTPS can include, but are not limited to, Contractor

Logistics Support (CLS), identification of Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material

Shortages (DMSMS), management, engineering, repair, configuration management, test, software, and logistics support.

The Contractor shall ensure delivered products meet the requirements as specified in this contract, including the LITENING Post-Production Support (PPS) System/Subsystem

Specification (SSS), this PWS, and Contract Data Requirements Lists (CDRLs).

This requirement herein will be implemented through the issuance of individual Delivery

Orders (DOs) against the LITENING Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (ID/IQ) contract. While the Contractor is not required to execute the requirements of this base ID/IQ contract, to include references CDRLs, until the requirements are contracted for in applicable

Delivery Orders, there may be one-time CDRL deliveries identified that will be due with the first awarded delivery order on the base and subsequent option.

This is a follow-on contract to NGSC in a partnership with the United States Government that has proven very successful in maintaining a high readiness of the LITENING LDPS system. As the original equipment/system design and manufacturer, NGSC (Large Company, Cage Code: 26916) has retained the engineering expertise to address all customers’ technical requirements. The CAF, USMC, and USN do not have full capability to provide the necessary services outside of this arrangement.

2. Documents

2.1 Applicable Documents and Order of Precedence:

The Contractor shall ensure that all work performed under this contract meet the documentation listed below as part of this PWS specified herein. If a conflict occurs between the referenced documents in Sections 2.2, 2.3, and 2.4 below and the PWS, the PWS shall have precedence. A document referenced without indicating specific applicable paragraphs is applicable in its entirety. The applicable revision of all documents referenced herein shall be the issue in effect on the date of contract/delivery order award unless this paragraph cites a specific revision.

2.2 LITENING Form, Fit, Function Documentation:

Name/Title of Publication PWS

Para.

Date of Publication & Change

093-013870

Form, Fit, Function and Interface (F3I)

Specification for the LITENING AT G4 System

4.1 27 September 2010

Rev C.

093-013739

Form, Fit, Function and Interface (F3I)

Specification for the LITENING AT Block 1

4.1 10 March 2010

094-014841

System/Sub-System Specification (SSS) for ATP-

SE Configuration

4.1 Superseded by 094-015069 SSS

dated 24 May 2020, Rev B.

094-015069

SSS for LITENING Post-Production Support

System/SubSystem Specification (PPS/SSS)

4.1 24 May 202026 June 2024

Rev BC

(CDRL Reference in Appendix B: , DI-IPSC-81431A, System/SubSystem Specification (SSS))

2.3 DoD, Air Force, and Military Standards/Instructions:

Date of Publication & Change

DAFI 91-204

Safety Investigations and Reports

8.2.2.7 10 March 21

AS9100D

Quality Management System- Requirements for

Aviation, Space, and Defense Organization

4.3.2, 6.1

September 2016

32 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 117 4.4.3, 8.2, 8.2.1

24 February 2021

DoD Manual 5205.02-M

Department of Defense Manual- DoD Operations

Security (OPSEC) Program Manual

8.2 29 October 20xx2020

DoDD 4715.1E

Department of Defense Direction- Environmental, Safety, and Occupational Health (EOSH)

9.1 30 December 2019

DoDD 5205.02E

Department of Defense Directive- DoD

Operations Security (OPSEC) Program

8.2 20 August 2020

FED-STD-313E

Material Safety Data, Transportation Data, and

Disposal Data for Hazardous Materials Furnished to Government Activities

3.3 12 October 2018

MIL-HDBK-2155 (NOT 2)

Failure, Reporting, Analysis, and Corrective

Action Taken

4.6.1 19 July 2019

ESD TR20.20

Handbook for the Development of an

Electrostatic Discharge Control Program for the

Protection of Electronic Parts, Assemblies and

Equipment

3.3 12 January 2021

MIL-HDBK-773B

Department of Defense Handbook/ Electrostatic

Discharge Protective Packaging

3.3 2 November 2020

MIL-HDBK-61B

Configuration Management Guidance

6.4 7 April 2020

ANSI/ESD S20.20

ESD Association Standard for the Development of an Electrostatic Discharge Control Program for

Protection of Electrical and Electronic Parts, Assemblies and Equipment (Excluding

Electrically Initiated Explosive Devices)

3.3 12 January 2021

MIL-STD-2073-1E (4)

Standard Practice for Military Packaging

3.3 22 April 2019

MIL-STD-882E(1) NOT 1

DoD Standard Practices for System Safety

9.3 27 September 2023

SD-25

Government-Industry Data Exchange

3.4.1 8 November 2023

GEIA-HB-0007B

Logistics Product Data Handbook

5.1.5 10 February 2014

AFI 23-101

AF Material Management

5.1.5 22 October 2020

TO 00-35D-54

USAF Deficiency Reporting, Investigation, and

Resolution

4.4.4 15 August 2022

2.4 Other Documents:

Date of Publication & Change

DFARS 231.205-71

Cost related to counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronics parts

3.4 10 October 2024

DFARS 252.211-7003

Item Unique Identification and Valuation

3.2 January 2023

DFARS 252.223-7001

Hazard Warning Labels

3.3 December 1991

DFARS 252.235-7003

Frequency Authorization

5.1 March 2014

DFARS 252.246-7007

Contractor Counterfeit Electronic Part Detection and Avoidance System

3.4 January 2023

DFARS 252.247-7016

Contractor Liability for Loss of or Damage

3.7.1 1 December 1991

FAR 23.107-1(d)Agency Affirmation

Procurement Programs

9.2 30 September 2024

FAR 31.205-46

Travel Costs

3.6 30 September 2024

FAR 42.302(a)(46)

Contract Administration Functions

6.4 30 September 2024

FAR 46.407

Nonconforming Supplies or Services

6.5 30 September 2024

FAR 52.245-1 Government Property 3.7.1 September 2021

FAR 52.245-1(f)(1)(iii)

Records of Government Property 252.245-7005

3.7.2 September 2021

Public Law 112-10

Department of Defense and Fully-Year

Continuing Appropriations Act (2011)

7.5 15 April 2011

Public Law 91-596

Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970

9.1 1 January 2004

3. Technical Requirements

3.1 Period and Place of Performance:

The LITENING CATP effort will be 10 year Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity ID/IQ with a Basic one-year ordering period plus 4 annual ordering periods with an option for 5 additional one-year ordering periods by the Combat Avionics Program office. The period of performance (PoP) described in the contract/order will end on the last date of the DO.

Supply and services will be performed at NGSC, 600 Hicks Rd., Rolling Meadows, IL and/or subcontractor/supplier facilities as required.

3.2 Item Unique Identification (IUID):

The Contractor shall apply IUID to all deliverable pods, Line Replaceable Units/ Weapons

Replaceable Assemblies (LRUs/WRAs), and when applicable, support equipment in accordance with DFARS Clause 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation. Unique

Item Identification is required for all items in table below (need to give the table a number) to be delivered to the Department of Defense (DoD) that meet the criteria established by the

FAR. Transmission of Government property must be recorded in the IUID Registry. The

Government is required to record the transfer of GFP to the Contractor. The Contractor is required to record the receipt of GFP from the Government. The Contractor is required to record the return of GFP to the Government. The Government or contractor/subcontractor personnel responsible for causing a “life cycle event” (i.e., abandoned, consumed, destroyed by accident, destroyed by combat, donated, exchanged – repair, exchanged – sold, exchanged

– warranty, expended – experimental/target, expended – normal use, leased, loaned, lost, reintroduced, retired, scrapped, sold – foreign government, sold – historic, sold – nongovernment, sold – other federal, sold – state/local, and stolen) will update the item record in the IUID Registry. The Contractor shall submit information from the IUID tags on new deliverables to the Wide Area Workflow (WAWF) IUID registry. Specific Part Numbers requiring IUID labels are referenced in the Table xx Below.

(CDRL Reference in Appendix B: DI-MGMT-81803A, Item Unique Identification (IUID)

Marking Plan), DI-MGMT-81804A, Item Unique Identification (IUID) Marking Activity, Validation, and Verification Report)

Product Baseline Base Part Number Product Baseline Base Part Number

ECU G4 001-008334 POD G4 COLOR 001-008975

ECU G4(L) 001-008517 POD G4E 001-008596

FEU 1K G4 001-008358 POD Gen4 001-008354

FEU 2.0 001-009141 POD Gen4(L) 001-008353

FEU 512 B1,2 001-008053 POD LDP 001-008887

FEU G4 COLOR 001-009093 POD SE 001-008596

FEU LDP 001-008790 Pod LDP (L) 001-009516

FS AT 001-008054 PSU 001-007990

FS G4 001-008355 SEU G4 COLOR 001-009104

FS G4 COLOR 001-008976 SEU MINI 001-008642

FS IRST 001-008864 VAADR 152-001830

FS SE 001-008622 VRMM 128GB 152-001951

IU 001-007992 ECU Container 13414

IU B2,G4 001-008316 FS Container AL4028-1608

IU, 28 V RELAY 001-007991 FS Container TA2J3350A

PnP 3 0 01-008561 FS Container T A2J3370A

PnP II 001-008338 FS Lifting Adapter TA1J0800B

PnP II 001-008417 FS/ECU Lifting Table TA1J1410D

ATDL 001-009217 IU Container 13414-095

POD (L) AT 001-008118 Key Loader Interface Assembly

152-002363-0001

Formatted Table

Commented [AE1]: Add DLR and LA here, DLR recorder, lasers.

Commented [AE2R1]: NGC to provide PNs for adds.

Formatted: Strikethrough

POD AT 001-007817 Laptop Computer 084-00835-0001

POD AT 001-007896 Mounting Adapter Container

AL7819-0805

POD AT 001-008021 PnP / PSU / FEU Container

13414-090

POD AT PnP 001-007817 PnP / PSU / FEU Container

15450-300

POD AT PnP 001-007896 Pod Container TA1J0100A/B/C/D

POD AT PnP 001-008021 Pod Handling Device TA1J3600A

POD ELDP 001-008887 Pod Installation Device 104-011799

Portable Power Box

001-008918 Pod Lifting Adapter TA1J3200E

SEU / IU

Container

15450-500 Pod Weight Neutralizer TA1J3350B

SEU Container 13414-046 VAADR Container 15450-100

3.3 Packaging, Handling, Storage, and Transportation (PHS&T):

The Contractor shall provide sets of reusable shipping containers, of the appropriate configuration, for transport of LITENING Pods, LRU/WRAs/Shop Replaceable Units

(SRUs), spares, and/or support equipment to operating unit sites to the locations specified in the awarded DO. The contractor shall also maintain the status and update the approved

Maintenance Information System (MIS) accounting system to enable prompt shipment tracking for all inbound containers from the manufacturing Contractor’s facility. The former

MIS was Reliability and Maintainability of Pods (RAMPOD) and any future requirements that may fall under the Integrated Maintenance Data System (IMDS) system are expected to mimic previous RAMPOD requirements.

Packaging should be in accordance with Northrop Grumman Document #399-007259 Rev-

(or latest version) and refence MIL-STD-2073-1E (4) for additional guidance. The

Contractor shall package and mark material in accordance with the contract (basic and/or order, as applicable) Air Force Material Command (AFMC) Form 158, Packaging

Requirements and Department of Defense (DD) Form 1653, Transportation Data for

Solicitations. The Contractor shall ensure that item packages or containers containing any hazardous material are labeled in accordance with DFARS 252.223-7001, Hazard Warning

Labels. The Contractor’s submission of Special Packaging Instructions shall include

Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) in accordance with FED-STD-313E. The Contractor shall ensure that classified materials is packaged, marked, and delivered in accordance with

32 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 117. The Contractor shall package and mark material in accordance with other applicable Government regulations including, but not limited to, those regarding security, safety, and environmental concerns.

1. The Contractor shall package and mark material for movement, shipment, receipt, and storage in a manner that ensures the protection and preservation of the material for shipment too and storage stored at the destination. The Contractor shall package electronic parts susceptible to Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) damage in accordance with ANSI/ESD S20.20, ESD Association Standard for the Development of an

Electrostatic Discharge Control Program for Protection of Electrical and Electronic

Parts, Assemblies and Equipment (Excluding Electrically Initiated Explosive

Devices); ESD TR20.20, Handbook for the Development of an Electrostatic

Discharge Control Program for the Protection of Electronic Parts, Assemblies and

Equipment; and MIL-HDBK-773B, Department of Defense Handbook/Electrostatic

Discharge Protective Packaging. Shipping guidelines in accordance with Northrop

Grumman Document #399-007260 Rev E (or latest version) and reference MIL-STD-

2073-1E(4) can be used for additional guidance.

In accordance with MIL-STD 2073-1E(4), Standard Practice for Military Packaging, shipping containers received which meet the requirements of AFMC Form 158 and are suitable for return shipment of serviceable assets, shall be reclaimed and stored for reutilization. Unsuitable shipping containers shall be disposed of and replaced with new containers that meet the requirements of AFMC Form 158.

3.3.1 LITENING Shipping Containers (CLIN x040):

The Contractor shall provide reusable LITENING Pod shipping containers 7 LRU/WRA “J-

PAC” containers as ordered per Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs) as shown in Table 1.

The contractor shall repair containers deemed repairable. The Contractor shall gain access to the Maintenance Information System (MIS) of record and shall record the location and status information on all LITENING pod containers in their possession for tracking weekly. The former MIS was Reliability and Maintainability of Pods (RAMPOD) but future requirements may fall under the Integrated Maintenance Data System (IMDS). The Contract shall provide reuseable LRU/WRA containers, as required, to support the supply chain management system needed to maintain the availability rate per All sections and subsections of 4.2

Availability Support Services Summary of this PWS. The contractor shall maintain control of these LRU/WRA containers until, or unless the USG claims right to title, as noted in paragraph 5.1.4 Right to Title of Initial Spares is invoked for any containers procured under this contract. Repaired/new spare USMC/USN Forward Section LRU/WRAs shall only be shipped in USMC/USN “Forward Section Containers”.

Part Number National Stock Number

(only used for USMC/USN)

Cage

Code

Nomenclature

13414-125 80132 Shipping Container-ECU

LRU/WRA

13414-090 80132 Shipping Container-

FEU/PSU/VDL/PnP

LRU/WRA

TA2J3350A 1924A Shipping Container- FS LRU/

WRA (USAF “Green”)

TA2J3370A 8145-01-469-8529 1924A Shipping Container- FS LRU/

WRA (“Grey”)

13414-095 80132 Shipping Container- IU

LRU/WRA

TA1J0100F 8145-01-469-8528 1924A Shipping Container-

LITENING Pod

13414-046 80132 Shipping Container- SEU

LRU/WRA

13414-024 80132 Shipping Container- VAADR

LRU/WRA

13414-025 80132 Shipping Container- VRMM

LRU/WRA

Table 1.

3.4 Counterfeit Electronic Parts:

The Contractor shall establish and maintain a counterfeit electronic parts detection and avoidance system to mitigate the risk of counterfeit electronic parts being installed in end items or otherwise entering the DoD inventory. For material purchases under this contract, the system shall incorporate processes/procedures to address the requirements listed in

DFARs 231.205-71, Cost of Remedy for use or Inclusion of Counterfeit Electronic Part

Detection and Avoidance System; DFARs 252.244-7001, Contractor Purchasing System

Administration; DFARs 252.246-7007, Contractor Counterfeit Electronic Part Detection and

Avoidance System; and Aerospace Standard AS5553A, Fraudulent/Counterfeit Electronic

Parts, Avoidance, Detection, Mitigation, and Disposition. The Government’s review of the

Contractor’s system will be accomplished as part of the evaluation of the Contractor’s purchasing system in accordance with DFARS 244.3, Contractor’s Purchasing Systems

Reviews, and DFARs 252.244-7001.

(CDRL Reference in Appendix B: DI-MISC-81832, Counterfeit Prevention Plan)

3.4.1 Government-Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP):

The Contractor shall obtain and maintain active membership in GIDEP. The Contractor shall report suspect counterfeit parts to Government investigative authorities, and to the original equipment manufacturer of the genuine part to the GIDEP using the SD-25, Government-

Industry Data Exchange Program, as a guide.

3.5 Data Management System/Support Data:

The Contractor shall maintain a data management system to ensure that the data items are electronically submitted on schedule to meet projected milestones and that the content complies with requirement of the contract. The data management system shall document tracking and monitoring of data submittals, coordination, changes, and approval status. The data management system shall include preparation, maintenance, and submission of a Data

Accession List (DAL), as required by DO and/or requested by Government Contracting

Officer. The contractor shall require suppliers and/or subcontractors to develop and control technical data to ensure adequacy accuracy and delivery of data required by this contract.

(CDRL Reference in Appendix B: DI-MGMT-81453C/T Data Accession List (DAL))

3.6 Travel/Taxes & Shipping (CLIN x049):

Travel by contractor personnel shall be conducted in accordance with the Contractor’s existing travel policy. All travel must comply with FAR 31.205-46, Travel Costs. All travel costs including any incurred taxes, fees, or fees associated with travel for expedited

Government direction/requirements shall be included under this CLIN.

For services CLINS that are firm-fixed price, the Contractor is required to price all foreign taxes in its bid. If the contractor has difficulty doing so because of the to-be-determined nature of the OCONUS trip and the Contractor and/or its employees are required to pay taxes, the USG shall reimburse the Contractor for the amount of these taxes as well as any incidental compliance expenses provide that these taxes and expenses are reasonable, and the

Contractor presents the USG with properly substantiated invoices.

All travel, with the exceptions of travel associated with Operations Flight Program (OFP) which required requires flexibility in travel to support SIL and FLT events, requires USG concurrence prior to travel with an expense report provided to USG no later than (NLT) 10 business days upon scheduled return date. If an approved travel date is canceled for any reason, the Contractor is required to obtain a new travel approval from the USG team. For individual DOs with task descriptions that contain tentative and/or a range of dates, additional USG travel approval is not required, however expense report is due to USG NLT 5

10 days upon return date.

CLIN x049 may be utilized for shipping charges, subject to the individual delivery order task description, when shipping is not included in the firm, fixed pricing structure (Example: OFP

Software Delivery Order).

3.7 Government Property and Services:

3.7.1 Definitions:

Government Property will be provided in accordance with the Government Furnished

Equipment list in contract Attachment x.?9 Any Government Furnished Property

(GFP)/Material (GFM)/Equipment (GFE) if/when identified shall be listed in the

Aattachment at the contract base? and will revert to Government ownership at the conclusion of the contract.

“Government property” is defined in the clause at FAR 52.245-1, Government Property.

“Loss of Government Property” means unintended, unforeseen, or accidental loss, damage, or destruction of Government property that reduces the Government’s expected economic benefits of the property. Loss of Government property does not include purposeful destructive testing, obsolescence, normal wear and tear, or manufacturing defects. Loss of

Government property includes, but is not limited to –

(1) Items that cannot be found after a reasonable search.

(2) Theft.

(3) Damage resulting in unexpected harm to property requiring repair to restore the item to unusable condition, or

(4) Destruction resulting from incidents that render the item useless for its intended purpose or beyond economical repair.

“Unit Acquisition Cost” means the dollar value assigned by the Government and identified in the contract.

(1) For GFP the dollar value assigned by the Government and identified in the contract;

and

(2) For Contractor Acquired Property (CAP), the cost derived from the Contractor’s records that reflect consistently applied, generally acceptable accounting principles.

The contractor shall be responsible for Government property in their possession in accordance with FAR and applicable supplements including but not limited to FAR Part 45, Government Property; FAR 52.245-1, Government Property; and DFARS Part 245, Government Property. The contractor shall report on GFE in accordance with CDRLDI-

MGMT-82173.

(CDRL Reference in Appendix B: DI-MGMT-82173, Government Furnished Equipment

(GFE) Inventory Report)

3.7.2 Reporting of Government Property:

The Contractor shall have a system of internal controls to manage (control, use, preserve, protect, repair, and maintain) Government property in its possession in accordance with FAR

52.245-1, and its property management system shall be adequate to satisfy the requirements of this clause. The contractor shall record receipt and return of all Government Furnished

Property (GFP), as well as the reporting of shipment, consumption, disposal, or transfer to another contract, in the GFP Module in Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment

(PIEE), https://piee.eb.mil, as stipulated by DFARS 252.245-7005. This reporting requirement does not change any liability provisions or other reporting requirements that may exist under the contract. GFP training and guidance is located at the DoD Procurement

Toolbox at https://dodprocurementtoolbox.com/. PerIn support of DAFI 21-103 and

Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness (FIAR) compliance, the contractor shall conduct two hands-on GFP inventory audits per calendar year. Pods will be audited 100% each time.

The contractor shall identify the location of any GFP not located at the contractor's facility via supporting documentation or appropriate evidence.

3.7.3 Loss of Government Property:

Definition of Loss of Government Property: “Loss of Government property” means unintended loss of or damage to Government property including property that cannot be found after a reasonable search, loss due to inadequate storage, loss due to lack of security, theft, damage requiring repair to restore the item to usable condition, or damage that renders the property useless for its intended purpose or Beyond Economical Repair (BER). Loss of

Government property does not include manufacturing defects, obsolescence, normal wear and tear or purposeful destructive testing. Unless otherwise stated in the contract/order loss of Government property does not include normal and reasonable inventory adjustments, i.e., losses of low priority consumable material, such as common hardware, as agreed to by the

Commented [AE3]: This is in current PWS section 3.5 and was erroneously left out of my versions of this CATP but still apply. This just calls out our twice a year inspection we have to do for VIPT.

https://piee.eb.mil/ https://dodprocurementtoolbox.com/

Contractor and the Government Property Administrator. Such losses are typically a product of normal process variation. The Contractor shall ensure that its property management system provides adequate management control measures, e.g., statistically process controls, as a means of managing such variation.

The Contractor shall report loss of Government property in the GFP Module located in PIEE, https://piee.eb.mil/piee-landing/.

The Contractor shall report losses of Government property outside normal process variation, e.g., losses due to:

(a) Theft;

(b) Inadequate storage

(c) Lack of physical security; or

(d) “Acts of God”

This reporting requirement does not change any liability provisions or other reporting requirements that may exist under this contract.

3.7.4 Return/Retention of Government Property:

All property provided by the Government remains the property of the Government and shall be returned to the Government as directed, but no later than completion of the contract/order, unless the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) directs the Contractor to retain the property for continued use under a successor contract. All Government property shall be returned to the Government in the condition provided unless approved in advance by the PCO. All material generated under the contract/order becomes the property of the Government and shall be returned to the Government as directed, but no later than completion of the contract/order, unless the PCO directs the Contractor to retain the material for continued use under a successor contract...

3.7.5 Government System(s):

The Government will provide Contractor personnel access to system(s) necessary to perform tasks under the contract/order.

3.7.6 Government Provided Logistics Support for OCONUS Contractor

Employees:

Logistics support for contractor employees will be furnished in support of this contract, when available, via a Letter of Authorization (LOA) for Authorized Government Services.

Authorized Government Services does not necessarily mean that the Government provides these services to contractors on a non-reimbursable basis. For certain categories of authorized services, the contractor may be required to reimburse the government IAW applicable

Federal, DOD or COCOM regulations/policies and/or the contract terms and conditions. The indicated Authorized Government Services via the LOA are only applicable for the designated countries to be visited during the deployment; however, if the services vary between countries, the contracting officer shall specify which services may be authorized in each country. If the country to be visited has a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) in place that governs the categories of services to be authorized, then the terms of the SOFA take https://piee.eb.mil/piee-landing/ precedence over the terms the LOA. A comprehensive list of services are listed below however, items in bold are minimum services authorized by USG.

Authorized Government Services:

a. Weapon*

b. Billeting

c. CaC (see section 8.2.2.3)

d. Local Access Badge

e. Dining Facility (DFAC)

f. Government Furnished Meals (GFM)

g. APO/FPO/Postal Services

h. Diplomatic Post Office (DPO)

i. Primary Care** (See note below as part of “Other” section as PCO does not have authority to approve on LOA)

j. Military Issued Clothing

k. Military Issued Equipment

l. MWR Facilities

m. Military Exchange

n. Commissary

o. Military Banking

p. Excess Baggage

q. MILAIR

r. Transportation (other than MILAIR)

s. Other (see LOA remarks field)

t. None

*Combatant Commander (CCDR) authorization is required IAW DFARS 252.225-7039 FAR

Clause 52.225-26 in order for a contractor to be authorized to carry a weapon.

** Resuscitative/Emergency Care is the default level of care. Unless specifically negotiated in the contract, ALL medical care is reimbursable to the U.S. Government.

Contract personnel must not be a fulltime resident in the host country, nationals of non-

NATO countries, or a stateless person. Personnel must be engaged full time in support of a

US forces mission. Upon completion of the mission, the employee will return to the point of origin.

Specific attention is invited to the fact that permanent family or bachelor Government quarters are not included as items of individual logistics support.

Website utilized for OCONUS deployment is Syncronized Pre-Deployment and Operational-

Enterprise Suite: https://spot.dmdc.mil/default.aspx

3.7.6.1 Government Provided Logistics Support for OCONUS Contractor

Employees:

Formatted: Font: Not Bold

Formatted: Font: Bold

Under the provisions of Article 73, Supplementary Agreement to NATO Status for Forces

Agreement, Contractor Personnel who are assigned to USAEUR are considered as “Members of the Civilian Component” of the US Forces, provided they are:

(a) Technical Experts who will serve the US Forces exclusively

(b) Not stateless persons

(c) Nationals of a NATO state, excluding Germany

(d) Not ordinarily a resident of Germany

Contractor personnel and their dependents are identified as “Members of the Civilian

Component,” by a Certificate of Status stamp in their passport. This certificate entitles the passport holder the rights and privileges listed in the Status of Forces Agreement for this category of personnel. The Government will assist contractor personnel and their dependents to ensure the above certificates of status stamp in the passport is obtained, or such other or additional documentation for members or their accompanying family members as will enable them to accomplish their missions and obtain proper benefits and status under NATO SOFA agreement.

3.8 Systems Engineering

As required in applicable DO, or subtasks, the Contractor shall submit a Systems

Engineering Management Plan (SEMP). The Contractor shall ensure that system design integrity is maintained at the system and LRU/WRA levels, and that the provisions of the

LITENING specifications are maintained during development, production, and deployment of related upgrades, support hardware and technical manuals/technical orders. For any development, upgrade, or retrofit actions, the Contract shall update the appropriate

LITENING specifications and shall perform testing to verify compliance with the new performance baseline. Supporting actions shall include providing system, hardware and software engineering disciplines and resources for design compliance and technical oversight to ensure that system performance and operational readiness parameters are met and maintained. As required, the Contractor shall provide engineering and other technical support for LITENING testing to verify pod conformance.

(CDRL Reference in Appendix B: DI-IPSC-81431A, System/Subsystem Specifications (SSS)

DI-MISC-80711A, Scientific and Technical Reports, DI-MISC-81174, Frequency Allocation

Data), DI-SESS-81785A81785B, Systems Engineering Management Plan (SEMP))

3.8.1 Integrated Production & Process Development & Risk Management:

The Contractor shall support Integrated Test Teams (ITTs), held at the Continental United

States (CONUS) locations selected by the Government. Minutes shall be provided within seven calendar days, as required in applicable DOs. The Contractor shall provide for integrated process/product development, production, and risk management. The Contractor shall have the necessary resources and expertise to provide the contracted products in compliance with the applicable performance specifications and to meet product budgets and schedules. The Contractor shall establish and maintain a risk/opportunities management program (to include an annual Integration Risk Assessment review with the Government) to be held in conjunction with a Government and Contractor meeting such as LITENING ATP program reviews.

(CDRL Reference in Appendix B: DI-ADMN-81250C, Conference Meeting Minutes)

3.8.2 Operations Safety, Suitability, and Effectiveness (OSS&E) Support:

The Contractor, in Support of the Government’s OSS&E process, shall provide data for proper assessment of LITENING-related hardware and/or software development, testing, qualification and/or certifications, as required in applicable DOs. For each Operations Flight

Program (OFP) updates or modification, the Contractor shall provide Software Verification

Test (SVT) results and Software Version Descriptions (SVDs) in support of obtaining flight clearances.

(CDRL Reference in Appendix B:, DI-PSSS-81535B, Acquisition and Sustainment Data

Package (ASDP) Deficiency Report, DI-IPSC-81436A, Interface Design Description (IDD),DI-

IPSC-81442A/T, Software Version Description (SVD), DI-AVCS-80700A/T, Computer Software

Product End Item, DI-MISC-81454D, Computer Program Identification Number (ACPIN) Data and

Control Record, DI-NDTI-80566A, Test Plan, DI-NDTI-80603A, Test Procedure, DI-NDTI-80809B, Test/Inspection Report)

3.8.3 Prohibited Materials – Class I Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS):

The Contractor shall minimize hazardous materials and Class I ODS from the design and manufacturing of individual LITENING upgrades, through the systems engineering process.

Use of hazardous materials or Class I ODS shall only be permitted with consent of the

Government.

(CDRL Reference in Appendix B: DI-MISC-81479, Ozon Depleting Substances (ODS)

Plan), DI-SAFT-80102C80102D, Safety Assessment Report (SAR) DI-SAFT-

80103C80103D, Engineering Change Proposal System Safety Report (ECPSSR) DI-SAFT-

80104C80104D, Waiver or Deviation System Safety Report (WDSSR),)

3.8.4 Design Engineering:

The contractor shall provide systems engineering support for any USG-funded design or modification of the LITENING pods which results in an additional or improved capability.

Systems engineering services provided shall be described in the task description and/or statement of work accompanying the delivery order.

(CDRL Reference in Appendix B: DI-SESS-81757A/T, Design Review Information Package

DRIP))

4. Contractor Logistics Support, Sustainment, and Engineering Services

4.1 Availability Support (AS) Scope

The Contractor shall execute required contract actions to maintain the LITENING fleet in accordance with this PWS. Availability Support (AS) includes Contractor Logistics support as well as Program Management Support and will be defined under Fixed and Variable Cost

CLINs. The requirements of this section are specific to the hardware and software configuration(s) of pods fielded at the time of contract award, as defined by the product and functional baseline at the time of contract award and may be modified by mutual agreement.

Commented [AE4]: Ozone Depletion is no longer in

ASSIST. May look for a replacement, may not

The Pproduct baseline is described in Table 2, below, and the functional baseline is captured in section 2.2 LITENING Form, Fit, Function Documentation of this PWS.

Product Baseline MAJCOM Base Part Number

LITENING AT (Right Hand) USMC/Navy 001-007896

LITENING AT (Left Hand) USMC/Navy 001-008118

LITENING G4 (Left Hand) USMC/Navy 001-008353

LITENING G4 (Right Hand) CAF, USMC/Navy 001-008354

LITENING LDP/ELDP (Right Hand) CAF 001-008887

LITENING LDP (Left Hand) USN 001-009516

LITENING G4E/SE (Right Hand) CAF 001-008596

LITENING G4 Color (Right Hand) CAF 001-008975

LITENING AT (Right Hand) Spain 001-007896

LITENING AT (Right Hand) Italy 001-007896

LITENING Large Aperture CAF NP 001-009469

Table 2.

4.2 Availability Support Services Summary (SS):

Performance Objective PWS

Reference

Performance Threshold

Fleet Availability 4.2.1 Minimum 92% Fleet Availability (FA) Rate per user for all LITENING pods as computed by the percentage of time during which LITENING pods are available to support world-wide fleet requirements.

(Note: The remaining 8% of assets are part of the repair cycle pipeline)

Datalink (PnP)

Availability

4.2.1 For pods conducting deployed operations in an

Area of Responsibility (AOR) or scheduled to deploy and conducting range operations, a PnP datalink must be operable for the pod to be considered fully mission capable and thus attributable to the 92% FA rate listed above.

Reliability- Mean Time

Between Removals

(MTBR)

4.6 Minimum 200 pod operating hours/removals as

reported monthly by the Contractor.

Service Contract

Reporting

7.5 Within 30 calendar days of contract/order award, the Contractor shall establish a record for the contract/order in SAM including Order Data, Contract Data, and Location Data.

The Contractor shall provide an annual count of contractor/subcontractor personnel performing services and report all contract/subcontractor labor hours required for performance of services for each fiscal year. All data shall be reported

NLT 31 October of the following fiscal year.

Quality of CDRL deliverable

6.1 Data meets content requirements of the data item

description (DID). Data is marked and delivered

IAW the DD Form 1423-1. Data is compatible with Government information systems. Data must be accurate and complete with no more than two (2) major and five (5) minor deficiencies per CDRL submission. All deficiencies must be responded to within 7 calendar days upon notification.

Receipt of CDRL deliverable

6.1 CDRL deliverables shall be submitted via

Multiple-user ECP Automated Review System

(MEARs). There shall be no more than 5 late submission(s) of deliverables, in aggregate, per contract year. The Contractor shall notify the

Government if the delivery of any data/document will not meet the scheduled delivery date and negotiate a revised delivery date. The data/document shall be delivered by the revised delivery date acceptable to the

Government.

4.2.1 Fleet Availability (FA) Rate:

FA is defined as the percentage of time during which all supported LITENING pods are available to support world-wide fleet requirements. The Contractor shall maintain fielded

LITENING pods at a FA rate of 92% for each user, as reported by approved Maintenance

Information System (MIS) during both peacetime and wartime operations, and for up to ten

(10) concurrent Outside Continental United States (OCONUS) sites, including deployed sites, and up to 45 total bases, provided the Government orders line items in accordance with

AS para 4.1 above, when operated within the defined environment and usage profiles. For pods conducting deployed operations in an AOR or scheduled to deploy and conducting range operations, a PnP datalink must be operable for the pod to be considered fully mission capable and thus attributable to the 92% FA rate listed above. The 45 bases exclude test sites and Simulation/Software Integration Laboratory (SIL). They will be calculated continuously at a quantity equal to all operating hours experienced by each Major Command (MAJCOM) during any ordering period, as measured by the MIS Fully Mission Capable (FMC) data for the CAF and other reporting for the USMC/Navy. A pod is not FMC when MIS status shows it is awaiting parts (AWP), Partly Mission Capable Supply (PMCS), Not Mission Capable

Supply (NMCS), or Not Mission Capable Both (NMCB), at the depot awaiting repair, at a user location awaiting repair (MIS status: Not Mission Capable (NMC) or Not

Mission Capable Maintenance (NMCM)), or in transit to/from depot (unserviceable). Non-

FMC time may include up to 24 hours of time between discrepancy discovery and part ordered, and up to 48 hours of time between receipt of part and pod repair. FA and AS will not apply to excluded assets to include GFE and units under test, or any other assets by mutual agreement between the Contractor and the Government. Verification, as required, of

Commented [AE5]: Confirmed with CM and the QASP chain, this cannot be changed. This is the measurement in which your CPAR will be written. So we WILL be looking at the quality of your CDRL Submissions...you PMs need to be ON IT and be careful. This section refers to you acknowledging you have a deficiency. You can correct that deficiency within 7 days with no penalty OR I can non-concur/disapprove on the CDRL and allow you the appropriate days per the CDRL submission to return for approval.

Commented [AE6]: This section says in aggregate. So all

DO submissions provided in that CY fall into this category.

There is no reason CDRL submissions should be late, and if they are, the USG should know well in advance. We will also have to ensure each DO has a CDRL delivery schedule embedded from here on out. We do a pretty good job of this anyway. Maybe not so good when ECPs are needed.

Commented [AE7R6]: AS required thus far in our system have been entered in as the end PoP date so NGC hasn’t had any issues. We can keep this as if in lieu of a CDRL delivery schedule in the DOs.

the achievement of the FA Rate of 92% will start 90 calendar days after receipt of order using data accrued starting from the date of contract award and will be tracked monthly.

Further, the FA is based on the CAF ship times of 18 calendar days CONUS and 26 calendar days OCONUS from the creation of a Return Material Authorization (RMA) until the

LRU/WRA arrives at the Contractor’s facility. The user time for the installation of the serviceable LRU/WRAs from the receipt at the supply point shall not exceed an average of

48 hours should the LRU/WRA be required for a pod. The pod status, record of events and

Elapsed Time Indicator (ETI) hours will be recorded by the MIS for the CAF, weekly reporting for the USMC/Navy and the Contractor. The Contractor shall meet periodically with the Government and the MIS personnel to discuss and resolve any differences in the data. The Government will provide the MIS recorded event records to assist the Contractor in the creation of improvements to reduce the Organizational (O)-level maintenance events.

An example calculation of FA per the definition is represented below – Where:

FA-Fleet Availability percentage

Assigned = (pods assigned to USAF fleet) as of the last day of week 1 Unserviceable = (pods unserviceable) as of the last day of week 1.

Example of FA Calculation:

80 pods assigned to USAF Fleet inventory as of the last day of week 1 = 80 pods

2 pods in Test as of the last day of week 1 = 2 pods

Pods Counted as of the last day of week 1= (80-2) 78 pods

10 pods down as of the last day of each week= 10 pods

Total Unserviceable= 10 pods

FA for Week 1= (78-10)/78 =87%

Similar calculations will be performed for every week and a monthly average will be computed using the weeks that comprise each month:

FA Week 1 = 87%

FA Week 2 = 89%

FA Week 3 = 92%

FA Week 4 = 92%

Month 1 FA = (87+89+92+92)/4 = 90%

The Contractor shall not be responsible for any failure or delay in meeting the delivery or performance or any part thereof which may arise from:

a. Acts of Government

b. Acts of God

c. Acts of terrorism/war

d. Crash damaged hardware

e. Negligent…

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .