SOW.pdf

PDF 40 KB Posted

Attached to
Aircraft Launching, Landing, and Ground Handling Equipment
Solicitation number
FA8533-08-R-20817
Issued by

About this file

Statement of Work

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
C-130 ISO Stand Questions 22 July 2008.doc DOC document
C-130 ISO Stand Questions 9 July 2008.doc DOC document
C-130 ISO Stand Questions 8 Jul 08.doc DOC document
C-130 Stretch Profile.pdf PDF
C-130 Side.pdf PDF
C-130 Top.pdf PDF
C-130 Front_1.pdf PDF
Amendment 0001.doc DOC document
PD06WRGBZOENF34 Revision 1 2 July 2008.pdf PDF
9579776G.doc DOC document
9579777A.doc DOC document
C130 ISO Stand Questions 6-20-08.doc DOC document
A006ConferenceMinutes.pdf PDF
Attachment3Transmitallttr.pdf PDF
A009InstructionalMediaPackage.pdf PDF
Attachment2PPPQuestionnaire.pdf PDF
Attachment1Factssheets.pdf PDF
C001.pdf PDF
A003EngineeringCalculations.pdf PDF
C-130 ISO Stand Using Activities.doc DOC document
FA853308R20817 20 May 08.doc DOC document
Attachment4ClientAuthorization.pdf PDF
AFMC Form 158.xfd —
B001.pdf PDF
A0073DComputerModeling.pdf PDF
Attachment6Subkconsentform.pdf PDF
A00AA004ECPNOR.pdf PDF
D002ProvSDFP.pdf PDF
A008WeldingProcedures.pdf PDF
A005ConferenceAgenda.pdf PDF
PD06WRGBZOENF34_ —
D001ProvLMI.pdf PDF
Attachment5PPPQTR.pdf PDF
A001A002.pdf PDF
B001ProductDrawings.pdf PDF
Additional RFI Questions.doc DOC document
Show all 36

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

1 February 2008

STATEMENT OF WORK TASKING DOCUMENT

FOR

C-130 ISO STAND

Prepared by

Stephen Gibbs

WR-ALC/642 CBSG/GBEA

460 Richard Ray Blvd Ste 200 Robins AFB GA 31098-1813

CONTENTS

Section / Paragraph Page

1 SCOPE 4

1.1 Scope 4

2 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS 4

3 REQUIREMENTS 4

3.1 General 4

3.1.1 Conflict of Requirements 4

3.1.2 Preproduction Unit Approval 4

3.1.3 Production Release 4

3.1.4 Drawing CAGE 4

3.1.5. Baseline 4

3.1.6 Procurement 4

3.2 Program Management 5

3.2.1 Program Management Reviews (PMR) 5

3.3 Program Reviews 5

3.3.1 Preliminary Design Review (PDR) 5

3.3.2 Critical Design Review (CDR) 5

3.3.3 Conference Minutes 5

3.4 Technical Data 5

3.4.1 Engineering Data 5

3.4.2 Engineering Data Guidance Conference 5

3.4.3 In-Process Review (IPR) of the TDP 6

3.4.4 Relationship of Contractor with Subcontractors/Vendors 6

3.4.5 Engineering Data Updates and Revisions 6

3.4.6 Design Data and Calculations 7

3.4.7 Conceptual Design Drawings/Models 7

3.5 Product Qualification 7

3.5.1 Product Testing 7

3.5.2 Preproduction Unit Test Procedures 7

3.5.3 Preproduction Unit Test Report 7

3.6 Provisioning 7

3.6.1 Provisioning Requirements 8

3.7 Manuals 8

3.7.1 Technical Orders 8

3.8 Welding 8

3.8.1 Welding Procedures 8

3.9 Instructional Media Package 8

3.9.1 Familiarization 8

1 SCOPE

1.1 Scope. This Statement of Work (SOW) defines those programmatic requirements for which the contractor shall be responsible in the contract for the development of a C-130 ISO Stand. Specific technical and performance requirements for the C-130 ISO Stand are detailed in the accompanying Purchase Description (PD), PD06WRGBZOENF34.

2 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

3 REQUIREMENTS

3.1 General

3.1.1 Conflict of Requirements. In the event of any conflict of requirements specified herein, the conflict shall be referred to the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) for resolution. If a difference in interpretation of contract requirements exists as specified herein between the contractor and any Government representative, the contractor shall seek clarification from the PCO.

3.1.2 Preproduction Unit Approval. Final Government approval of the preproduction unit is contingent upon Government approval of the Preproduction Unit Test Procedure, Preproduction Unit Test Report, and User Operational Test and Evaluation.

3.1.3 Production Release. The contractor assumes all risks in initiating production before the Government has fully approved the preproduction unit.

3.1.4 Drawing CAGE. The drawings shall have the government’s CAGE on them.

3.1.5. Baseline. The baseline for this contract is after first article report has been approved.

3.1.6 Procurement. This item will be a U.S procurement only.

3.2 Program Management

3.2.1 Program Management Reviews (PMR). The contractor shall prepare and maintain a monthly status report which shall include a phased project plan, milestone chart, program schedule and current status. The status report shall be delivered to the Government monthly in accordance with the applicable DD1423 (DI-ADMN-81249A).

3.3 Program Reviews

3.3.1 Preliminary Design Review (PDR). The contractor shall prepare and present a PDR within 4 months after contract award. The PDR shall be held at Robins Air Force Base, Warner Robins, GA. The contractor shall submit an agenda, provide advance notification of PDR, and provide advance copy of the PDR presentation and supporting documents in accordance with the DD1423, (DI-ADMN-81249A). The contractor shall present the status of the program at the PDR.

3.3.2 Critical Design Review (CDR). The contractor shall host a CDR at the contractor’s facility within 7 months after contract award. The contractor shall submit an agenda, provide advance notification of CDR, and provide advance copy of the CDR presentation and supporting documents in accordance with the DD1423 (DI-ADMN-81249A). The contractor shall present the status of the program at the CDR.

3.3.3 Conference Minutes. The contractor shall provide a written record of the discussions, decisions, and action items identified at each review meeting or conference.

The contractor shall submit meeting minutes no later than 10 days after the meeting. The minutes shall be in accordance with the DD1423 (DI-ADMN-81250A).

3.4 Technical Data

3.4.1 Engineering Data. The contractor shall develop/produce/maintain a Technical Data Package (TDP) that accurately depicts the final product. The TDP shall provide the necessary design, engineering, manufacturing, testing and quality assurance requirements information necessary to enable the procurement or manufacture of an interchangeable item that duplicates the physical and performance characteristics of the original product, without additional design engineering effort or recourse to the original design activity in accordance with the DD1423 (DI-SESS-81000C/T).

3.4.2 Engineering Data Guidance Conference. The contractor shall support and co-chair a Guidance Conference for engineering data within 60 days after contract award. The Conference shall be convened at a site and on a date agreed upon by the Government contracting officer and the contractor. The contractor shall prepare an agenda and record the minutes of the Guidance Conference in accordance with the DD1423 (DI-ADMN- 81249A, DI-ADMN-81250A). The contractor shall address, discuss, and provide status on the following:

a. Understanding of all CDRL requirements, applicable Data Item Descriptions (DIDs), specifications and standards.

b. TDP review requirements and schedules.

c. TDP delivery requirements and schedules.

d. Contractor's drafting practices/procedures/TDP drawing formats.

e. The contractor's quality assurance procedures relating to TDP documents, including quality control of subcontractor and vendor data.

f. The role of subcontractors and vendors who may deliver TDP documents under this contract.

g. The contractor's configuration management system, including methods for releasing documents, approving documents, and incorporating changes into documents.

h. Digital Technical Data Package (TDP) deliverables.

Note: Guidance Conference may be held in conjunction with Post Award Conference.

3.4.3 In-Process Review (IPR) of the TDP. The contractor shall host, support, and co-chair an IPR of the engineering drawings and associated lists and other documentation to be included in the TDP. The IPR shall be conducted only after the contractor's quality assurance personnel have completely reviewed the data and determined that data are of sufficient quality that Government time will be effectively utilized during the review.

IPR may be scheduled when data has reached the 50% percent completion point and shall be held, when possible, in conjunction with other reviews (i.e., PDR, CDR). The contractor shall notify 584 CBSS /GBHCC a minimum of 30 days prior to the anticipated date of completion point. The IPR shall focus on the contractor's progress in the preparation of the TDP. The contractor shall support and provide the necessary resources, i.e., meeting agenda, conference room, applicable data, minutes, and appropriate personnel available to answer any questions to perform the IPR effectively.

The contractor shall correct all discrepancies identified in the IPR. All subcontractor/vendor data shall be made available for review. If the quantity of subcontractor/vendor data is of sufficient magnitude, the Government may schedule a separate IPR at the subcontractor's/vendor's facility. In accordance with the DD1423 (DI-

ADMN-81249A, DI-ADMN-81250A).

3.4.4 Relationship of Contractor with Subcontractors/Vendors. The contractor shall levy on sub-contractors and sub-vendors the same requirements for Technical Data Packages (TDPs) as are levied on them by this contract. This requirement shall apply at all tiers of sub-contractor/vendor levels associated with the program.

3.4.5 Engineering Data Updates and Revisions. The contractor shall (and shall cause subcontractors and vendors to) update and maintain engineering data for the item(s) designed/ developed/modified/produced by this contract for the life of this contract and shall incorporate all changes in accordance with the following:

a. All engineering changes shall be incorporated into the applicable engineering data within 90 days after engineering release/Air Force concurrence or at intervals of five changes, whichever occurs first, except a change involving safety, which shall be incorporated immediately.

b. All engineering changes shall be incorporated into the applicable engineering data prior to delivery of data for review.

c. All engineering changes shall be incorporated into the applicable engineering data prior to delivery of final media (this includes all EO’s generated as a result of the preliminary data review.)

3.4.6 Design Data and Calculations. The contractor shall complete all supporting engineering calculations for the design development and execution phases of this program in accordance with DD1423 (DI-GDRQ-80650). The contractor shall provide all supporting engineering calculations, both formal and informal, to the Government for approval.

3.4.7 Conceptual Design Drawings/Models. The C-130 ISO Stand shall be fully modeled utilizing computer 3-D modeling and animation. The 3-D Model shall be in accordance with the requirements of this section. The Stand shall be shown fully interfaced with the C-130 aircraft. At a minimum, the 3-D model shall reflect the ‘H’ and ‘J’ versions of the C-130. The following requirements shall be met:

a) All aircraft access doors including paratrooper door and crew entry door, door openings, cowling openings, jack access locations, flaps fully extended, engines with props, four (4) external fuel tanks, main landing gear area, etc.

shall be included.

b) Full documentation of the 3-D Model shall be presented at the Preliminary Design Review (PDR) and the Critical Design Review (CDR). The 3-D Models shall be delivered to the Government in digital and hard copy format.

The contractor shall deliver the final 3-D Model to the Government in digital and hard copy format prior to the start of production.

d) Government shall review and approve 3-D Modeling within 14 days from the date of CDR completion.

e) Final 3-D computer model digital data shall be provided in accordance with Air Force Document 9579776.

3.5 Product Qualification

3.5.1 Product Testing. A preproduction unit shall be built and tested by the contractor.

Upon completion of contractor testing, the preproduction unit shall be delivered to the Government for Government user testing and evaluation (See PD06WRGBZOENF34).

3.5.2 Preproduction Unit Test Procedures. The contractor shall develop Preproduction Unit Test Procedures in accordance with DD1423 (DI-NDTI-80603A). The contractor shall submit the test procedures to the Government for approval. Government approval must be granted prior to conducting preproduction unit testing. The test procedures shall address all Preproduction Testing identified in PD06WRGBZOENF34.

3.5.3 Preproduction Unit Test Report. The contractor shall prepare a Preproduction Unit Test Report in accordance with the DD1423 (DI-NDTI-80809B). The contractor shall submit the report for government approval.

3.6 Provisioning

3.6.1 Provisioning Requirements. Provisioning shall be a top down break down in accordance with the applicable DD1423, ref MIL-PRF-49506 for provisioning data.

Contractor shall identify and recommend logical spare/repair parts sufficient to meet system/equipment operation and supportability in accordance with the Air Force Initial Provisioning Performance Specification (IPPS). MIL-PRF-49506 should be used as a guide. Format must be consistent with existing government Provisioning data system (D220). The following DIDs apply: DI-ALSS-81529 Provisioning Technical Documentation (PTD), Provisioning Parts List (PPL), and Design Change Notices (DCNs) DI-ALSS-81557 Supplemental Data for Provisioning (SDFP).

3.7 Manuals

3.7.1 Technical Orders. The contractor shall prepare Technical Orders in accordance with the applicable DD-1423.

3.8 Welding

3.8.1 Welding Procedures. The contractor shall prepare and qualify all welding procedures in accordance with DD1423 (DI-MISC-80875). The contractor shall provide all welding procedures utilized on the stand to the Government for approval.

3.9 Instructional Media Package

3.9.1 Familiarization. The contractor shall provide training on the stands in accordance with DD1423 (DI-SESS-81526B).

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .